Is the ECB enforcing the will of the big Eurozone member states on the small? Can the euro area live with that?

The interview of Benoît Cœuré, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, was conducted by Marie Charrel of 'Le Monde' newspaper and was published on 27 July 2015. (ECB Audiovisual Services, 27 July 2015).

The interview of Benoît Cœuré, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank (pictured here), was
conducted by Marie Charrel of ‘Le Monde’ newspaper and was published on 27 July 2015. (ECB Audiovisual Services, 27 July 2015).

Reviewing the political or economic events in retrospect always gives the observer a privileged position. This is the point where Benoît Cœuré – a Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank – found himself at an interview last Monday. At some point he was asked if the ECB had suffocated Greece’s commercial banks in order to convince the country to ‘surrender’. After reciting the usual narrative that the ECB had increased the liquidity to the Greek banks from €40 billion to €130bn during the last few months he said, “That people are turning to the central bank on issues that demand a political rather than technical response reveals a serious weakness in the institutional functioning of the euro area. This weakness fuels excessive expectations concerning the ECB”.

In this way Cœuré opened two doors wide. The one led him to make a deeply political observation. He questioned the foundations of the Economic and Monetary Union by saying that “The decision-making mechanism at the heart of the monetary union does not work well. It is based on an intergovernmental principle that is no longer appropriate”. He didn’t restrict himself though to that. He went on by making political proposals about how the Eurozone should function from now.

Molesting Greece

The second door that the executive director of ECB opened leads directly to a well founded guesstimate about how the Greek Prime Minister was convinced to utterly discard his personal and his left-wing SYRIZA party beliefs. To be reminded that ten days ago Alexis Tsipras made a full 180 degrees u-turn and asked his Eurozone colleagues for a third bail-out, which carries severe terms and conditions leading the country to even deeper austerity and pains.

In reality Tsipras has let down an entire nation. On top of that he is now fighting to control SYRIZA. A large part of the party’s deputies and central committee members have repudiated his choice to impose on the country a new austerity program in return of more loans, to repay the confirmed as unsustainable Greek sovereign debt and recapitalize the always shaking banking system. Many distinguished economists have concluded that this new bail-out program is untenable.

How did this happen?

Understandably Cœuré couldn’t reveal the entire process that led Tsipras to totallyabandon his promises to the people and finally ask for a painful and very risky third bail-out. Nonetheless the central banker gave a good hint about that, by stating that “people are turning to the central bank on issues that demand a political rather than technical response”. In reality it was the ECB that forced Tsipras and the Greek government to capitulate. Up to the point where the ECB cut off the Greek banks from any liquidity sourcing, Athens had been steadily rejecting the demands of its creditors, denying to ignominiously cut down pensions and increase taxes in order to service a monstrous debt. To be noted that the International Monetary Fund is convinced that the debt is not sustainable as it stands.

The ECB did the job

As it turns out now the Tsipras government had been drafting plans for a Grexit, if the euro area partners insisted on more severe austerity measures. Evidently Greece chose to stay in Eurozone, but many people wonder why and how Tsipras was convinced. It seems that the ECB was deeply involved in that. Even before the 12 July – when the 19 Eurozone heads of state and government were shut away for 17 hours to formulate the terms of the harsh austerity measures that Greece was supposed to take – Athens had already capitulated. Nobody has told us directly how Tsipras was forced to do that, but the broad lines cannot be hidden.

It’s obvious though that the ECB had played the crucial role in that. It was the central bank’s Governing Council which did the dirty job of the politicians to convince Tsipras to comply. To do this the ECB abruptly cut down the liquidity financing to the Greek banking system, forcing Athens to impose capital controls to avoid instant death. The euro area political leaders on 12 July just formulated the details of the bail-out and victimize both the country and its prime minister.

On the opposite side

On 6 July the Sting wrote “During the arduous negotiations to settle the Greek problem, the ECB has been sitting on the opposite side of the table together with the IMF and the EU Commission facing an isolated Greece. It was the first time in the history of the IMF that a country asking for a bailout due to a sovereign debt crisis has its central bank sitting on the same side of the table with the Fund. This arrangement has left the poor country alone to face the omnipotent Fund without the help of a central bank or decisive backing from its Eurozone partners. It was EU-ECB-IMF versus Greece right from the beginning”.

It’s a fact then that the power leverage that made Tsipras and Athens to capitulate to the demands of Berlin, Paris and Brussels was the ECB. Cœuré says it almost plainly: “…the ECB functions on the following principle: the Governing Council has a discussion, it then votes if necessary, before moving on to something else. And that works!” The reader should pay attention to the exclamation mark, because it is probably an indirect way to underline how Greece was molested. This is exactly how the ECB decided to cut off the liquidity life line to the besieged Greek banking system condemning it to introduce capital controls and forcing Tsipras to yield to the demand of the creditors. Cœuré is right that there was no other mechanism built-into the treaties of Eurozone to make Greece either exit from the euro area or capitulate. For the time being the country took the second choice but it seems that the first one is still open.

Change the Treaties

Cœuré goes even further and discloses his ‘political’ proposals about how Eurozone should be institutionalized in a better and more functional mode. To this effect he stated to Marie Charrel of ‘Le Monde’ newspaper that, “By understanding that replacing the intergovernmental process with shared decision-making will not diminish the sovereignty of member countries. On the contrary, it will provide more room for the political dimension by ensuring shared responsibility that will enhance mutual trust…Take as an example the implementation of the European fiscal framework, which has become complex and opaque. If there were European fiscal instruments that were discussed within a “ministry of finance” for the euro area, under the watchful eye of the European Parliament, political discussion would regain its clout…”.

In reality, this director of ECB ventures to singlehandedly write down a new EU Treaty providing for nothing less than a European ministry of Finance. He forgets though that a similar plan was concisely rejected by the French and the Dutch people in the 2005 referendums held on a Treaty meant then to establish a Constitution for Europe. Then came the much watered down Lisbon Treaty.

Doing the politicians’ dirty job

In short the ECB or at least some of its directors are now openly accepting that in the case of Greece the central bank did the politicians’ dirty job. Yet Cœuré doesn’t hesitate to go as far as to propose the creation of a central political authority in the Eurozone, a ministry of Finance, which will decide by a qualified majority vote, as the Governing Council of the ECB does. Not a word is spoken though about creating also a safety valve against the aggression of the large countries against the smaller ones. In the US this role of is undertaken by the prestigious US Senate, where all the member states of the union are represented on an equal footing regardless of population and have exactly the same voting rights. Would Germany ever accept to have in such a powerful body the same voting rights as Greece? This is exactly the question Eurozone has to answer in order to avoid the worse.

The story of Greece tells us clearly that the ECB has to be refrained in some way or another, because instead of supporting a poor country which it was supposed to serve as its central bank, it stood on the other side of the table with the creditors, enforcing the will of the powerful against the weak. And the ECB does that without any democratic or judiciary control. This is exactly what happened in Ireland in 2010. But the Eurozone cannot live very long with that.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

The 28 EU leaders care more about fiscal orthodoxy than effectively fighting youth unemployment

Greece @ MWC14: Greek-born mobile champions at MWC 2014

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

G20 LIVE: G20 Statement on the fight against terrorism

Joris in Indonesia

Google strongly rejects EU antitrust charges and now gets ready for the worst to come

The US repelled EU proposals on common rules for banks

Eurozone 2013: Where to?

How much more social deterioration can the EU people endure?

Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

The succesful cooperation

Italy’s rescue operation Mare Nostrum shuts down with no real replacement. EU’s Triton instead might put lives at risk

Unanswered questions for Europe’s youth in President Juncker’s State of Union

It ain’t over until Google says it’s over

Migration crisis: how big a security threat it is?

Greece returns to markets at a high cost to taxpayers, after four years out in the cold

Why Commissioner Rehn wants us all to work more for less

TTIP: why it is worth not to pull the covers over your head?

EU Commission: a rise in wages and salaries may help create more jobs

Tax evasion and fraud threaten the European project

Fostering global citizenship in medicine

No way out for Eurozone’s stagnating economy

Britain heading to national schism on exit from EU

Cross-roads

The IMF sees Brexit’s ‘substantial impact’ while the world’s economy holds its breath

Is the EU competent enough to fight human smuggling in 2015?

OECD tells Eurozone to prepare its banks for a tsunami coming from developing countries

How Germany strives to mold ECB’s monetary policy to her interests

Banks suffocate the real economy by denying loans

Will Brexit shatter the EU or is it still too early to predict?

Assembly of European Regions @ European Business Summit 2014: The European regions on the path to recovery

Breaking barriers between youth in the new tech era: is there an easy way through?

IMF’s Lagarde indirectly cautioned Eurozone on deflation

Population in crisis hit EU countries will suffer for decades

Any doubt?

EU threatens Japan to suspend FTA negotiations if…

Migration crisis, a human crisis after all

The Banking Union divides deeply the European Union

A new crop of EU ‘Boards’ override the democratic accountability and undermine the EU project

Germany tries to save Europe from war between Ukraine and Russia

EU to gain the most from the agreement with Iran

EU countries invested €5 trillion abroad

What we need for a better European Solidarity Corps

Azerbaijan chooses Greek corridor for its natural gas flow to EU

ECOFIN: Protecting bankers and tax-evaders

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

Migration Crisis: how to open the borders and make way for the uprooted

EU Parliament raises burning issues over the FTA with the US

Why growth is now a one way road for Eurozone

The impossible end of the war in Syria

Access to healthcare: what do we lack?

Does EURES really exist?

Brussels wins game and match in Ukraine no matter the electoral results

New VAT rules in the EU: how a digital sea could have become an ocean

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

ECB should offer more and cheaper liquidity if Eurozone is to avoid recession

Commission goes less than mid-way on expensive euro

Except Poland, can climate change also wait until 2021 for the EU Market Stability Reserve to be launched?

Why banks escape from competition rules but not pharmaceutical firms

What the US and the world can expect from the 8 November election?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s