EU Commission announces Safe Harbour 2.0 and a wider Data protection reform

Joint press conference by Andrus Ansip, Vice-President of the EC, Günther Oettinger and Vĕra Jourová, Members of the EC, on the conclusions of the weekly meeting of the Juncker Commission (© European Union, 2015 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service, Shimera / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart)

Joint press conference by Andrus Ansip, Vice-President of the EC, Günther Oettinger and Vĕra Jourová, Members of the EC, on the conclusions of the weekly meeting of the Juncker Commission (© European Union, 2015 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service, Shimera / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart)

The new EU-US data transfer deal, currently under development, will give the European Union the right to suspend the pact if privacy concerns are raised again, EU Justice Commissioner Věra Jourová said in a statement last week. For the first time, such right is formally guaranteed, and even though the pact is still a draft, the news sounds already like a game changer.

Biggest news in place

Indeed when more than two months ago the former data agreement between the European Union and the United States – the so-called “Safe Harbour” – was declared not valid, it became clear that the history of data protection between the two blocs would be changing sensibly. “In the new Safe Harbour there will be a suspension clause, saying that under concrete conditions we are going to suspend (it),” Commissioner Jourová said at the 6th Annual European Data Protection and Privacy Conference that took place last Thursday in Brussels.

The safe harbour story

The Safe Harbour, which was slammed on October 6 by the European Court of Justice because of worries about mass US surveillance practices, was basically making it legal for American firms to handle European citizens’ data if they could demonstrate – through a “self-certification” – that they met Europe’s privacy controls. Since 2000, more than 4,500 US firms have relied on Safe Harbour to go along with the EU Data Protection Directive on the protection and the transfer of personal data from the EU to the US. The two blocs have been negotiating for the past two years over a new agreement to replace Safe Harbour, but the Snowden scandal first and the Schrems’ case thereafter have rapidly changed things.

The ECJ ruling

Overall, Commissioner Jourová strongly defended the ruling by the European Court of Justice. “The Court ruling reaffirmed the fundamental right to data protection, including where data is transferred outside the EU”, she said. She then spoke about the importance of the economic ties the EU and the US have, and the consequent need of a “more comprehensive framework in place”, to ensure “proper protection and enforcement on both sides of the Atlantic”. “And this is what the Court ruling requires: where personal data travels, the protection has to travel with it”, the Commissioner for Justice underscored.

A wider reform

But the opening of the Annual European Data Protection and Privacy Conference was not limited to the new Safe Harbour. Indeed Commissioner Věra Jourová’s words last Thursday paved the way towards a wider EU data protection reform, whose aim would be to “strengthen the fundamental rights of individuals” and at the same time to “simplify the regulatory environment for businesses operating in Europe’s single market”. Surely not an easy mission, given the complexity of the matter, and the tight deadline she set: “We hope to reach agreement already within the next two weeks”, she added. Let’s try to see what the possibilities are and how the whole situation with the US looks like, starting from the Commissioner’s remarks on business.

“A renewed arrangement will mean robust safeguards for citizens and legal certainty for businesses”, she said. “Businesses”, she continued, “will benefit by saving around 2.3 billion Euros per year only in terms of administrative burden and compliance costs deriving from the current fragmentation of national data protection laws”. For the attendants expecting more on the business side there was not a wider focus unfortunately.

An optimistic deadline?

All in all, Commissioner Jourová spread wide enthusiasm also towards her American counterparts by saying that she got the impression in Washington that the American side share the same aim and that she hopes “they share our sense of urgency after the judgment”. However, many things are still to be put in shape for such a revolution. Commissioner Jourová, again, maintains that she hopes the deal would be in place “by January”, but this deadline sounds a bit too optimistic right now. Indeed, Ted Dean, a US department of commerce official, who is also part of the US negotiating team, said the January deadline is meaningless. “It is not our goal to be done at the end of January. It is our goal to be done as soon as we possibly can,” he reportedly said.

American concerns

This happens for many reasons. It’s true for instance that US officials never admitted any violation of the European citizens’ privacy, and refused claims of mass surveillance. Robert Litt, a general counsel in the US office of the director of national intelligence, was quoted as saying that the ECJ basically has no evidence. “The Court did not find that US law and practices in fact did not protect privacy rights”, he reportedly argued. Moreover, there’s still an enormous sense of frustration on the other side of the Atlantic, among the some 4,500 US companies that previously signed up the self-certification regime, post the ECJ ruling. It’s pretty sure that no big collaboration without concessions will eventually come in the end.

EU to mitigate risks

The EU is now pushing for stronger privacy guarantees from the US negotiators, in order to ensure that a new framework won’t be slammed in the court’s door again, but it seems this won’t happen easily. The US has been historically reluctant to offer broad openings regarding the way American authorities access data for national security purposes, and the whole question seems to be ‘too’ thorny at this moment.

Sceptics now warn that in the absence of strong privacy protections, a new Safe Harbour could be found again not valid in court, as it happened to its predecessor. Nevertheless, what would be much needed now is surely a wider reform of privacy laws on both sides of the Atlantic, something that would iron differences and prepare the ground for a long-lasting pact.

Then another data privacy pact could come along again. In that scenario the 31st of January rather sounds indeed a bit too optimistic.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Τhe EU Refugee Crisis: a day in the life of a Refugee in Greece

Much more than a ‘lifeline’ for millions of households, remittances can spur global growth, says UN agency

Why Eurozone urgently needs the ECB to print and distribute at least €500 billion

A Sting Exclusive: “The Chinese economy is steady and moving in the right direction”, Ambassador Yang of the Chinese Mission to EU underscores from Brussels

FEATURE: Niger’s girls find sanctuary in fistula treatment centres

Brexit talks: 2nd round fails to bring the EU and the UK closer on key issues

Why Commissioner Rehn wants us all to work more for less

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

ECB money bonanza not enough to revive euro area, Germany longs to rule with stagnation

EU and Amazon cut deal to end antitrust investigation over e-books deals

We’ll succeed together

Is “Sustainable Development” a concept that integrates Health Literacy and Health Policy as a global health action?

EU and China discuss economic and trade relations at the 7th High-level Economic and Trade Dialogue

The ECB proposes a swift solution for SMEs’ financing

The Next Web 2014, the biggest European conference on Internet so far and the Absence of Brussels from Amsterdam

Assault on key Yemeni port would endanger 300,000 children and ‘choke off’ aid for millions more: UNICEF chief

Managing and resolving conflicts in a politically inclined group of team members

How much time has the ‘European Union of last chance’ left?

AIESEC @ European Business Summit 2014: The Digital Era: A New Business Frontier

Opening – Parliament expresses support for victims of Fuego volcano in Guatemala

UN chief welcomes resolution to 27-year-old disagreement over renaming the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

The European Sting writes down the history LIVE from G20 Leaders’ Summit in Turkey

The representatives of the regions and the cities know better what the EU needs on migration, trade, poverty and taxation

EU Trade Ministers come together in a desperate attempt to save TTIP

EU Leaders’ meeting in Sofia: Completing a trusted Digital Single Market for the benefit of all

MWC 2016 LIVE: The top 5 themes of this year’s Mobile World Congress

UK: Crawley group wins European Citizens’ Prize

ECB to people: Not responsible if you lose money on Bitcoin, your governments are

Following the World Cup? Then you’re watching high-performing migrants at work

The vehicles of our future

Cyber attacks are shutting down countries, cities and companies. Here’s how to stop them

Here are three ways blockchain can change refugees’ lives

UNICEF delivers medical supplies to Gaza in wake of deadly protests

Court of Auditors: EU spending infested with errors well above the materiality threshold of 2%

“Who do I call if I want to call Europe?” Finally a name and a number to answer Henry Kissinger’s question

Trump’s trade war splits the EU; Germany upset with Juncker’s “we can be stupid too”

ITU Telecom World 2017: exploring smart digital transformation

Google once more under EU crossfire from a possible record fine and new Right to be forgotten case

Commission to decide on bank resolution issues

These charts show where the world’s refugees came from in 2017 – and where they’re heading

France v Croatia: How the World Cup finalists stack up off the pitch

Venezuela: Parliament calls for urgent EU help for people fleeing the country

I’m not feeling lucky: The “Right to Be Forgotten” ruling puts Google inside a box

G20 LIVE: G20 Leaders’ Communiqué Antalya Summit, 15-16 November 2015

Germany not famous for easy way outs from political stalemates

Draghi tells the EU Parliament his relaxed policies are here to stay

These countries are all building brand-new cities

Lithuania finds the ways to maintain its energy security

The EU Parliament and the ECB unknowingly or unwillingly fail to protect our financial assets

How blockchain can manage the future electricity grid

EU’s tougher privacy rules: WhatsApp and Facebook set to be soon aligned with telcos

ECB to support only banks not Peoples

Containers at the port of Tokyo. (Copyright: European Union, 2016. Source: EC - Audiovisual Service. Photo: Haruyoshi Yamaguchi)

EU cuts fast-track free trade deals with Japan and Singapore and leads the trade scene

Latin America’s cities are ready to take off. But their infrastructure is failing them

Brexit uncertainty keeps shaking the world’s financial markets

AI has huge potential – but it won’t solve all our problems

The EU to bear the cost of eventual sanctions against Russia

MWC 2016 LIVE: Ericsson/Cisco partnership on track, insist execs

UK’s PM Theresa May asks for a two-year Brexit transition plan as negotiations round kicks off

Eurozone cannot endure any longer youth marginalisation

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s