Can the next financial crisis be avoided?

High-level seminar of the European Political Strategy Centre on the European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS). From left to right, Mejra Festić, Vice-Governor of the Central Bank of Slovenia, Thierry Dissaux, Chairman of the Board of the Guarantee Fund for Deposit and Resolution, Dirk Cupei, Head of the Department "Financial market stability" at the Association of German Banks, Alex Kuczynski, Coordinator of the EU Committee of the European Forum of Deposit Insurers (EFDI), Giuseppe Boccuzzi, Director General of the Italian Interbank Deposit Protection Fund, and Joseph Delhaye, Chairman of the Guarantee Deposit Association Luxembourg. (Date: 03/12/2015, Location: Brussels – EC / Berlaymont, © European Union , 2015/Source: EC - Audiovisual Service/Photo: Etienne Ansotte).

High-level seminar of the European Political Strategy Centre on the European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS). From left to right, Mejra Festić, Vice-Governor of the Central Bank of Slovenia, Thierry Dissaux, Chairman of the Board of the Guarantee Fund for Deposit and Resolution, Dirk Cupei, Head of the Department “Financial market stability” at the Association of German Banks, Alex Kuczynski, Coordinator of the EU Committee of the European Forum of Deposit Insurers (EFDI), Giuseppe Boccuzzi, Director General of the Italian Interbank Deposit Protection Fund, and Joseph Delhaye, Chairman of the Guarantee Deposit Association Luxembourg. (Date: 03/12/2015, Location: Brussels – EC / Berlaymont, © European Union , 2015/Source: EC – Audiovisual Service/Photo: Etienne Ansotte).

The descent of prices in the world capital markets continued almost unhindered this past week and only last Friday financial, oil and commodity values gained some limited grounds. Altogether however, the major stock markets have erased trillions off their capitalization since last June, when the dark clouds gathered above the Chinese mega-cities of Shanghai and Shenzhen. Presently, the downfall continues being particularly costly in the financial and the oil – commodities markets.

As it appears, the selloff of Chinese stocks was just the beginning. Now, it’s the major western banks which head the fall in the capital markets. The reason is that they have heavily invested other people’s money in highly risky assets. Such placements yield strong returns in the short-term, but are exposed to the chilly winds blowing from whatever direction in the world financial markets. And those winds are now felt by all, including the dreadful geopolitical risks in regions like the Middle East and the Sea of China.

Heading to a new crisis?

For example, the mighty Deutsche Bank sits on a pile of risks amounting to around €50 trillion in the derivatives markets and another €10tn in government debt. As for the American banks, they are heavily exposed to corporate and developing country debt and of course they have an, impossible to estimate, exposure to all kinds of derivatives.

Now, we learn to our dismay that all the major western banks are also heavily exposed to the oil and other commodities markets. Quite naturally, when those markets plummet, the banks’ losses in derivatives and other linked products may be multiple. No one can estimate how much those losses can amount to. That’s why the regular investors, who manage pension and other very long-term funds are alarmed and are now unloading banking stocks en mass.

‘My death will cause your death’

Of course, this is a double cutting edge action and even those standard savers are forced to a large extent to support the tricky games of the banks and stop uploading the lenders’ stocks. This interconnectedness of the fates of savers – investors with those of bankers is one of the sticking new features of our brave new world. The bankers’ motto is nowadays similar to Sampson’s last words, “O God…Let me die with the Philistines!”, meaning in free translation ‘my death will cause also your death’.

As things stand now, the ‘too big to fail’ banks are indirectly asking the monetary authorities to keep feeding them with more zero cost money. Presently, the task to supply the banks with additional newly printed cash has passed to the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan, but nothing compares with the Fed sizes and generosity. On top of that, the lenders are extremely negative over the possibility that the American central bank may start offering negative interest rates for the deposits the lenders place with it. Janet Yellen, the Fed President, when asked by the American lawmakers if the Fed would look into negative interest rates, answered “I wouldn’t take those off the table”.

The ‘system’ of the banks

During the past six years the Fed has ‘supplied’ the banks with $4.5tn. From 16 December 2008 until 16 December 2015 the Fed charged for all that money anything between 0.0% to 0.25%. As from last December it charges anything between 0.25% – 0.50%. Obviously this abundant ‘money for nothin’ policy was the famous Washington treatment to repel the reverberations of the 2008 financial Armageddon.

However, this ‘money for nothing’ strategy cannot go on forever for obvious reasons. The first and most important one is that money must cost something noticeable. The universe of ‘money for nothin’ is a fantasy which cannot last long. The second and more pressing problem is that, if a new crisis comes about, the Fed will be almost totally out of ammunition to deal with it, because it would be a totally impossible reaction to draw the monetary accommodation (quantitative easing) line beyond the current float of $4.5tn.

To straighten this anomaly, last December the Fed decided as mentioned above to start charging the banks with 0.25% – 0.50% for the $4.5bn they have got. On top of that, the monetary policy decision makers said they will proceed to four more interest rates rises during 2016, presumably of the same magnitude. This would have brought those interest rates to 1.25% to 1.50% by December 2016.

Now, Yellen says that apart from all that, the Fed can charge negative interest rates for the money the banks deposit with it. At this point, it must be clarified that the banks at times ‘park’ with the Fed their excess liquidity expecting a positive return. Now this easy profit making possibility may disappear and even entail some cost.

Reducing Fed’s exposure

With all those policy changes, the Fed expects that its outstanding credit line to banks of $4.5tn would be reduced to lower levels. Predictably, the banks would return a good part of the money they got for free, because now they are paying something for it, albeit negligible. On the same line of action, the Fed left to be understood that it wouldn’t refinance all the maturing debt.

Obviously the markets, led by the banks, are now reacting quite negatively to those new monetary policy lines. Naturally, if one is accustomed to free treatments, one doesn’t like at all to start paying for the consumption. So the banks triggered the selloff in the capital markets that plagued almost all and every stock from the beginning of this year.

New environment

Up to December 2015 the western financial system, headed by the big banks, had stomached the Chinese crisis but seemingly it couldn’t or it didn’t’ want to digest the new changes of the Fed’s monetary policy at the same time. The new quantities of free money provided by the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan do not seem enough to replace the Fed’s bonanza.

So, there is a strong possibility that the major western lenders, as they are currently structuring their business, are unwilling or incapable to operate in the new monetary environment of a restored normality, as far as the value of money is concerned.

They refuse normality

That’s why the banks vehemently oppose any attempt by the Fed to normalize the trade. At the same time though, the Fed cannot reverse its policies, just a few weeks after it introduced them. The impasse is then real, despite the fact that the money markets ‘predict’ a full policy reversal, with no further interest rates increases.

Irrespective of the fact that this may be the result of the banks’ unwillingness or inability to comply, the outcome will be the same; the next and more devastating financial catastrophe may be around the corner. Unfortunately for us all, the governments on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean have changed nothing in the regulatory environment of the financial industry and the banks have manage to retain a size that reaches colossal dimensions.

As a result, the domino effect from a banking fallout would reach the smallest corner of the real economy. Without fast growth in the developing world the Atlantic banking industry will suffer. In reality, there will be no place to hide under this new Armageddon, which will be bolstered by the geopolitical hazards.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EntEx Organises 5 Summer Schools for Young Entrepreneurs across Europe in June/July 2014

Denmark’s last circus elephants are retiring – here’s what might take their place

A Sting Exclusive: “Junior Enterprises themselves carry out projects focusing on the environment”, JADE President Daniela Runchi highlights from Brussels

‘Comprehensively include migrants’ or sustainable development won’t happen, warns General Assembly President

Towards a European Republic

Is Britain to sail alone in the high seas of trade wars?

This is the world’s biggest mental health problem – and you might not have heard of it

Last-chance Commission: Why Juncker promised investments of €300 billion?

Tobacco is harming the planet, not just our health, says new study

WHO and UNICEF in campaign to protect 1.6 million in Sudan from cholera

The three US financial war fleets

Online government services could change your life. But only if you have access to the internet

Parallel downfalls of Merkel and Deutsche Bank threaten Germany and Europe

Amid ‘volatile’ environment, UN mission chief urges Iraqi leaders to ‘listen to the voice of the people’

“As long as we work together through thick and thin, more benefits can be delivered to the people of Eurasia”, China’s Premier Li Keqiang highlights from ASEM in Brussels

Eurozone 2013: Where to?

Carnage must stop in northwest Syria demands Lowcock, as attacks intensify

‘A trusted voice’ for social justice: Guterres celebrates 100 years of the International Labour Organization

Act now to end violence, Zeid urges Nicaraguan authorities

Netherlands: Budget MEPs back €1.2m in job-search aid for 450 redundant workers

Four in 10 indigenous languages at risk of disappearing, warn UN human rights experts

Health Education, is it a necessity?

After the Italian ‘no’ and the Brexit, Germans must decide which Europe they want

Here are the biggest cybercrime trends of 2019

Peace in the Gulf ‘at a critical juncture’ says DiCarlo, urging continuation of Iran nuclear deal

In the age of the tourism backlash, we need ‘destination stewards’

Traditional finance is failing millennials. Here’s how investing needs to change

World Migratory Bird Day highlights deadly risks of plastic pollution

Online shopping across the EU to be easier from 3 December

Force used against protestors in Gaza ‘wholly disproportionate’ says UN human rights chief

COP24 negotiations: Why reaching agreement on climate action is so complex

EU-US trade talks go ahead despite Prism and civil rights breach

Low quality healthcare is increasing the burden of illness and health costs globally

How music can help children with autism connect

Parliament votes for €1 billion in aid to Ukraine

5 things you need to know about water

Top UN officials strongly condemn ‘horrible terrorist act’ in Nairobi

Hungary has made progress on greening its economy and now needs to raise its ambitions

IMF’s Lagarde indirectly cautioned Eurozone on deflation

Bankruptcy or referendum: which one is going to be first?

10th ASEM in Milan and the importance of being one: EU’s big challenge on the way to China

Impact of high debt levels on least developed countries ‘cannot be overstated’, says UN

Food safety: New rules to boost consumer trust approved by MEPs

What just happened? 5 themes from the COP24 climate talks in Poland

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: #GlobalGoals progress, essential meds, updates from Cox’s Bazar, Sudan and DR Congo

Saudi Arabia: UN experts push for prompt release of women human rights defenders

FROM THE FIELD: A mountain of indigenous knowledge in Peru

Cheap sea transport with low cost seafarers

A European Discovers China: 3 First Impressions

As inequality grows, the UN fights for a fairer world

After Brexit and Grexit, Brussels to deal with Poloust

The Energy Union: from vision to reality

Impact investment favours expats over African entrepreneurs. Here’s how to fix that

US resolution to condemn activities of Hamas voted down in General Assembly

Europe faces economic turmoil as Italy gets closer to the Excessive Debt Procedure

We are ‘burning up our future’, UN’s Bachelet tells Human Rights Council

Why vaccines are not just for children

3 ways firms can master the digital challenges of the 4IR

How Islamic finance can build resilience to climate change

Youth platforms call on German Government to break down legal barriers for young volunteers and pupils

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s