Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

Intel Logo

“The General Court upholds the fine of 1.06 billion euros ($ 1.4 billions) imposed on Intel for having abused its dominant position on the market for x86 central processing units between 2002 and 2007”. With these words the judge of the General Court of the European Union dismissed Intel’s action against the decision of the Commission in its entirety last week. The record fine closed a long antitrust question between the US microchip giant and the European Commission.

Let’s see now how the American giant played an unfair game in the European market. With a decision taken on 13 May 2009 the Commission imposed a fine of €1.06 billion on Intel, the American microchip manufacturer, for having abused its dominant position on the market for x86 CPUs, in infringement of the competition rules of the EU and the European Economic Area (EEA), the court explained in a press release.

Europe fined Intel, which had a market share of around 70 percent in 2009, for impeding AMD’s ability to compete between October 2002 and October 2007. The European Commission argued that Intel acted in an ‘unfair’ way “by implementing a strategy aimed at foreclosing from the market its only serious competitor, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.”. Intel was basically awarding rebates to computer makers like Dell and HP, if they bought exclusively or mostly Intel-made CPUs, the most important bit of the computer you are reading this article through. The Commission considered that Intel was in a dominant position and that it was extremely difficult for competitors to enter the market and to expand.

Allegedly Intel also made payments to computer makers (HP, Acer and Lenovo), if they agreed to postpone or cancel the launch of computers that contained CPUs made by AMD, and/or putting restrictions on the distribution of those products, EU officials claimed. Intel has argued that it was not working outside the frames of the law and said to Reuters that “it’s a complex case” that cannot be broken down that easily. Intel, through the voice of its spokeswoman Sophie Jacobs, declared that there’s big “disappointment with the decision”. “None of the arguments raised by Intel supports the conclusion that the fine imposed is disproportionate,” the Court replied, given also that DG Competition fines for anti-trust violations can reach a maximum of 10 percent of a company’s annual turnover, if that is found ‘guilty’. For Intel, the penalty was equivalent to 4.8 percent of the company’s 2008 turnover. So they should be happy already.

The Commission openly welcomed the outcome last week and so did BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC stands for French “Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs”). Monique Goyens, BEUC’s Director General commented: “When large companies abuse their dominance of the market, it causes direct harm to consumers. The Court’s ruling issued a strong reminder that such behaviour is illegal and unacceptable. Antitrust actions can help clean the market and this record fine should serve as an expensive deterrent against companies abusing oversized market shares”, BEUC reported.

Intel’s fine remains the largest ever for breaching Europe’s competition laws. The European Commission has been thoroughly monitoring the technology industry. It has already launched antitrust cases against Google and Microsoft, and continues to say that it will “police the technology industry where necessary”. Silicon Valley is trembling not without a reason.

There are always two ways to look at it though. This might be seen as a fight between the ‘free market’ in which a company does everything possible to gain market share and a watchdog which tries to keep the market controlled. However, what should be well considered is that Intel was not found ‘innocent’ for a good reason; the Californian company actually tried to control the market itself, not being the ‘free market’ champion, again, but  the one that wanted to control the market in a ‘monopolistic’ manner. Some say that DG Competition has not accurately considered the economic effects of Intel’s decision through the years, but the truth is that when there is evidence of a long term ‘unfair’ strategy, a market is no longer free and authorities are called to draw the line. This is not Europe’s innovative breakthrough but every free market’s role in the world.

The question many are asking is whether 1 billion euros is too much a fine. Or too low maybe? BEUC’s Monique Goyens last week probably introduced the most important aspect for this kind of questions: “Consumers harmed by Intel’s long-lasting misconduct were left out of any compensation”. Are consumers truly free when several years later an antitrust case is proved to have been influencing the market and its terms?

It’s easy to forget that the most important thing in a market which can call itself “free” is not only the freedom of an entrepreneurial mind to make ambitious business plans without asking his mom but also equally important is the freedom of choice of the consumer of the market. Europe has long been a champion in protecting its consumers by setting high standards and instead of everyone attacking Almunia and his team maybe they need to be more transparent and fair in their price strategies and business development plans.

Everyone if free to conquer the world market with chips or potatoes against competitors but only in a way that does not kill the market. Good competition ethics by giants like Intel, Microsoft and Google is a must in Europe. Only like that products can be of the highest standards, the price as low as possible and only then the consumer will be able to do the impossible, make a rational purchase decision. At least she will try.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

The Sting’s Team

After Brexit and Grexit, Brussels to deal with Poloust

2014 will bring more European Union for the big guys and less for the weak

Commission presents far-reaching anti-tax evasion measures

EU: Huge surplus in the trade of services with the rest of the world

“TTIP can boost the European project”; the Sting reports live from EBS 2015 on TTIP

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

Can the next financial crisis be avoided?

COP21 Breaking News_08 December: Cities & Regions Launch Major Five-Year Vision to Take Action on Climate Change

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: UN Secretary-General Announces “Climate Action 2016” Partnership

EU Ombudsman investigates the European Commission

I’m not feeling lucky: The “Right to Be Forgotten” ruling puts Google inside a box

The third bailout agreement for Greece is a done deal amid European economies full of problems

MWC 2016 LIVE: BlackBerry acquires Encription, talks Microsoft and health

A Sting Exclusive: “eHealth can change many dimensions of how the healthcare area functions”, Polish MEP Michal Boni underscores from Brussels

CHINA UNLIMITED. PEOPLE UNLIMITED. RESTRICTIONS LIMITED

Eurogroup president swallows statement on savings confiscation

EU elections: The louder the threats and the doomsaying the heavier the weight of the vote

Businesses succeed internationally

Commission to decide on bank resolution issues

France fails again the exams. Kindly requested to sit in on Commission’s class

Greece’s future solely in the hands of Tsipras; he can direct the poor country any way he likes

EU leaders slammed on anti-tax evasion inaction and expensive energy

Ukraine turns again to the EU for more money

JADE @ European Business Summit 2014: Youth Unemployment – a drive to Entrepreneurship

Economic sentiment and business climate stagnate in miserable euro area

“China will strive to enhance the performance of economic growth”, President Xi highlights from the World Economic Forum 2017 in Davos

Mobile World Congress 2015 first to debate EU’s new stance on Net Neutrality and Roaming Charges

2014 budget: The EU may prove unable to agree on own resources

Is South Korea set to lose from its FTA with the EU?

Trade deals’ pure realism: it may take 10 years for a post-Brexit agreement

Matthias in Canada

What will the US look like under Trump? Was his election campaign a big scam?

Environmental labelling, information and management schemes are central to the circular economy

To Bing or Not to Bing? That is the question

Microsoft’s YouthSpark: a kiss of Life to European Youth from the European Parliament

Income inequality threatens the socio-political structures in developed countries

Diana in Vietnam

The West and Russia impose a new order on the world

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

EU free-trade agreements with Canada and US: imagine the fallout if put to national referendums

Capital transaction tax on Ecofin table

European Youth Forum welcomes strong stance on human rights in State of the Union

Commission facilitates the activities of ‘merchants of labour’

German elections: Is Merkel losing ground or Shultz is winning?

World Retail Congress announces Dubai 2016 Hall of Fame Inductees

COP21 Breaking News_10 December: the final sprint of the Final Agreement Negotiations

The ECB still protects the banks at the expense of the EU taxpayers

The consequences of Brexit seen by a European young entrepreneur

The EU slams Theresa May’s Brexit option; sets base for own European defense, security platform

The Eurogroup has set Cyprus on fire

daniela-runchi-jade-president__

A Sting Exclusive: “Education in Europe, fostering skills development inside and outside the school system”

How bad is the Eurozone economy? The ECB thinks too bad

The New Year 2016 will not be benevolent to Europe

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “Chinese economy has great potential, resilience and ample space for policy adjustment”, China’s Vice President Li Yuanchao reassures from Davos

YOUTH WILL BE A KEY FOCUS IN THE NEXT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

JADE Generations Club: Connecting perspectives, changing Europe.

IMF to teach Germany a Greek lesson

Bundestag kick starts the next episode of the Greek tragedy

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s