COP21 Breaking News_10 December:#ParisAgreement: Points that remain in suspense

COP21 Paris AgreementObjectives and level of ambition of the agreement, financial support for countries of the South, and burden sharing between developed and developing countries are all difficult issues that remain to be decided on by Friday, the end of the Climate Conference, which should produce a universal pact to combat climate change.

– An “ambitious” agreement? 2°C or 1.5°C?

At the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the States Parties decided to limit the temperature rise to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial era, which requires drastically limiting greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency measures, investing in renewable energy sources, and reforestation, amongst other things.

Many countries, including island States that are threatened by rising sea levels, consider themselves in danger beyond 1.5°C, but such an objective would require considerable efforts by the major emitters, such as China and India, who are against such a threshold.

In the text proposed on Wednesday, all options remain open, including only 2°C, only 1.5°C, or, very probably, a compromise wording reaffirming the 2°C goal, combined with “increased efforts” to achieve 1.5°C.

HOW?

Out of 195 countries, 185 have announced measures to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. But even if these commitments are fulfilled, temperatures would still be set to rise by around 3°C.

The text is split between precise, ambitious objectives – reducing emissions by 40% to 70% (scenario to achieve 2°C) or by 70% top 95% (scenario for 1.5°C) by 2050 compared to 2010, or the achievement of zero emissions” by the middle of the century – and vague wording, only committing the Parties to act “over the course of this century”.

CARBON OR NO CARBON?

Should the text also include the idea that we will eventually have to do without fossil fuels? This is a prospect that is opposed by oil- and coal- producing countries. One of the formulations proposed is “climate neutrality”, the vagueness of which infuriates NGOs.

REVIEW OF COMMITMENTS

One of the key provisions of the agreement is the creation of a review mechanism for the commitments of the various countries. It has already be decided that it will take place every five years and that there will be a “progression” on each occasion compared to the previous commitments. But when should it start?

The date of 2020/2021 has been proposed for new commitments. Two milestone reviews could also take place in 2018/2019, then in 2023/2024.

– Developed and developing countries: who does what? – The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a strict division between developed and developing countries in the sharing of obligations.

The industrialized countries, especially the United States, would like to increase the flexibility of this division, but countries like India refuse to abolish it, in the name of their right to development and the historic responsibility of the countries of the North for climate change.

This particularly sensitive point arises throughout the draft agreement, particularly concerning the sharing of emission reduction efforts. The choice remains open: either only developed countries take absolute emissions reduction steps, or all countries then join them in that later on.

– Financial support for developing countries: in 2009, the rich countries promised to spend $100 billion per year by 2020 in order to fund the climate policies of developing countries.

The latter want that budget to be increased after 2020, to finance their clean energy sources as well as measures of adaptation to the effects of global warming (embankments, weather warnings, resistant crops, etc.), emphasizing the importance of more predictable “public funds”. A balance seems to have been found between these two areas of spending.

But industrialized countries do not wish to be the only ones paying, and want a contribution from countries like China, South Korea, Singapore and the rich oil-producing countries, for example.

One option proposes that “All Parties” should contribute, but “with developed country Parties taking the lead”. Another option only requires efforts from developed countries.

Source: http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/accorddeparis-les-points-toujours-en-suspens/

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EU and UK soon to be in a post-Brexit rush over free trade agreement with Australia

It is now the era to evolve mutually as the bacteria do

Trade barriers: EU removes record number in response to surge in protectionism

From coca to cocoa: three lessons from Peru on how farmers can leave the drug trade behind

How to end overfishing in the global South

Samsung’s profits fall as cheaper smartphones gain market share

Libya: Security Council demands commitment to ‘a lasting ceasefire’

UN chief welcomes agreement by rival leaders in South Sudan, as a step towards ‘inclusive and implementable’ peace

A comprehensive strategy for Eurozone’s long term growth gains momentum

Iraq: Over 150,000 children endangered by ‘freezing’ temperatures, warns UNICEF

From social entrepreneurship to systems entrepreneurship: how to create lasting change

MEPs call on EU countries to end precarious employment practices

Is the EU’s enlargement over-stretched?

Here’s why infrastructure will make or break our response to climate change

Yemen: Major UN aid boost for ‘up to 14 million’ as country risks becoming a land of ‘living ghosts’

Customs Union: Fake and potentially dangerous goods worth nearly €740 million stopped at EU customs in 2018

Berlin vies for a Germanic European Central Bank

How India’s government can build better contracts with blockchain

Coronavirus: How worried should we be?

UN chief praises Malaysia’s death penalty repeal as ‘major step forward’

EU adopts retaliative measures in response to US steel and aluminum tariffs

Digital development: technology-enabled, but human-centric

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Unprecedented Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction to Combat Climate Change

Public Health equality in a trench

Trade: EU-Singapore agreement to enter into force on 21 November 2019

How climate change sparks innovation for fragile communities

Berlin ‘orders’ the EU Parliament to compromise

Rising insecurity in Central Africa Republic threatens wider region, Security Council told

Zeid calls for ICC probe into Myanmar Rohingya crisis

We must learn and change after Haiti sexual abuse scandal -Oxfam chief

Is the West gradually losing Africa?

UN experts urge United Arab Emirates to release terminally ill woman to live her last days ‘in dignity’

MWC 2016 LIVE: 5G to embrace unlicensed bands and Wi-Fi

Algorithmic warfare is coming. Humans must retain control

Malta: investigation risks being compromised while Prime Minister is in office

Lagarde: Keep feeding the banks cut down wages and food subsidies

At this ‘critical moment’, UN chief urges anti-corruption conference to adopt united front

Escalation in Syria fighting cause for ‘great concern’ says UN chief, dozens more civilians dead or injured

What the Women’s World Cup can teach us about capitalism

Commission presents far-reaching anti-tax evasion measures

Gynecologic care in the 21st century

Ahead of State of the Union the European Youth Forum highlights lack of action on youth employment

Light at the end of the Eurozone tunnel

Coronavirus: Commission issues guidance to ensure essential freight keeps moving by air

Brexit: Ensuring a smooth transition for car producers and safety on the roads

Ten UN peacekeepers killed in a terrorist attack in northern Mali

Copyright: European Union , 2017; Source: EC - Audiovisual Service; Photo: Frank Molter

EU hits deadlock on the future of glyphosate a month before deadline

G20 LIVE: “ISIL is the face of evil; our goal is to degrade and ultimately destroy this barbaric terrorist organisation”, US President Barack Obama cries out from Antalya Turkey

The European Commission, European Investment Bank and Breakthrough Energy Ventures establish a new €100 million fund to support clean energy investments

Cutting CO2 emissions from trucks: MEPs reach deal with Council

“Beyond the beach: tackling plastic pollution upstream”, a Sting Exclusive by Erik Solheim, Head of UN Environment

Water pollution is killing millions of Indians. Here’s how technology and reliable data can change that

2016 crisis update: the year of the Red Fire Monkey burns the world’s markets down

This Netherlands football stadium creates its own energy and stores it in electric car batteries

Sochi not far away from Ukraine

State aid: Commission approves support for six offshore wind farms in France

These 5 countries plan to slash their CO2 emissions. But how will they do it?

WhatsApp to face scrutiny from EU regulators task force over data sharing with Facebook

How to stop plastic pollution at source

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s