What the future holds for the EU – China relations?

José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, and several Members of the College received Xi Jinping, President of the People's Republic of China (on the right). It was the first official visit to the European Union by the latter but also the first visit ever by a Chinese President to EU institutions. Handshake between Xi Jinping and José Manuel Barroso, in the presence of Herman van Rompuy President of the Council (in the centre). (EC Audiovisual Servises, 31/03/2014).

José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, and several Members of the College received Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China (on the right). It was the first official visit to the European Union by the latter but also the first visit ever by a Chinese President to EU institutions. Handshake between Xi Jinping and José Manuel Barroso, in the presence of Herman van Rompuy President of the Council (in the centre). (EC Audiovisual services, 31/03/2014).

EU and China relations are perfectly depicted in a passage from a European Union External Action service Press release issued recently. It says, “While acknowledging China’s advancement of the economic and social wellbeing of its people in the past 25 years, the EU also hopes to see greater space open up for discussion and debate about China’s recent history and for lawyers, human rights defenders and journalists to carry out their work without harassment or interference”.

In any case the fact remains that China is the EU’s biggest source of imports and has become one of the EU’s fastest growing export markets. China and Europe now trade goods of a value well over € 1 billion a day. EU imports from China are mainly industrial and consumer goods. At the same time their bilateral trade in services amounts to just one tenth of trade in goods. According to the EU Commission in 2013, EU exports to China increased by 2.9% to €148.1bn, while the EU imported €279.9bn worth of goods in 2013 (down by 4% compared to 2012). Hundreds of thousands of jobs depend on those relations and consequently both sides are very watchful on the other side’s actions.

Trade is the king

Undoubtedly the huge economic exchanges between Europe and China play the most vital role in their overall relations. This observation is supported by the fact that the setting of the institutional environment and the management of their bilateral all-important trade has been bestowed exclusively to the Brussels authorities. The EU member states cannot sign separate bilateral economic agreements with the Asian giant. Member states are very cautious even while touching issues like human rights thought to be a sensitive subject for the Chinese, with strong impact on the overall relations.

This said, the Brussels authorities overseeing the trade between the two entities, have traditionally paid special attention to effectively support the interests of the EU member states. This past week the relevant EU services announced that China finally agreed to terminate the investigations into European wine exports. This investigation threatened to penalize the quite important and growing sales of this special EU product. Wine is of special interest in all core EU member states. In the same line of action the Commission rushed last year to rather bluntly protect the European solar panel producing industry against the Chinese exports.

Unduly ‘use’ of human rights issues

On many occasions, the Brussels authorities also ‘use’ the very sensitive to the Chinese human rights issues or some burning political topics like Tibet. They transform them into additional ‘ammunition’ in the always visible frictions over various trade topics. This is a practice introduced many years ago by the US, with Washington ‘using’ to this effect its special relations with the Dalai Lama. (As if the human rights of a colored youth in the streets of New York’s Bronx are better protected against the local police, than the rights of a Tibetan tribesman vis-à-vis the Chinese authorities).

On many occasions lately, the European Union authorities and institutions used the American methods, while confronting their Chinese counterparts. Invariably such matters offer lots of opportunities for political criticism, given China’s autocratic administrative, policing and governance practices. It’s very characteristic though that on the day the Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Brussels at the end of March, on the same day a high level representation of the European Economic and Social Committee participated in a demonstration for human rights in China.

No much attention was paid by the EESC to the subject matter of the visit which was nothing less than the EU-China investment agreement. This is a very important affair waiting to be promoted during President Xi Jinping visit in Brussels on 31 March. The agreement in question is expected to “boost bilateral investment flows by opening up markets as well as by establishing a legal framework of investment protection in order to enhance legal certainty and predictability for long-term investment relations between the EU and China”.

Of paramount economic interest

Cynically enough, the EU-China relations are so deep and wide that can’t be seriously threatened by frictions about human rights. The far-reaching effects of the trade and otherwise economic relations are so important, that touch the everyday lives of hundreds of millions of peoples in both sides. The wide diversity of economic relations of the two entities produces everyday new agreements. On 16 May the EU and China signed a landmark mutual recognition agreement which intensifies their customs cooperation.

In the framework of this new agreement EU and Chinese ‘trusted traders’ will enjoy lower costs, simplified procedures and greater predictability in their activities. ”Under the agreement, the EU and China commit to recognising each other’s certified safe traders, thereby allowing these companies to benefit from faster controls and reduced administration for customs clearance. The EU is the first trading partner to enter into such an agreement with China, having already signed similar deals with the USA (2012) and Japan (2011)”.

The TTIP and China

Last but not least the two sides must be presently exploiting the side effects on their bilateral economic relations, from the currently under negotiation EU-US Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TTIP). Last week in Berlin Karel De Gucht European Commissioner for Trade delivered a speech entitled “EU Trade Policy as a Means to Influence Globalization”. He more or less explicitly stated Europe’s stance on this issue. De Gucht explained, “Finally, its (TTIP’s) geostrategic implications are important. An agreement between the two largest economies in the world, the US and the EU, has the potential to be a benchmark for talks with a wider range of partners elsewhere. This means that TTIP will be an important way for us to shape regulations, norms, including on investment, and ultimately values that govern economic exchange worldwide”.

In short the EU is to use its TTIP with the US as a measure against which all the other trade agreements of the Union must comply. The EU Commissioner had more to say “…all our bilateral trade agreements … address the difficult issue of social labour and environmental standards – and recognise that trade and investment should not be promoted at the expense of labour rights or environmental regulation. At the same time, our Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are part of the overall institutional relations with our partner countries, which in turn require respect for human rights. In our agreements, the human rights clauses constitute a so-called ‘essential element’. This means that the non-implementation of human rights obligations can ultimately lead to the suspension of the trade agreement”.

No FTA with China in sight

This is tantamount as saying that an FTA with China is presently impossible. On top of that a possible in the future EU-China free trade and investment agreement will have to comply with the principles set by the EU-US TTIP. This may be an early message, but if De Gucht expresses authentically the views of the core EU countries, it becomes clear that an FTA between EU and China is not within sight. On the contrary the EU is deeply engaged in talks with Japan for one.

All in all, the present basic institutional framework for the EU-China bilateral economic relations will basically remain the same in the foreseeable future. It will continue to be regulated by the WTO rules. The rare earths case is a strong witness of that. The EU Jointly with the US and Japan, successfully challenged in the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism China’s restrictions on access to rare earths and other raw materials. There may be more special agreements between the EU and China, but the WTO will remain the basic institutional framework for their economic relations.

 

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Draghi’s negative interest rates help Eurozone’s cohesion

How COVID-19 could open the door for driverless deliveries

A new Europe for people, planet and prosperity for all

€5 billion of EU energy efficiency project money spent on “comfort”

2030 development agenda: Major breakthrough for world of work

UN chief saddened at news of death of former US President George H.W. Bush

It is me

Consumer protection: Deal on EU-wide rules for those sold faulty products

Blockchain is not a magic bullet for security. Can it be trusted?

Towards a climate-neutral Europe: EU invests over €10bn in innovative clean technologies

Draghi indirectly accuses Germany of using double standards in financial issues

UN court increases sentence of former Bosnian-Serb leader to life imprisonment

EU-US: A new transatlantic agenda for global change

More unemployment and lower wages to make European workers competitive?

UN chief applauds Bangladesh for ‘opening borders’ to Rohingya refugees in need

The gender gap of medicine in 2018

Turn toxic e-waste into a source of ‘decent work’, UN labour agency urges

Why Trump’s tariffs are good news for US garlic farmers

Lifting the lid on policy decisions across Africa

Homicide kills far more people than armed conflict, new UN study shows

10 things you – and your government – should know about competitiveness in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Why 2020 will see the birth of the ‘trust economy’

We must work together to build a new world order. This is how we can do it

Digital mental health is here – but how do we ensure its quality?

The collision of these 3 geographies is creating a new world order

Here’s why e-mobility must be at the heart of the green recovery

VAT: EU Member States still losing almost €150 billion in revenues according to new figures

Switzerland: prepare for population ageing to maintain high living standards

First seat projections for the next European Parliament

This NASA-inspired technology converts carbon dioxide into food. Here’s how

Our children’s career aspirations have nothing in common with the jobs of the future

Moves to create a Kosovo army have ‘deteriorated relations’ with Serbia: UN peacekeeping chief

EU adopts retaliative measures in response to US steel and aluminum tariffs

1 in 5 deaths globally caused by fossil fuel pollution, a new study reveals

Mental health: simple ideas that can make a difference

The technologies – and thoughtful collaborations – that can build resilience in the food system after COVID-19

European research priorities for 2021-2027 agreed with member states

Contribution of healthcare professionals towards the 2030 Global Health Agenda

Joint EU-U.S. statement following the EU-U.S. Justice and Home Affairs Ministerial Meeting

UN committed to helping Haiti build better future, says Guterres, marking 10-year anniversary of devastating earthquake

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

Syrian crisis is ‘clearest example’ of foreign investment in terrorism, Deputy Prime Minister says at UN

Coronavirus: the truth against the myths

“Only through energy policy we can trigger competitiveness”. The Sting live from #EBS2015: Energy Union – When will it happen?

‘Signs of hope’ toward a political settlement in Yemen, UN special envoy tells Security Council

EU leaders slammed on anti-tax evasion inaction and expensive energy

Ceasefire holds in Tripoli, but core problems remain, says UN Libya mission chief

Quality education an ‘essential pillar’ of a better future, says UN chief

Stateless Rohingya refugee children living in ‘untenable situation’, UNICEF chief

Quality Education on the table at the European Parliament

The developing world must get ready to adapt its trade to climate change

Five cities short-listed to become the European Youth Capital 2017

Cambodia’s digital currency can show other central banks the way

Eurozone: Statistics don’t tell the whole story

We don’t know how autonomous vehicles will depreciate – and that’s a problem

4 key trends on how COVID has impacted women in business

Final turnout data for 2019 European elections announced

Investors have a role in securing our shared digital future

Parliament demands democratic scrutiny over national recovery efforts

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s