The EU to fight cross-border tax evasion with a toothless directive

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union, Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg).

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union. Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg.).

On Tuesday 6 October the powerful Economic and Financial Affairs Council of the European Union, the well know ECOFIN group, took a decision advertised to be monumental. For the first time ever the 28 EU countries agreed to shed some light on the ‘tax rulings’, as well as at the ‘advance pricing arrangements’.

These are the two infamous concessions regularly accorded by some EU governments to multinational companies and wealthy individuals allowing them to move around income and capital and have it taxed in the jurisdiction they choose. In view of that, the ECOFIN decided this week that as from January 2017 there will be an “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” between the EU member states. The information will be also available at a registry operated by the Commission.

Special tax ‘cure’

A ‘tax ruling’ is an agreement between a company or an individual and the tax authorities of a country. It gives to taxpayers an assurance on how certain aspects of taxation will be applied in specific cases. An advance or transfer pricing arrangement, also issued by tax the authorities, is a type of a tax ruling in favor of a company, determining the method and other relevant details of pricing to be applied on transfers of goods or services between business entities of the same or collaborating groups of interest.

This latest facility is used by multinationals in order to transfer their profits to and accumulate capital in the jurisdiction of their liking. It employs over, under or completely untrue pricing in the trade of goods or services between companies operating in different countries of the same business or interest groups (subsidiaries). Understandably under this ‘technique’ the transfer of profits directs incomes and profits to the jurisdiction where the multinational and the tax authorities of the country have concluded a favorable tax ruling.

Noble intentions but dirty results

Initially the cross-border tax rulings have been used by certain EU countries to attract investments by multinational companies. However, in many cases those investments are restricted to an accounting center without any real productive content. Some EU member states actually are happy if the multinational or the wealthy individual just park their fortune or entrust their profits and incomes within the financial system of the country.

The case of the Luxembourg scandal made headlines last year. Last November the world learned that the tax authorities of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg had concluded hundreds of ‘tax rulings’ with multinational companies and wealthy individuals thus facilitating tax evasion. In this way incomes and wealth created in another country could profit from Luxembourg’s special tax allowances. The scandal came as a blow to the then newly elected and appointed Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker. In the recent past he had served as Prime Minister or Minister of Finance of Luxembourg for more than ten years. Understandably he was the architect of the ‘special arrangements’ offered to the wealthy tax evaders.

Automatic exchange of what?

Mind you, the “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” to be applied as of 1 January 2017 between member states doesn’t legally block the conclusion of similar tax rulings and transfer pricing arrangements. However, the agreement struck in the ECOFIN this week requires that “Member States automatically exchange information on their tax rulings”. Currently, the EU countries share very little information with one another about such issues. It is at the discretion of the member state to decide whether a tax ruling might be relevant to another EU country.

In any case, the possibility of any EU member state to ask and get information about the tax agreement between a company or an individual with another member state may act as a deterrent for these dealings. The idea is that the shared knowledge of the conclusion of such agreements in one member state which straightforwardly leads to or facilitates tax evasion or avoidance in another EU country, may even lead to penal persecution. This is due to the great differences of the tax legislation in the 28 EU countries. There was never such a thing as a common EU tax policy.

Tax evasion aided by banks

Undeniably, in today’s globalised financial markets with the immense abilities of the white and grey financial systems to spin the world incomes and capital around, the ability of the tax authorities to substantiate before the courts an illegal tax practice presents insurmountable obstacles. On top of that, the text of this new EU “directive aimed at improving transparency in assurances given to companies about how their taxes are calculated” cannot cover the many possibilities the modern aggressive or active ‘tax planning’ offers. Only the American prosecutors and judges have arrived at punishing some global banks with huge fines for helping their clients to evade taxation.

There are also characteristic examples of some giant American pharmaceutical firms which spend billions to purchase their EU peers just for tax purposes. By the same token, the multinationals and wealthy individuals are willing to spend a lots of money in similar schemes in as much as they can gain from tax evasion. Under this light what the ECOFIN did this week is that it created just one more opportunity for the EU governments to appear before their voters as taking ‘serious measures’ against the tax evasion of the wealthy.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Taxation: Commission refers Germany to the Court for its failure to apply EU rules on VAT for farmers

Can self-charging batteries keep us connected for ever? A young scientist explains

Europe plans to send satellites into space to monitor CO2 emissions

Much more than a ‘lifeline’ for millions of households, remittances can spur global growth, says UN agency

Strength in unity: Commission makes recommendations for the EU’s next strategic agenda 2019-2024

‘Maintain calm’ and ‘exercise patience’ UN envoy urges, as Nigeria heads to polls

10 expert predictions for the next decade in Chinese AI

Here’s what a Korean boy band can teach us about globalization 4.0

The importance of pre-departure training for a better understanding of global health issues

South Eurozone urgently needs fairer distribution of taxation burden

At the edge of humanity: refugee healthcare in Greece and the EU

ECB will be the catalyst of Eurozone’s reunification

With potential to boost profits by up to 20 per cent, a woman’s place is at work, says UN labour agency

Cédric in India

Northern Ireland: Parliament wants to secure post-Brexit regional funding

We must stop a devastating ‘battle to the end’ in southwest Syria, declares UN envoy

Erasmus+: a turning point in the lives of 5 million European students

For Youth Rights: steps forward for better protection.

‘Climate change is the battle of my life’, UN chief tells students living on the frontline in Fiji

Eurozone: Negative statistics bring deflation and recession closer

Public opinion misled by the Commission on air transport safety

With 10 million Yemenis ‘one step away from famine’, donors pledge $2.6 billion

Afghanistan: Bring ‘architects’ of latest ‘appalling’ suicide bombing to justice, says deputy UN mission chief

Asking for more restriction on intra EU immigration: Unproductive and politically dangerous

COP21 Breaking News_07 December: “The world is expecting more from you than half-measures”, UN Secretary General Bank Ki-moon cries out from Paris

Commission concludes that an Excessive Deficit Procedure is no longer warranted for Italy at this stage

FROM THE FIELD: Keeping Morocco’s indigenous culture and conservation in balance

Zuckerberg, a paella, and the mighty EU questionnaires that would stop Whatsapp acquisition by Facebook?

UN refugee agency presses States to aid 49 refugees stranded on Mediterranean

Stricter rules and tougher sanctions for market manipulation and financial fraud

The Brussels bureaucracy blocks the Youth Guarantee scheme

Three steps we must take to secure the future of our forests

SMEs and micro firms sinking together with south Eurozone

Fleeing Venezuela: MEPs to probe humanitarian conditions in Colombia and Brazil

Posting of workers: final vote on equal pay and working conditions

Children are so hungry in one British town they are eating from bins

These cities score an ‘A’ for environmental action – but hundreds more are falling behind

Mergers: Commission fines Canon €28 million for partially implementing its acquisition of Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation before notification and merger control approval

How universities can become a platform for social change

The Government of China and UNIDO partner to develop technical guidelines for standards of small hydropower development

UN Security Council condemns Taliban offensive as a blow against ‘sustainable peace’

5 lessons for the future success of virtual and augmented reality

Drawing scenarios for drifting Britain; elections or May’s deadlock?

Deeper reforms in Korea will ensure more inclusive and sustainable growth

India is a latecomer to AI. Here’s how it plans to catch up

Mine action is at ‘the nexus’ of peace, security and development: UN official

The Banking Union may lead to a Germanic Europe

How microfinance develops decent work

FROM THE FIELD: What do you want to be when you grow up? One day I will…

Alarm over violent attacks on lawmakers, opposition in Malawi, ahead of elections

EU to give more power to national antitrust authorities in a bid to secure regulatory fines

After Brexit and Grexit, Brussels to deal with Poloust

How do you get people to trust self-driving vehicles? This company is giving them ‘virtual eyes’

IMF: The near-term outlook for the U.S. economy is one of strong growth and job creation

Pledging ongoing UN support during visit to cyclone-hit areas, Guterres praises resilience of Mozambicans

We have the tools to beat climate change. Now we need to legislate

The Sino-American trade conflict may be resolved soon

EU to present a “hefty” exit bill to the UK moments before Brexit negotiations

The EU’s trading partners: US, China and the rest

Luxembourg has achieved high levels of growth and well-being but must do more to preserve and share prosperity

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s