The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

European Parliament. Joint meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) and the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE). Exchange of views between the TAXE Committee President Alain Lamassoure (on the left) with Commission President Jean- Claude Juncker and Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Pierre Moscovici (on the right). (European Parliament Audiovisual Services. Event Date: 17/09/2015. Copyright: © European Union 2015).

European Parliament. Joint meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) and the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE). Exchange of views between the TAXE Committee President Alain Lamassoure (on the left) with Commission President Jean- Claude Juncker and Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Pierre Moscovici (on the right). (European Parliament Audiovisual Services. Event Date: 17/09/2015. Copyright: © European Union 2015).

The European Parliament once more honored its role as the authentic exponent of the will of the European citizens. Last Tuesday it dismissed as a “missed opportunity” the EU Council’s decision to water down the mandatory exchange of the ‘tax rulings’ between member states. A ‘tax ruling’ is a special taxation arrangement accorded to a company or an individual by the tax authorities of a country. It’s accorded mainly to foreign taxpayers providing an actual tax haven bargain and an assurance about how certain aspects of taxation will be applied in each specific case.

The ‘tax rulings’ made headlines in November 2014 when the world learned that the authorities of Luxembourg had accorded special tax ‘treatment’ to hundreds of wealthy individuals and multinationals in order to park their money in the Grand Duchy. It also became known that more EU and other European countries offer similar ‘services’ facilitating wealthy individuals and companies to evade taxation.

It all started in Luxembourg

After the Luxembourg scandal broke out, Jean- Claude Juncker, the then newly elected President of the EU Commission felt obliged to do something in order to appease the anger of the public opinion. He himself must have been behind these Luxembourgish tax agreements. He had served a Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of the Grand Duchy for many years.

All that said, the Commission, under his instructions, prepared a proposal to make it mandatory for EU member states to exchange information on their tax rulings. However, this proposal was met with disappointment by the European Parliament for its ineffectiveness. Even worse, the powerful ECOFIN council, regrouping the 28 EU ministers of Finance, further watered it down obliging Markus Ferber (EPP, DE), the Parliament’s rapporteur, to voice his dismay at the “directive’s limited scope and late entry into force”. His report was approved by the Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee last Tuesday by 49 votes in favor, 0 against and 6 abstentions. Tax experts say that the more transparent and communicated those tax dealings are, the less will be used for tax evasion. Let’s see that in detail.

The member states are reluctant

When the draft text of the new directive on the ‘tax rulings’, as it was formulated by the 28 member states at the ECOFIN council became known, the European Sting commented that, “The EU (is about) to fight cross-border tax evasion with a toothless directive”. On 8 October the Sting’s first story concluded that the “text of this new EU directive aimed at improving transparency in assurances given to companies about how their taxes are calculated cannot cover the many possibilities the modern aggressive or active ‘tax planning’ offers”.

What the Parliament wants

In any case, the European Parliament has proposed very concrete amendments to the text that the ECOFIN council ministers agreed. The MEPs want the following changes:

*the directive should apply to all tax rulings, not just the cross border ones “given that purely national transactions can also have cross-border effects. The Council made the directive’s scope cross-border only”.

* The Parliament insists that the European Commission should be able to use the information exchanged between member states on the tax rulings for purposes other than just overseeing that the member states conform to the directive.

* The Parliament wants the automatic exchange of information to start as soon as possible, whereas the Commission proposes that it should start on 1 January 2016 and the Council agreed on 1 January 2017.

*The Commission says that the mandatory exchange mechanism should apply to tax rulings issued in the ten years before it enters into force, whereas MEPs say it should apply to all rulings that are still valid on the day the directive enters into force. From its side, the Council insists that the directive should apply only to rulings, amendments or renewals of rulings after 31 December 2016.

* The MEPs insist that the information should be communicated “promptly after the ruling is issued” rather than “within one month following the end of the quarter during which the ruling was issued” as the Commission proposes. The Council deal says that the information should be provided “within three months following the end of the half of the calendar year during which the ruling was issued”. This means that if a ruling is issued in January, the mandatory exchange of information can take place until 30 September.

Different visions

Obviously, there are key differences in the three texts. Initially, there was the one drafted by the Commission. Then the ECOFIN council agreed upon a drastically modified one, while the Parliament wants to change them both. It goes without saying that the parliamentarians are the strictest of them all concerning the effectiveness of the directive against tax evasion. What is at stake here relates to the ability of the member states to accord special tax treatments to wealthy individuals and probably help some companies to evade taxation.

Understandably those ‘rulings’ realized in one EU member state may damage the tax collection ability also of another country. The question is why so far the 28 governments tolerated such an abominable arrangement? And the equally obvious answer is that every country wants to safeguard its right to use tax allowances in order to attract money and investments. Unfortunately, those dealings have very rarely led to investments in the real economy and the creation of jobs. In most cases they have just facilitated the ‘parking services’ for capital a country chooses to offer.

Now the Parliament and the Council have to begin consultations in order to achieve a compromise on the final text. The directive is expected to be adopted at a forthcoming Council meeting but the European Parliament has to officially give its opinion first.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

The EU Commission predicts a decimated growth in the next years

Deutsche Bank: the next financial crisis is here and the lenders need €150 billion from taxpayers

Catalonia’s vote for independence and the power of symbols

G20 LIVE: World Leaders in Turkey for G20 Summit. Global Economy will be discussed in Antalya

Brexit: when the hubris of one man can set the UK, the EU and the entire world on fire

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

daniela-runchi-jade-president__

A Sting Exclusive: “Education in Europe, fostering skills development inside and outside the school system”

EU to lead one more fight against climate change at G7 summit

China invites the EU to a joint endeavor for free trade and order in the world

Landmark EU Parliament – ECB agreement on bank supervision

EU Council: The US airlines may freely pollute the European air

Hostages to a rampant banking system

Eurozone in trouble after Nicosia’s ‘no’

Fighting for minds of youth in Latvia

The Monetary Union drives Europe into dangerous paths, CoR demands an EMU of regional content

COP21 Breaking News_04 December: Launch of CREWS, climate risk & early warning systems

One more country to test the EU project: Kaczynski’s Poland

MWC 2016 LIVE: Intel focuses on 5G “beyond the Powerpoint”

Greece @ MWC14: Greek-born mobile champions at MWC 2014

Do the EU policies on agro-food smell?

EU Commission: Once in every 20 beef meals you eat…horse probably with drugs in it

G20 World Exclusive Interview: “The world, especially emerging economies and developing countries, require a more sustainable and quality development”, the Spokesperson of Japan underscores live from Antalya Turkey

EU’s social crisis and unemployment to deteriorate

Did Draghi ask the Germans to accept a drastic change of austerity policies?

The Eurogroup protects Germany and blames others

The British “nonsense”, the relaxed Commissioner and the TTIP “chiaroscuro” at this week’s Council

On Google antitrust case: “Let’s face it, some companies want to hurt Google and it goes as simple as that”

Appreciation of euro to continue

Teamgum @ TheNextWeb 2014

No end to Deutsche Bank’s problems: new litigations in the US and frailty in EU stress test

Commission Vice-President Rehn exaggerates Eurozone’s growth prospects

A Sting Exclusive: “Doing ourselves a favour”, Vice President Dombrovskis underscores that this time growth has to come from within the EU

Volkswagen getting away with it in Europe

EU: Divided they stand on immigration and Trump hurricanes

Is the European Banking Union an impossible task?

The ECB proposes a swift solution for SMEs’ financing

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “Chinese economy has great potential, resilience and ample space for policy adjustment”, China’s Vice President Li Yuanchao reassures from Davos

Marco Polo’s Dream

No agreement in sight on EU budget

ECB readies itself for extraordinary monetary measures defying Germany

A Sting Exclusive: “One year on from the VW scandal and EU consumers are still in the dark”, BEUC’s Head highlights from Brussels

Do you dare to go to China?

The West definitively cuts Russia off from the developed world

What happens when the Eurogroup decides to help Greece


Re-thinking citizenship education: bringing young people back to the ballot box

At last a good price for the Greek debt!

Who is responsible for public health? The tendencies and its benefits –or not– on Health Education around the world

Community Manager – 1289

MWC 2016 LIVE: BT chief aims to be at UK 5G forefront

Can We(esterners) ever understand (the) Chinese

Has Germany rebuffed ECB on the banking union?

Parliament votes reform for better European Co2 market but critics want it sooner than later

Royal Navy to unveil future surveillance and reconnaissance requirements next February in Rome

€5 billion of EU energy efficiency project money spent on “comfort”

An ECB banker wants to change the European social model

Tax evasion and fraud threaten the European project

Five years down the drain

ECB: Growth measures even before the German elections

Unemployment and immigrants haunt the EU; who can offer relief?

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “CO2 is not the problem, it is the symptom”, the pilots who crossed the world using solar energy cry out from Davos

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s