The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

European Parliament. Joint meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) and the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE). Exchange of views between the TAXE Committee President Alain Lamassoure (on the left) with Commission President Jean- Claude Juncker and Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Pierre Moscovici (on the right). (European Parliament Audiovisual Services. Event Date: 17/09/2015. Copyright: © European Union 2015).

European Parliament. Joint meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) and the Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE). Exchange of views between the TAXE Committee President Alain Lamassoure (on the left) with Commission President Jean- Claude Juncker and Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs Pierre Moscovici (on the right). (European Parliament Audiovisual Services. Event Date: 17/09/2015. Copyright: © European Union 2015).

The European Parliament once more honored its role as the authentic exponent of the will of the European citizens. Last Tuesday it dismissed as a “missed opportunity” the EU Council’s decision to water down the mandatory exchange of the ‘tax rulings’ between member states. A ‘tax ruling’ is a special taxation arrangement accorded to a company or an individual by the tax authorities of a country. It’s accorded mainly to foreign taxpayers providing an actual tax haven bargain and an assurance about how certain aspects of taxation will be applied in each specific case.

The ‘tax rulings’ made headlines in November 2014 when the world learned that the authorities of Luxembourg had accorded special tax ‘treatment’ to hundreds of wealthy individuals and multinationals in order to park their money in the Grand Duchy. It also became known that more EU and other European countries offer similar ‘services’ facilitating wealthy individuals and companies to evade taxation.

It all started in Luxembourg

After the Luxembourg scandal broke out, Jean- Claude Juncker, the then newly elected President of the EU Commission felt obliged to do something in order to appease the anger of the public opinion. He himself must have been behind these Luxembourgish tax agreements. He had served a Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of the Grand Duchy for many years.

All that said, the Commission, under his instructions, prepared a proposal to make it mandatory for EU member states to exchange information on their tax rulings. However, this proposal was met with disappointment by the European Parliament for its ineffectiveness. Even worse, the powerful ECOFIN council, regrouping the 28 EU ministers of Finance, further watered it down obliging Markus Ferber (EPP, DE), the Parliament’s rapporteur, to voice his dismay at the “directive’s limited scope and late entry into force”. His report was approved by the Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee last Tuesday by 49 votes in favor, 0 against and 6 abstentions. Tax experts say that the more transparent and communicated those tax dealings are, the less will be used for tax evasion. Let’s see that in detail.

The member states are reluctant

When the draft text of the new directive on the ‘tax rulings’, as it was formulated by the 28 member states at the ECOFIN council became known, the European Sting commented that, “The EU (is about) to fight cross-border tax evasion with a toothless directive”. On 8 October the Sting’s first story concluded that the “text of this new EU directive aimed at improving transparency in assurances given to companies about how their taxes are calculated cannot cover the many possibilities the modern aggressive or active ‘tax planning’ offers”.

What the Parliament wants

In any case, the European Parliament has proposed very concrete amendments to the text that the ECOFIN council ministers agreed. The MEPs want the following changes:

*the directive should apply to all tax rulings, not just the cross border ones “given that purely national transactions can also have cross-border effects. The Council made the directive’s scope cross-border only”.

* The Parliament insists that the European Commission should be able to use the information exchanged between member states on the tax rulings for purposes other than just overseeing that the member states conform to the directive.

* The Parliament wants the automatic exchange of information to start as soon as possible, whereas the Commission proposes that it should start on 1 January 2016 and the Council agreed on 1 January 2017.

*The Commission says that the mandatory exchange mechanism should apply to tax rulings issued in the ten years before it enters into force, whereas MEPs say it should apply to all rulings that are still valid on the day the directive enters into force. From its side, the Council insists that the directive should apply only to rulings, amendments or renewals of rulings after 31 December 2016.

* The MEPs insist that the information should be communicated “promptly after the ruling is issued” rather than “within one month following the end of the quarter during which the ruling was issued” as the Commission proposes. The Council deal says that the information should be provided “within three months following the end of the half of the calendar year during which the ruling was issued”. This means that if a ruling is issued in January, the mandatory exchange of information can take place until 30 September.

Different visions

Obviously, there are key differences in the three texts. Initially, there was the one drafted by the Commission. Then the ECOFIN council agreed upon a drastically modified one, while the Parliament wants to change them both. It goes without saying that the parliamentarians are the strictest of them all concerning the effectiveness of the directive against tax evasion. What is at stake here relates to the ability of the member states to accord special tax treatments to wealthy individuals and probably help some companies to evade taxation.

Understandably those ‘rulings’ realized in one EU member state may damage the tax collection ability also of another country. The question is why so far the 28 governments tolerated such an abominable arrangement? And the equally obvious answer is that every country wants to safeguard its right to use tax allowances in order to attract money and investments. Unfortunately, those dealings have very rarely led to investments in the real economy and the creation of jobs. In most cases they have just facilitated the ‘parking services’ for capital a country chooses to offer.

Now the Parliament and the Council have to begin consultations in order to achieve a compromise on the final text. The directive is expected to be adopted at a forthcoming Council meeting but the European Parliament has to officially give its opinion first.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Governments should step up their efforts to give people skills to seize opportunities in a digital world

How to build a paradise for women. A lesson from Iceland

A Sting Exclusive: Paris Climate Change Summit, a defining moment for humanity, by Ulf Björnholm Head of UNEP Brussels

European elections: A chance to repel both nationalism and no-deal Brexit

UN chief encourages victims of terrorism to ‘raise up their voices’

An analysis of the impacts of climate change on human health

EU-wide rules for safety of drones approved by European Parliament

Statement by the Brexit Steering Group on UK paper on EU citizens in the UK

How do you get people to trust self-driving vehicles? This company is giving them ‘virtual eyes’

The Europeans back Russia-Turkey on Syria: A ‘Waterloo’ for Saudis and their Crown Prince

On World Day to Combat Desertification, UN shines spotlight on ‘true value’ of land

Europe enters uncharted waters with Kiev-Moscow standoff

Are the G20 leaders ready to curb corporate tax-avoidance?

The Middle East needs a technological revolution. Start-ups can lead the way

Distributed ownership: what it means and how it could transform India

UN rights chief ‘alarmed’ by upsurge in attacks against civilians in Syria’s Idlib

ECB should offer more and cheaper liquidity if Eurozone is to avoid recession

High internet taxes are restricting access and slowing economic growth

In Bali, UN chief Guterres outlines importance of international financial cooperation for sustainable development

Why the Fourth Industrial Revolution needs more arts graduates

Global Citizen – Volunteer Internships

INTERVIEW: UN’s top official in North Korea foresees ‘surge’ in humanitarian aid

Inflation and interest rates indicate urgent need for action

Sub10 Systems @ MWC14: Bridging the Ethernet of the Future

What have the banks done to the markets making them unable to bear cheap oil?

IQ scores have been falling for decades, new study finds

“Airbnb and YouTube are two great examples of a crowd based capitalism”, key stakeholders outline the boundaries of the 4th Industrial Revolution in Davos

New EU rules ensure better protection for 120 million holidaymakers this summer

Japan’s holiest shrine is pulled down and rebuilt every 20 years – on purpose

China will be the world’s top tourist destination by 2030

Acute food insecurity ‘far too high’ UN agency warns, as 113 million go hungry

ECOFIN: Choosing between the re-unification of Eurozone and a stalemate

UN chief welcomes agreement by rival leaders in South Sudan, as a step towards ‘inclusive and implementable’ peace

Your chocolate can help save the planet. Here’s how

Here’s how to build energy infrastructures fit for the future

EU-US Privacy Shield data exchange deal: US must comply by 1 September, say MEPs

Does the sharing economy truly know how to share?

Flexible jobs can make work-life balance worse, a German study finds

ECB bets billions on Eurozone’s economic recovery

Brexit and migration dominates the debate on October’s EU summit

Galileo and EGNOS programmes back in orbit powered with €70 billion

4 myths about manufacturing in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

South Korea once recycled 2% of its food waste. Now it recycles 95%

Ηealth’s foundation is falling apart: what can we do about it?

For Youth Rights: steps forward for better protection.

Welfare of transported animals: MEPs urge EU states to do a better job

Governments and non-state actors need to take urgent action to meet Paris Agreement goals

‘Informing is not a crime’ UN chief calls for better protection of journalists, press freedom

Will the European Court of Justice change data privacy laws to tackle terrorism?

Dangers of poor quality health care revealed ‘in all countries’: WHO report

Reality Shock

A Sting Exclusive live from Brussels: Solheim’s consequential visit leading the world and the UN

Security Council extends mandate of UN Interim Force in Lebanon for a year

Fostering defence innovation through the European Defence Fund

How the Middle East is suffering on the front lines of climate change

UN refugee agency presses States to aid 49 refugees stranded on Mediterranean

Air quality: Commission takes action to protect citizens from air pollution

The 28 EU leaders don’t touch the thorny issues

UN condemns ‘heinous’ suicide attack on education centre in Afghanistan

MEPs urge EU states to ensure better care of transported animals

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s