COP21 Breaking News_10 December:#ParisAgreement: Points that remain in suspense

COP21 Paris AgreementObjectives and level of ambition of the agreement, financial support for countries of the South, and burden sharing between developed and developing countries are all difficult issues that remain to be decided on by Friday, the end of the Climate Conference, which should produce a universal pact to combat climate change.

– An “ambitious” agreement? 2°C or 1.5°C?

At the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the States Parties decided to limit the temperature rise to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial era, which requires drastically limiting greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency measures, investing in renewable energy sources, and reforestation, amongst other things.

Many countries, including island States that are threatened by rising sea levels, consider themselves in danger beyond 1.5°C, but such an objective would require considerable efforts by the major emitters, such as China and India, who are against such a threshold.

In the text proposed on Wednesday, all options remain open, including only 2°C, only 1.5°C, or, very probably, a compromise wording reaffirming the 2°C goal, combined with “increased efforts” to achieve 1.5°C.

HOW?

Out of 195 countries, 185 have announced measures to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. But even if these commitments are fulfilled, temperatures would still be set to rise by around 3°C.

The text is split between precise, ambitious objectives – reducing emissions by 40% to 70% (scenario to achieve 2°C) or by 70% top 95% (scenario for 1.5°C) by 2050 compared to 2010, or the achievement of zero emissions” by the middle of the century – and vague wording, only committing the Parties to act “over the course of this century”.

CARBON OR NO CARBON?

Should the text also include the idea that we will eventually have to do without fossil fuels? This is a prospect that is opposed by oil- and coal- producing countries. One of the formulations proposed is “climate neutrality”, the vagueness of which infuriates NGOs.

REVIEW OF COMMITMENTS

One of the key provisions of the agreement is the creation of a review mechanism for the commitments of the various countries. It has already be decided that it will take place every five years and that there will be a “progression” on each occasion compared to the previous commitments. But when should it start?

The date of 2020/2021 has been proposed for new commitments. Two milestone reviews could also take place in 2018/2019, then in 2023/2024.

– Developed and developing countries: who does what? – The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a strict division between developed and developing countries in the sharing of obligations.

The industrialized countries, especially the United States, would like to increase the flexibility of this division, but countries like India refuse to abolish it, in the name of their right to development and the historic responsibility of the countries of the North for climate change.

This particularly sensitive point arises throughout the draft agreement, particularly concerning the sharing of emission reduction efforts. The choice remains open: either only developed countries take absolute emissions reduction steps, or all countries then join them in that later on.

– Financial support for developing countries: in 2009, the rich countries promised to spend $100 billion per year by 2020 in order to fund the climate policies of developing countries.

The latter want that budget to be increased after 2020, to finance their clean energy sources as well as measures of adaptation to the effects of global warming (embankments, weather warnings, resistant crops, etc.), emphasizing the importance of more predictable “public funds”. A balance seems to have been found between these two areas of spending.

But industrialized countries do not wish to be the only ones paying, and want a contribution from countries like China, South Korea, Singapore and the rich oil-producing countries, for example.

One option proposes that “All Parties” should contribute, but “with developed country Parties taking the lead”. Another option only requires efforts from developed countries.

Source: http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/accorddeparis-les-points-toujours-en-suspens/

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

The Sting’s Team

After Brexit and Grexit, Brussels to deal with Poloust

2014 will bring more European Union for the big guys and less for the weak

Commission presents far-reaching anti-tax evasion measures

EU: Huge surplus in the trade of services with the rest of the world

“TTIP can boost the European project”; the Sting reports live from EBS 2015 on TTIP

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

Can the next financial crisis be avoided?

COP21 Breaking News_08 December: Cities & Regions Launch Major Five-Year Vision to Take Action on Climate Change

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: UN Secretary-General Announces “Climate Action 2016” Partnership

EU Ombudsman investigates the European Commission

I’m not feeling lucky: The “Right to Be Forgotten” ruling puts Google inside a box

The third bailout agreement for Greece is a done deal amid European economies full of problems

MWC 2016 LIVE: BlackBerry acquires Encription, talks Microsoft and health

A Sting Exclusive: “eHealth can change many dimensions of how the healthcare area functions”, Polish MEP Michal Boni underscores from Brussels

CHINA UNLIMITED. PEOPLE UNLIMITED. RESTRICTIONS LIMITED

Eurogroup president swallows statement on savings confiscation

EU elections: The louder the threats and the doomsaying the heavier the weight of the vote

Businesses succeed internationally

Commission to decide on bank resolution issues

France fails again the exams. Kindly requested to sit in on Commission’s class

Greece’s future solely in the hands of Tsipras; he can direct the poor country any way he likes

EU leaders slammed on anti-tax evasion inaction and expensive energy

Ukraine turns again to the EU for more money

JADE @ European Business Summit 2014: Youth Unemployment – a drive to Entrepreneurship

Economic sentiment and business climate stagnate in miserable euro area

“China will strive to enhance the performance of economic growth”, President Xi highlights from the World Economic Forum 2017 in Davos

Mobile World Congress 2015 first to debate EU’s new stance on Net Neutrality and Roaming Charges

2014 budget: The EU may prove unable to agree on own resources

Is South Korea set to lose from its FTA with the EU?

Trade deals’ pure realism: it may take 10 years for a post-Brexit agreement

Matthias in Canada

What will the US look like under Trump? Was his election campaign a big scam?

Environmental labelling, information and management schemes are central to the circular economy

To Bing or Not to Bing? That is the question

Microsoft’s YouthSpark: a kiss of Life to European Youth from the European Parliament

Income inequality threatens the socio-political structures in developed countries

Diana in Vietnam

The West and Russia impose a new order on the world

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

EU free-trade agreements with Canada and US: imagine the fallout if put to national referendums

Capital transaction tax on Ecofin table

European Youth Forum welcomes strong stance on human rights in State of the Union

Commission facilitates the activities of ‘merchants of labour’

German elections: Is Merkel losing ground or Shultz is winning?

World Retail Congress announces Dubai 2016 Hall of Fame Inductees

COP21 Breaking News_10 December: the final sprint of the Final Agreement Negotiations

The ECB still protects the banks at the expense of the EU taxpayers

The consequences of Brexit seen by a European young entrepreneur

The EU slams Theresa May’s Brexit option; sets base for own European defense, security platform

The Eurogroup has set Cyprus on fire

daniela-runchi-jade-president__

A Sting Exclusive: “Education in Europe, fostering skills development inside and outside the school system”

How bad is the Eurozone economy? The ECB thinks too bad

The New Year 2016 will not be benevolent to Europe

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “Chinese economy has great potential, resilience and ample space for policy adjustment”, China’s Vice President Li Yuanchao reassures from Davos

YOUTH WILL BE A KEY FOCUS IN THE NEXT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

JADE Generations Club: Connecting perspectives, changing Europe.

IMF to teach Germany a Greek lesson

Bundestag kick starts the next episode of the Greek tragedy

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s