Will the European Court of Justice change data privacy laws to tackle terrorism?

European Court of Justice 2016.jpg

European Court of Justice – February 2016

The next European Court of Justice (ECJ) meeting will take place on April 12 regarding the breaching of human rights by the massive interception of communication data. This hearing is very crucial as it is probable that the EU judges will decide to cut down on the power of UK surveillance laws since ECJ’s rulings are binding on UK courts as well.

There are also three cases that are related to the legality of data collection and are still pending ECJ ‘s decision, which could undermine the new data pact agreement, known as Privacy Shield, putting lots of billions of euros at stake.

Privacy Shield: Is it better than its predecessor?

The EU-US Privacy Shield is made to impose stronger obligations to US companies and protect European citizen’s personal data. This pact was drafted on February 2 and is meant to replace Safe Harbour which has been acknowledged as invalid by the ECJ due to concerns about US mass surveillance. However, it seems that it is too early to judge whether Privacy Shield is going to protect European rights more robustly.

The cases ECJ has to hear

One of the three cases the ECJ will hear is between EU and Canada on sharing airline passenger’s data for law purposes, while the other two focus on data lockup by telecommunication companies. The main problem is meant to be the interception of communication data according to Isabelle Falque-Pierrotin. The chairwoman of the group of 28 EU data protection authorities mentioned during a hearing at the European Parliament: “Bulk collection is obviously a key issue and the judge has not yet settled this”.

It remains to be seen though whether the EU will become more repressive on the data protection framework forcing US firms to comply with the laws or getting them sanctioned or even excluded.

Can EU judges halt British police?

The main point lies on whether the European Court of Justice will decide at the upcoming hearing on reducing the power of the police and security services to receive information from citizen’s phone calls, text messages and e-mails. The latter is coming at a strange point in time where terrorist attacks are the greatest concern in Europe. Thus, if the EU judges implement the aforementioned policy, the British government will not be able to enable police with more power data to locate and capture criminals.

All started when David Davis, a Conservative Member of the European Parliament, and Tom Watson, Labour’s Deputy Leader, won in the High Court against the UK Government on the basis that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (Dripa) 2014 allows the police to spy on citizens without adequate privacy.

The ECJ will now have to make a decision on this act which has been characterized by the High Court as “inconsistent with European Union law”. More specifically, David Davis had stated: “The simple fact is that the Government is too casual about authorisation mechanisms for data that is very private to ordinary British citizens. They gather up lots of innocent people’s data and allowed too many agencies to get to it too easily. If we win this case it will require them [the Government] to have much more independent scrutiny over that access. It will not stop that access but it will limit unnecessary intrusion in people’s lives.”

Should data privacy laws change to tackle terrorism?

The European Union must become once again an area of security; a word that has lost its meaning in the EU during the last months due to the atrocious terrorist attacks taking place at the Old Continent. It is clear that data privacy laws should be altered in a way that people’s lives remain private but data sharing information is enhanced between intelligent agencies in order to combat terrorism effectively.

Further, Camilla Graham Wood, legal officer at Privacy International, said on this issue: “It would be more effective to use targeted surveillance to tackle terrorism and organized crime. As we have seen from recent atrocities suspected terrorists are known to the police. It is not effective for the authorities to drown themselves in data and to state that this is needed to tackle terrorism and organized crime without providing supporting evidence. It undermines effective scrutiny of the need for these powers.”

All in all, in times of this unprecedented terrorist crisis EU officials are called to act without any delay and protect the ideals and private lives of citizens. At the same time high time that the bloc starts using the mechanisms to improve unification and collaboration against terrorism and the rest of the cumbersome threats.

There is no doubt tough that it is too hard to accomplish both at the same time.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

EU countries invested €5 trillion abroad

In dreams and in love there are no impossibilities

Italy’s rescue operation Mare Nostrum shuts down with no real replacement. EU’s Triton instead might put lives at risk

Lost in translation

Draghi: A bridge from Brussels to Berlin

Is Europe misjudging its abilities to endure more austerity and unemployment?

Regional policies slowed down by EU bureaucracy

Facts and prejudices about work

European Youth calls on European Council for urgent action on “humanitarian crisis” and questions the EU/Turkey deal respect of human rights

ITU Telecom World 2016: it’s all about working together

The US bugged Europe: Is this news?

What changes in the EU as from today

Digital business is Europe’s best hope to get back to growth

250 days until the European Parliament elections

The way to entrepreneurship in the developing world

Facebook wins EU approval for WhatsApp acquisition; just a sign of the times

“Hasta la vista” Google says to Spain and now Europe is next?

Youth unemployment: No light at the end of the tunnel

The three sins the EU committed in 2015

Imaginary Journeys Into Eternal China

European Investment Bank to borrow €70 billion in 2013

More bank bailouts at taxpayers’ expenses

The European Sting at the Retail Forum for Sustainability live from Barcelona

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

My twin from Guangzhou

Medical Doctors in Industry 4.0: pure science fiction

A sterilised EMU may lead to a break up of Eurozone

An American duel in Brussels: Salesforce against Microsoft over Linkedin deal

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: Children Will Bear the Brunt of Climate Change: UNICEF

France: New labour laws for more competitiveness

EU Commission: The banks are not obliged to finance the real economy

Commission to decide on bank resolution issues

Memoirs from a unique trip to China: “my new old dragon” (Part I)

The EU learns about fishing and banking from tiny Iceland

Medicine in the 4th Industrial Revolution: the third entity of the new doctor-patient relationship

Cédric in India

EU Council: The US airlines may freely pollute the European air

The EU Parliament sidesteps the real issues about banks, while the US target the Eurozone lenders

Galileo funding: A ‘small’ difference of €700 million

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

European Business Summit 2015: In search of a vision for the future

Commission’s action against imports from China questioned

Who is to pay the dearest price in a global slowdown?

Why youth unemployment is so difficult to counter

IMAGINATION, FACTS AND OPPORTUNITIES – THE UNLIMITED POWER OF CHINA

Eurozone: Economic sentiment-business climate to collapse without support from exports

“If the job market doesn’t exist, then even the most brilliant Youth Guarantee cannot ensure a job to these young people”, European Youth Forum Secretary General Giuseppe Porcaro on another Sting Exclusive

It’s a week dedicated to all EU budgets; seven days that can make or break the Union

Merkel, Mercedes and Volkswagen to abolish European democracy

Three countries losing ground and one new prime minister

Time to be welcome: Youth work and integration of young refugees

JADE Testimonial #3: Sebastian @ Fundraising

The EU tells the bare truth to the UK that there is no such thing as easy divorces

The Eurogroup protects Germany and blames others

The IMF sees Brexit’s ‘substantial impact’ while the world’s economy holds its breath

Education and Training: where do we stand in 2014?

ECB bets billions on Eurozone’s economic recovery

“Be aware where you put your I Agree signature on and something else”; now Facebook by default opts you in an unseen private data bazar

Europe rethinking its severe austerity policies

More Stings?

Comments

  1. This piece of writing is really a nice one it helps new
    internet people, who are wishing for blogging.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s