COP21 Breaking News_10 December:#ParisAgreement: Points that remain in suspense

COP21 Paris AgreementObjectives and level of ambition of the agreement, financial support for countries of the South, and burden sharing between developed and developing countries are all difficult issues that remain to be decided on by Friday, the end of the Climate Conference, which should produce a universal pact to combat climate change.

– An “ambitious” agreement? 2°C or 1.5°C?

At the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the States Parties decided to limit the temperature rise to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial era, which requires drastically limiting greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency measures, investing in renewable energy sources, and reforestation, amongst other things.

Many countries, including island States that are threatened by rising sea levels, consider themselves in danger beyond 1.5°C, but such an objective would require considerable efforts by the major emitters, such as China and India, who are against such a threshold.

In the text proposed on Wednesday, all options remain open, including only 2°C, only 1.5°C, or, very probably, a compromise wording reaffirming the 2°C goal, combined with “increased efforts” to achieve 1.5°C.

HOW?

Out of 195 countries, 185 have announced measures to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. But even if these commitments are fulfilled, temperatures would still be set to rise by around 3°C.

The text is split between precise, ambitious objectives – reducing emissions by 40% to 70% (scenario to achieve 2°C) or by 70% top 95% (scenario for 1.5°C) by 2050 compared to 2010, or the achievement of zero emissions” by the middle of the century – and vague wording, only committing the Parties to act “over the course of this century”.

CARBON OR NO CARBON?

Should the text also include the idea that we will eventually have to do without fossil fuels? This is a prospect that is opposed by oil- and coal- producing countries. One of the formulations proposed is “climate neutrality”, the vagueness of which infuriates NGOs.

REVIEW OF COMMITMENTS

One of the key provisions of the agreement is the creation of a review mechanism for the commitments of the various countries. It has already be decided that it will take place every five years and that there will be a “progression” on each occasion compared to the previous commitments. But when should it start?

The date of 2020/2021 has been proposed for new commitments. Two milestone reviews could also take place in 2018/2019, then in 2023/2024.

– Developed and developing countries: who does what? – The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a strict division between developed and developing countries in the sharing of obligations.

The industrialized countries, especially the United States, would like to increase the flexibility of this division, but countries like India refuse to abolish it, in the name of their right to development and the historic responsibility of the countries of the North for climate change.

This particularly sensitive point arises throughout the draft agreement, particularly concerning the sharing of emission reduction efforts. The choice remains open: either only developed countries take absolute emissions reduction steps, or all countries then join them in that later on.

– Financial support for developing countries: in 2009, the rich countries promised to spend $100 billion per year by 2020 in order to fund the climate policies of developing countries.

The latter want that budget to be increased after 2020, to finance their clean energy sources as well as measures of adaptation to the effects of global warming (embankments, weather warnings, resistant crops, etc.), emphasizing the importance of more predictable “public funds”. A balance seems to have been found between these two areas of spending.

But industrialized countries do not wish to be the only ones paying, and want a contribution from countries like China, South Korea, Singapore and the rich oil-producing countries, for example.

One option proposes that “All Parties” should contribute, but “with developed country Parties taking the lead”. Another option only requires efforts from developed countries.

Source: http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/accorddeparis-les-points-toujours-en-suspens/

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EU adopts rebalancing measures in reaction to US steel and aluminium tariffs

Italy’s M.Renzi and Germany’s S. Gabriel veto austerity, ask EU leaders to endorse growth measures

Christmas spending: Who can afford not to cut?

Direction Wakanda: finance methods to make Africa a superhero continent

Women’s empowerment ‘essential to global progress’ says Guterres, marking International Day

How farms are getting closer to consumers in the pandemic

Central African Republic militia leader and football executive, transferred to ICC

OECD and European Commission join forces to further support structural reforms in European countries

What’s the difference between carbon negative and carbon neutral?

‘Crimes against humanity,’ ‘war crimes’ and risk of new ethnic violence in DR Congo, warn UN experts

This chart shows the fall in coal-power plants being planned around the world

Scotland and First Minister Salmond enter the most challenging battlefield for independence: Europe

Sustainable development demands a broader vision, says new OECD Development Centre report

COP24: World sports join team UN in race against climate change

Brussels terrorist attacks: Schengen in danger once again while leaders gather Europe’s multiple broken pieces

When is Berlin telling the truth about the EU banking union?

The European Parliament wants to stay in one place

New research reveals the true extent of corruption in fisheries

Trump ostracized by his party and world elites but still remains in course; how can he do it?

This chart shows the total number of COVID-19 cases and recoveries so far

The world needs carbon-neutral flying. Here’s how to bring it one step closer

Soccer is back with strict COVID-19 rules. Here’s what you need to know

This Dutch company has devised an innovative way to deal with food waste

Parental leave: why we can’t wait a century for equal rights for women

Countries must invest at least 1% more of GDP on primary healthcare to eliminate glaring coverage gaps

This man ran across the USA to raise awareness of plastic pollution

Business leaders must now turn positive ESG talk into long-term results

Rule of Law: European Commission takes new step to protect judges in Poland against political control

Parliament adopts its position on digital copyright rules

These countries have some of the highest voter turnout in the world

Thursday’s Daily Brief: Safeguarding civilians, strengthening Ebola response in DR Congo, marking Fistula Day, updates on CAR and Syria

The US calls off globalization, targets Germany. Paris offer to Berlin comes at a cost

Humanitarian aid: €7 million for disaster preparedness in Southern Africa and Indian Ocean region

How to create responsible supply chains in the age of globalization 4.0

Scale of displacement across Myanmar ‘very difficult to gauge’, says UN refugee agency

Gaza probe finds ‘reasonable grounds’ Israeli forces committed international human rights violations

Free flow of non-personal data: Parliament approves EU’s fifth freedom

The fatal consequences of troika’s blind austerity policy

Increased levels of carbon dioxide could reduce brainpower, study finds

A day in the life of a refugee: the wait

Coronavirus response: Team Europe supports Somalia with three EU Humanitarian Air Bridge flights

A Sting Exclusive: “Cybersecurity Act for a cyber-bulletproof EU”, by EU Vice-President Ansip

COVID-19: MEPs fear impact on justice system and threat to rule of law

It will take a lot more than free menstrual pads to end period poverty

IMF’s Lagarde: Ukraine must fight corruption

Top UN political official updates Security Council on Iran nuclear deal

COVID-19 is likely to increase youth unemployment in Africa, this is how business can mitigate the damage

Bacterial resistance: the significant worldwide problem

4 views on the shape of global cooperation in the time of COVID-19

Negative inflation hits Eurozone, ECB to print and distribute one trillion euro earlier than expected

These countries are leading the way in green finance

Young migrants: Is Europe creating a lost generation?

These chefs are fighting hunger and poverty with gastronomy

Tropical Cyclone Idai affects 1.5 million across Mozambique and Malawi, as UN ramps up response

A Sting Exclusive: Disaster risk resilience, key to protecting vulnerable communities

How COVID-19 shows the urgent need to address the cyber poverty gap

Europe and UN form bulwark against ‘might makes right’ worldview, EU foreign affairs chief tells Security Council

Safety fits into our palms: The role of mobile technology in healthcare systems and life saving

Aluminium can help to build the circular economy. Here’s how

Will COVID-19 usher in a new culture of outdoor living and dining?

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s