More billions needed to help Eurozone recover; ECB sidesteps German objections about QE

Eurogroup meeting - March 2015. The 19 Eurozone finance ministers meet on 9 March 2015 in Brussels. The President of ECB Mario Draghi (on the left) participates regularly in these meetings. In this instance he talks with the Jeroen Dijsselbloem, President of the Eurogroup. (European Council - Council of the European Union Photographic Library, 9/3/2015).

Eurogroup meeting – March 2015. The 19 Eurozone finance ministers meet on 9 March 2015 in Brussels. The President of ECB Mario Draghi (on the left) participates regularly in these meetings. In this instance he talks with the Jeroen Dijsselbloem, President of the Eurogroup. (European Council – Council of the European Union Photographic Library, 9/3/2015).

The Eurozone economy has been taking two steps forward and one step backward over the past few months. The minimal increase of the GDP growth rate to 0.4% during the first quarter of this year and the equally small increase of people in employment was accompanied by a fall of industrial production and a decrease of retail sales. All these statistics were released last week with relevant Press releases issued by Eurostat, the EU statistical service.

The uncertain or even precarious character of Eurozone’s recovery prompted Mario Draghi, the President of the European Central Bank, to state loudly that the bank’s quantitative easing (QE) program will not be ended prematurely, “will be implemented in full and continue for as long as it is needed”. To be reminded that the plan which was introduced this March has been designed to last until September 2016. According to this scheme, the central bank prints and injects €60 billion a month into the economy, through government and covered bond purchases. The total amount may reach €1.14tn. Obviously, the target is to support the struggling economy by injecting in it freshly printed money.

Is it a real recovery?

Seemingly, albeit minimal, the increase of the GDP growth rate by just one decimal point of a percentage unit to 0.4% during the first quarter of 2015 from 0.3% in the last quarter of 2014, has impelled some people to question the necessity of new money injections into the financial system. They claim that as the economy is reaching a growth path, there is no need of additional ECB money injections, a policy which may have some unwanted side effects by creating bubbles in certain markets. In view of this, Draghi must have felt he had to intervene. Let’s see who is right.

In Germany, the Ministry of Finance in Berlin and the central bank, the Bundesbank in Frankfurt alike have been opposing this ECB policy of free money distribution since it was initially conceived. No need to wonder why this is so. Germany is the only country with cash reserves reaching the region of at least one trillion euro. Understandably, the low-interest rate policy ECB pursues through those money injections, is undercutting interest returns to the outsized German reserves. That’s why Berlin detests low-interest rates.

A fight for interest rates

By doing that, Berlin appears as not caring much if an increase of the ‘price of money’ could derail the economy of every other Eurozone member state. Jens Weidmann the President of Bundesbank and Wolfgang Schäuble the German Minister for Finance seem to now want to convince everybody that Eurozone doesn’t need any more money injections, because it has now gained a solid growth path. They support this theory just by citing that the GDP grew by one more decimal point during the first quarter of this year. According to this logic, Eurozone doesn’t need any additional liquidity injections from ECB. The untold aim of Berlin is to stop the €60bn a month injections from ECB. If Schäuble and Weidmann manage to achieve that, they hope that interest rates will start increasing again, favouring the German moneybags.

Is the recovery solid?

However, unfortunately for us all, Eurozone doesn’t look like having abandoned the dangerous area of deflation and recession, despite some indications for the opposite. Let’s see why this is so, starting from the positive signs. Eurozone economy is said to be in an upwards path since the second quarter of 2013. Those GDP increases though are quite insignificant in the region of yearly increments in the region of 0.3%. Besides this, there are more indications pointing in the positive direction theoretically, but in reality don’t mean much.

Take for example total employment, which rose in 2014. According to Eurostat, the employment rate of the population aged 20-64 increased last year for the first time in the European Union, after the financial crisis of 2008-2010. In detail however, it kept decreasing all along the five crisis years (2009-2013). Only in 2014 it was measured at 69.2%, slightly up from 68.4% in 2013. Yet it hasn’t reached its 2008 pre-crisis level at 70.3%.

The negative signs

Against these barely positive developments there is evidence that other, equally important macroeconomic variables, point to the opposite direction. Industrial production and retail sales both fell in March. During this month compared with February 2015 industrial production decreased by 0.3% in the euro area. In the same month compared to February this year, the volume of retail trade retreated by 0.8% in Eurozone. Of course those negative occurrences are also limited to a few decimal points, but this is also true for the positive changes.

It’s not right though to put the two positive and the two negative events on a scale and conclude that they balance each other out. It will be wrong then to conclude that Eurozone is in stagnation just because the positive and the negative statistics are offsetting each other. However, neither is it right to conclude that Eurozone has entered a growth path and a return to recession is now out of question. It’s exactly for this reason that Draghi had to remind everybody that the ECB is decisively proceeding with its QE program and doesn’t contemplate to withhold it. Obviously he is convinced that the recovery is still precarious.

The ECB does not back off

In this way the ECB once more makes it clear to everybody, that it is a European institution mandated to act in everyone’s interest. Berlin cannot expect any special treatment favouring its reserves of one trillion euro, at a time when more than half the Eurozone countries are still struggling with employment and recession. Last Friday all European capital markets closed with losses for a good reason. The new rise of the euro against the dollar threatens to reverse the timid recovery of Eurozone, by undermining its exports. Undoubtedly the ECB and the markets know better what is good for Eurozone as a whole than the German politicians.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Is there a chance for the West to win the war on terror?

The rise of alternative medical practices in modern sports

Arlington, USA: kick-off of the fifth round of the EU-US boxing match

Brexit is happening now but the UK hasn’t really assessed the impact of a “no-deal” divorce

EU Parliament approves CETA: the EU-Canada free trade deal sees the light in Trump’s gloomy era

Landmark EU Parliament – ECB agreement on bank supervision

Why the euro may rise with the dollar even at lower interest rates

COP21 Breaking News_07 December: “The world is expecting more from you than half-measures”, UN Secretary General Bank Ki-moon cries out from Paris

EU and US close to an agreement on data sharing amid European citizens’ concerns

Cheap sea transport with low cost seafarers

Is poverty and exclusion the necessary price for EU’s recovery?

How Germany strives to mold ECB’s monetary policy to her interests

Humanitarian Aid 2016: The needs, the highlights, the crisis and the relief

Tackling youth unemployment through the eyes of a European entrepreneur

Austerity lovers to put a break on Renzi’s growth vision for Europe? the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

The Future of Balkans: Embracing Education

Theresa May’s global Britain against Philip Hammond’s Brexit fog

Ukrainian civil war: Is this the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning?

Germany’s fiscal and financial self-destructive policies

The EU accuses Russia of bullying Ukraine to change sides

What next after more sanctions against Russia, will the Ukrainian civil war end?

Is South Korea set to lose from its FTA with the EU?

On Youth Education: “Just a normal day in the life of a medical student”

Free trade agreement between EU and India?

WHO and IFMSA as transcendent pillars for world improvement

We are close yet so far…

EU prepares a banking union amidst financial ruins

EU’s tougher privacy rules: WhatsApp and Facebook set to be soon aligned with telcos

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

EU leaders slammed on anti-tax evasion inaction and expensive energy

A critical European young voice on Net Neutrality: the distance between Brussels and Washington

EU plans pan-European network of cybersecurity services

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Transport Industry Drive for Improved Energy Efficiency and Electro-Mobility to Stem High Growth of Emissions

The EU Commission is lying to the “Right2Water” campaign

Tourism offers much to the EU gets a little

Two women threaten to tear the world apart

The Brits are not an exception and that’s why they voted to leave

A new Europe for people, planet and prosperity for all

EU summit: Are the London Tories planning an exit from the EU?

EU economy: Between recession and indiscernible growth

Draghi: printing a full extra trillion non negotiable to help all borrow cheaply

A new global financial crisis develops fast; who denies it?

Aidex: the Global Humanitarian and Development Aid Event

The Syrian knot cannot be cut without devastating consequences

Is there a de facto impossibility for the Brexit to kick-start?

Apparently the EU Digital Single Market passes necessarily from China’s Digital Silk Road

Internet of Things: a Force for Good or Evil?

The UK referendum has already damaged Europe: even a ‘remain’ result is not without cost to Britain and the EU

Davos: Why the global elites couldn’t find answers this year?

A new arrangement between Eurozone’s haves and have-nots

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s