“BEUC cautions against TTIP that would seek to align EU and US chemicals management frameworks”

Cecilia Malmstrom EU Commissioner Trade

Cecilia Malmstrom, EU Commissioner responsible for Trade (European Union, 2016/ Source: EC-Aduiovisual Service/ Photo: Adam Berry)

As it happened several times in the past, the closer a TTIP negotiation round gets, the bigger the debate over the main questions intensifies. With the next round of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership talks due to take place this month in Brussels, this time was the turn of the European Consumer Organisation, BEUC, to raise concerns over the mammoth EU-US treaty.

The Brussels-based umbrella consumer group released a position paper on the proposed TTIP agreement last week where it urges the European Commission not to validate the pact with the US as it would allegedly increase consumer exposure to toxic chemicals. According to BEUC the EU’s chemical risks control system, which is by definition the world’s most ambitious one, could be potentially weakened by “the nature and scope of the transatlantic trade deal” itself.

Different systems

Indeed BEUC sees the many differences between the European and the American regulatory systems on chemical products, with the risk for the EU system to lose its high standards if merged with the American one, as the core issue of the discussion. The problem is that, according to BEUC, the new regulation was “a reaction” to three decades of “negative experience in the United States under the Toxic Substances Control Act”, the TSCA, which does not require chemical suppliers to provide any data on the hazards of their products.

The “REACH” shelter

As widely believed, the source of the risks for the consumers can be found in the lack of toxicity and exposure information on many chemical substances in commercial use. Against this background, the EU in 2006 adopted a legislation setting up a new system for the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals, the REACH. As also explained by BEUC in its paper, one of the core objectives of the REACH Regulation is thus to create pressure on companies to develop better information on their chemicals and guarantee safety for the consumers.

“REACH adopts several techniques that reverse the approach to chemicals management taken under TSCA, the most important of which are prescribing precaution in the face of scientific uncertainty and shifting the burden of proof from regulators to industry”, BEUC reported. In a few words, according to BEUC, the American system has too many “black holes” in its body, and so would ultimately allow too much space for chemical industries to manoeuvre. Therefore, BEUC’s position is quite clear: “Given the dismal record of toxic substance control in the United States, BEUC cautions against a transatlantic free-trade agreement that would seek to align EU and US chemicals management frameworks”, BEUC urged in its document.

BEUC’s requirements

Overall, BEUC’s position on TTIP and the way the proposed EU-US trade agreement would regulate chemicals and toxic products is quite clear. “We see a risk that current TTIP proposals would delay or thwart progress on reducing consumer exposure to toxic chemicals”, BEUC explained and so urged the negotiating parties to “reconsider their approach to the chemicals sector”. According to BEUC, the negotiating parties have so far “failed” to deliver “a bold, ambitious vision for transatlantic cooperation on chemicals that would bring real benefits to consumers and the environment”.

The European Consumer Organisation basically is now asking European negotiators and authorities to conclude an agreement which keeps the consumer always informed about the presence of harmful chemicals in products and that encourages management of chemicals based on hazard. The point is that BEUC is determined and firm on the position of having chemicals excluded from the TTIP regulatory cooperation chapters “should the negotiating parties fail to reconsider their approach”.

Contrasts with the industry’s view

BEUC’s position is openly in contrast with what other organisations and associations believe, like the European Chemical Industry Council for example. What CEFIC (From its former French name Conseil Européen des Fédérations de l’Industrie Chimique) says, as the main European trade association for the chemical industry, is that TTIP is a “remarkable opportunity” for both the European and American economic systems. CEFIC’s official position on the transatlantic trade agreement, as explained on its website, is that The European chemical industry supports this ambitious partnership as the United States remain the European Union’s biggest chemical trading partner.

“Maintain highest standards”

CEFIC also says that “proposals” to promote efficiencies “within and between the current legislations” and to reduce costs have been made with American Chemistry Council. “They [the proposals] aim to promote alignment, primarily by ensuring a common scientific basis for decision-making, without changing regulation”, says CEFIC on its website. Moreover, on its official position paper on TTIP, CEFIC asks EU policy makers to “maintain the highest standards of chemical safety in the EU”, where “an enhanced EU-US co-operation on agreeing classifications for chemicals could become a good basis for a global list while respecting each other procedures”. The Sting’s readers can find CEFIC position paper here.

Next TTIP round

The whole chemical system regulation issue is surely destined to have a big impact on the next round of talks, as on the whole negotiation process. In the official report of last negotiations round, published by the EU, it has already been said that chemicals provision in TTIP, which basically were not discussed in the 11th round, will have a prominent position during next round.

The 12th round of TTIP talks is due to to take place in the second half of February, although dates haven’t been announced yet.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

China hopes EU Commissioner De Gucht drops super anti-dumping tariff on solar panels

Everybody against Japan over yen’s devaluation

Brexit uncertainty keeps shaking the world’s financial markets

More capital and liquidity for the banks

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

Legal Manager – 2050

Yanis Varoufakis in a Sting Exclusive: “Unsustainable debt turns the creditor into Leviathan; Life under it is becoming nasty, brutish and short”

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “Employment contracts today are a reducing share of the workforce”, scientists worry in Davos that the 4th industrial revolution threatens employment globally

De Gucht: More gaffes with the talks on the EU-US free trade agreement

Can ECB’s €60 billion a month save Eurozone?

Paris, Rome, Brussels and Frankfurt to confront Berlin over growth and the Athens enigma

European Court of Justice to Google: It is #righttobeforgotten but not #righttoberemembered

IMF: European banks do not perform their duty to real economy

MWC 2016 LIVE: 5G to embrace unlicensed bands and Wi-Fi

Varna (Bulgaria) awarded European Youth Capital 2017

TTIP’s 11th round major takeaways and the usual “leaked” document

Appreciation of euro to continue

Germany loves a strong euro; the new Fiscal Councils can deliver despite the Greek chaos and a wider questioning of austerity

Junker for Commission President: What were the stakes in this affair

THE ROAD TO GANESHA

Responsible Artificial Intelligence

Rehn ready to sacrifice part of the real economy

Trump’s Russophiles under investigation, Europe remains ‘en garde’

UN Human Rights Council resolution on youth and human rights: a step forward for youth rights

European Youth Forum welcomes establishment of new Youth Intergroup in the European Parliament

Parliament votes reform for better European Co2 market but critics want it sooner than later

Is Eurozone heading for disinflation?

Migration crisis, a human crisis after all

Rehn very reserved about growth in Eurozone

Germany fears that Americans and Russians want to partition Europe again

168 hours left for MEPs – ECOFIN Council to deliver a Banking Union

Facebook and Google to treat Europe as the 51st State of the USA

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile has power to tame transaction fees – PayPal CEO

Who cares about the unity of Ukraine?

Medical Doctors in Industry 4.0: pure science fiction

MWC 2016 LIVE: Orange targets VoLTE and Voice over Wi-Fi; strikes Google partnership

What does Tsipras have to offer to the rest of Europe? Is it worth an early advance of €10 billion? Berlin sturdily denies it

EU-US relations on the dawn of the Trump era

iSting: Change Europe with your Writing

Who is to pay the dearest price in a global slowdown?

The EU accuses Russia of bullying Ukraine to change sides

The impact of refugees on the European healthcare system

EU is officially in recession

Commission criticised member states on blocking financial transaction tax

South Sudan’s foreseen genocide: from “Never Again” to “Again and Again and Again”?

EU Summit: Why was Poland isolated in opposing Tusk and the ‘multi speed’ Europe

A European young student speaks about the Youth Policies of the European Commission

Tackling Youth Unemployment

The Next Web 2014, the biggest European conference on Internet so far and the Absence of Brussels from Amsterdam

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s