Europe votes against GMOs but the Council votes for TTIP

ENVI committee meeting - Vote on Possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory (EP Audiovisual Services, 11/11/2014)

Frederique Ries during ENVI committee meeting – Vote on Possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory (EP Audiovisual Services, 11/11/2014)

Yesterday afternoon good news came out of the European Parliament; good news for the anti-GM (Genetically Modified Organisms) movement and hopefully for the EU too. The Environment Committee of the European Parliament (ENVI) voted in favour of the right of the member-states to ban GMOs from their territories with 53 votes to 11 and 2 abstentions.

According to the result of the vote, the European member states are able to decide upon the cultivation of GMOs in their territory, despite any EU collective lead to adopt one GMO product or another. The European politicians voted in fact against the EU Council proposal of last June, according to which the EU countries would need to negotiate and strike a deal with the GMO producer on its insertion in the market.

Only under their dead body

“This vote shows we have secured a broad consensus between the political groups in the European Parliament on this sensitive issue” said Frédérique Ries (ALDE, BE) who is steering the legislation through Parliament.”The measures approved today will secure flexibility for member states to restrict, ban the cultivation of GMO crops if they so wish. At the same time, we have secured a clear process for the authorisation of GMOs at EU level, with improved safeguards and a key role for the European Food Safety Authority, which is important for us” she added.

Furthermore, in the text it is described that the reasons for an EU member state to ban a GMO crop, despite an EU approval, can be the particular environmental policies of the state, the urbanist planning, policies on agriculture, public policy or even potential social or economic consequences.

But of course an EU member can always have more reasons to ban a GMO crop. Those can be the “contamination danger” of other products, scientific doubts about the ‘harmless’ genetically modified seeds, development of pesticide resistance, the environmental disruption that GMOs could cause, as well as evidence of harmful impacts on health. The MEPs yesterday really had a wild ride against GMOs, expressing to the fullest all the anti-GM feelings and arguments of their electorate.

Not to omit that our good MEPs pointed the finger to the European Food Safety Authority, to examine every GMO ‘intrusion’ as a case per case project. They also ‘instructed’ the authority to examine the direct but also the indirect and longterm consequences of GMO cultivation in the EU.

Regarding the member states, the MEPs underlined yesterday that the EU countries should work to stop “GMO contamination” of other products in neighbour countries. Hence, they asked for the provision of “buffer zones” between neighbour countries, to stop the GMO ‘virus’ from spreading around.

Basically, MEPs told EFSA that GMOs will expand in Europe only under their dead body. That was crystal clear from yesterday’s vote at the Parliament. In addition, the Parlamentarians’ position is so rigid that they will take the matter for negotiations at the EU Council, under the coordination of the Italian Presidency. It remains to be seen first how strong the anti-GM sentiment in Italy is and second if the Council will do what it has to do, listen to the European citizen.

The GMO political framework in Europe

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a big debate in Europe for already a long time. The general sentiment of the citizens is certainly against GMOs. France and Germany are the two big powers in Europe that are fiercely fighting against GMO expansion in the Old Continent. On the Contrary, the UK, traditional ally of the US, which by the way is the world’s biggest GMO power, is emphatically in favour. Fruit of the fierce pan-European anti-GM sentiment is the fact that there is only one GMO seed at the moment growing at the Old Continent, Monsanto’s GM maize MON810.

A key fact in the GMO story, though, that gave birth to the MEP rage, is the Council’s proposal of last June. According to that, if the EU approves a GM crop and then the member state wants to ban it, then the country should negotiate with the GM company and ‘hopefully’ strike a deal. Yesterday’s MEPs vote basically attacked this specific clause.

Corine Lepage, French MEP, had said on the Council’s proposal: “The Council’s text does not give a solid judicial basis to realistically ban GMOs. It gives biotechnology companies a tremendous influence in the decision-making process”. Further, Marco Contiero, Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director, argues on the matter: “Member states have to go to [GM seed producer] Syngenta and ask: please Syngenta, can you exclude our territory?”…“You oblige a sovereign state to strike a deal with a private company.” Referring to this suggested ‘deal-making’ model, Catherine Bearder, a Liberal Democrat MEP, right after the vote yesterday said: “We want to keep this issue out of the courts as companies are much more likely to challenge a member states’ decision that is unclear”.

But the Council votes for TTIP

As expected, yesterday’s vote was welcomed by left-leaning parties. Similarly all anti-GM organisations were openly satisfied by the result. At the same time the conservative parties in Europe voted against and felt great disappointment for the result.

“Today’s vote would give European countries a legally solid right to ban GM cultivation in their territory, making it difficult for the biotech industry to challenge such bans in court,” said Marco Contiero, Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director. On the other hand, the other voice was heard too: “The parliament’s position on GM cultivation risks inflicting untold damage to robust, science-based policymaking in Europe. We strongly oppose these proposals and voted against them today. We will continue to oppose them,” said Julie Girling, environment spokeswoman for the Conservatives in the European Parliament.

New angle: no GMOs no TTIP

All in all, it is evident that the GMO matter is one of the very few matters at the EP where almost unanimously our politicians defend our right for no GMOs on our dishes. Council’s proposal for member states to fight this out with GMO giants hit on an immense brick wall yesterday that appears impossible to breach.

Bringing another angle to the matter, it seems that the EU Council is supporting ‘wholeheartedly’ TTIP (Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership), as the Commission does as well. Given the importance of the GMO matter for the EU-US trade deal to succeed, June’s proposal can only be correlated with pro TTIP politics. Apparently, the ministers wanted to leave the door open for GMO giants, e.g. Monsanto, to fight out ban claims in conferences or courts.

This would greatly please Washington, as a good step forward on the road to TTIP conclusion. But the MEPs care only about the sentiment of their electorate body, which by the way is emphatically anti-GM and often anti-TTIP.

Yesterday’s vote could be seen as a clear failure of pro TTIP politics at the Council and a victory of the European citizen. In any case, as the TTIP negotiations evolve, an agreement on the matter must be made between the two sides of the Atlantic.

Otherwise, no GMOs, no TTIP.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

At this Italian bookshop, children swap their recycling for something to read

Making the most of the Sustainable Development Goal 3: its overlooked role in medical education

Mergers: Commission clears E.ON’s acquisition of Innogy, subject to conditions

Confirmed ‘Blue Line’ tunnels ‘do not appear’ to surface in Israel – UN peacekeeping chief

A Young entrepreneur cries out: “start in Europe, stay in Europe”

From violence to dialogue: as land conflicts intensify, UN boosts efforts to resolve disputes through mediation

US – Russia bargain on Syria, Ukraine but EU kept out

EU and Japan select first Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Programmes

New book honours UN women who made HERstory

There are more than 1 billion guns in the world and this is who owns them

Around 600,000 Afghan children face death through malnutrition without emergency funds: UNICEF

IFMSA and IPSF on the Health of Migrants and Refugees

EU budget: Commission proposes most ambitious Research and Innovation programme yet

Why precision medicine is the future of healthcare

UN chief condemns terror attack in Kismayo, Somalia

This Mexican company is making biofuel from cactus plants

Half the world’s refugee children not in school, UN agency finds

MEPs approve boost to workers’ rights in the gig economy

Berlin and Paris pursue the financial fragmentation of Eurozone

FROM THE FIELD: Watering the parched farmland of São Tomé and Príncipe

Draghi cuts the Gordian knot of the Banking Union

UN food agency begins ‘last resort’ partial withdrawal of aid to opposition-held Yemeni capital

EU Copyright Directive: Will US tech giants comply or ditch the EU market?

Greenery: the miracle cure for urban living

Why Eurozone can afford spending for growth

An ageing workforce isn’t a burden. It’s an opportunity

Portugal can use its economic recovery to build up resilience

Khashoggi case highlights ‘very worrying practice’ of overseas abductions, says UN expert

How can entrepreneurship tackle the migration crisis in the EU?

UN chief praises New Zealand premier’s ‘admirable’ response to Christchurch attacks

45th Anniversary of the French Confederation (Confédération Nationale des Junior Entreprises)

UN experts urge United Arab Emirates to release terminally ill woman to live her last days ‘in dignity’

How music can help children with autism connect

EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?

July was the hottest month ever – what does that actually mean?

We can save our ocean in three steps – if we act now

The West unites against Mali desert rebels

How a teen refugee survived a shipwreck and saved a baby’s life

‘Staunch support’ for Iran nuclear deal tempered by concern over missile testing

‘Pioneering’ former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet officially appointed new UN human rights chief

5 ways to #BeatAirPollution

China Unlimited: the dragon’s long and winding road

Metrics of the Sustainable Developments Goals: Can we trust our data?

Scourge of slavery still claims 40 million victims worldwide, ‘must serve as a wakeup call’

Spotlight Initiative – EU and UN fight against domestic violence in the Pacific region

Congolese expelled from Angola returning to ‘desperate situation’: UN refugee agency

Greece may offer to China a European gateway

Utmost hypocrisy emitted by EU’s energy regulation

The JADE Spring Meeting is about to begin

Ceasefire holds in Tripoli, but core problems remain, says UN Libya mission chief

COP21 Breaking News_10 December: UN Climate Chief Calls for Final Push to Meet Adaptation Fund Goal Very Close to Target

What keeps me up at night? Two strategists reply

Syria: UN chief warns Idlib offensive may set off ‘humanitarian catastrophe’

These are the fastest trains in the world

What makes America the world’s most competitive economy?

COP21 Breaking News: Paris Pact on Water and Climate Change Adaptation Announced

MWC 2016 LIVE: The top 5 themes of this year’s Mobile World Congress

The EU launches € 1 billion plan on supercomputers and tries to catch-up with competitors

Most people on the internet live in this country

These are the world’s best cities to be a cyclist

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s