COP21 Breaking News_10 December:#ParisAgreement: Points that remain in suspense

COP21 Paris AgreementObjectives and level of ambition of the agreement, financial support for countries of the South, and burden sharing between developed and developing countries are all difficult issues that remain to be decided on by Friday, the end of the Climate Conference, which should produce a universal pact to combat climate change.

– An “ambitious” agreement? 2°C or 1.5°C?

At the 2009 Copenhagen Conference, the States Parties decided to limit the temperature rise to 2°C compared to the pre-industrial era, which requires drastically limiting greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency measures, investing in renewable energy sources, and reforestation, amongst other things.

Many countries, including island States that are threatened by rising sea levels, consider themselves in danger beyond 1.5°C, but such an objective would require considerable efforts by the major emitters, such as China and India, who are against such a threshold.

In the text proposed on Wednesday, all options remain open, including only 2°C, only 1.5°C, or, very probably, a compromise wording reaffirming the 2°C goal, combined with “increased efforts” to achieve 1.5°C.

HOW?

Out of 195 countries, 185 have announced measures to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. But even if these commitments are fulfilled, temperatures would still be set to rise by around 3°C.

The text is split between precise, ambitious objectives – reducing emissions by 40% to 70% (scenario to achieve 2°C) or by 70% top 95% (scenario for 1.5°C) by 2050 compared to 2010, or the achievement of zero emissions” by the middle of the century – and vague wording, only committing the Parties to act “over the course of this century”.

CARBON OR NO CARBON?

Should the text also include the idea that we will eventually have to do without fossil fuels? This is a prospect that is opposed by oil- and coal- producing countries. One of the formulations proposed is “climate neutrality”, the vagueness of which infuriates NGOs.

REVIEW OF COMMITMENTS

One of the key provisions of the agreement is the creation of a review mechanism for the commitments of the various countries. It has already be decided that it will take place every five years and that there will be a “progression” on each occasion compared to the previous commitments. But when should it start?

The date of 2020/2021 has been proposed for new commitments. Two milestone reviews could also take place in 2018/2019, then in 2023/2024.

– Developed and developing countries: who does what? – The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established a strict division between developed and developing countries in the sharing of obligations.

The industrialized countries, especially the United States, would like to increase the flexibility of this division, but countries like India refuse to abolish it, in the name of their right to development and the historic responsibility of the countries of the North for climate change.

This particularly sensitive point arises throughout the draft agreement, particularly concerning the sharing of emission reduction efforts. The choice remains open: either only developed countries take absolute emissions reduction steps, or all countries then join them in that later on.

– Financial support for developing countries: in 2009, the rich countries promised to spend $100 billion per year by 2020 in order to fund the climate policies of developing countries.

The latter want that budget to be increased after 2020, to finance their clean energy sources as well as measures of adaptation to the effects of global warming (embankments, weather warnings, resistant crops, etc.), emphasizing the importance of more predictable “public funds”. A balance seems to have been found between these two areas of spending.

But industrialized countries do not wish to be the only ones paying, and want a contribution from countries like China, South Korea, Singapore and the rich oil-producing countries, for example.

One option proposes that “All Parties” should contribute, but “with developed country Parties taking the lead”. Another option only requires efforts from developed countries.

Source: http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/accorddeparis-les-points-toujours-en-suspens/

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Draghi drafts a plan to donate more money to bankers, the era of ‘money for nothin’ is flourishing

Germany may have a stable and more cooperative government

Human rights champions from across the world receive top UN prize

Statement by Frans Timmermans, Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal, on the announcement to postpone the COP26

WHO study reveals ‘game-changer’ drug with potential to save thousands of women’s lives in childbirth

High-tech or ‘high-touch’: UK survey gives clues to the jobs of the future

UN chief condemns attack targeting international forces in northern Mali

A 3-step plan for carbon-neutral cars

This is why coral reefs are so vital for the planet

UN gender agency hails record-breaking number of women in new US Congress as ‘historic victory’

Solutions for cultural understanding: medical students’ perspective

Ebola cases rising in DR Congo, but UN health agency cites progress in community trust-building

UN envoy commends successful conclusion of Guinea-Bissau presidential election

The European Brain Drain: a truth or a myth?

Miguel Arias Cañete European Commission

EU should invest more in climate and not sit back on its laurels and watch

Strengthening the rule of law through increased awareness, an annual monitoring cycle and more effective enforcement

Here’s how community lending could help refugees find their feet

UN agencies launch emergency plan for millions of Venezuelan refugees and migrants

EU trade agreements: delivering new opportunities in time of global economic uncertainties

How India’s new consumers can contribute to a $6 trillion opportunity

The financial world upside-down: debt failure closer

Commission Vice-President Rehn exaggerates Eurozone’s growth prospects

Greece to stay in the euro area but the cost to its people remains elusive

EU to increase spending and improve delivery of education in emergencies and protracted crises

3 ways digitalization will help end crime

Fed and ECB prepare a new party for the financial sharks

“Will TTIP solve the massive EU-US unemployment? Absolutely not!” A revealing Sting Exclusive with Tim Bennett from the Transatlantic Business Council

Catalonia secessionist leader takes Flemish ‘cover’; Spain risks more jingoist violence

An EU first: youth Ministers debate youth participation in live broadcast

Germany objects to EU Commission’s plan for a Eurozone bank deposits insurance scheme but Berlin could go along

Commissioner sings “Volar-e” but the European driver no “Cantar-e”

These charts show where the world’s refugees came from in 2017 – and where they’re heading

Why EU’s working and unemployed millions remain uncertain or even desperate about their future

Evidence shows ‘brutal’ killing of Saudi journalist ‘planned and perpetrated’ by State officials: UN independent expert

Why do medical students need to emigrate to become doctors in 2017?

The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

This is how Middle Eastern retailers can keep up with e-commerce

Landmine casualties high for third consecutive year despite record funding, latest monitor reports

Central America: drought, resulting crop losses threaten food security of two million people, UN warns

Skeptic France about Trump-Juncker trade deal favoring German cars; EU’s unity in peril

Governments adopt UN global migration pact to help ‘prevent suffering and chaos’

It takes far too long for a rare disease to be diagnosed. Here’s how that can change

External action: more funds for human rights, development and climate change

EU Telecoms deal: Fees on calls across the EU capped and 5G network by 2020

Threat from petty criminals who turn to terrorism, a growing concern, Security Council hears

Syria: UN-backed watchdog says chemical weapon ‘likely used’ in February attack

Taxation: Commission refers Spain to the Court for imposing disproportionate sanctions for failure to report assets held abroad

The West – the EU and the US – is writing off Turkey’s Erdogan

EU fundamental rights under threat in several member states

Trade defence report: restoring the level playing field for European producers

Coronavirus: Commission presents practical guidance on implementing the temporary restriction on non-essential travel to the EU

Continuing incarceration of women’s rights activists in Saudi Arabia, ‘reprehensible’: UN experts

Understanding the gender gap in the Global South

Bringing nuclear test ban treaty into force a ‘central pillar’ of global disarmament push, says UN chief

Endocrine disruptors: A strategy for the future that protects EU citizens and the environment

Why it’s time to celebrate migrants

European Semester 2019 Spring Package: Commission issues recommendations for Member States to advance sustainable and inclusive economic growth

How to get ageing populations to invest in their health

FROM THE FIELD: ‘Race is on’ to halt biodiversity loss in Indonesia

The financial war touches Frankfurt and Berlin

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s