Mario Draghi didn’t do it but Kim Jong-un did

Inauguration of the European Central Bank's new premises on 18 March 2015 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Mario Draghi (in the middle) cuts the ribbon. (European Central Bank Audiovisual Services).

Inauguration of the European Central Bank’s new premises on 18 March 2015 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Mario Draghi (in the middle) cuts the ribbon. (European Central Bank Audiovisual Services).

Last Thursday, Mario Draghi, the President of the European Central Bank, was unable to move the capital and money markets with his customary monetary policy Press conference in Frankfurt am Main. On the contrary, North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un, a global castoff, did it the next day just by pressing a button. However, it took the test explosion of a most powerful nuclear warhead of 10 Kilotons to move the markets. Both those events happened last week and at first reading are completely unrelated.

However, they both had a quantifiable effect on the markets. The first had no effect at all while the second did move them. This comparison is meant to show, how vulnerable the overgrown capital markets of our brave new world may be, in view of unpredictable developments. On the one hand, markets had more or less discounted Draghi’s decision to leave monetary policy unchanged. On the other hand though, it’s quite impossible to foresee when and how the North Korean despot or any other outcast will decide to move the world, with a nuclear test or with anything else, as it was the case last week.

Unpredictability reigns

Judged from their results though, the two incidents are closely related as far as their repercussions are concerned. For sure if the North Korean dictator had chosen to do something more menacing, Mario Draghi would very possibly have been obliged to announce more money printing, in order to soothe the market turmoil Kim caused with his nuclear toy. What can be more frightening than a 10 Kiloton nuclear bomb test is very likely a larger one or one mounted on a strategic missile and sent to hit the water near South Korea or Japan.

As a matter of fact, this is the first time that a North Korean menace has clearly and directly moved the global capital markets. The Reuters news agency reported that stocks in Wall Street fell sharply on Friday, after the nuclear test in North Korea was detected. It drove the S&P index lower in the worst market day since June. In detail, the Dow Jones industrial index fell by 2.13% and the S&P closed 2.45% lower, while Nasdaq lost 2.54% at the last day of last week. Altogether, those three New York stock market main indexes had their worst week in months.

Kim likes plaguing the markets

Now, what if Kim Jong-un decides to explode his next nuclear bomb or whatever he is secretly machinating, at a time when the world markets are having a bad turn? He must have certainly noticed that his last Friday’s explosion has rocked the global economy. So, from now on he may choose to explode his devices at the worst timing for world markets, mainly targeting at the New York stock exchanges.

In this way, the capital markets, mainly the ones of the western world, may enter an era when their prospects will be made dependant on external, and thus rather unpredictable factors, to a much larger extent than today. As a result, insecurity may become the main guiding force of the systemically agile capital and money universe, at the same time destroying its effectiveness. Not without good reason then last Thursday Draghi said, “available evidence so far suggests resilience of the euro area economy to the continuing global economic and political uncertainty”.

Draghi sees that

The careful reader would note the semantic use of the expression “so far suggests resilience”. Obviously, he is aware, that the global environment becomes every day more unpredictable and therefore more menacing. North Korea or somebody else may open the door for the world to enter in a new and terrifying age. Even worse, there might be a global power center ready to play with fire and try to use the Pyongyang lunatic or any other madcap for its own goals and further destabilise the global scenery.

As it turns out, the ECB seems to recognize the worsening of the global scenery, but appears unwilling to take more vigorous action in support of the ailing Eurozone. Draghi indirectly said that when he stated “our baseline scenario remains subject to downside risks”. Yet, he refused to take action now. The euro area’s central bank is still seemingly under the strong influence of the German financial orthodoxy, rejecting the use of more effective monetary measures to overcome stagnation and prepare for the next rainy day.

Eurozone unprepared

The international scenery is becoming every day more complex, unpredictable and perilous. Yet, Eurozone dragged down by Berlin remains motionless. Even with the available basic statistics, the ECB is not up to its mandate to maintain price stability and take action to bring inflation close to the statutory target of 2%. ECB’s extraordinary monetary measure of monthly asset purchases of €80 billion has so far proved not enough to winkle out inflation from the zero area.

On top of that, this program expires next March. If the currently applied policies continue unchanged, it’s rather impossible in the brief period of the next six months for inflation to rise close to 2%. Despite all that, the ECB strongly pressed by Germany, didn’t announce an increment of the monthly asset purchases nor did it prolong the period of the plan.

It’s always Germany

In other words, Eurozone may be caught without strong defensive walls in the event of an unexpected development in the global backdrop. Europe’s economy remains defenseless, just because Germany stupidly enough longs to safeguard its huge financial reserves at any cost. Alternatively, Berlin could have decided to use a small part of those reserves to fortify Eurozone’s collective financial markets and still keep the ownership of the resources employed.

The current arrangement in the euro area, with Germany accumulating reserves and the rest of the member states piling up debt, is explosive and has started steaming. The damage has already been made. Europe’s political background has cracked and its financial superstructure is full of risky assets.

What if?

What if the next North Korean 10 kiloton nuclear bomb is mounted on a strategic rocket to be fired? Would the euro area’s banking structures be able to stand the heat? Will the North be safe if the South crumbles? Is there enough interconnectedness to spread the disease?

The clock is ticking and Berlin has to answer those questions before the next ECB Governing Council convenes on 20th October. Otherwise it will be just too late.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Eurozone banks to separate risky activities: Can they stay afloat?

Commission’s action against imports from China questioned

Migration crisis update: The “Habsburg Empire” comes back to life while EU loses control

EU agrees on Ukraine – Georgia visa-free travel amid veto risks and populist fears

Eurozone 2013: Where to?

Facebook wins EU approval for WhatsApp acquisition; just a sign of the times

ECB again to subsidize euro area banks with more than one trillion euro

Youth Forum welcomes positive ruling on non-EU student visas

MWC 2016 LIVE: GTI shifts to phase two – 5G – after hitting milestones

EU responds to terror fallout by eroding borderless Europe and molesting the refugees

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

The West definitively cuts Russia off from the developed world

Do academia and banks favour a new Middle Ages period?

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

On Youth Education: “Just a normal day in the life of a medical student”

Businesses succeed internationally

Let your fingers do the walking

The inhumane face of crisis mirrored in numbers

EU to spend €135.5 billion in 2014 or 6.5% less than this year

China is the first non-EU country to invest in Europe’s €315 billion Plan

The JADE Spring Conference 2017 is casting its shadows before

Why will Paris upcoming “loose” climate change agreement work better than the previous ones?

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

The EU Commission by serving the banks offers poor support to European mainstream political parties

eGovernmnet for more efficiency, equality and democracy

“These Romans are crazy”, the “Greek Gauls” will be shouting today in Brussels hoping Caesar backs off

De Gucht: More gaffes with the talks on the EU-US free trade agreement

FIAT Chrysler: from Geneva Motor show to the World, and back

A Sting Exclusive: EU Commissioner Mimica looks at how the private sector can better deliver for international development

EU economic governance: More exploitation for the weaker countries

A Monday to watch the final act of a Greek tragedy; will there be catharsis or more fear?

Fair completion rules and the law of gravity don’t apply to banks

European Youth Capital 2018 : Cascais

The European giant tourism sector in constant growth

Is the EU competent enough to fight human smuggling in 2015?

Italy’s Letta: A European Banking Union soon or Eurozone collapses

Paris agreed with Berlin over a loose and ineffective banking union

Fostering global citizenship in medicine

Bertelsmann Stiftung @ European Business Summit 2014: Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TTIP) needs balanced approach

The Ecofin Council creates officially the clan of ‘undead’ banks

It’s EU vs. Google for real: the time is now, the case is open

EU crisis aggravates structural differences, threatens cohesion

The New Year 2016 will not be benevolent to Europe

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

ECB’s unconventional monetary measures give first tangible results

TTIP 9th Round marked by American disappointment: Will some optimism save this trade agreement?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s