Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

Intel Logo

“The General Court upholds the fine of 1.06 billion euros ($ 1.4 billions) imposed on Intel for having abused its dominant position on the market for x86 central processing units between 2002 and 2007”. With these words the judge of the General Court of the European Union dismissed Intel’s action against the decision of the Commission in its entirety last week. The record fine closed a long antitrust question between the US microchip giant and the European Commission.

Let’s see now how the American giant played an unfair game in the European market. With a decision taken on 13 May 2009 the Commission imposed a fine of €1.06 billion on Intel, the American microchip manufacturer, for having abused its dominant position on the market for x86 CPUs, in infringement of the competition rules of the EU and the European Economic Area (EEA), the court explained in a press release.

Europe fined Intel, which had a market share of around 70 percent in 2009, for impeding AMD’s ability to compete between October 2002 and October 2007. The European Commission argued that Intel acted in an ‘unfair’ way “by implementing a strategy aimed at foreclosing from the market its only serious competitor, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.”. Intel was basically awarding rebates to computer makers like Dell and HP, if they bought exclusively or mostly Intel-made CPUs, the most important bit of the computer you are reading this article through. The Commission considered that Intel was in a dominant position and that it was extremely difficult for competitors to enter the market and to expand.

Allegedly Intel also made payments to computer makers (HP, Acer and Lenovo), if they agreed to postpone or cancel the launch of computers that contained CPUs made by AMD, and/or putting restrictions on the distribution of those products, EU officials claimed. Intel has argued that it was not working outside the frames of the law and said to Reuters that “it’s a complex case” that cannot be broken down that easily. Intel, through the voice of its spokeswoman Sophie Jacobs, declared that there’s big “disappointment with the decision”. “None of the arguments raised by Intel supports the conclusion that the fine imposed is disproportionate,” the Court replied, given also that DG Competition fines for anti-trust violations can reach a maximum of 10 percent of a company’s annual turnover, if that is found ‘guilty’. For Intel, the penalty was equivalent to 4.8 percent of the company’s 2008 turnover. So they should be happy already.

The Commission openly welcomed the outcome last week and so did BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC stands for French “Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs”). Monique Goyens, BEUC’s Director General commented: “When large companies abuse their dominance of the market, it causes direct harm to consumers. The Court’s ruling issued a strong reminder that such behaviour is illegal and unacceptable. Antitrust actions can help clean the market and this record fine should serve as an expensive deterrent against companies abusing oversized market shares”, BEUC reported.

Intel’s fine remains the largest ever for breaching Europe’s competition laws. The European Commission has been thoroughly monitoring the technology industry. It has already launched antitrust cases against Google and Microsoft, and continues to say that it will “police the technology industry where necessary”. Silicon Valley is trembling not without a reason.

There are always two ways to look at it though. This might be seen as a fight between the ‘free market’ in which a company does everything possible to gain market share and a watchdog which tries to keep the market controlled. However, what should be well considered is that Intel was not found ‘innocent’ for a good reason; the Californian company actually tried to control the market itself, not being the ‘free market’ champion, again, but  the one that wanted to control the market in a ‘monopolistic’ manner. Some say that DG Competition has not accurately considered the economic effects of Intel’s decision through the years, but the truth is that when there is evidence of a long term ‘unfair’ strategy, a market is no longer free and authorities are called to draw the line. This is not Europe’s innovative breakthrough but every free market’s role in the world.

The question many are asking is whether 1 billion euros is too much a fine. Or too low maybe? BEUC’s Monique Goyens last week probably introduced the most important aspect for this kind of questions: “Consumers harmed by Intel’s long-lasting misconduct were left out of any compensation”. Are consumers truly free when several years later an antitrust case is proved to have been influencing the market and its terms?

It’s easy to forget that the most important thing in a market which can call itself “free” is not only the freedom of an entrepreneurial mind to make ambitious business plans without asking his mom but also equally important is the freedom of choice of the consumer of the market. Europe has long been a champion in protecting its consumers by setting high standards and instead of everyone attacking Almunia and his team maybe they need to be more transparent and fair in their price strategies and business development plans.

Everyone if free to conquer the world market with chips or potatoes against competitors but only in a way that does not kill the market. Good competition ethics by giants like Intel, Microsoft and Google is a must in Europe. Only like that products can be of the highest standards, the price as low as possible and only then the consumer will be able to do the impossible, make a rational purchase decision. At least she will try.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

The increasing drug prices in Europe

Draghi: printing a full extra trillion non negotiable to help all borrow cheaply

Time to be welcome: Youth work and integration of young refugees

The 28 EU leaders unable to start a relevant debate on migration and Brexit

Scotland and First Minister Salmond enter the most challenging battlefield for independence: Europe

EU legislation protecting home buyers approved in Parliament

Half of Eurozone in deflation expecting salvation from monetary measures

“None of our member states has the dimension to compete with China and the US, not even Germany!”, Head of EUREKA Pedro Nunes on another Sting Exclusive

ECB steadily continues monetary easing policy as EU economy gains momentum

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “Chinese economy has great potential, resilience and ample space for policy adjustment”, China’s Vice President Li Yuanchao reassures from Davos

EU budget agreement rejected by the European Parliament

Diana in Vietnam

EU Parliament raises burning issues over the FTA with the US

Progress in medical research: leading or lagging behind?

IMF’s Lagarde to Peoples of the world: You have to work more for the banks!

Politics still matter in the US but not in Europe

Will the three major parties retain control of the new EU Parliament?

Will Europe be able to deal with the migration crisis alone if Turkey quits the pact?

On Human Rights Day European Youth Forum calls for end to discrimination of young people

Changing for the change: Medicine in Industry 4.0

Mental Health Policy, a significant driver for growth

Cameron’s Conservatives and UKIP are exploiting and cultivating anti-EU immigration sentiment but Labour party isn’t?

The financial future of Eurozone on the agenda of Friday’s ECOFIN council

EU sets ambitious targets for the Warsaw climate conference

ECB’s new money bonanza handed out to help the real economy or create new bubbles?

Eurozone business activity again on upwards path

The three sins the EU committed in 2015

Bankruptcy or referendum: which one is going to be first?

Trump’s Russian affair spills over and upsets Europe

COP21 Breaking News: Paris Pact on Water and Climate Change Adaptation Announced

EU: Centralised economic governance and bank supervision may lead to new crisis

London to say hello or goodbye to Brussels this week

EU makes key TTIP document public as protests get louder

The EU Parliament slams Commission on economic governance

Eurozone: New data show recession and debt closer to explosion

Climate change and health: public health awareness in an international framework

Europe bows to Turkey’s rulers, sends Syrian refugees back to chaos

Greece lost a month that cannot be found neither in “mini Summits” nor in Berlin

ECB’s billions fortify south Eurozone except Greece; everybody rushes to invest in euro area bonds zeroing their yields

Does Draghi have another ace up his sleeve given his Quantitative Easing failure?

45th Anniversary of the French Confederation (Confédération Nationale des Junior Entreprises)

A Year in China

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: There is a new draft agreement on the negotiating table

EU unveils plan to accelerate Capital Markets Union ahead of London’s departure from the bloc

Why the ECB had to clarify it caters for the entire Eurozone not just Germany?

VW emissions scandal: While U.S. car owners are vindicated, Europe still unable to change its laws and protect its consumers

What the future holds for the EU – China relations?

What has changed in the French politico-economic horizon

Europe must regain its place as world leader in digital technology

TTIP update: postponed vote and INTA meeting shuffle cards again

Mobile World Congress 2015 first to debate EU’s new stance on Net Neutrality and Roaming Charges

Tools of asset development: Renewable Energy Projects case

French election: Will France vote for a reformed or no EU?

A Sting Exclusive: “Climate Change needs to be demystified”, Anneli Jättenmäki Vice President of European Parliament underscores from Brussels

An all-out fight for the EU budget

European markets itchy with short-term disturbances

Will ECB win against low inflation by not following Quantitave Easing?

MEP Cristiana Muscardini @ European Business Summit 2014: International Trade in Europe

FIAT Chrysler: from Geneva Motor show to the World, and back

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s