Who can compel Wallonia to unlock CETA, the EU-Canada free trade pack?

Martin Schulz, European Parliament President meets with Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Trade of Canada in a last ditch effort to save the much disputed Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement -CETA between the EU and Canada. Event Date: 22/10/2016. City: Brussels. Copyright: © European Union 2016 - Source: EP.

Martin Schulz, European Parliament President meets with Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Trade of Canada in a last ditch effort to save the much disputed Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement – CETA between the EU and Canada. Event Date: 22/10/2016. City: Brussels. Copyright: © European Union 2016 – Source: EP.

No, it wasn’t just the tiny Wallonia region of Belgium and its 3.6 million French speaking inhabitants who blocked CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement). This is an EU-Canada free trade and investment pact that took eight years to the Brussels Commission and the Canadian authorities to draft. It was also the Brexit and the winds of change that now blow in Europe and the US against globalization that traded this very strong blow to CETA.

The ‘big guys’ are furious with Wallonia

Even if the agreement survives the Wallon blow, a very probable eventuality, nothing will be the same any more for the future of free international trade agreements. The European civil organizations and the thousands of citizens who protested against CETA are the main force against globalization and their ideas are very swiftly gaining grounds. Last minute information though says that the EU authorities do not tolerate Belgium’s government inability to ‘convince’ Wallonia to sign the deal.

According to Brussels sources Donald Tusk, the EU Council President issued an ultimatum to Belgium, asking Prime Minister Charles Michel to come up with a clear answer until this evening. Obviously the EU leadership and the European politico-economic establishment are frantic with tiny Wallonia, daring to block even for a few days the choices of the ‘big guys’. But still the tide against globalization cannot be stopped . Let’s see why more free trade is no longer appealing to citizens in Europe and the US.

Who gains more from free trade?

Citizens in the West now believe that the open borders policies for capital and trade movements have worked only in favor of the multinationals and the banks. Free flows of goods and capital allow big business groups to produce in low cost countries and freely import their goodies to Europe and the US. In this way they export jobs from the EU and the US and increase their profit margins.

At the beginning it was low qualification jobs being exported, not anymore. Despite the strong support from the politico-economic establishment and mainstream media for more ‘free trade’, a growing number of political formations in the West are now following their survival instinct and their rhetoric incorporates voters’ anguish. Everybody is becoming skeptical about more globalization.

The US election is about that

It’s not by chance that the US electoral campaign, despite the fact that the American establishment calls it a ‘circus’, has a lot to teach us about the future of globalization. Both Presidential candidates, the impossible Donald Trump and the Wall Street’s favorite, Hillary Clinton, have turned their back to the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This is a plan for free trade agreement between the US and Canada and a number of Asia – Pacific Realm and South American countries (Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam).

However, it is even more telling that both candidates have questioned the NAFTA. This is the long time cherished, pivotal and already operational for many years North American Free Trade Association between US, Canada and Mexico. His outspoken opposition to NAFTA and the Mexican immigrants has transformed Trump from a second rate TV persona into a strong contester for the American Presidency. To be noted, that US and Canada are involved in all those free trade packs for different reasons. The US because of its many multinationals and Canada since the country can only thrive in a free trade world.

The Wallons are coming

Last Friday afternoon, Chrystia Freeland, the Canadian Trade minister came out of the Wallonia government buildings and, in tears, told the Press, that the CETA after nine years of negotiations and drafting has collapsed. She explained that after the Wallon Parliament and government definitively decided to reject CETA, it’s impossible for the EU to sign an international deal.

According to the Belgian constitution, the three autonomous regions, the Brussels-Capital Region, the Flemish Region (Flanders) and Walloon Region (Wallonia) must all approve trade agreements. With Wallonia rejecting CETA, Belgium cannot concede. On the 28EU level all international trade agreements have to be concluded in unanimity, otherwise the Union cannot undersign them.

However, this is the institutional part of the whole CETA affair. In real political life though, no prime rate European political force can press tiny Wallonia to change attitude towards CETA. This is so simply because the agreement has already triggered strong reactions from civil society bodies, business organizations and widespread street protests all over Europe. Be it the powerful German Chancellor Angela Merkel or the internally beset French President Francois Hollande, none of them now has the political capital to openly press Belgium and Wallonia to accept CETA. They face strong reactions in their own countries on this account.

Can Brussels do it?

The same is true for the conservative center-right tri-partite Belgian alliance government. Prime Minister Charles Michel cannot press Wallonia harder, not only because the regional Parliament and government are overwhelmingly under socialist control, but also because he faces strong reactions against CETA in his own governing coalition. Add to that the Wallon stubbornness and the strong linguistic and otherwise divisions of Belgium between the French speaking Wallonia and the Flemish Flanders, and the deadlock becomes stronger. However the EU leadership can pull many levers and ‘convince’ Belgium and Wallonia to sign the pact, if the stakes prove to be bigger than what a Wallon can imagine.

On the international horizon, the problems of CETA will certainly trigger reactions all over the western world. For one thing, the Canadians have managed to directly confer and secure a very positive attitude for CETA from a number of big EU countries. It is a fact that practically all EU governments including Belgium do not oppose CETA, few leaders though have come in the open supporting it. In the past months, Freeland has convinced practically all the European leaders to decisively back the agreement, but they won’t come in the open about that. In any case, the Canadian fervor for the approval of the deal is a very good indicators about who can gain from this bilateral free trade agreement.

Opening Pandora’s Box

With CETA blocked, at least for the time being, the other colossal Transatlantic free trade agreement (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership – TTIP) between the EU and the US, must be considered closer to oblivion. In the western political scenery it seems that the Brexit has opened a new era of nationalism and xenophobia. In practical terms, this is a political proposal for economic protectionism, opposing free movements of goods, capital and people. This issue was in the heart of the American election campaign, until the moment when the US politico-economic and media establishment chose to diverge the confrontation to non-political issues, like human sexual habits.

In Europe, mainstream media are doing it again. They tend to belittle the 3.6 million Wallons who…dared oppose the will of 508 million Europeans and 36.3 million of Canadians. None dares to ask what all those hundreds of millions of people would be likely to vote in referendums, if given the chance to decide about CETA. Unquestionably, under the currently prevailing political and social climate, rather all country referendums would have turned out a negative result. If it was otherwise, some governments would have already called such referendums, to support free movements of capital, goods and bank ‘investments’.

In conclusion, it’s not tiny Wallonia that opened Pandora’s Box. It’s the European peoples who are now questioning the results of more than forty years of ‘openness’, serving mainly the needs of multinationals. This widespread feeling in the public opinion has also nurtured suspicion vis-à-vis the political elites and an apathy which easily turns into general defiance. Even if in the end Wallonia succumbs to truly global pressures and lifts its veto for CETA, the compass has definitively turned showing now less globalization.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

We must work together to build a new world order. This is how we can do it

Climate change helped destroy these four ancient civilisations

EU and Australia launch talks for a broad trade agreement

COVID-19: Commission creates first ever rescEU stockpile of medical equipment

iSting: Change Europe with your Writing

The world needs a grand coalition to tackle climate change

Fighting Terrorism Online: EU Internet Forum committed to an EU-wide Crisis Protocol

‘Countless opportunities’ for new people-centred workplace, but ‘decisive action’ critical

Why “de-learning” is equally important as reskilling in conversations about the future of work

Millennials (and Gen X) – Here are the steps you should take to secure your financial future

GSMA outlines new developments for Mobile World Congress Shanghai 2018

UNICEF delivers medical supplies to Gaza in wake of deadly protests

Our children’s career aspirations have nothing in common with the jobs of the future

Bold measures needed to protect cross-border and seasonal workers in EU, MEPs say

Humanitarian Aid: €10.5 million for South and South East Asia

How can impact investors balance the green energy equation?

This is how much the US-China trade war could cost the world, according to new research

Problems Faced by Young Doctors and What We Can Do About Them

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Latest news from Monday’s World Health Organization briefing

Why we need both science and humanities for a Fourth Industrial Revolution education

Health spending set to outpace GDP growth to 2030

Six months into DR Congo’s deadliest Ebola outbreak, top UN official praises ‘brave’ response effort

This is how Copenhagen plans to go carbon-neutral by 2025

June infringements package: key decisions

Brexit ‘no-deal’ preparedness: Final Commission call to all EU citizens and businesses to prepare for the UK’s withdrawal on 31 October 2019

Imaginary Journeys Into Eternal China

LETTER FROM AFGHANISTAN: Elections serve up food for thought, for Afghan youth

What are antibody tests and can they get the world back to work?

The Collapse of the Brazilian Health Care System

Draghi drafts a plan to donate more money to bankers, the era of ‘money for nothin’ is flourishing

Why the Greeks forgave Tsipras’ pirouettes around austerity and voted again for SYRIZA

Tech companies could achieve much more by serving the common good. Here’s 3 steps they should take

Venezuela: European Parliament calls for additional sanctions

5 ways the ocean can contribute to a green post-COVID recovery

Turbocharging scientific discovery: with bits, neurons, qubits – and collaboration

MEPs back first EU management plan for fish stocks in the Western Mediterranean

Liaison Officer – 2020

Germany may have a stable and more cooperative government

‘Provocative actions and inflammatory rhetoric’ destabilizing Middle East, warns top UN official

Why today’s leaders need to know about the power of narratives

Parliament to ask for the suspension of EU-US deal on bank data

How to build a better world for heart health after COVID-19

Is Germany closer to Russia than the West? Nord Stream II and Iran count more

Free movement of services: Commission takes further action to ensure a well-functioning Single Market for professionals

Around 260,000 children in DR Congo’s Kasai region suffering severe acute malnutrition

‘Uphold human dignity’, dismantle ‘specious notion of racial superiority’ urges UN chief

COVID-19’s isolated world is the norm for people for disabilities

Parliament mobilised to channel EU funds to those affected by Coronavirus pandemic

Parliament pushes for cleaner cars on EU roads by 2030

Why exporters need to mind the trade finance gap

This start-up is 3D-printing an entire neighbourhood in Mexico

Now doctors can manipulate genetics to modify babies, is it ethical?

The eyes of Brazil and the world turn to the largest rainforest and largest biodiversity reserve on Earth #PrayForAmazonia.

Yemen ceasefire deal: ‘Potential’ now to restore humanitarian lifeline to millions

A reflection of health inequity in recent epidemics

Japan’s agro-food sector would benefit greatly from policies to boost innovation, entrepreneurship and sustainable resource use

Italy’s M.Renzi and Germany’s S. Gabriel veto austerity, ask EU leaders to endorse growth measures

How we can survive the great COVID lockdown: IMF Chief Economist Gita Gopinath

These are the top 10 emerging technologies of 2019

Environment Committee MEPs push for cleaner trucks and electric buses

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Brendan Riley says:

    There seems to be a misunderstanding on behalf of people though that the benefits of free trade are spread out throughout society with lower prices. People like to harp on free trade because they don’t understand how it is putting money in their pockets. Of course there are losers and there are winners, but all of the most rigorous economic analyses show that free trade boosts overall aggregate economic growth. The problem is that since the winnings are often diffuse (lower prices for everyone) and the losses are concentrated (a particular type of industry shutting down), we tend to focus on the losses more without keeping in mind that the gains far outweigh the losses. It is incumbent upon governments that engage in trade liberalization to find ways to reorient, support, and train workers that are affected by this dislocations.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s