“Leaked” TTIP document breaks post 8th negotiations round silence and opens door to critics

From left to right Dan Mullaney, Chief US Negotiator for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and Ignacio Garcia Bercero, Chief EU Negotiator for the TTIP, opened last month the eight round of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) talks, in Brussels (EC Audiovisual Services, 06/02/2015)

From left to right Dan Mullaney, Chief US Negotiator for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and Ignacio Garcia Bercero, Chief EU Negotiator for the TTIP, opened last month the eight round of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) talks, in Brussels (EC Audiovisual Services, 06/02/2015)

The 9th round of the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations is a bit more than one month and a half away, but the evolutions of the last days are certainly bound to influence and shape future talks. Last week a leaked draft of what the European Union would like to exclude from a new trade deal with the United States has been brought to light by the BBC. The document, which cane be read here, is described as “the initial offer of the European Union in the context of TTIP negotiations”, including a schedule of specific commitments and reservations.

The 103-page long document was put forward by EU negotiators in early February, before the most recent round of TTIP negotiations were held in Brussels, with the intent of reserving judgements on health services in the controversial agreement -health and privatisation risks being one of the hottest topic of the deal. The leaked document is now generating new debates though, especially in the UK, where the topic is particularly sensible and critics are wider than anywhere else. Anti-TTIP campaigners say a specific exemption for the NHS from trade liberalisation is still needed and that the document has basically shown tha the UK’s health system, NHS, is still included in the deal and, therefore, at risk.

Specifically on health the document states: “The EU reserves the right to adopt or maintain any measure with regard to the provision of all health services which receive public funding or State support in any form”. The European Commission had also previously and repeatedly said TTIP would not affect how NHS services are provided, either in Scotland or the rest of the UK. The UK trade minister, Lord Livingston, said last week that this text ensured “publicly funded health services are excluded”, but unionists don’t really share the same opinion.

During the month of January, Unite general secretary, Len McCluskey raised already his voice against TTIP in regards of health services. He said: “The people of this country do not believe it is right for the NHS to be part of a US trade deal”. He also recently added that Britain “expects David Cameron to stand up for the NHS and use his veto in Europe to get the NHS out of TTIP”.

The document generated a lot of debate in Scotland as well. The SNP published an official note on February 26 to highlight “concern” that a leaked draft of the European Union’s position on a new trade deal does not contain “explicit protection” of the NHS. Unite’s Scottish regional secretary Pat Rafferty said “real risks” remain, as the draft confirms the dispute resolution mechanism TTIP is expected to include, as reported by the BBC. Furthermore, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had previously called for the NHS to be specifically excluded from the deal and warned that the Scottish Government will “fight tooth and nail against any moves to privatise the NHS by the back door”.

Further, UK trade minister, Lord Livingston, responded last week affirming that the operation of the health services will not be affected by TTIP, and that the health services are basically not for sale. “The decisions about how they are operated will continue to be that for the democratically elected government of the individual area”, he underlined.

Despite those critics and reassurances being accurate and well-founded, the debate on TTIP’s main knots is open now more than ever. Still many critics are being addressed to the negotiators on this side of the Atlantic for an alleged lack of transparency, despite the efforts that have often been made to subvert this feeling. The leaked document indeed demonstrates that what negotiators and TTIP backers are saying since several months, that the EU is basically reserving the right to adopt or maintain any measure regarding health services, is beyond any doubt true. What does not make campaigners happy is that they want this once and for all out of the negotiations, being any risk of privatisation an uncountable risk for the European citizens according to them.

Leak or share?

Actually there’s no big news in the document, to be completely honest. Many parts of the EU services offer have been freely available on the internet since last May, like the letter from the EU Trade Commissioner, Cecilia Malmström, to Lord Livingston regarding NHS. It just would be interesting to ask ourselves whether or not the leak was totally fortuitous. It is practically clear that, at least for the majority of people which are generally well informed about the EU-US deal, the opposition to the gigantic trade agreement is largely due to a perceived poor communication on the issue. The document came out in a moment in which most of the people think the EU should do more to inform its citizens, and to demonstrate its commitment to preserve some high standards on health and food safety regulations, and this is a very communication-oriented coincidence.

But latest controversy on TTIP is not exclusively due to the dispute on NHS in England and Scotland. France too is in the midst of an intense political battle over the future of the trade agreement that promises to liberalise one-third of the trade on globe. The last, intense week saw also the controversial ISDS clause back under the spotlight. In a letter to French MEPs, seen by EurActiv France, the French Secretariat General for European Affairs (SGAE) has warned them to not go against ISDS.

Now SGAE is reportedly at odds with Secretary of State for Foreign Trade Mathias Fekl, who has repeatedly expressed his government’s opposition to the mechanism that would allow corporations to sue governments in tribunals if they believe they have been obstructed by local laws. French U-turn on ISDS is basically another hot question in the recent TTIP history, and another fact that deserves attention and investigation, especially ahead of the vote at the European Parliament’s International Trade Committee on May 6th.

What is entirely clear here is that recent evolutions are filling the gap left by a weak 8th round of negotiations, a few weeks ago, where a very few decisions were taken and poor communications followed.

And this should be mainly the reason reason the “TTIP leak” is happening, accidentally or not.

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Civil society groups matter for Cambodia’s sustainable development: UN expert

How can we produce enough protein to feed 10 billion people?

EU will not deliver on promises without democratic accountability

International community makes important progress on the tax challenges of digitalisation

Trade in fake Italian goods costs economy billions of euros

What changes in the EU as from today

EU Parliament raises burning issues over the FTA with the US

Human trafficking, slavery reports and health of migrants in Libya

The EU Parliament slams Commission on economic governance

The cost of healthcare is rising in ASEAN. How can nations get the most for their money?

Forward Agenda: What can we expect from 2019?

Parental leave: why we can’t wait a century for equal rights for women

American negotiators can’t pay for their trip to Brussels, EU-US trade agreement freezes

The European Brain Drain: hard facts and harder truths

99 per cent of intravenous drug users lack access to health, ‘social services with dignity’ says UNAIDS chief

Asia and Pacific on course to miss all Sustainable Development Goals, says UN region chief

Quantum leap: why the next wave of computers will change the world

The right approach to addressing overcapacity problem from a Chinese perspective

Where does our food come from? Here’s why we need to know

This is how we can help Australia organize the world’s generosity

Restoring prospect of peace in Middle East is ‘our shared responsibility’ UN envoy tells Security Council

Europe should make voice ‘more heard’ in today’s ‘dangerous world,’ says UN chief

The best and worst parenting advice I’ve heard, by a leading psychologist

These vending machines are giving out free short stories to London commuters

Mental health and suicide prevention

EU to Turkey: No other ties than €3+3bn to upkeep refugees

The 8 pieces of digital DNA we need to thrive in the AI age

Quelling antimicrobial resistance: a clinico-pharmacological exigency

4 radical shifts required to achieve universal health coverage worldwide

UN chief urges ‘active, substantive and meaningful participation’ on International Day of Democracy

Here’s how China is going green

Trump rejects Europe’s offer for zero car tariffs; he had personally tabled that idea in July

MEPs want robust EU cyber defence and closer ties with NATO

Horn of Africa: UN chief welcomes Djibouti agreement between Eritrea, Ethiopia and Somalia

Will technology connect or divide us? The challenge for leaders in Globalization 4.0

Love Affair with Some(one)/(thing)

What will Germany look like after the next election?

Embrace ‘people-centered multilateralism,’ UN-civil society forum urges

Four lessons for a successful switch to value-based healthcare

Is Europe ready to cooperate with the rest of the world? Can Germany change its selfish policies?

How cities can become more resilient to climate change

UN study projects $32 billion loss for UK post no-deal Brexit

Independent rights experts sound alarm at Iran protest crackdown, internet blackout

At UN, youth activists press for bold action on climate emergency, vow to hold leaders accountable at the ballot box

Budgetary Control Committee asks for stronger measures to protect EU spending

As the inventor of copy and paste dies, here are other computing innovations we take for granted

Fresh airstrikes kill dozens in conflict-ravaged Syria

Austerity lovers to put a break on Renzi’s growth vision for Europe? the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

Portugal wants its emigrants back – so it’s paying them to return

Energy Union: Commission calls on Member States to step up ambition in plans to implement Paris agreement

Quality of air in Bucharest-Romania: is it fog or is it smog?

Cholera prevention efforts underway to protect millions in Sudan’s Khartoum state

British PM May’s Brexit proposal remains obscure while her government unravels

These countries are the most peaceful – in 3 charts

UN’s Bachelet rejects Sri Lankan official’s ‘spin’ on Human Rights Council encounter, urges reforms

UN sounds alarm as Venezuelan refugees and migrants passes three million mark

Rare diseases are more common than you might think

We can’t tell if we’re closing the digital divide without more data

How each country’s share of global CO2 emissions changes over time

Mainland Europe adopts Germanic cartel business patterns

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s