Europe votes against GMOs but the Council votes for TTIP

ENVI committee meeting - Vote on Possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory (EP Audiovisual Services, 11/11/2014)

Frederique Ries during ENVI committee meeting – Vote on Possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory (EP Audiovisual Services, 11/11/2014)

Yesterday afternoon good news came out of the European Parliament; good news for the anti-GM (Genetically Modified Organisms) movement and hopefully for the EU too. The Environment Committee of the European Parliament (ENVI) voted in favour of the right of the member-states to ban GMOs from their territories with 53 votes to 11 and 2 abstentions.

According to the result of the vote, the European member states are able to decide upon the cultivation of GMOs in their territory, despite any EU collective lead to adopt one GMO product or another. The European politicians voted in fact against the EU Council proposal of last June, according to which the EU countries would need to negotiate and strike a deal with the GMO producer on its insertion in the market.

Only under their dead body

“This vote shows we have secured a broad consensus between the political groups in the European Parliament on this sensitive issue” said Frédérique Ries (ALDE, BE) who is steering the legislation through Parliament.”The measures approved today will secure flexibility for member states to restrict, ban the cultivation of GMO crops if they so wish. At the same time, we have secured a clear process for the authorisation of GMOs at EU level, with improved safeguards and a key role for the European Food Safety Authority, which is important for us” she added.

Furthermore, in the text it is described that the reasons for an EU member state to ban a GMO crop, despite an EU approval, can be the particular environmental policies of the state, the urbanist planning, policies on agriculture, public policy or even potential social or economic consequences.

But of course an EU member can always have more reasons to ban a GMO crop. Those can be the “contamination danger” of other products, scientific doubts about the ‘harmless’ genetically modified seeds, development of pesticide resistance, the environmental disruption that GMOs could cause, as well as evidence of harmful impacts on health. The MEPs yesterday really had a wild ride against GMOs, expressing to the fullest all the anti-GM feelings and arguments of their electorate.

Not to omit that our good MEPs pointed the finger to the European Food Safety Authority, to examine every GMO ‘intrusion’ as a case per case project. They also ‘instructed’ the authority to examine the direct but also the indirect and longterm consequences of GMO cultivation in the EU.

Regarding the member states, the MEPs underlined yesterday that the EU countries should work to stop “GMO contamination” of other products in neighbour countries. Hence, they asked for the provision of “buffer zones” between neighbour countries, to stop the GMO ‘virus’ from spreading around.

Basically, MEPs told EFSA that GMOs will expand in Europe only under their dead body. That was crystal clear from yesterday’s vote at the Parliament. In addition, the Parlamentarians’ position is so rigid that they will take the matter for negotiations at the EU Council, under the coordination of the Italian Presidency. It remains to be seen first how strong the anti-GM sentiment in Italy is and second if the Council will do what it has to do, listen to the European citizen.

The GMO political framework in Europe

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a big debate in Europe for already a long time. The general sentiment of the citizens is certainly against GMOs. France and Germany are the two big powers in Europe that are fiercely fighting against GMO expansion in the Old Continent. On the Contrary, the UK, traditional ally of the US, which by the way is the world’s biggest GMO power, is emphatically in favour. Fruit of the fierce pan-European anti-GM sentiment is the fact that there is only one GMO seed at the moment growing at the Old Continent, Monsanto’s GM maize MON810.

A key fact in the GMO story, though, that gave birth to the MEP rage, is the Council’s proposal of last June. According to that, if the EU approves a GM crop and then the member state wants to ban it, then the country should negotiate with the GM company and ‘hopefully’ strike a deal. Yesterday’s MEPs vote basically attacked this specific clause.

Corine Lepage, French MEP, had said on the Council’s proposal: “The Council’s text does not give a solid judicial basis to realistically ban GMOs. It gives biotechnology companies a tremendous influence in the decision-making process”. Further, Marco Contiero, Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director, argues on the matter: “Member states have to go to [GM seed producer] Syngenta and ask: please Syngenta, can you exclude our territory?”…“You oblige a sovereign state to strike a deal with a private company.” Referring to this suggested ‘deal-making’ model, Catherine Bearder, a Liberal Democrat MEP, right after the vote yesterday said: “We want to keep this issue out of the courts as companies are much more likely to challenge a member states’ decision that is unclear”.

But the Council votes for TTIP

As expected, yesterday’s vote was welcomed by left-leaning parties. Similarly all anti-GM organisations were openly satisfied by the result. At the same time the conservative parties in Europe voted against and felt great disappointment for the result.

“Today’s vote would give European countries a legally solid right to ban GM cultivation in their territory, making it difficult for the biotech industry to challenge such bans in court,” said Marco Contiero, Greenpeace EU agriculture policy director. On the other hand, the other voice was heard too: “The parliament’s position on GM cultivation risks inflicting untold damage to robust, science-based policymaking in Europe. We strongly oppose these proposals and voted against them today. We will continue to oppose them,” said Julie Girling, environment spokeswoman for the Conservatives in the European Parliament.

New angle: no GMOs no TTIP

All in all, it is evident that the GMO matter is one of the very few matters at the EP where almost unanimously our politicians defend our right for no GMOs on our dishes. Council’s proposal for member states to fight this out with GMO giants hit on an immense brick wall yesterday that appears impossible to breach.

Bringing another angle to the matter, it seems that the EU Council is supporting ‘wholeheartedly’ TTIP (Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership), as the Commission does as well. Given the importance of the GMO matter for the EU-US trade deal to succeed, June’s proposal can only be correlated with pro TTIP politics. Apparently, the ministers wanted to leave the door open for GMO giants, e.g. Monsanto, to fight out ban claims in conferences or courts.

This would greatly please Washington, as a good step forward on the road to TTIP conclusion. But the MEPs care only about the sentiment of their electorate body, which by the way is emphatically anti-GM and often anti-TTIP.

Yesterday’s vote could be seen as a clear failure of pro TTIP politics at the Council and a victory of the European citizen. In any case, as the TTIP negotiations evolve, an agreement on the matter must be made between the two sides of the Atlantic.

Otherwise, no GMOs, no TTIP.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

On Human Rights Day European Youth Forum calls for end to discrimination of young people

This afternoon Britain will be once more isolated from mainland Europe

Eurozone: Disinflation engulfs the industrial goods sector

Vulnerable young people must not be blamed & stigmatised for violent radicalisation

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

Alice in Colombia

The Parliament defies a politically biased Banking Union

The big challenge of leadership and entrepreneurship in Europe

Eurozone’s north-south growth gap to become structural

On the euro but out of it?

EU sets ambitious targets for the Warsaw climate conference

Intel @ MWC14: Our Love Story with Mobile – Transforming Wireless Networks

Trump asked Merkel to pay NATO arrears and cut down exports ignoring the EU

Everybody against Germany over the expensive euro

Doctors without borders

Arlington, USA: kick-off of the fifth round of the EU-US boxing match

European Confederation of Junior Enterprises hosts in Geneva the Junior Enterprise World Conference

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

Medical students: The need for emigration

While EU Open Days 2013 discuss the 2020 strategy, Microsoft shares a glimpse of EU 2060

The scary EU elections result and the delayed Council’s repentance

China’s stock markets show recovery signs while EU is closely watching in anticipation of the €10bn investment

Germany fears that Americans and Russians want to partition Europe again

Trailing the US-EU economic confrontation

YOUTH RIGHTS AT RISK FROM RISE OF EXTREME-RIGHT AND POPULISTS IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EU to negotiate an FTA with Japan

ECB readies itself for extraordinary monetary measures defying Germany

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

Marco Polo’s Dream

Any doubt?

Happens now in Brussels: Green Week sets the EU and global climate policy agenda

The completion of the European Banking Union attracts billions of new capital for Eurozone banks

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

Exchanges of medical students and the true understanding of global health issues

Access to health in the developped and developing world

Will the EU ever tackle the migration crisis despite the lack of political will?

GSMA Mobile 360: Connecting Cities, Connecting Lives, Connecting Europe

French elections: by the time the EU economy revives and the migration crisis is solved extremists could take over Europe

The next 48 hours may change the European Union

Nitrate pollution of water sources: new impulses for EU Water Policy?

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Europe’s children urge leaders to commit to climate action at UN Climate Summit in Paris

No better year for the EU’s weak chain links

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

EU and Amazon cut deal to end antitrust investigation over e-books deals

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: There is a new draft agreement on the negotiating table

Fear casts again a cold, ugly shadow over Europe; Turkey sides with Russia

The European Commission cuts roaming charges. But “it’s not enough”…

A hot autumn after a cool summer for Europe

EU-US to miss 2015 deadline and even lose Germany’s support in TTIP’s darkest week yet

Can the banking union help Eurozone counter its imminent threats?

Should Europe be afraid of the developing world?

Access to ‘affordable’ medicines in India: challenges & solutions

Is Europe misjudging its abilities to endure more austerity and unemployment?

IMF – World Bank meetings: US – Germany clash instituted, anti-globalization prospects visualized

Global Citizen – Volunteer Internships

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

The EU accuses Russia of bullying Ukraine to change sides

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s