The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

European Parliament. Joint meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) and the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE). Exchange of views between the TAXE Committee President Alain Lamassoure (on the left) with Commission President Jean- Claude Juncker and Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Pierre Moscovici (on the right). (European Parliament Audiovisual Services. Event Date: 17/09/2015. Copyright: © European Union 2015).

European Parliament. Joint meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) and the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE). Exchange of views between the TAXE Committee President Alain Lamassoure (on the left) with Commission President Jean- Claude Juncker and Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Pierre Moscovici (on the right). (European Parliament Audiovisual Services. Event Date: 17/09/2015. Copyright: © European Union 2015).

The European Parliament once more honored its role as the authentic exponent of the will of the European citizens. Last Tuesday it dismissed as a “missed opportunity” the EU Council’s decision to water down the mandatory exchange of the ‘tax rulings’ between member states. A ‘tax ruling’ is a special taxation arrangement accorded to a company or an individual by the tax authorities of a country. It’s accorded mainly to foreign taxpayers providing an actual tax haven bargain and an assurance about how certain aspects of taxation will be applied in each specific case.

The ‘tax rulings’ made headlines in November 2014 when the world learned that the authorities of Luxembourg had accorded special tax ‘treatment’ to hundreds of wealthy individuals and multinationals in order to park their money in the Grand Duchy. It also became known that more EU and other European countries offer similar ‘services’ facilitating wealthy individuals and companies to evade taxation.

It all started in Luxembourg

After the Luxembourg scandal broke out, Jean- Claude Juncker, the then newly elected President of the EU Commission felt obliged to do something in order to appease the anger of the public opinion. He himself must have been behind these Luxembourgish tax agreements. He had served a Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of the Grand Duchy for many years.

All that said, the Commission, under his instructions, prepared a proposal to make it mandatory for EU member states to exchange information on their tax rulings. However, this proposal was met with disappointment by the European Parliament for its ineffectiveness. Even worse, the powerful ECOFIN council, regrouping the 28 EU ministers of Finance, further watered it down obliging Markus Ferber (EPP, DE), the Parliament’s rapporteur, to voice his dismay at the “directive’s limited scope and late entry into force”. His report was approved by the Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee last Tuesday by 49 votes in favor, 0 against and 6 abstentions. Tax experts say that the more transparent and communicated those tax dealings are, the less will be used for tax evasion. Let’s see that in detail.

The member states are reluctant

When the draft text of the new directive on the ‘tax rulings’, as it was formulated by the 28 member states at the ECOFIN council became known, the European Sting commented that, “The EU (is about) to fight cross-border tax evasion with a toothless directive”. On 8 October the Sting’s first story concluded that the “text of this new EU directive aimed at improving transparency in assurances given to companies about how their taxes are calculated cannot cover the many possibilities the modern aggressive or active ‘tax planning’ offers”.

What the Parliament wants

In any case, the European Parliament has proposed very concrete amendments to the text that the ECOFIN council ministers agreed. The MEPs want the following changes:

*the directive should apply to all tax rulings, not just the cross border ones “given that purely national transactions can also have cross-border effects. The Council made the directive’s scope cross-border only”.

* The Parliament insists that the European Commission should be able to use the information exchanged between member states on the tax rulings for purposes other than just overseeing that the member states conform to the directive.

* The Parliament wants the automatic exchange of information to start as soon as possible, whereas the Commission proposes that it should start on 1 January 2016 and the Council agreed on 1 January 2017.

*The Commission says that the mandatory exchange mechanism should apply to tax rulings issued in the ten years before it enters into force, whereas MEPs say it should apply to all rulings that are still valid on the day the directive enters into force. From its side, the Council insists that the directive should apply only to rulings, amendments or renewals of rulings after 31 December 2016.

* The MEPs insist that the information should be communicated “promptly after the ruling is issued” rather than “within one month following the end of the quarter during which the ruling was issued” as the Commission proposes. The Council deal says that the information should be provided “within three months following the end of the half of the calendar year during which the ruling was issued”. This means that if a ruling is issued in January, the mandatory exchange of information can take place until 30 September.

Different visions

Obviously, there are key differences in the three texts. Initially, there was the one drafted by the Commission. Then the ECOFIN council agreed upon a drastically modified one, while the Parliament wants to change them both. It goes without saying that the parliamentarians are the strictest of them all concerning the effectiveness of the directive against tax evasion. What is at stake here relates to the ability of the member states to accord special tax treatments to wealthy individuals and probably help some companies to evade taxation.

Understandably those ‘rulings’ realized in one EU member state may damage the tax collection ability also of another country. The question is why so far the 28 governments tolerated such an abominable arrangement? And the equally obvious answer is that every country wants to safeguard its right to use tax allowances in order to attract money and investments. Unfortunately, those dealings have very rarely led to investments in the real economy and the creation of jobs. In most cases they have just facilitated the ‘parking services’ for capital a country chooses to offer.

Now the Parliament and the Council have to begin consultations in order to achieve a compromise on the final text. The directive is expected to be adopted at a forthcoming Council meeting but the European Parliament has to officially give its opinion first.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Will Brexit shatter the EU or is it still too early to predict?

Antitrust: Commission imposes interim measures on Broadcom in TV and modem chipset markets

Tributes for ‘role model’ former UN refugee agency chief, Sadako Ogata

This Japanese concept will help you see the world – and learn – in a different way

UN experts urge United Arab Emirates to release terminally ill woman to live her last days ‘in dignity’

Medical Doctors in Industry 4.0: pure science fiction

AIESEC @ European Business Summit 2015: The power of an individual and how we can awaken Europe’s Youth

Why global collaboration is needed to protect against a new generation of cyber threats

4 ways 3D printing can revolutionize manufacturing

Armed insurgency in north-east Nigeria ‘has created a humanitarian tragedy’

Brexit update: Will the EU grant extention to Britain preventing economic chaos?

France asks help from Germany but it will not be for free

Humanitarian Aid: EU announces €18.5 million additional package for Latin America and the Caribbean

UN launches ‘South-South Galaxy’ knowledge-sharing platform in Buenos Aires

European Young Innovators Forum @ European Business Summit 2014: Europe for StartUps, vision 2020

UN commemorates International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People

‘Multiplicity’ of rights violations in Ukraine as fifth winter of conflict bites

Somalia: UN mission head condemns deadly terrorist attacks in Mogadishu, Galkayo

The issues of practicing medicine in Pakistan

How health privatization increases health inequities

UN spotlights digitization of audiovisual archives to preserve human history on World Day

Eurozone business activity again on upwards path

The future of suicide and depression prevention

Global public-private collaboration tackles cybersecurity skills gap

For how long and at what cost can the ECB continue printing trillions to keep euro area going?

Security Council urged to help spare Syrians from ‘devastation’

FROM THE FIELD: Urban Mexico moves toward better livelihoods, cleaner cities

Jo Cox’s murderer believed the ‘leave’ campaign leaders that the ‘remain’ vote is treason

FROM THE FIELD: Argentina Preserving Pristine Forests

Is poor generational intelligence holding you back at work?

Parliament makes it easier to organise a European Citizens’ Initiative

There isn’t a single country on track to make the UN’s targets for gender equality

MWC 2016 LIVE: Under Armour learns from “robust community of data”

Amidst high trade tensions and policy uncertainty, UN cuts economic growth forecast

The movement of anti-vaccers: taking humanity back 200 years

EU free-trade agreements with Canada and US: imagine the fallout if put to national referendums

A conceptual approach to Violence Against Healthcare in Turkey from SDG’s

What do toilets have to do with climate change?

Chart of the day: This is what violence does to a nation’s GDP

EU and Overseas Countries and Territories boost cooperation at annual Forum with €44 million

Imported and EU fisheries products should be treated equally

ITU Telecom World 2016: it’s all about working together

Social entrepreneurs can change the world – but these 6 things are holding us back

Soil pollution ‘jeopardizing’ life on Earth, UN agency warns on World Day

This start-up made doing good a business priority – and flourished

FROM THE FIELD: Stopping aquatic hitchhikers to safeguard environments at sea

Welcome to the age of the platform nation

Campaign kicks off with High-level Event on #FairInternships

Venezuela: Competing US, Russia resolutions fail to pass in Security Council

Member States agree to Commission proposal to support Irish beef producers impacted by market uncertainty

European Union: Retail sales show deep recession

Deep chasm still divides Athens and Brussels; can Eurozone use the nuclear arm of liquidity against Greece?

Let the Italians have it their way, it may be good for all Eurozone

Global aid appeal targets more than 93 million most in need next year

Asia-Pacific ‘regional parliament’ underway to advance equality, empowerment, for more than four billion citizens

DPRK reports ‘little progress’ since historic June 2018 summit with US

European Parliament marks EU accession prospects for Serbia and Kosovo

Ship Recycling is the Commission’s Titanic

UN ‘stands in solidarity’ with cyclone-hit India – Secretary-General Guterres

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s