Benjamin Franklin was wrong: Amazon can tax evade

Amazon_Logo“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes”, Benjamin Franklin said back in the 18th century. Three hundred years later in principle it maintains validity, when it comes to the former. Of course for most developed societies tax is a de facto obligation of the citizen.

Most of us we are not even asked to pay taxes; our employers keep a priori a good part of our salary, we buy anything 20% more expensive and in general we learn to live in a manner that we never think about taxes; we simply and subconsciously pay them by default. Well, this is not the case for companies, especially big ones, that are able to hire teams of experienced people to invent creative ways to pay less taxes.

Governments tolerate corporate tax evasion

Although less taxes paid by big companies mean less school renovations, the governments somehow tolerate to a certain extent this “corporate behaviour”, because with the taxes collected already some schools will be renovated anyway. However, some countries, EU member states, simply overdo it. Recently Apple, Stanbucks and Fiat Finance and Trade have been the aim of Mr Almunia and his team. The reason of this investigation is to confirm whether those multinationals are transferring prices and profits to their subsidiaries in order to benefit from taxation in EU member states that is low and also whether tax authorities are favourable.

Amazon under the magnifying glass

Currently the European Commission is investigating a 2003 deal made between Luxembourg tax authorities and Amazon, the world’s most successful e-shop. Apparently when you buy a pair of shoes online from your home in Europe, you always have a transaction between Amazon Luxembourg and yourself. The paradox is that at the end of the year Amazon Luxembourg is not making any significant profit. Now for a 14 billion euro company this would certainly attract the attention of any tax collector; if not the Luxembourgeois, the EU one for sure.

As Mr Almunia, EU Commissioner responsible for competition issues, puts it: “The Amazon subsidiary in Luxembourg records most of the group’s Europe profit. It pays a royalty to another entity in Luxembourg… “At this stage we consider the amount of this royalty, which lowered the taxable profits of Amazon, was not in line with market conditions. Luxembourg agreed to limit the amount subject to tax.”

It seems that Amazon’s CFO is a cunning one. Amazon Luxembourg is paying heavy invoices for intellectual property, sent by Amazon Europe Holding Technologies SCS (AEHT), the parent company. This of course shows in the P&L (Profit and Loss statement) of the Luxembourgeois company a very small EBITDA (earnings before tax). There you go!

Luxembourg the place to be

In principle the DG Competition is against any special treatment given by some member states to big multinationals. “It is only fair that subsidiaries of multinational companies pay their share of taxes and do not receive preferential treatment which could amount to hidden subsidies,” says Commissioner Almunia. The Commission clearly implies here that Luxembourg state is allowing this phenomenon to occur or is looking to another direction, since its deal with the American online giant.

In response to Almunia’s claim, the Finance Ministry of the small city/state replied with expected reassurance: “Luxembourg is confident that the allegations of state aid in this case are unsubstantiated and that the Commission investigation will conclude that no special tax treatment or advantage has been awarded to Amazon.” Similarly Amazon states officially that: “Amazon has received no special tax treatment from Luxembourg, we are subject to the same tax laws as other companies operating here”.

So, nobody shows any special fiscal treatment and thus nobody receives it. Can we go home now? Not yet. When Almunia and his team open an investigation they are never in a rush to close it. See Google’s case that is lasting now for 4 good years.

It seems that the aim of the Commission is to shoot against the big companies/brands. Is it because these are the only companies with a ‘creative’ CFO? Certainly not! There are two reasons instead; the first reason is that usually these companies make a hell of turnover and thus the fines to be paid are greater. This is highly needed, especially in a European economy that is lately shaky enough. The second reason is that by investigating or even fining the big, the small will hopefully become more prudent.

Millionaires are bound to tax evade

All in all, corporate tax evasion is a big issue, not only in Europe but globally. The source of evil in this case is the mere mentality of the major shareholder of a company; if you ask him, “why do you tax evade?”, the answer would be, “if you could make all this money, would you give half of it back to the state?”

While it is hard to answer the latter, as it is impossible to simulate your behaviour with a few million euros in your current account, it is reassuring to know that there are EU bodies like the Commission that monitor this activity and tries at least to put a break in the predator instincts of shareholders.

At the end of the day Amazon or any Amazon deserves every penny from its slim gross margin but definitely not at the expense of a new bridge, faculty or park that will make the rest of the taxpayers keep paying their taxes and  buying shoes online.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

On Human Rights Day European Youth Forum calls for end to discrimination of young people

This afternoon Britain will be once more isolated from mainland Europe

Eurozone: Disinflation engulfs the industrial goods sector

Vulnerable young people must not be blamed & stigmatised for violent radicalisation

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

Alice in Colombia

The Parliament defies a politically biased Banking Union

The big challenge of leadership and entrepreneurship in Europe

Eurozone’s north-south growth gap to become structural

On the euro but out of it?

EU sets ambitious targets for the Warsaw climate conference

Intel @ MWC14: Our Love Story with Mobile – Transforming Wireless Networks

Trump asked Merkel to pay NATO arrears and cut down exports ignoring the EU

Everybody against Germany over the expensive euro

Doctors without borders

Arlington, USA: kick-off of the fifth round of the EU-US boxing match

European Confederation of Junior Enterprises hosts in Geneva the Junior Enterprise World Conference

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

Medical students: The need for emigration

While EU Open Days 2013 discuss the 2020 strategy, Microsoft shares a glimpse of EU 2060

The scary EU elections result and the delayed Council’s repentance

China’s stock markets show recovery signs while EU is closely watching in anticipation of the €10bn investment

Germany fears that Americans and Russians want to partition Europe again

Trailing the US-EU economic confrontation

YOUTH RIGHTS AT RISK FROM RISE OF EXTREME-RIGHT AND POPULISTS IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EU to negotiate an FTA with Japan

ECB readies itself for extraordinary monetary measures defying Germany

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

Marco Polo’s Dream

Any doubt?

Happens now in Brussels: Green Week sets the EU and global climate policy agenda

The completion of the European Banking Union attracts billions of new capital for Eurozone banks

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

Exchanges of medical students and the true understanding of global health issues

Access to health in the developped and developing world

Will the EU ever tackle the migration crisis despite the lack of political will?

GSMA Mobile 360: Connecting Cities, Connecting Lives, Connecting Europe

French elections: by the time the EU economy revives and the migration crisis is solved extremists could take over Europe

The next 48 hours may change the European Union

Nitrate pollution of water sources: new impulses for EU Water Policy?

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Europe’s children urge leaders to commit to climate action at UN Climate Summit in Paris

No better year for the EU’s weak chain links

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

EU and Amazon cut deal to end antitrust investigation over e-books deals

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: There is a new draft agreement on the negotiating table

Fear casts again a cold, ugly shadow over Europe; Turkey sides with Russia

The European Commission cuts roaming charges. But “it’s not enough”…

A hot autumn after a cool summer for Europe

EU-US to miss 2015 deadline and even lose Germany’s support in TTIP’s darkest week yet

Can the banking union help Eurozone counter its imminent threats?

Should Europe be afraid of the developing world?

Access to ‘affordable’ medicines in India: challenges & solutions

Is Europe misjudging its abilities to endure more austerity and unemployment?

IMF – World Bank meetings: US – Germany clash instituted, anti-globalization prospects visualized

Global Citizen – Volunteer Internships

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

The EU accuses Russia of bullying Ukraine to change sides

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Reblogged this on Ace News Desk 2014 and commented:
    #AND2014

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s