The EU to fight cross-border tax evasion with a toothless directive

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union, Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg).

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union. Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg.).

On Tuesday 6 October the powerful Economic and Financial Affairs Council of the European Union, the well know ECOFIN group, took a decision advertised to be monumental. For the first time ever the 28 EU countries agreed to shed some light on the ‘tax rulings’, as well as at the ‘advance pricing arrangements’.

These are the two infamous concessions regularly accorded by some EU governments to multinational companies and wealthy individuals allowing them to move around income and capital and have it taxed in the jurisdiction they choose. In view of that, the ECOFIN decided this week that as from January 2017 there will be an “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” between the EU member states. The information will be also available at a registry operated by the Commission.

Special tax ‘cure’

A ‘tax ruling’ is an agreement between a company or an individual and the tax authorities of a country. It gives to taxpayers an assurance on how certain aspects of taxation will be applied in specific cases. An advance or transfer pricing arrangement, also issued by tax the authorities, is a type of a tax ruling in favor of a company, determining the method and other relevant details of pricing to be applied on transfers of goods or services between business entities of the same or collaborating groups of interest.

This latest facility is used by multinationals in order to transfer their profits to and accumulate capital in the jurisdiction of their liking. It employs over, under or completely untrue pricing in the trade of goods or services between companies operating in different countries of the same business or interest groups (subsidiaries). Understandably under this ‘technique’ the transfer of profits directs incomes and profits to the jurisdiction where the multinational and the tax authorities of the country have concluded a favorable tax ruling.

Noble intentions but dirty results

Initially the cross-border tax rulings have been used by certain EU countries to attract investments by multinational companies. However, in many cases those investments are restricted to an accounting center without any real productive content. Some EU member states actually are happy if the multinational or the wealthy individual just park their fortune or entrust their profits and incomes within the financial system of the country.

The case of the Luxembourg scandal made headlines last year. Last November the world learned that the tax authorities of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg had concluded hundreds of ‘tax rulings’ with multinational companies and wealthy individuals thus facilitating tax evasion. In this way incomes and wealth created in another country could profit from Luxembourg’s special tax allowances. The scandal came as a blow to the then newly elected and appointed Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker. In the recent past he had served as Prime Minister or Minister of Finance of Luxembourg for more than ten years. Understandably he was the architect of the ‘special arrangements’ offered to the wealthy tax evaders.

Automatic exchange of what?

Mind you, the “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” to be applied as of 1 January 2017 between member states doesn’t legally block the conclusion of similar tax rulings and transfer pricing arrangements. However, the agreement struck in the ECOFIN this week requires that “Member States automatically exchange information on their tax rulings”. Currently, the EU countries share very little information with one another about such issues. It is at the discretion of the member state to decide whether a tax ruling might be relevant to another EU country.

In any case, the possibility of any EU member state to ask and get information about the tax agreement between a company or an individual with another member state may act as a deterrent for these dealings. The idea is that the shared knowledge of the conclusion of such agreements in one member state which straightforwardly leads to or facilitates tax evasion or avoidance in another EU country, may even lead to penal persecution. This is due to the great differences of the tax legislation in the 28 EU countries. There was never such a thing as a common EU tax policy.

Tax evasion aided by banks

Undeniably, in today’s globalised financial markets with the immense abilities of the white and grey financial systems to spin the world incomes and capital around, the ability of the tax authorities to substantiate before the courts an illegal tax practice presents insurmountable obstacles. On top of that, the text of this new EU “directive aimed at improving transparency in assurances given to companies about how their taxes are calculated” cannot cover the many possibilities the modern aggressive or active ‘tax planning’ offers. Only the American prosecutors and judges have arrived at punishing some global banks with huge fines for helping their clients to evade taxation.

There are also characteristic examples of some giant American pharmaceutical firms which spend billions to purchase their EU peers just for tax purposes. By the same token, the multinationals and wealthy individuals are willing to spend a lots of money in similar schemes in as much as they can gain from tax evasion. Under this light what the ECOFIN did this week is that it created just one more opportunity for the EU governments to appear before their voters as taking ‘serious measures’ against the tax evasion of the wealthy.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Destabilizing Lebanon after burning Syria; plotting putsch at home: King and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

EU members commit to build an integrated gas market and finally cut dependency on Russia

Migration has set EU’s political clock ticking; the stagnating economy cannot help it and Turkey doesn’t cooperate

Earthquake: Monte Dei Paschi Di Siena

European Youth Forum celebrates 20 years of fighting for youth rights

Population in crisis hit EU countries will suffer for decades

Junior Enterprises as a solution for Youth Entrepreneurship

China and UK relations post Brexit as EU addresses Chinese takeovers

European Young Innovators Forum @ European Business Summit 2014: Europe for StartUps, vision 2020

Turkey’s Erdogan provokes the US and the EU by serving jihadists and trading on refugees

The banks want now free capital from taxpayers

What do Europeans believe about the crisis and the possible way out?

Tackling youth unemployment through the eyes of a European entrepreneur

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

Europe’s top court hears Intel and sends € 1.06 bn antitrust fine to review

Will Europe be able to deal with the migration crisis alone if Turkey quits the pact?

France and Poland to block David Cameron’s plans on immigration

Manufacturers Get Smarter for Industry 4.0

It’s EU vs. Google for real: the time is now, the case is open

Elections results: Austerity’s black to prevail in the new multicolored German government

EU free-trade agreements with Canada and US: imagine the fallout if put to national referendums

Managers’ pay under fire

A new world that demands new doctors in the fourth industrial revolution

Governments and non-state actors need to take urgent action to meet Paris Agreement goals

European Commission: Does Apple, Starbucks and Fiat really pay their taxes?

The Americans are preparing for the next financial crisis

Kellen Europe Hosts EuroConference 2016

Failing to see reality or deceiving the masses? The EU about poverty and social exclusion

Eurozone: Economic sentiment-business climate to collapse without support from exports

Eurostat overturns Commission’s assessment of the economy

Can the Americans alone determine the future of Syria?

EU Parliament: It takes real banks to fight unemployment and recession

Is there a chance for the West to win the war on terror?

On Grexit: Incompetence just launched the historic Ultimatum that could open “pandora’s box”

Refugee crisis: Commission proposes a new plan urging EU countries to help Italy

The challenges of mental health: an inconvenient reality

Rising political extremism in Europe escapes control

European Youth Forum demands immediate action & binding agreement on climate change

Four major resources for new European young entrepreneurs

Far from a healthy Health Workforce: lack of workforce planning leaves our citizens without access to proper care

“BEUC cautions against TTIP that would seek to align EU and US chemicals management frameworks”

Crimean crisis: not enough to slow down European indices

Access to health in the developped and developing world

Macro-Financial Assistance: Europe’s way to control Ukraine?

Eurozone: Economic Sentiment Indicator recovering losses

Dutch voters reject EU-Ukraine partnership and open a new pandora’s box for the EU

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: There is a new draft agreement on the negotiating table

CDU-SPD agree the terms for EU’s Banking Union

Who threatens the lives and livelihoods of Ukrainians?

JADE Testimonial #3: Sebastian @ Fundraising

At last a solid base for the European Banking Union

How Greece was destroyed

Will the European Court of Justice change data privacy laws to tackle terrorism?

Youth unemployment: No light at the end of the tunnel

Let the Italians have it their way, it may be good for all Eurozone

The MWC14 Sting Special Edition

Berlin repels proposal for cheaper euro

Is the EU’s enlargement over-stretched?

G20: Less growth, more austerity for developing countries

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s