The EU to fight cross-border tax evasion with a toothless directive

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union, Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg).

Cross-border tax rulings. EU Ministers of Finance met on 6 October 2015 in Luxembourg to discuss cross-border corporate tax rulings and some other important issues. Companies active in more than one EU countries pay on the average at least 30% less taxes than their peers operating only in one member state. (European Council – Council of the European Union. Shoot date: 06/10/2015, Location: Luxembourg, Luxembourg.).

On Tuesday 6 October the powerful Economic and Financial Affairs Council of the European Union, the well know ECOFIN group, took a decision advertised to be monumental. For the first time ever the 28 EU countries agreed to shed some light on the ‘tax rulings’, as well as at the ‘advance pricing arrangements’.

These are the two infamous concessions regularly accorded by some EU governments to multinational companies and wealthy individuals allowing them to move around income and capital and have it taxed in the jurisdiction they choose. In view of that, the ECOFIN decided this week that as from January 2017 there will be an “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” between the EU member states. The information will be also available at a registry operated by the Commission.

Special tax ‘cure’

A ‘tax ruling’ is an agreement between a company or an individual and the tax authorities of a country. It gives to taxpayers an assurance on how certain aspects of taxation will be applied in specific cases. An advance or transfer pricing arrangement, also issued by tax the authorities, is a type of a tax ruling in favor of a company, determining the method and other relevant details of pricing to be applied on transfers of goods or services between business entities of the same or collaborating groups of interest.

This latest facility is used by multinationals in order to transfer their profits to and accumulate capital in the jurisdiction of their liking. It employs over, under or completely untrue pricing in the trade of goods or services between companies operating in different countries of the same business or interest groups (subsidiaries). Understandably under this ‘technique’ the transfer of profits directs incomes and profits to the jurisdiction where the multinational and the tax authorities of the country have concluded a favorable tax ruling.

Noble intentions but dirty results

Initially the cross-border tax rulings have been used by certain EU countries to attract investments by multinational companies. However, in many cases those investments are restricted to an accounting center without any real productive content. Some EU member states actually are happy if the multinational or the wealthy individual just park their fortune or entrust their profits and incomes within the financial system of the country.

The case of the Luxembourg scandal made headlines last year. Last November the world learned that the tax authorities of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg had concluded hundreds of ‘tax rulings’ with multinational companies and wealthy individuals thus facilitating tax evasion. In this way incomes and wealth created in another country could profit from Luxembourg’s special tax allowances. The scandal came as a blow to the then newly elected and appointed Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker. In the recent past he had served as Prime Minister or Minister of Finance of Luxembourg for more than ten years. Understandably he was the architect of the ‘special arrangements’ offered to the wealthy tax evaders.

Automatic exchange of what?

Mind you, the “automatic exchange of information on cross-border tax rulings” to be applied as of 1 January 2017 between member states doesn’t legally block the conclusion of similar tax rulings and transfer pricing arrangements. However, the agreement struck in the ECOFIN this week requires that “Member States automatically exchange information on their tax rulings”. Currently, the EU countries share very little information with one another about such issues. It is at the discretion of the member state to decide whether a tax ruling might be relevant to another EU country.

In any case, the possibility of any EU member state to ask and get information about the tax agreement between a company or an individual with another member state may act as a deterrent for these dealings. The idea is that the shared knowledge of the conclusion of such agreements in one member state which straightforwardly leads to or facilitates tax evasion or avoidance in another EU country, may even lead to penal persecution. This is due to the great differences of the tax legislation in the 28 EU countries. There was never such a thing as a common EU tax policy.

Tax evasion aided by banks

Undeniably, in today’s globalised financial markets with the immense abilities of the white and grey financial systems to spin the world incomes and capital around, the ability of the tax authorities to substantiate before the courts an illegal tax practice presents insurmountable obstacles. On top of that, the text of this new EU “directive aimed at improving transparency in assurances given to companies about how their taxes are calculated” cannot cover the many possibilities the modern aggressive or active ‘tax planning’ offers. Only the American prosecutors and judges have arrived at punishing some global banks with huge fines for helping their clients to evade taxation.

There are also characteristic examples of some giant American pharmaceutical firms which spend billions to purchase their EU peers just for tax purposes. By the same token, the multinationals and wealthy individuals are willing to spend a lots of money in similar schemes in as much as they can gain from tax evasion. Under this light what the ECOFIN did this week is that it created just one more opportunity for the EU governments to appear before their voters as taking ‘serious measures’ against the tax evasion of the wealthy.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

How storytelling can be a force for social change

An Easter Special: Social protection of migrants in Europe as seen through the eyes of European youth

G20 LIVE: G20 Leaders’ Communiqué Antalya Summit, 15-16 November 2015

On Human Rights Day European Youth Forum calls for end to discrimination of young people

The Banking Union may lead to a Germanic Europe

We need a new Operating System for the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Inflation not a problem for Europe

The US and EU decisively oppose Erdogan’s plans for Turkey and beyond

FROM THE FIELD: Weaving profits in Azerbaijan

Vote at 16 in Malta: next stop Europe

ILO welcomes new UNDP report that places decent work at the heart of sustainable development

Responsible Artificial Intelligence

Eurozone officials play with people’s deposits and minds

How can entrepreneurship tackle the migration crisis in the EU?

EU Summit/Migration: Parliament calls for joint solutions based on solidarity

MARKUP initiative to boost market access to Europe for East African SMEs

Post-Brexit muddled times: the resignation of UK’s top ambassador and Theresa May’s vague plans

May a parody constitute a copyright infringement? European Court of Justice to give the answer

How dearly will Germany pay for the Volkswagen emissions rigging scandal

Bugged Europe accepts US demands and blocks Morales plane

Eurostat overturns Commission’s assessment of the economy

Regional competitiveness and growth: a Gordian knot for Europe

Indoor air pollution is deadly. Here’s an unconventional solution

UN Human Rights Council resolution on youth and human rights: a step forward for youth rights

EU Budget: A Reform Support Programme and an Investment Stabilisation Function to strengthen Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union

A Sting Exclusive: the EU referendum is about fighting for an outward-looking Britain

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

OECD: Mind the financial gap that lies ahead

10 Downing street: Another desperate attempt to unite Britain on Brexit

Varna (Bulgaria) awarded European Youth Capital 2017

Do we have to choose between creating jobs and protecting the climate?

Financial Transaction Tax: More money for future bank bailouts?

The South China Sea Arbitration: Illegal, Illegitimate and Invalid

168 hours left for MEPs – ECOFIN Council to deliver a Banking Union

EDRi @ European Business Summit 2014: Digital Citizenship in Brussels – the case of Net Neutrality

Eurozone: Retail sales betray economic frailty

Who can compel Wallonia to unlock CETA, the EU-Canada free trade pack?

EU budget agreement rejected by the European Parliament

This is how people in Europe are helping lead the energy charge

We need to talk about how we define responsibility online – and how we enforce it

IMF – World Bank meetings: US – Germany clash instituted, anti-globalization prospects visualized

Brussels terrorist attacks: Schengen in danger once again while leaders gather Europe’s multiple broken pieces

A Sting Exclusive: “On the road to Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement”, by Ambassador Katakami of the Japanese Mission to the European Union

EU Migrant Crisis: Italian Coast Guard Headquarters and Italian Navy to give host national opening addresses at Border Security 2016 in Rome

New book honours UN women who made HERstory

A Sting Exclusive: “Without climate, forget about peace!”, Swedish MEP Bodil Valero cautions from Brussels

China-EU Special Report: Chinese Premier Li Keqiang endorses China’s big investment on Juncker’s plan at 10th China-EU Business Summit

COP21 Breaking News_12 December: The New Draft Agreement!

London to say hello or goodbye to Brussels this week

No tears for Cyprus in Brussels and Moscow

This solar-powered car lets you drive for free

Why and how Germany had it again its own way in Cyprus

What the US and the world can expect from the 8 November election?

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

Here are five things to know about the future of being human

Reception conditions for asylum-seekers agreed between MEPs and Council

Eurozone’s sovereign debt not a problem anymore?

5 surprising ways digital technology is changing childhood

Achieving targets on energy helps meet other Global Goals, UN forum told

A week to decide if the EU is to have a Banking Union

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s