The EU to fight cross-border tax evasion with a toothless directive

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union, Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg).

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union. Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg.).

On Tuesday 6 October the powerful Economic and Financial Affairs Council of the European Union, the well know ECOFIN group, took a decision advertised to be monumental. For the first time ever the 28 EU countries agreed to shed some light on the ‘tax rulings’, as well as at the ‘advance pricing arrangements’.

These are the two infamous concessions regularly accorded by some EU governments to multinational companies and wealthy individuals allowing them to move around income and capital and have it taxed in the jurisdiction they choose. In view of that, the ECOFIN decided this week that as from January 2017 there will be an “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” between the EU member states. The information will be also available at a registry operated by the Commission.

Special tax ‘cure’

A ‘tax ruling’ is an agreement between a company or an individual and the tax authorities of a country. It gives to taxpayers an assurance on how certain aspects of taxation will be applied in specific cases. An advance or transfer pricing arrangement, also issued by tax the authorities, is a type of a tax ruling in favor of a company, determining the method and other relevant details of pricing to be applied on transfers of goods or services between business entities of the same or collaborating groups of interest.

This latest facility is used by multinationals in order to transfer their profits to and accumulate capital in the jurisdiction of their liking. It employs over, under or completely untrue pricing in the trade of goods or services between companies operating in different countries of the same business or interest groups (subsidiaries). Understandably under this ‘technique’ the transfer of profits directs incomes and profits to the jurisdiction where the multinational and the tax authorities of the country have concluded a favorable tax ruling.

Noble intentions but dirty results

Initially the cross-border tax rulings have been used by certain EU countries to attract investments by multinational companies. However, in many cases those investments are restricted to an accounting center without any real productive content. Some EU member states actually are happy if the multinational or the wealthy individual just park their fortune or entrust their profits and incomes within the financial system of the country.

The case of the Luxembourg scandal made headlines last year. Last November the world learned that the tax authorities of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg had concluded hundreds of ‘tax rulings’ with multinational companies and wealthy individuals thus facilitating tax evasion. In this way incomes and wealth created in another country could profit from Luxembourg’s special tax allowances. The scandal came as a blow to the then newly elected and appointed Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker. In the recent past he had served as Prime Minister or Minister of Finance of Luxembourg for more than ten years. Understandably he was the architect of the ‘special arrangements’ offered to the wealthy tax evaders.

Automatic exchange of what?

Mind you, the “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” to be applied as of 1 January 2017 between member states doesn’t legally block the conclusion of similar tax rulings and transfer pricing arrangements. However, the agreement struck in the ECOFIN this week requires that “Member States automatically exchange information on their tax rulings”. Currently, the EU countries share very little information with one another about such issues. It is at the discretion of the member state to decide whether a tax ruling might be relevant to another EU country.

In any case, the possibility of any EU member state to ask and get information about the tax agreement between a company or an individual with another member state may act as a deterrent for these dealings. The idea is that the shared knowledge of the conclusion of such agreements in one member state which straightforwardly leads to or facilitates tax evasion or avoidance in another EU country, may even lead to penal persecution. This is due to the great differences of the tax legislation in the 28 EU countries. There was never such a thing as a common EU tax policy.

Tax evasion aided by banks

Undeniably, in today’s globalised financial markets with the immense abilities of the white and grey financial systems to spin the world incomes and capital around, the ability of the tax authorities to substantiate before the courts an illegal tax practice presents insurmountable obstacles. On top of that, the text of this new EU “directive aimed at improving transparency in assurances given to companies about how their taxes are calculated” cannot cover the many possibilities the modern aggressive or active ‘tax planning’ offers. Only the American prosecutors and judges have arrived at punishing some global banks with huge fines for helping their clients to evade taxation.

There are also characteristic examples of some giant American pharmaceutical firms which spend billions to purchase their EU peers just for tax purposes. By the same token, the multinationals and wealthy individuals are willing to spend a lots of money in similar schemes in as much as they can gain from tax evasion. Under this light what the ECOFIN did this week is that it created just one more opportunity for the EU governments to appear before their voters as taking ‘serious measures’ against the tax evasion of the wealthy.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

At last Britain considers a super-soft Brexit

Actions not words: what was promised at the UN’s landmark climate summit?

EU Budget 2019: no deal before the end of the conciliation period

How can batteries become more sustainable? This young scientist might have the answer

UK Labour Party leader Corbyn readies to change Brexit political backdrop

Why the way of loving closes doors of health?

Will Europe be a different place this Monday?

‘Unlock opportunities’ and pave the way for sustainable development, UN chief urges on World Population Day

ECB is about to lend trillions to banks

This company lets you set your own salary

Is the West gradually losing Africa?

5 ways to make your organization a great sustainability partner

Vegetarianism is good for the economy too

An FTA between EU-US to hurt South Korea

Deeper reforms in Germany will ensure more inclusive and sustainable growth

Alarming number of women mistreated during childbirth, new UN health agency figures show

Ensure that widows are ‘not left out or left behind’, UN chief urges on International Day

In visit to hurricane-ravaged Bahamas, UN chief calls for greater action to address climate change

Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections to O2 CZ, CETIN and T-Mobile CZ for their network sharing agreement

Donor countries need to reform development finance to meet 2030 pledge

These Dutch microgrid communities can supply 90% of their energy needs

GSMA Mobile World Congress Americas

EU Commission: Once in every 20 beef meals you eat…horse probably with drugs in it

EU Justice Scoreboard 2018: justice systems’ key role in upholding the rule of law and EU values

From violence to dialogue: as land conflicts intensify, UN boosts efforts to resolve disputes through mediation

A Europe that protects: EU reports on progress in fighting disinformation ahead of European Council

New European frontiers for renewable energy development

Security Council approves ‘historic’ political Haiti mission, ending UN peacekeeping role in the country

Election-related violence claims 85 lives in Afghanistan: UN report

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: hate speech, dementia, Libya and Yemen, human rights in Brazil and Lebanon

Yemen blast kills 14 children, leaves others fighting for their lives in Sana’a

Brussels enraged with Swiss referendum result to keep out EU citizens

Climate Change: a challenge yet to be tackled in medical schools

Destroying nuclear waste to create clean energy? It can be done

Let your fingers do the walking

Australian solar could power Singapore within a decade

UN migration agency launches $10 million appeal to support hurricane recovery in The Bahamas

Better ID card security to curb document fraud

Why cooperative and competitive federalism is the secret to India’s success

Women’s leadership ‘critical’ to future of Niger

Trump asked Merkel to pay NATO arrears and cut down exports ignoring the EU

UN Mission in Haiti calls on protestors, authorities, to refrain from violence

How Abu Dhabi found a way to grow vegetables in 40-degree heat

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

Forests ‘essential’ for the future, UN agriculture chief spells out in new report

Israeli security forces’ response to Gaza protests ‘a recipe for more bloodshed’, says UN expert

UN postal agency ‘regrets’ US withdrawal

An analysis of the impacts of climate change on human health

Can Pakistan make its energy sector greener, cheaper and more reliable? The government thinks so

Draghi: Germany has to spend if Eurozone is to exit recession

UN, Egypt help avert another Israel-Palestine war in Gaza that was ‘minutes away’, Security Council hears

We must work together to build a new world order. This is how we can do it

‘Well-being of two million’ in Gaza at stake as emergency fuel runs dry: UN humanitarian coordinator

UN rights chief ‘strongly condemns’ attack on Indian security forces in Kashmir

How to provide health education and thus create better health systems

Tackling water scarcity: 4 ways to pull H20 out of thin air

For Africa, ‘winds of hope are blowing ever stronger,’ Guterres declares at conference on development

3.7 million lives could be saved by 2025 if health services ramp up nutrition actions: WHO

5 ways students can graduate fully qualified for the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Q and A on the draft digital copyright directive

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s