COP21 Breaking News_10 December:#ParisAgreement: Points that remain in suspense

COP21 Paris AgreementObjectives and level of ambition of the agreement, financial support for countries of the South, and burden sharing between developed and developing countries are all difficult issues that remain to be decided on by Friday, the end of the Climate Conference, which should produce a universal pact to combat climate change.

– An “ambitious” agreement? 2°C or 1.5°C?

At the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the States Parties decided to limit the temperature rise to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial era, which requires drastically limiting greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency measures, investing in renewable energy sources, and reforestation, amongst other things.

Many countries, including island States that are threatened by rising sea levels, consider themselves in danger beyond 1.5°C, but such an objective would require considerable efforts by the major emitters, such as China and India, who are against such a threshold.

In the text proposed on Wednesday, all options remain open, including only 2°C, only 1.5°C, or, very probably, a compromise wording reaffirming the 2°C goal, combined with “increased efforts” to achieve 1.5°C.

HOW?

Out of 195 countries, 185 have announced measures to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. But even if these commitments are fulfilled, temperatures would still be set to rise by around 3°C.

The text is split between precise, ambitious objectives – reducing emissions by 40% to 70% (scenario to achieve 2°C) or by 70% top 95% (scenario for 1.5°C) by 2050 compared to 2010, or the achievement of zero emissions” by the middle of the century – and vague wording, only committing the Parties to act “over the course of this century”.

CARBON OR NO CARBON?

Should the text also include the idea that we will eventually have to do without fossil fuels? This is a prospect that is opposed by oil- and coal- producing countries. One of the formulations proposed is “climate neutrality”, the vagueness of which infuriates NGOs.

REVIEW OF COMMITMENTS

One of the key provisions of the agreement is the creation of a review mechanism for the commitments of the various countries. It has already be decided that it will take place every five years and that there will be a “progression” on each occasion compared to the previous commitments. But when should it start?

The date of 2020/2021 has been proposed for new commitments. Two milestone reviews could also take place in 2018/2019, then in 2023/2024.

– Developed and developing countries: who does what? – The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a strict division between developed and developing countries in the sharing of obligations.

The industrialized countries, especially the United States, would like to increase the flexibility of this division, but countries like India refuse to abolish it, in the name of their right to development and the historic responsibility of the countries of the North for climate change.

This particularly sensitive point arises throughout the draft agreement, particularly concerning the sharing of emission reduction efforts. The choice remains open: either only developed countries take absolute emissions reduction steps, or all countries then join them in that later on.

– Financial support for developing countries: in 2009, the rich countries promised to spend $100 billion per year by 2020 in order to fund the climate policies of developing countries.

The latter want that budget to be increased after 2020, to finance their clean energy sources as well as measures of adaptation to the effects of global warming (embankments, weather warnings, resistant crops, etc.), emphasizing the importance of more predictable “public funds”. A balance seems to have been found between these two areas of spending.

But industrialized countries do not wish to be the only ones paying, and want a contribution from countries like China, South Korea, Singapore and the rich oil-producing countries, for example.

One option proposes that “All Parties” should contribute, but “with developed country Parties taking the lead”. Another option only requires efforts from developed countries.

Source: http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/accorddeparis-les-points-toujours-en-suspens/

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

“At the Environment Assembly citizens expect clean, not hot air”, the Head of UN Environment in Europe underscores in a Sting Exclusive

Congrats to the #FutureofMalta: a new age of voting

NEC @ MWC14: “Smart cities” hold the key to enhancing citizens’ lives and cutting costs

MARKUP initiative to boost market access to Europe for East African SMEs

Progress in medical research: leading or lagging behind?

Security: better access to data for border control and migration management

European Youth cries out: Sustainable Development Goals ambitious, but lack focus on youth

Juncker Investment Plan for Europe welcomed by European Youth Forum

A Sting Exclusive: “Delivering on the Environmental Dimension of the new Sustainable Development Agenda”, Ulf Björnholm underscores from UNEP Brussels

Junker for Commission President: What were the stakes in this affair

The German banks first to profit from public subsidies of trillions

EU: The Member States to pay for national banking problems

Rehn very reserved about growth in Eurozone

Young people meet in Malta to shape the future of Europe

Microsoft’s YouthSpark: a kiss of Life to European Youth from the European Parliament

How many more financial crises in the West can the world stand?

Is Germany yielding to pressures for more relaxed economic policies?

Has the EU economy truly revived from the financial crisis?

Chart of the day: These are the cities where the World Cup threatens productivity the most

The Tears of lovely Memories

Inegalitarian taxation on labour haunts Europe’s social model

Google once more under EU crossfire from a possible record fine and new Right to be forgotten case

A Sting Exclusive: “EU’s Sustainable Finance Action Plan – Laying down the foundations for a Greener Financial System”, by European Commission’s Vice-President Dombrovskis

Palm Oil: With Malaysia cracking down on production, what’s the alternative?

This team of Saudi women designed an award-winning app to make the Hajj safer

Medical students: The need for emigration

Women-Friendly Spaces for Rohingya refugees: A place for protection and care

UN condemns attack that leaves one ‘blue helmet’ dead in Central African Republic

Nigeria floods: Guterres ‘deeply saddened’ by loss of life and rising need

Foreign Affairs Council (Trade) of 22/05/2018: EU relations with key trading partners

Three ways the Fourth Industrial Revolution is shaping geopolitics

The quality of health education around the globe

G20 LIVE: the EU trade gold rush continues as EU and Australia agree to launch Free Trade Agreement (FTA) live from Antalya Turkey

MEPs condemn attacks on civilians, including children, in Yemen

Walk, cycle, dance and play – UN health agency recommends new action plan for good health

Global immunization is having its annual check-up. What can we learn?

MEPs demand an end to migrant deaths across the Mediterranean Sea

Charles Michel advocates a strong Europe that acts where it can add real value

Europe united in not supporting a US attack on Syria

‘I thought I’d never get out alive’ – the Muslim director who interviewed neo-Nazis

COP21 Breaking News_07 December: “The world is expecting more from you than half-measures”, UN Secretary General Bank Ki-moon cries out from Paris

After the Italian ‘no’ and the Brexit, Germans must decide which Europe they want

UN chief urges Hamas and Israel to ‘step back from the brink of another devastating conflict’ in Gaza

Berlin to pay at the end for Eurozone banks’ consolidation

End of plastic water bottles at European Parliament

The 13th round of TTIP negotiations hits a wall of intense protests and growing concerns

More taxpayers’ money for the banks

Parallel downfalls of Merkel and Deutsche Bank threaten Germany and Europe

Italy’s Letta: A European Banking Union soon or Eurozone collapses

No recovery for EU economy in sight and a Brexit can aggravate things for everyone

Bias in AI is a real problem. Here’s what we should do about it

Varna (Bulgaria) awarded European Youth Capital 2017

‘True’ peace, requires standing up for human rights, says UN chief Guterres

UN rights office appeals for peaceful Zimbabwe elections amid reports of intimidation

EU’s Mogherini visits Turkey “to step up engagement” and highlight interests

Far from a healthy Health Workforce: lack of workforce planning leaves our citizens without access to proper care

Service Engineer Intern – 1991

The ECB will do whatever it takes to set the Eurozone economy again in motion

Cameron’s Conservatives and UKIP are exploiting and cultivating anti-EU immigration sentiment but Labour party isn’t?

The EU can afford to invest trillions in support of employment

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s