COP21 Breaking News_10 December:#ParisAgreement: Points that remain in suspense

COP21 Paris AgreementObjectives and level of ambition of the agreement, financial support for countries of the South, and burden sharing between developed and developing countries are all difficult issues that remain to be decided on by Friday, the end of the Climate Conference, which should produce a universal pact to combat climate change.

– An “ambitious” agreement? 2°C or 1.5°C?

At the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the States Parties decided to limit the temperature rise to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial era, which requires drastically limiting greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency measures, investing in renewable energy sources, and reforestation, amongst other things.

Many countries, including island States that are threatened by rising sea levels, consider themselves in danger beyond 1.5°C, but such an objective would require considerable efforts by the major emitters, such as China and India, who are against such a threshold.

In the text proposed on Wednesday, all options remain open, including only 2°C, only 1.5°C, or, very probably, a compromise wording reaffirming the 2°C goal, combined with “increased efforts” to achieve 1.5°C.

HOW?

Out of 195 countries, 185 have announced measures to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. But even if these commitments are fulfilled, temperatures would still be set to rise by around 3°C.

The text is split between precise, ambitious objectives – reducing emissions by 40% to 70% (scenario to achieve 2°C) or by 70% top 95% (scenario for 1.5°C) by 2050 compared to 2010, or the achievement of zero emissions” by the middle of the century – and vague wording, only committing the Parties to act “over the course of this century”.

CARBON OR NO CARBON?

Should the text also include the idea that we will eventually have to do without fossil fuels? This is a prospect that is opposed by oil- and coal- producing countries. One of the formulations proposed is “climate neutrality”, the vagueness of which infuriates NGOs.

REVIEW OF COMMITMENTS

One of the key provisions of the agreement is the creation of a review mechanism for the commitments of the various countries. It has already be decided that it will take place every five years and that there will be a “progression” on each occasion compared to the previous commitments. But when should it start?

The date of 2020/2021 has been proposed for new commitments. Two milestone reviews could also take place in 2018/2019, then in 2023/2024.

– Developed and developing countries: who does what? – The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a strict division between developed and developing countries in the sharing of obligations.

The industrialized countries, especially the United States, would like to increase the flexibility of this division, but countries like India refuse to abolish it, in the name of their right to development and the historic responsibility of the countries of the North for climate change.

This particularly sensitive point arises throughout the draft agreement, particularly concerning the sharing of emission reduction efforts. The choice remains open: either only developed countries take absolute emissions reduction steps, or all countries then join them in that later on.

– Financial support for developing countries: in 2009, the rich countries promised to spend $100 billion per year by 2020 in order to fund the climate policies of developing countries.

The latter want that budget to be increased after 2020, to finance their clean energy sources as well as measures of adaptation to the effects of global warming (embankments, weather warnings, resistant crops, etc.), emphasizing the importance of more predictable “public funds”. A balance seems to have been found between these two areas of spending.

But industrialized countries do not wish to be the only ones paying, and want a contribution from countries like China, South Korea, Singapore and the rich oil-producing countries, for example.

One option proposes that “All Parties” should contribute, but “with developed country Parties taking the lead”. Another option only requires efforts from developed countries.

Source: http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/accorddeparis-les-points-toujours-en-suspens/

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Where is heading Putin’s Russia?

Let your fingers do the walking

While EU Open Days 2013 discuss the 2020 strategy, Microsoft shares a glimpse of EU 2060

Post-Brexit muddled times: the resignation of UK’s top ambassador and Theresa May’s vague plans

GradList Launched At TheNextWeb 2014

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Argentina Accepts KP Amendment

Europe turns out more jobs this summer

China’s 13th Five Year Plan and the opportunities for Europe

LEAGUE OF YOUNG VOTERS LAUNCHES TOOL FOR YOUNG PEOPLE TO COMPARE POLITICAL PARTIES AHEAD OF EU ELECTIONS

European Youth Capital 2018 : Cascais

EU Council: Private web data to be protected by…abusers

Unemployment and stagnation can tear Eurozone apart if austere policies persist

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

European Youth Forum demands immediate action & binding agreement on climate change

EU Council agrees to reform the system for motor vehicles but with “restricted” power for the Commission

Gloomy new statistics signify no end to Eurozone’s economic misery

Greece bailout programme: Full agreement after marathon negotiations on debt relief between IMF and Eurozone

SCADA Security Conference 2017 in Prague, Czech Republic

Huawei answers allegations about its selling prices

Is the advent of nationalism to destroy economic neo-liberalism?

Greece: Tsipras’ referendum victory does not solve the financial stalemate of the country and its banks

An expert in the South China Sea issue on an exclusive interview at the European Sting

Brexit Update: EU endorses unprecedented compromise to help Cameron out of the referendum mess he got himself into

Google strongly rejects EU antitrust charges and now gets ready for the worst to come

European Union: More taxes out of less income

ECB’s trillion has to be printed and distributed fast before Armageddon comes

Eurozone: Statistics don’t tell the whole story

Why capital markets have no more reservetions about Eurozone

MWC 2016 LIVE: Orange targets VoLTE and Voice over Wi-Fi; strikes Google partnership

“We are in Europe, but not of it”, from Churchill to Cameron: British Exceptionalism now threatens the entire EU Edifice

Draghi’s top new year resolution: Quantitative Easing

G20 LIVE: “ISIL is the face of evil; our goal is to degrade and ultimately destroy this barbaric terrorist organisation”, US President Barack Obama cries out from Antalya Turkey

How wealthy people transmit this advantage to their children and grand children

Entrepreneurial leadership: what does it take to become a leader?

Trump asked Merkel to pay NATO arrears and cut down exports ignoring the EU

Tackling Youth Unemployment

Impacting society with digital ingenuity – World Summit Award proclaiming the top 8 worldwide

Brexiteer May gets lip-service from Trump and Turkish promises from Erdogan

MWC 2016 LIVE: Ingenu steps up efforts to build LPWA networks across the globe

Economic recovery won’t tackle youth unemployment problem

On Grexit: Incompetence just launched the historic Ultimatum that could open “pandora’s box”

EU takes again positive action on migration crisis while Turkey asks for dear favors in exchange for cooperation

EU Trust Fund for Africa: Can it be beneficial for Italy and tackle the migration crisis in the Mediterranean?

Refugee crisis update: EU fails to relocate immigrants from Greece and Italy

May a parody constitute a copyright infringement? European Court of Justice to give the answer

Germany loves a strong euro; the new Fiscal Councils can deliver despite the Greek chaos and a wider questioning of austerity

The EU checks the multinationals for tax fraud but Britain may sail out of the EU via Panama

The ECB tells Berlin that a Germanic Eurozone is unacceptable and doesn’t work

Alexis Tsipras ready to test Eurozone’s political sturdiness; Up to what point?

EU’s tougher privacy rules: WhatsApp and Facebook set to be soon aligned with telcos

Last-chance Commission: Why Juncker promised investments of €300 billion?

MWC 2016 LIVE: Under Armour learns from “robust community of data”

Alexandre in Czech Republic

“Two Pack” approved: Is democracy chased away from Brussels?

MWC 2016 LIVE: BT chief aims to be at UK 5G forefront

EU seeks foreign support on 5G from Mobile World Congress 2015 as the “digital gold rush” begins

Latest leaked TTIP document confirms EU sovereignty may be under threat

VW diesel scandal and climate change: can increased independent car checks lead to cleaner mobility?

South Eurozone countries threatened by rising borrowing cost and expensive euro

Has the EU economy truly revived from the financial crisis?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s