Search Engine neutrality in Europe in danger: Are 160.000 Google filtering requests good enough?

Google_logo

The long awaited last public discussion about “the right to be forgotten” took place in Brussels yesterday. This was the last of the seven miracles or otherwise open forums in different European cities that the Californian giant has been organising since last May. The reason for these costly events was to engage civic society in the dialogue of the famous ECJ ruling of last May and consequently to lobby against it.

The panel yesterday at the “capital” of Europe was consisted by Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, Oxford University ethicist, Luciano Floridi and Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, former German minister of justice. What was different in this seventh and final stop of the Google debate tour, as expected, was that EU officials took part to contribute their insights on the “wise” ECJ ruling. Paul Nemitz, a director of the Commission’s justice department, was intensely critical against Google’s “resistance against the right to be forgotten ‘mandate’.

“In Brussels of course we are used to big-time lobbying activities, and as some have commented these panels may in part be a good-faced (well-intentioned) effort to find practical solutions to the problem, but in part of course also they may be passive-aggressiveness toward our data protection rules and our jurisprudence,” he mentioned yesterday. Further, Mr Patrick Van Eecke, Head of the Internet Law Group at law firm DLA Piper state argued: “It’s not Google who should decide about whether or not we remove a link from the search results”…“A search engine should not be involved in deciding whether to remove hyperlink as you would be party and judge at the same time.”

The #righttobeforgotten debate is certainly not something new in Brussels or in the entire digital world. News travel too fast nowadays. The European Sting has been following this topic very closely since the very beginning, keeping a balanced critical approach on the matter that is missing still.

It all started last May when Mario Costeja, citizen of Spanish origin, brought his plea for data privacy right in front of the European Court of Justice. Mr Costeja had previously failed in Spain to succeed the deletion of some inaccurate information available on the Spanish web, referring to his old debts. This man asked ECJ that Google suspends these results and to many people’s surprise he made it. Now, you may think that a one man case is impossible to generate a butterfly effect, opening the doors of “hell” to some hundreds of thousands more requests addressed to Google. Well think again!

Believe it or not, in just 5 months past this ruling, some 160.000 claims for search engine filtering have been received by Google. According to sources, those requests are coming from citizens, companies, even ex-convincted criminals that want to start a new life, erasing all the traces of their tainted past. By the way, does an ex-convincted pedophile have “the right to be forgotten”? Unfortunately this is only one of the questions that one can make.

As expected, the Costeja case and the obscene expansion it has received globally has triggered substantial debates with various angles being lighted. It seems that there are two sides here. On the one hand, you have the EU officials and all fanatic data privacy protectionists. On the other hand, you have entrepreneurs and all fanatic freedom of expression (FoE) protectionists. Both sides have sound arguments but overall it seems that the whole project has not been worked through adequately well.

That an EU Official will protect an ECJ ruling this is something expected of course. That an EU Official is sticking to theoretical terminology without pragmatic approach is unfortunately also expected. And indeed Mr Nemitz is right; Google organised these seven costly meetings around Europe to lobby against the expansion of the ECJ ruling to 1 million filtering requests per second. Almost all is about lobbying in this European capital and we perfectly know it. And surely data privacy is ranked very high in the EU policy agenda, especially after the huge NSA scandals. And it should stay like this. But has anyone thought about the reason Google receives “allies” in this lobby battle, like Wikipedia, which is by the way a completely independent organisation? It is because Google is receiving paid support? No, it is just that the importance of the matter has been severely down played.

What about the “right to be remembered”? The immense debate generated in the blogosphere after May’s ECJ ruling is not generated by Google lobbyists only. Instead, it is generated by critical minds, digital geeks if you like, that are able to see the tricky part of this decision and most of all its domino effect. Clearly freedom of expression is at stake here. It is really awfully frightening to count 160.000 requests to filter Google results in just 5 months time! How many these will be in one year, 3 years or ten years? Probably millions. Who tolerates in today’s ‘digital democracy’ that the most important and accessible information gate, the search engine, is filtered and customised per individual requests?Do you?

It is only unacceptable that in Europe one ECJ case can demolish the high standards of a neutral internet that we enjoy. It is unacceptable that the EU officials who adore the term “data privacy” are not able to also grasp the meaning of the term freedom of expression in the 21st century through new media. It is not the role of the search engine to filter its results according to customised requests or court rulings. At least not in this part of the world.

Another critical issue is the detachment that is noticed in Brussels between EU officials, advocates and philosophical verbose professionals, and entrepreneurship. People in Brussels don’t understand a thing about companies. Consequently more than often they cannot follow. How is it possible for a company/search engine to assess 160.000 requests for filtering? Whether the requests are legit or not, why should Google do it? And who will pay for the additional costs created in the company for this not small “filtering” project?

All in all, the aim of this piece is definitely not to cleanse Google from its ‘sins’. Instead, it is rather to highlight the urgent need for a balanced approach in this case. It is not only about data privacy; it is also freedom of expression that the EU needs to think about. Also, it is about business reality; how search engines are able to cope with this kind of “costly” projects, especially smaller ones than Google.

Most of all, it is about how to stop, control and manage chaos triggered by one single ECJ ruling that created a butterfly effect to the whole continent. The EU needs to watch this incidents and control them before 1 million filtering claims are launched. Then it will be too late. A balanced approach towards the citizen and search engines is highly required, coupled with a clear proposal to describe the “filtering search engines” project, if finally is necessarily required.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Why collective action is the key to saving our forests

EU Commission: Growth first then fiscal consolidation

IMF launches a new offensive against Germany

Transport Committee pledges to stop empty flights due to COVID-19

Africa is helping the drone industry get off the ground. Here’s how

The EU Consumer Policy on the Digital Market: A Behavioral Economics View

South Sudan: UN official welcomes release of women and children abducted by armed group

Calculators didn’t replace mathematicians, and AI won’t replace humans

Mental Health of Health Professionals Facing COVID-19

SMEs are the most valuable partners. Here’s why

EU Commission indifferent on Court of Auditors’ recommendations

What does the world really think about the UN Sustainable Development Goals?

A brief history of cryptography and why it matters

European Commission adopts rules to ensure a smooth transition to its next President and the next College of Commissioners

Hollande protects the euro from the attacks of extremists

A geared turbofan at Pratt & Whitney's production hub in West Palm Beach (copyright: Pratt & Whitney - a UTC Company- 2018; Source: Pratt & Whitney's website, media center)

The EU Commission approves UTC’s acquisition of Rockwell Collins under conditions

Now’s the time to take up cycling – here are 6 reasons why

UN police officer recognized for protecting vulnerable Somali women from abuse

Coronavirus: the truth against all myths

Why exchange programs are essential for the medical students of the 21st century

Here’s why e-mobility must be at the heart of the green recovery

How can we make entrepreneurship serve the greater good?

Malta: Human rights experts call for justice in case of murdered journalist

This is what happened to CO2 emissions in the EU last year

Energy: EU priority projects should be aligned with 2050 climate objectives

EU Commission: Germany can make Eurozone grow again just by helping itself

FROM THE FIELD: Weather reports come to aid of Uganda’s farmers

Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon

5 ways to fast-track the transition to a carbon neutral world

18th EU Eco-Innovation Forum in Barcelona shows the way for Europe’s new Environmental policy

UN and African Union in ‘common battle’ for development and climate change financing

The role of junior entrepreneurs as a bridge between academia and business world

GSMA Mobile 360 – MENA Dubai on 26-27 November 2019, in association with The European Sting

Facebook changes its terms and clarify its use of data for consumers following discussions with the European Commission and consumer authorities

UN chemical weapons watchdog adds new powers to assign blame, following attacks

Brexit: UK business fear of a no-deal scenario preparing for the worst

The new ethical dilemmas in medicine of the 21st century

How building renovations can speed up the electric vehicle revolution

European Commission increases support for the EU’s beekeeping sector

What just happened? 5 themes from the COP24 climate talks in Poland

Launch of Pact for Youth: European Youth Forum calls for real business engagement

Coronavirus could worsen hunger in the developing world

UN highlights profound implication of population trends on sustainable development

Back to the Basics: Primary Healthcare

India’s economy is growing fast, but its poorest areas lag behind. Here’s why this could be about to change

We’ll succeed together

M360 Security for 5G: Security for 5G Predictions 2020, in association with The European Sting

3 ways to nurture collaboration between universities and industry

Unity, regional cooperation and international support needed for Horn of Africa to develop sustainably

Can the US deal a blow to EU and Russia together over Ukraine?

State aid: Commission approves €286 million Finnish measure to recapitalise Finnair

Food safety critical to development and ending poverty: FAO deputy chief

Protect women’s rights ‘before, during and after conflict’ UN chief tells high-level Security Council debate

The EU now has rules that say household appliances must be easier to fix

Data and the future of financial services

EU: Tax evasion and fraud flourish under political protection

MEPs wants to increase research funding to €120 billion in 2021-2027

We had the hottest June ever this year – this is what happened around the world

We can use plastics to change the world for the better

Robots will soon be a necessity but they won’t take all our jobs

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s