What the future holds for the EU – China relations?

José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, and several Members of the College received Xi Jinping, President of the People's Republic of China (on the right). It was the first official visit to the European Union by the latter but also the first visit ever by a Chinese President to EU institutions. Handshake between Xi Jinping and José Manuel Barroso, in the presence of Herman van Rompuy President of the Council (in the centre). (EC Audiovisual Servises, 31/03/2014).

José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, and several Members of the College received Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China (on the right). It was the first official visit to the European Union by the latter but also the first visit ever by a Chinese President to EU institutions. Handshake between Xi Jinping and José Manuel Barroso, in the presence of Herman van Rompuy President of the Council (in the centre). (EC Audiovisual services, 31/03/2014).

EU and China relations are perfectly depicted in a passage from a European Union External Action service Press release issued recently. It says, “While acknowledging China’s advancement of the economic and social wellbeing of its people in the past 25 years, the EU also hopes to see greater space open up for discussion and debate about China’s recent history and for lawyers, human rights defenders and journalists to carry out their work without harassment or interference”.

In any case the fact remains that China is the EU’s biggest source of imports and has become one of the EU’s fastest growing export markets. China and Europe now trade goods of a value well over € 1 billion a day. EU imports from China are mainly industrial and consumer goods. At the same time their bilateral trade in services amounts to just one tenth of trade in goods. According to the EU Commission in 2013, EU exports to China increased by 2.9% to €148.1bn, while the EU imported €279.9bn worth of goods in 2013 (down by 4% compared to 2012). Hundreds of thousands of jobs depend on those relations and consequently both sides are very watchful on the other side’s actions.

Trade is the king

Undoubtedly the huge economic exchanges between Europe and China play the most vital role in their overall relations. This observation is supported by the fact that the setting of the institutional environment and the management of their bilateral all-important trade has been bestowed exclusively to the Brussels authorities. The EU member states cannot sign separate bilateral economic agreements with the Asian giant. Member states are very cautious even while touching issues like human rights thought to be a sensitive subject for the Chinese, with strong impact on the overall relations.

This said, the Brussels authorities overseeing the trade between the two entities, have traditionally paid special attention to effectively support the interests of the EU member states. This past week the relevant EU services announced that China finally agreed to terminate the investigations into European wine exports. This investigation threatened to penalize the quite important and growing sales of this special EU product. Wine is of special interest in all core EU member states. In the same line of action the Commission rushed last year to rather bluntly protect the European solar panel producing industry against the Chinese exports.

Unduly ‘use’ of human rights issues

On many occasions, the Brussels authorities also ‘use’ the very sensitive to the Chinese human rights issues or some burning political topics like Tibet. They transform them into additional ‘ammunition’ in the always visible frictions over various trade topics. This is a practice introduced many years ago by the US, with Washington ‘using’ to this effect its special relations with the Dalai Lama. (As if the human rights of a colored youth in the streets of New York’s Bronx are better protected against the local police, than the rights of a Tibetan tribesman vis-à-vis the Chinese authorities).

On many occasions lately, the European Union authorities and institutions used the American methods, while confronting their Chinese counterparts. Invariably such matters offer lots of opportunities for political criticism, given China’s autocratic administrative, policing and governance practices. It’s very characteristic though that on the day the Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Brussels at the end of March, on the same day a high level representation of the European Economic and Social Committee participated in a demonstration for human rights in China.

No much attention was paid by the EESC to the subject matter of the visit which was nothing less than the EU-China investment agreement. This is a very important affair waiting to be promoted during President Xi Jinping visit in Brussels on 31 March. The agreement in question is expected to “boost bilateral investment flows by opening up markets as well as by establishing a legal framework of investment protection in order to enhance legal certainty and predictability for long-term investment relations between the EU and China”.

Of paramount economic interest

Cynically enough, the EU-China relations are so deep and wide that can’t be seriously threatened by frictions about human rights. The far-reaching effects of the trade and otherwise economic relations are so important, that touch the everyday lives of hundreds of millions of peoples in both sides. The wide diversity of economic relations of the two entities produces everyday new agreements. On 16 May the EU and China signed a landmark mutual recognition agreement which intensifies their customs cooperation.

In the framework of this new agreement EU and Chinese ‘trusted traders’ will enjoy lower costs, simplified procedures and greater predictability in their activities. ”Under the agreement, the EU and China commit to recognising each other’s certified safe traders, thereby allowing these companies to benefit from faster controls and reduced administration for customs clearance. The EU is the first trading partner to enter into such an agreement with China, having already signed similar deals with the USA (2012) and Japan (2011)”.

The TTIP and China

Last but not least the two sides must be presently exploiting the side effects on their bilateral economic relations, from the currently under negotiation EU-US Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TTIP). Last week in Berlin Karel De Gucht European Commissioner for Trade delivered a speech entitled “EU Trade Policy as a Means to Influence Globalization”. He more or less explicitly stated Europe’s stance on this issue. De Gucht explained, “Finally, its (TTIP’s) geostrategic implications are important. An agreement between the two largest economies in the world, the US and the EU, has the potential to be a benchmark for talks with a wider range of partners elsewhere. This means that TTIP will be an important way for us to shape regulations, norms, including on investment, and ultimately values that govern economic exchange worldwide”.

In short the EU is to use its TTIP with the US as a measure against which all the other trade agreements of the Union must comply. The EU Commissioner had more to say “…all our bilateral trade agreements … address the difficult issue of social labour and environmental standards – and recognise that trade and investment should not be promoted at the expense of labour rights or environmental regulation. At the same time, our Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are part of the overall institutional relations with our partner countries, which in turn require respect for human rights. In our agreements, the human rights clauses constitute a so-called ‘essential element’. This means that the non-implementation of human rights obligations can ultimately lead to the suspension of the trade agreement”.

No FTA with China in sight

This is tantamount as saying that an FTA with China is presently impossible. On top of that a possible in the future EU-China free trade and investment agreement will have to comply with the principles set by the EU-US TTIP. This may be an early message, but if De Gucht expresses authentically the views of the core EU countries, it becomes clear that an FTA between EU and China is not within sight. On the contrary the EU is deeply engaged in talks with Japan for one.

All in all, the present basic institutional framework for the EU-China bilateral economic relations will basically remain the same in the foreseeable future. It will continue to be regulated by the WTO rules. The rare earths case is a strong witness of that. The EU Jointly with the US and Japan, successfully challenged in the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism China’s restrictions on access to rare earths and other raw materials. There may be more special agreements between the EU and China, but the WTO will remain the basic institutional framework for their economic relations.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Fail fast, fail better: 3 ways companies can master innovation

Cyprus Parliament says no to blackmail

To tackle climate change, we need city diplomacy

How transparency can help the global economy to grow

UN member states express their will to tackle global migration but specific actions are still missing

Civil society organisations disenchanted with “Youth Guarantee”

Food safety critical to development and ending poverty: FAO deputy chief

Hunger and obesity in Latin America and the Caribbean compounded by inequality: UN report

Long-term EU budget: MEPs lay down funding priorities for post-2020 budget

Eurozone: Despite anemic growth and shaky banks marks record trade surplus

EU confronts environmental threats as global leaders attempt to revive the global sentiment at NYC climate week

The China-US trade deal will be signed on time; the path is set

South Sudan’s foreseen genocide: from “Never Again” to “Again and Again and Again”?

US must abide by humanitarian refugee accords: UN refugee agency

The Catcher in the Rice

New Report Offers Global Outlook on Efforts to Beat Plastic Pollution

How populist and xenophobic movements in the EU tear apart European businesses and startups

Climate Change Revolution: by-laws for the world

EU tells Britain stay in as long as you wish

Here’s how the global financial crisis is still affecting your wages

ECB: A revolutionary idea to revitalize the European economy with cheap loans to SMEs

Who would pay and who is to gain from the EU-US free trade agreement

A Sting Exclusive: why the environment is important to your health, by UNEP’s Head for Europe

Four million Syrian children have only known war since birth: UNICEF

ECB asks for more subsidies to banks

Europe eyes to replace US as China’s prime foreign partner

Youth unemployment: think out of the box

Innovation can transform the way we solve the world’s water challenges

Commission’s spending totally uncontrolled

Could the fourth wave of globalization help to end epidemics?

Security Council urges countries to factor child protection into conflict prevention efforts

Talent is worldwide. Opportunity is not. How can we redistribute it?

EU-China Light Bridge in Brussels signals the bright coming of the Year of The Dog

Greece: Tsipras’ referendum victory does not solve the financial stalemate of the country and its banks

Safer products: stepping up checks and inspections to protect consumers

European Youth Vlog

US-North Korea summit in Singapore ‘a promising development’ says Guterres

World ‘not yet on track’ to ensure children a better future: UN rights chief

ECB should offer more and cheaper liquidity if Eurozone is to avoid recession

Human rights chief calls for international probe on Venezuela, following ‘shocking accounts of extrajudicial killings’

The 28 EU leaders show contempt for the European Elections results

EU Elections: new rules to prevent breaches of data used to influence elections

“Asia-Pacific takes stock of ambitious development targets”, written by the Heads of UNFPA and ESCAP

The importance of pre-departure training for a better understanding of global health issues

Does the West play the Syrian game in Egypt?

Building an Inclusive ICT Innovation Ecosystem

How blockchain can cut the cost of new medicine

SDGs and the historical and economic impact on Brazilian health

Nicaragua must end ‘witch-hunt’ against dissenting voices – UN human rights experts

3 ways to ensure the internet’s future is creative, collaborative and fair

China Unlimited Special Report: at the heart of Beijing

EU will not deliver on promises without democratic accountability

Iraq: UN demining agency rejects desecration accusations, involving historic Mosul churches

Gas pipeline in the European Union. (Copyright: EU, 2012 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Ferenc Isza)

EU Investment Bank approves € 1.5bn loan for Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP)

Will Europe be a different place this Monday?

Easing funding woes for UN agency assisting Palestine refugees a ‘wise investment for today and the future’

EU prepares for the worst case scenario as Turkey seems to be withdrawing from the migration deal

The Irish Presidency bullies the Parliament over EU budget

At last some rules on banks

Humanitarian emergency in Venezuela was central debate of the EuroLat plenary

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s