COP21 Breaking News_10 December:#ParisAgreement: Points that remain in suspense

COP21 Paris AgreementObjectives and level of ambition of the agreement, financial support for countries of the South, and burden sharing between developed and developing countries are all difficult issues that remain to be decided on by Friday, the end of the Climate Conference, which should produce a universal pact to combat climate change.

– An “ambitious” agreement? 2°C or 1.5°C?

At the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the States Parties decided to limit the temperature rise to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial era, which requires drastically limiting greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency measures, investing in renewable energy sources, and reforestation, amongst other things.

Many countries, including island States that are threatened by rising sea levels, consider themselves in danger beyond 1.5°C, but such an objective would require considerable efforts by the major emitters, such as China and India, who are against such a threshold.

In the text proposed on Wednesday, all options remain open, including only 2°C, only 1.5°C, or, very probably, a compromise wording reaffirming the 2°C goal, combined with “increased efforts” to achieve 1.5°C.

HOW?

Out of 195 countries, 185 have announced measures to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. But even if these commitments are fulfilled, temperatures would still be set to rise by around 3°C.

The text is split between precise, ambitious objectives – reducing emissions by 40% to 70% (scenario to achieve 2°C) or by 70% top 95% (scenario for 1.5°C) by 2050 compared to 2010, or the achievement of zero emissions” by the middle of the century – and vague wording, only committing the Parties to act “over the course of this century”.

CARBON OR NO CARBON?

Should the text also include the idea that we will eventually have to do without fossil fuels? This is a prospect that is opposed by oil- and coal- producing countries. One of the formulations proposed is “climate neutrality”, the vagueness of which infuriates NGOs.

REVIEW OF COMMITMENTS

One of the key provisions of the agreement is the creation of a review mechanism for the commitments of the various countries. It has already be decided that it will take place every five years and that there will be a “progression” on each occasion compared to the previous commitments. But when should it start?

The date of 2020/2021 has been proposed for new commitments. Two milestone reviews could also take place in 2018/2019, then in 2023/2024.

– Developed and developing countries: who does what? – The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a strict division between developed and developing countries in the sharing of obligations.

The industrialized countries, especially the United States, would like to increase the flexibility of this division, but countries like India refuse to abolish it, in the name of their right to development and the historic responsibility of the countries of the North for climate change.

This particularly sensitive point arises throughout the draft agreement, particularly concerning the sharing of emission reduction efforts. The choice remains open: either only developed countries take absolute emissions reduction steps, or all countries then join them in that later on.

– Financial support for developing countries: in 2009, the rich countries promised to spend $100 billion per year by 2020 in order to fund the climate policies of developing countries.

The latter want that budget to be increased after 2020, to finance their clean energy sources as well as measures of adaptation to the effects of global warming (embankments, weather warnings, resistant crops, etc.), emphasizing the importance of more predictable “public funds”. A balance seems to have been found between these two areas of spending.

But industrialized countries do not wish to be the only ones paying, and want a contribution from countries like China, South Korea, Singapore and the rich oil-producing countries, for example.

One option proposes that “All Parties” should contribute, but “with developed country Parties taking the lead”. Another option only requires efforts from developed countries.

Source: http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/accorddeparis-les-points-toujours-en-suspens/

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

EU Parliament: Follow the fraudulent money and confiscate it

These are the cities with the biggest carbon footprints

Mobile 360 Africa 11-13 July 2017

Europe must regain its place as world leader in digital technology

A day in the life of a refugee: why should we care?

The financial crisis always prefers the south of Eurozone

Brexit talks: 2nd round fails to bring the EU and the UK closer on key issues

Medicine and mental health: relax, the doctor is a lifelong learner

European Youth, quo vadis?

How bad is the Eurozone economy? The ECB thinks too bad

US-North Korea summit ‘an important milestone’ towards denuclearization, says Guterres

Will Western Balkans respond positively to EU initiatives?

Recession: the best argument for growth

A young person’s perspective on the Paris and Beirut attacks and aftermath

Early signs of growth in Eurozone?

Draghi to hold on zero interest rates until he leaves ECB

EU Council: Private web data to be protected by…abusers

Greece will probably stay in the Eurozone but at what cost?

Putin becomes the ‘perfect enemy” for the West

Dealing with stress among healthcare professionals: are we missing the elephant in the room?

CEOs in these countries are more likely to go with their gut

Walk, cycle, dance and play – UN health agency recommends new action plan for good health

Who will win the AI race? If countries work together, then the answer could be all of us

Tsipras imposes more austerity on insolvent Greece; plans to win new early election soon

Young people are not a nameless, faceless mass. So why do we treat them as such?

G20 LIVE: “This was not an attack against France, this was an attack against the universal human values!”, EU President Juncker cries out from G20 in Antalya Turkey

CHINA UNLIMITED. PEOPLE UNLIMITED. RESTRICTIONS LIMITED

Following the World Cup? Then you’re watching high-performing migrants at work

Does the West play the Syrian game in Egypt?

“Airbnb and YouTube are two great examples of a crowd based capitalism”, key stakeholders outline the boundaries of the 4th Industrial Revolution in Davos

Is sub-Saharan Africa ready for the electric vehicle revolution?

‘True’ peace, requires standing up for human rights, says UN chief Guterres

Towards the Rise of the United States of the Atlantic?

Spending another 3 billion euros on Turkey feels better than admitting EU’s failure

A Sting Exclusive: “EU’s Sustainable Finance Action Plan – Laying down the foundations for a Greener Financial System”, by European Commission’s Vice-President Dombrovskis

Refugee crisis update: EU fails to relocate immigrants from Greece and Italy

Minority governments ‘à la mode’ in Europe but can they last long?

Hostilities in Syria’s southwest, mean cuts in vital aid across Jordanian border: Senior UN official

It’s a lie Eurozone isn’t competitive

EU will not deliver on promises without democratic accountability

Draghi reveals how failing banks will be dealt, may cut interest rates soon

MWC 2016 LIVE: Ford trumpets new in-vehicle system, “fundamentally rethinks” transportation

The EU invites the US and Russia to partition Ukraine

The EU Consumer Policy on the Digital Market: A Behavioral Economics View

GradList Launched At TheNextWeb 2014

Cyprus tragedy reveals Eurozone’s arbitrary functioning

How will the EU face the migration crisis when the Turkish threats come true?

COP21 Breaking News_04 December: Building a Sustainable Future – speech by UNEP Deputy Executive Director Ibrahim Thiaw at the LPAA Thematic Event on Buildings

European Youth Forum and youngest MEPs call on President Juncker to keep his promise to Europe’s youth

EU job-search aid worth €9.9 million for 1,858 former Air France workers

An ECB banker wants to change the European social model

EU: 13 major banks may pay fines 10% of worldwide turnover

Drowning in the Mediterranean this summer? Many happy returns

Germany takes cover from Trump in Eurozone and decides to pay for it

2014 will bring more European Union for the big guys and less for the weak

EU voters not interested in the European Parliament elections. What’s behind this European Titanic?

The Changing Scope of International Economic Relations – Chinese Leadership in the 21st Century

Why European manufacturing SMEs in the South face fatal dangers

EU’s Bank signs € 150 million loan to India as part of record investment in clean energy

EU-China trade: closer ties as US-China trade battle brews

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s