EU Commission announces Safe Harbour 2.0 and a wider Data protection reform

Joint press conference by Andrus Ansip, Vice-President of the EC, Günther Oettinger and Vĕra Jourová, Members of the EC, on the conclusions of the weekly meeting of the Juncker Commission (© European Union, 2015 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service, Shimera / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart)

Joint press conference by Andrus Ansip, Vice-President of the EC, Günther Oettinger and Vĕra Jourová, Members of the EC, on the conclusions of the weekly meeting of the Juncker Commission (© European Union, 2015 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service, Shimera / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart)

The new EU-US data transfer deal, currently under development, will give the European Union the right to suspend the pact if privacy concerns are raised again, EU Justice Commissioner Věra Jourová said in a statement last week. For the first time, such right is formally guaranteed, and even though the pact is still a draft, the news sounds already like a game changer.

Biggest news in place

Indeed when more than two months ago the former data agreement between the European Union and the United States – the so-called “Safe Harbour” – was declared not valid, it became clear that the history of data protection between the two blocs would be changing sensibly. “In the new Safe Harbour there will be a suspension clause, saying that under concrete conditions we are going to suspend (it),” Commissioner Jourová said at the 6th Annual European Data Protection and Privacy Conference that took place last Thursday in Brussels.

The safe harbour story

The Safe Harbour, which was slammed on October 6 by the European Court of Justice because of worries about mass US surveillance practices, was basically making it legal for American firms to handle European citizens’ data if they could demonstrate – through a “self-certification” – that they met Europe’s privacy controls. Since 2000, more than 4,500 US firms have relied on Safe Harbour to go along with the EU Data Protection Directive on the protection and the transfer of personal data from the EU to the US. The two blocs have been negotiating for the past two years over a new agreement to replace Safe Harbour, but the Snowden scandal first and the Schrems’ case thereafter have rapidly changed things.

The ECJ ruling

Overall, Commissioner Jourová strongly defended the ruling by the European Court of Justice. “The Court ruling reaffirmed the fundamental right to data protection, including where data is transferred outside the EU”, she said. She then spoke about the importance of the economic ties the EU and the US have, and the consequent need of a “more comprehensive framework in place”, to ensure “proper protection and enforcement on both sides of the Atlantic”. “And this is what the Court ruling requires: where personal data travels, the protection has to travel with it”, the Commissioner for Justice underscored.

A wider reform

But the opening of the Annual European Data Protection and Privacy Conference was not limited to the new Safe Harbour. Indeed Commissioner Věra Jourová’s words last Thursday paved the way towards a wider EU data protection reform, whose aim would be to “strengthen the fundamental rights of individuals” and at the same time to “simplify the regulatory environment for businesses operating in Europe’s single market”. Surely not an easy mission, given the complexity of the matter, and the tight deadline she set: “We hope to reach agreement already within the next two weeks”, she added. Let’s try to see what the possibilities are and how the whole situation with the US looks like, starting from the Commissioner’s remarks on business.

“A renewed arrangement will mean robust safeguards for citizens and legal certainty for businesses”, she said. “Businesses”, she continued, “will benefit by saving around 2.3 billion Euros per year only in terms of administrative burden and compliance costs deriving from the current fragmentation of national data protection laws”. For the attendants expecting more on the business side there was not a wider focus unfortunately.

An optimistic deadline?

All in all, Commissioner Jourová spread wide enthusiasm also towards her American counterparts by saying that she got the impression in Washington that the American side share the same aim and that she hopes “they share our sense of urgency after the judgment”. However, many things are still to be put in shape for such a revolution. Commissioner Jourová, again, maintains that she hopes the deal would be in place “by January”, but this deadline sounds a bit too optimistic right now. Indeed, Ted Dean, a US department of commerce official, who is also part of the US negotiating team, said the January deadline is meaningless. “It is not our goal to be done at the end of January. It is our goal to be done as soon as we possibly can,” he reportedly said.

American concerns

This happens for many reasons. It’s true for instance that US officials never admitted any violation of the European citizens’ privacy, and refused claims of mass surveillance. Robert Litt, a general counsel in the US office of the director of national intelligence, was quoted as saying that the ECJ basically has no evidence. “The Court did not find that US law and practices in fact did not protect privacy rights”, he reportedly argued. Moreover, there’s still an enormous sense of frustration on the other side of the Atlantic, among the some 4,500 US companies that previously signed up the self-certification regime, post the ECJ ruling. It’s pretty sure that no big collaboration without concessions will eventually come in the end.

EU to mitigate risks

The EU is now pushing for stronger privacy guarantees from the US negotiators, in order to ensure that a new framework won’t be slammed in the court’s door again, but it seems this won’t happen easily. The US has been historically reluctant to offer broad openings regarding the way American authorities access data for national security purposes, and the whole question seems to be ‘too’ thorny at this moment.

Sceptics now warn that in the absence of strong privacy protections, a new Safe Harbour could be found again not valid in court, as it happened to its predecessor. Nevertheless, what would be much needed now is surely a wider reform of privacy laws on both sides of the Atlantic, something that would iron differences and prepare the ground for a long-lasting pact.

Then another data privacy pact could come along again. In that scenario the 31st of January rather sounds indeed a bit too optimistic.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Me and China

European Investment Bank to borrow €70 billion in 2013

China confirms anti-state-subsidy investigation on EU wine imports

Dutch voters reject EU-Ukraine partnership and open a new pandora’s box for the EU

The EU Parliament endorses tax on financial transactions

EU’s guidelines on net neutrality see the light although grey areas do remain

European Commissioner for Youth wants young people to be at heart of policy making

Parliament sets up plan to fight the 3,600 criminal rings of EU

EU migrant crisis: Germany, France and UK to show the way. Will the rest of the EU follow?

Bundesbank’s President Weidmann criticises France and the EU. Credibility at risk?

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “If we do not do properly the Paris agreement, then all 16 remaining goals will be undermined”, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon cautions from Davos

Eurozone in trouble after Nicosia’s ‘no’

A Sting Exclusive: “Without climate, forget about peace!”, Swedish MEP Bodil Valero cautions from Brussels

Economic recovery won’t tackle youth unemployment problem

Eurozone to enter the winter…

Will ECB win against low inflation by not following Quantitave Easing?

The Chinese spirit

Why did Cameron gain absolute majority? What will he do now? Will he vote ‘yes’ in Britain’s in – out EU referendum?

Presentation of Juncker’s Investment Plan: Can 315 billion euros save the EU?

YO!FEST ENGAGES 8,000 YOUNG EUROPEANS IN FUTURE OF EU

Eurozone officials play with people’s deposits and minds

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

Eurozone recession subsides

MWC 2016 LIVE: Ingenu steps up efforts to build LPWA networks across the globe

IFMSA and IPSF on the Health of Migrants and Refugees

EU will not deliver on promises without democratic accountability

South Eurozone urgently needs fairer distribution of taxation burden

All talk but no action against fraudulent bankers

Eurozone: Statistics don’t tell the whole story

Crimea, a wicked game of political chess and a ‘big’ coincidence

European Youth Forum welcomes strong stance on human rights in State of the Union

US, Russia oblige each other in Syria and Ukraine selling off allies

Can the world take the risk of a new financial armageddon so that IMF doesn’t lose face towards Tsipras?

European Employment Forum 2013 and not European Unemployment Forum 2014

Glaringly false reassurances about the repercussions of the EU-US free trade agreement

European Banking Union: no one is perfect

Europe united in not supporting a US attack on Syria

Commission challenges Council over EU 2014 budget

Data show EU Economy in a stubbornly subdued state

IMF to teach Germany a Greek lesson

The West definitively cuts Russia off from the developed world

The impossible end of the war in Syria

Why do medical students need to go abroad to become a doctor in 2017?

The Swiss will pay dearly for voting out fellow Europeans

What the world will look like after the Iran and 5+1 deal; the US emerges as major power broker in Middle East

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

Macron plans for Europe, Brexit and banks but vague on France

Will the outcome of the UK referendum “calm” the financial markets?

The West and Russia took what they wanted from Ukraine

“CETA is a game changer for major trade agreements”. The Sting reports live from EBS 2015

Russia and the West to partition Ukraine?

GREXIT final wrap-up: nobody believed Aesop’s boy who cried wolf so many times

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: Children Will Bear the Brunt of Climate Change: UNICEF

Why medicine is relevant to the battle against climate change

The West – the EU and the US – is writing off Turkey’s Erdogan

Fair completion rules and the law of gravity don’t apply to banks

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

MWC 2016 LIVE: Freemium MVNO model a success, claims FreedomPop head

The Sting’s Mission

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s