The New EU-US “Shield” for data privacy is full of holes

Vĕra Jourová, European Commissioner in charge of Justice

Vĕra Jourová, European Commissioner in charge of Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality at the European Parliament Plenary last January in Strasbourg. © European Union , 2016 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service / Photo: Jean-François Badias.

Last week the “post-Safe Harbour era” was officially launched. On February 2 the European Union and the United States have agreed on a new framework for transatlantic data flows, the so-called Privacy Shield. The two sides have now a brand new data-sharing deal, which will allow websites like Facebook, Apple and Google to transfer EU citizens’ data across the Atlantic and to process them in the US under certain privacy terms.

Background

The announcement by the European Commission came three months after the European Court of Justice struck down the previous data-protection deal, the Safe Harbour, and immediately gave relief to thousands of American companies which used to rely on Safe Harbour to handle data. Indeed, the old agreement have been used for 15 years, since the beginning of the new Millennium, to transfer personal data from the EU to US in compliance with the EU Data Protection Directive and European privacy laws.

Following the cocktail of NSA leaks, Snowden scandal and the Schrems case, which raised concerns that Europeans’ personal data stored by companies in the US might be exposed to American intelligence agencies, the ECJ found that the Safe Harbour was “inadequate” to serve its protection purpose and that was not compliant with the EU Data Protection Directive.

From that moment on a sort of nightmare began for 4,500+ American firms, which started to fear they might have been requested to process data locally in each country they operate. Until a week ago, when things changed again, and “normality” came back.

Satisfaction for a “strong framework”

European Commission’s Vice President for the Digital Single Market Andrus Ansip greeted the news and expressed satisfaction for a “strong framework”. “Our people can be sure that their personal data is fully protected”, he underlined last week. “Our businesses, especially the smallest ones, have the legal certainty they need to develop their activities across the Atlantic”, he added. “We have a duty to check and we will closely monitor the new arrangement to make sure it keeps delivering”, he also declared.

EU Justice Commissioner Věra Jourová also commented the news. “The new EU-US Privacy Shield will protect the fundamental rights of Europeans when their personal data is transferred to US companies”, she said. “For the first time ever, the United States has given the EU binding assurances that the access of public authorities for national security purposes will be subject to clear limitations, safeguards and oversight mechanisms”, she added.

Commissioner Jourová also said that the US government has assured it will not conduct “mass or indiscriminate” surveillance of Europeans. The two sides have indeed established an annual joint review in order to closely monitor the implementation of these commitments, with the first expected sometime next year.

What businesses say

Besides the official plaudit by negotiators and authorities, which have worked to find the perfect balance between the privacy protection needs and the requirements of the businesses, what the real improvements, or the simple consequences, the new data-transfer agreement will bring are still to be defined. From a business perspective, the new deal will have some positive effects.

Many businesses greeted the new deal with a sigh of relief, as many now believe the new deal will bring an end to some big uncertainty the fall of Safe Harbour left behind. Others expressed just a cautious optimism, as they are still keen to see if the new deal will be just a temporary measure or a proper, cost-effective solution. In general, the new pact will effectively allow an easier transfer of data from the EU to the US and grease the “mechanics” of the data flow.

Privacy concerns

However, from a privacy protection perspective, critics are way heavier. European privacy activists were sharply critical of Tuesday’s deal, saying it will not help protect the EU citizens’ privacy, as bigger issues are basically underneath the “tip of the iceberg”.

One of the main critique is indeed that many do not believe that an American government agency which operates in secret can be monitored and checked on a regular base, and so can be trusted. Moreover, activists claim that the new framework is more intended to keep European courts from getting involved into business than to protect citizens from being spied on.

Also Maximilian Schrems, the Austrian law student and Facebook user that triggered the scandal, expressed his own concerns. “A couple of letters by the outgoing Obama administration is by no means a legal basis to guarantee the fundamental rights of 500 million European users in the long run, when there is explicit US law allowing mass surveillance,” he reportedly wrote in a letter. “We don’t know the exact legal structure yet, but this could amount to obviously disregarding the Court’s judgment”, he continued.

A short life for Privacy Shield?

Indeed, and this is what basically everyone thinks, Privacy Shield risks to have a very short life, as it seems it simply doesn’t have what it takes to survive the standards set by the European Court of Justice, but only to “buy some time” instead in the meantime. The Washington, D.C.-based Center for Democracy & Technology published a statement right after the formalization of the new EU-US deal, saying that despite the framework’s improvement for EU citizens’ data privacy it would still probably face trouble in court.

“More aligned” with human rights norm

Jens-Henrik Jeppesen, Director of European Affairs at the CDT, said that the Privacy Shield will be “deemed sufficient by the Court of Justice”. Mr. Jeppesen also declared that he believes the EU Member States should narrow their surveillance laws and practices to be “more aligned” with international human rights norms. “The goal must remain a long-term, sustainable transatlantic consensus on the proper legal framework for law enforcement and national security access to data, as well as strong, transparent commercial privacy practices,” Jeppesen concluded.

Lack of info

All in all, the main point here is that a real, effective evaluation of the new deal is really hard to be made at this point, given the tremendous lack of information. The full framework is not yet available, and so the boundaries of the EU citizens’ data are not yet precisely defined. Besides the new clause that foresees an annual EU-US joint review to check the agreement is being applied correctly, we basically only know that the US will provide “written assurances” that they will basically limit surveillance and not a lot further.

The EU declared in last week’s statement that Commissioners Ansip and Jourová receive the mandate to prepare a draft “adequacy decision” in the coming weeks, which could then be presented by the College of Commissioners to the Member States.

In general, with the people’s privacy on the table the ball should be played carefully. No doubt that some steps forward and improvements towards privacy protection were taken, but still it seems hard to believe a final solution has been found.

At the end, if the European Court of Justice sunk an EU-US data privacy deal with such a background like the Safe Harbour one, there’s no real reason why it shouldn’t do the same with this one too.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

EU Commission retracts on the Chinese solar panel case

Greece did it again

Greece: The new government of Alexis Tsipras shows its colors

Chinese economy to raise speed and help the world grow

Ahead of State of the Union the European Youth Forum highlights lack of action on youth employment

Minsk “ceasefire” leaves more doubts than safety, with EU already planning steps further

Far from a healthy Health Workforce: lack of workforce planning leaves our citizens without access to proper care

On Youth Participation: Are we active citizens?

Syria: Why did the US now take the Russian offer for a truce? What next?

ISIS fighters fleeing Mosul for Syria can topple Assad. Why did the US now decide to uproot them from Iraq?

An introduction to ‘Eco-Medical Literacy’ and its importance in shaping expert medical professionals

Council Presidency: Floundering with the EU 2014 budget

Commission to decide definitely on genetically modified Maize 1507 seed

The European Parliament x-rays the troika’s doings

Commission considers anti-dumping duty on Chinese solar glass imports

MWC 2016 LIVE: The top 5 themes of this year’s Mobile World Congress

ECB offers cheaper money despite reactions from Germany

Who threatens the lives and livelihoods of Ukrainians?

Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson: who forced the two ‘brave’ Brexiteers to quit?

Does the EU want GMOs and meat with hormones from the US?

Politics still matter in the US but not in Europe

Entrepreneurship in a newly shaped Europe: what is the survival kit for a young Catalan and British entrepreneur in 2018?

TTIP: why it is worth not to pull the covers over your head?

The Eurogroup protects Germany and blames others

Tsipras imposes more austerity on insolvent Greece; plans to win new early election soon

A new world that demands new doctors in the fourth industrial revolution

EU seems to fail its moderate migration promises postponing them for end 2015

Bankruptcy or referendum: which one is going to be first?

Public opinion misled by the Commission on air transport safety

EU Summit’s major takeaway: a handkerchief cannot save Greece from austerity

Access to ‘affordable’ medicines in India: challenges & solutions

Mobile 360 Africa 11-13 July 2017

A Sting Exclusive: “Regional Policy: a fully-fledged investment policy”, Commissioner Cretu reveals live from European Business Summit 2015

IMF asks Europe to decide on bank resolutions and the Greek Gordian knot

Who is to profit from the quasi announced ECB rate cut?

EU Commission: Germany can make Eurozone grow again just by helping itself

Bitpay @ TheNextWeb 2014: Innovation’s Best Friend

Innovation and Entrepreneurship Changing the Face of Europe

Education expenditure in the EU not hurt much by crisis

Love unlimited

Will Europe be able to deal with the migration crisis alone if Turkey quits the pact?

Brexit update: Leave campaign leads race but undecided voters will determine the outcome of the EU referendum

Drowning in the Mediterranean this summer? Many happy returns

The Brussels bureaucracy blocks the Youth Guarantee scheme

EU Top Jobs summit ended with no agreement: welcome to Europe’s quicksand!

Does the world have strong enough institutions to handle risks like Trump and Brexit?

GSMA Mobile 360: Connecting Cities, Connecting Lives, Connecting Europe

G20 LIVE: “ISIL is the face of evil; our goal is to degrade and ultimately destroy this barbaric terrorist organisation”, US President Barack Obama cries out from Antalya Turkey

Refugee crisis: Commission proposes a new plan urging EU countries to help Italy

France: New labour laws for more competitiveness

Merkel’s triumph will make Berlin more unbending

A new arrangement between Eurozone’s haves and have-nots

European Business Summit 2015: In search of a vision for the future

France sneaks into the Geneva US-Iran talks to claim its business share in Tehran

A Sting Exclusive: “There can be no global deal on emissions without China and the USA”, Conservative MEP Ian Duncan stresses from Brussels

UK economy in dire straits: leading banks now officially plan to Brexit too

European Youth Forum on Summit on Jobs and Growth

The West and Russia accomplished the dismembering and the economic destruction of Ukraine

Greece: Tsipras’ referendum victory does not solve the financial stalemate of the country and its banks

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s