Cameron’s Conservatives and UKIP are exploiting and cultivating anti-EU immigration sentiment but Labour party isn’t?

David Cameron is counting to Manuel Barroso the reasons why the EU immigrants should be stopped from entering the UK but Ed Miliband from the UK labour party can count more. Photo taken during discussions between David Cameron, British Prime Minister, and José Manuel Barroso during a on a Ukranian crisis meeting  between Heads of EU State at the EU Council, earlier this year. (EC Audiovisual Services, 6/03/2014)

David Cameron is counting to Manuel Barroso the reasons why the EU immigrants should be stopped from entering the UK but Ed Miliband from the UK labour party can count more. Photo taken during discussions between David Cameron, British Prime Minister, and José Manuel Barroso during a Ukranian crisis meeting between Heads of EU State at the EU Council earlier this year. (EC Audiovisual Services, 6/03/2014)

Currently the significant success of the eurosceptic UKIP party in polarising the British voter in several social issues, like immigration, has set the agenda for other parties to follow. David Cameron and his conservative party has long seen that his electorate gets substantially motivated by anti-immigration campaigns. This is of course part of the general framework of the “UK exit” promise. But now, 6 months before the UK elections, we see also the labour party remarkably shifting to that direction.

It was only yesterday that Rachel Reeves, shadow work and pensions secretary of the UK Labour party, announced a significant change in their policy on immigration, particularly EU immigration. Currently the European citizen that has moved to the UK in her quest for a job needs to wait for 3 months before she is able to apply for the job seeker’s allowance. Mrs Reeves, instead, stated that the Labour party, if of course in power, would make those three months two years. Is this expected to raise Ed Miliband’s chances to win May’s elections?

Mrs Reeves goes like this in yesterday’s statement: “the UK social security system was never designed for the levels of migration we are now seeing”. She is seeing a hell of EU immigrants apparently but most of all she is seeing Labour voters to be shaky. Later she continues: “I will never pander to those who would deny the positive contribution that immigrants have always made to our country or the economic benefits we gain from our membership of the EU … but I also believe that we have to listen to the real concerns that people have about how immigration is being managed.” And that is where the Labour partisan wants to differentiate Labour party from the Tories and UKIP. According to the Labour shadow work and pensions secretary, “We don’t need to walk away from Europe to put the principles of work and contribution at the heart of our system. We can deliver these changes through negotiation and reform and we will.” So, she wants to be inside the EU but without sharing common EU immigration policy. Not sure if Brussels would be happy about that.

Overall, the Labour announced policy against EU immigration, which is even harder that what David Cameron had in mind to propose, has been heavily criticised. Mrs Reeves decided that she is “ready for a fight with the European Commission”, but it seems that there is no fight to be given but an attempt to further engage her voter a few months before elections. The advantage of the Labour party is very slim over the Conservatives in the recent polls and the last 6 months are considered to be decisive for the outcome. Currently both Cameron’s Convervatives and Labour are exploiting the popularity of the UKIP extremists to steal votes by “rationalising” pro-independence sentiments. It is interesting to quote here Ed Miliband’s words of last week that came as a “self fulfilling prophecy” in Mrs Reeves’ plans, that Labour would be “talking more about immigration as a party”, but “always on the basis of Labour values, not UKIP values”.

Beyond EU immigration

However, this Labour policy shift seems to expand beyond EU immigration. Simply because stimulating eurosceptic sentiments is different than stimulating general anti-immigration sentiments. The Labour party is eager to “catch” both profiles of voters. But this attempt when it is performed in a non organised manner and under time pressure it is bound to show weaknesses. Yesterday Mrs Yvette Cooper, Shadow Home Secretary of the Labour party, announced some rather controversial general plans of her party to limit immigration in the UK.

Mrs Cooper yesterday added that “the next Labour government will introduce exit checks so we can count people in and out” and that “it isn’t racist to be worried about immigration or to call for immigration reform”. Particularly the Labour party executive states that she would increase border control personnel by 1.000 people. And that the resources for that would be gathered by making any immigrant to the UK pay 10 pounds per entry. Of course as weak this idea sounds to our readers as weak it sounded to the Conservatives and UKIP that criticised widely the “fragility” of this measure.

To end with, interestingly Mrs Cooper argued in a very strict manner: “Ukip are exploiting peoples’ fears, fuelling anxiety and division, and David Cameron is racing to catch up”. But how different is really the UK Labour party in its electoral campaign 6 months before the General Elections? The answer is to be given by our readers.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Phone lines open between Ethiopia and Eritrea, and people are calling strangers

EU continues targeting on Chinese steel imports instead of the revival of its own economy

‘Terror and panic’ among Rohingya who may be forced to return to Myanmar – UN rights chief

SMEs and micro firms sinking together with south Eurozone

For video game addiction, now read official ‘gaming disorder’: World Health Organization

Euro-Mediterranean Assembly fixes its permanent seat in Rome

UN Forum examines three pillars of 2030 Global Goals

Why is the EU launching a doomed policy in stopping immigrant waves? What are the real targets?

The migration crisis is slowly melting the entire EU edifice

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

A European Discovers China: 3 First Impressions

Lies and reality about incomes and wealth in the EU

The EU Commission openly repudiates the austere economic policies

Parliament approves key directive regulating professional qualifications

UN chief welcomes resolution to 27-year-old disagreement over renaming the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

EU unveils plan to accelerate Capital Markets Union ahead of London’s departure from the bloc

Key Brazilian border crossing for Venezuela refugees reopens as asylum numbers pass last year’s total

Digital development: technology-enabled, but human-centric

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

London to say hello or goodbye to Brussels this week

MEPs want robust EU cyber defence and closer ties with NATO

Brussels enraged with Swiss referendum result to keep out EU citizens

Conflict and climate change challenge sustainable development effort: UN report

Nicaragua must end ‘witch-hunt’ against dissenting voices – UN human rights experts

Discussion at Europe House: Brexit & Food

No tears for Cyprus in Brussels and Moscow

China is building 8 new airports a year

FEATURE: Niger’s girls find sanctuary in fistula treatment centres

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Unprecedented Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction to Combat Climate Change

A geared turbofan at Pratt & Whitney's production hub in West Palm Beach (copyright: Pratt & Whitney - a UTC Company- 2018; Source: Pratt & Whitney's website, media center)

The EU Commission approves UTC’s acquisition of Rockwell Collins under conditions

How bad could British healthcare get for its citizens abroad post-Brexit?

Cancer research put at risk by General Data Protection Regulation? The possible dangers of a data privacy EU mania

Teenage girl’s death sentence spotlights Sudan’s failure to tackle forced marriage, gender-based violence – UN rights office

Greece and Ukraine main items on EU28 menu; the course is set

Diversity training doesn’t change people’s behaviour. We need to find out what does

Let Nagasaki remain ‘the last city’ to suffer nuclear devastation says museum director, as UN chief arrives

UN Environment Assembly 2017: where the world convenes to #BeatPollution

European Parliament calls on Russia to end occupation of Georgian territories

France sneaks into the Geneva US-Iran talks to claim its business share in Tehran

Europe provides financial support to African countries while Turkey denies to change terrorism laws jeopardising the EU deal

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

‘Much more’ can be done to raise awareness about the plight of persons with albinism: UN chief

Rule of law in Hungary: Parliament should ask Council to act, say committee MEPs

“There are many converging visions and interests between the One Belt One Road initiative and the Juncker Investment Plan”, Ambassador Yang of the Chinese Mission to EU highlights from Brussels

The EU launches € 1 billion plan on supercomputers and tries to catch-up with competitors

The EU threatens to occupy Libya militarily; is another colonial war brewing?

Ukraine turns again to the EU for more money

How will the EU face the migration crisis when the Turkish threats come true?

Disintegrating Tories will void May’s pledge for Brexit deal in seven weeks

Is the West gradually losing Africa?

Devastating storms like Hurricane Florence ‘unusual this far north’: UN weather agency

How civil society must adapt to survive its greatest challenges

What washing your hands can teach you about global change

EU countries invested €5 trillion abroad

Why Microsoft is a regular to Almunia’s

AIESEC @ European Business Summit 2015: The power of an individual and how we can awaken Europe’s Youth

Where are people most proud to be European?

Brussels terrorist attacks: Schengen in danger once again while leaders gather Europe’s multiple broken pieces

Can the world take the risk of a new financial armageddon so that IMF doesn’t lose face towards Tsipras?

Paris agreed with Berlin over a loose and ineffective banking union

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s