European Court of Justice to Google: It is #righttobeforgotten but not #righttoberemembered

Google
Did you always feel bad about that weird drunk photo your girlfriend had taken a few years ago and was posted on your Hi5 profile? How disappointed did you feel when you saw that if you Google your name, that horrible photo is still at the first 10 results even though you have today lost both the girl and your Hi5 account?

Guess what. As of 13 May 2014 you are able to contact Google about this ‘majour’ issue that puts your ‘conspicuous’ image under serious risk and then Google will have to listen to you and probably stop sourcing your odd photo at its results. Happy now? Well, to be frank I’ m not!

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled a couple of weeks ago that the short 1998 article describing the Spanish Mario Costeja to have social security debts should not be among the Google results that bring the search of his name. ECJ allegedly protected in this case Mr Gonzalez’ “right to be forgotten”. But what about the “right to be remembered”?

While on one side every data privacy activist would be initially jumping from joy on this decision, I am wondering if this is thought well enough. First of all, since your girlfriend had tagged that photo with your name, it means that Google should link it with a Google search about you; otherwise their spider is ill. The fact that there is not plenty and better content on the web about you than that idiotic photo brings this bad moment of your student life in the first five results of Google about you. Is it Google to blame for this? I am afraid not! Just create some better content about yourself on the web, back link it substantially and this photo will be automatically undermined. Is it possible to send Google requests every once and a while to ‘erase’ our bad Web moments?

First of all, there are major technical issues about that. Who will process those claims, who will judge whether the “right to be forgotten” surpasses “the right to be remembered”, who will take the case to court and who will pay the bill for all that? Moreover, if my clumsy Web result is not shown in Google Belgium, will it be hidden also from Google France and what about Google Canada? According to recent reports after ECJ’s verdict earlier this month, thousands of claims popped up in Google’s ‘mailbox’ from people and companies to stop showing specific results in their profile Google search. Sources also claim that many of them consist of previously convicted criminals that do not want their bad deeds to be on top of Google when someone Googles their names. My goodness! Can ECJ or any sane data privacy activist weigh the implications that something like that has to the society? Do they have the right to forget or do we have the right to remember in this case?

It seems that there is a lot going on here than doesn’t meet ECJ’s eye. Big technical and societal issues apart, I opine that the freedom of the Internet is also at stake here. What do we really want from Google, Bing and all the info access points of our browsers? Do we want them filtered and biased or to obey to individual claims by former convicted pedophiles (sources from UK press support that some of the claims to Google were made by people that were distributing child pornography)? Or do we want them to do their job, scan with their robots the Web following specific code principles, which by the way is their IP, to bring to our eyes the most powerful content about anything in terms of how much it is being discussed and linked to? Honestly, I would go for the second option. I want to believe that everyone that has enough occupied space between his ears wants an absolutely free Web where major stakeholders like search engines are not mandated by any government or organisation to change the way they work.

What is next? Should we expect in Europe soon the story of Google China to be repeated? Not to forget that there the search engine giant refused to filter its results according to the policy of the Chinese government and hence they had to move to the ‘more liberal’ Hong Kong to do business. Do you see this as an extreme? Give Google 1.000.000 EU claims per day to filter anything from ugly photos to content about ex-cons and I will tell you then if they will stay in the Old Continent or they will leave us to the hands of smaller alternatives like Bing of Microsoft. And even in that case, what if Bing starts getting claims after that to filter Web content? Then courts will rule search engines and we will be protagonists of a Spielberg movie where in 2100 we will all look and act the same, since we will all have access to the same info.

My strong point here is that this decision began a vicious circle that can grow exponentially and endanger freedom of speech and access to information, if not examined properly. At the same time, Google and the peer are not saints either. There is a lot covert info on the way they operate, the code they use and how they scan Internet content from Papua islands to Madrid and bring it to our screen in milliseconds. Not to forget here the big EU investigation against Google by DG Competition that started at the end of 2010 and almost 4 years later no decision has been made to fine or not fine the Internet giant. And all this despite the fierce company (e.g. Microsoft) and government (e.g. French Economy Minister Arnaud Monterbourg, German Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel) will to frisk Google spider for multiple reasons. The reason for this huge delay can surely be anything from the complexity of the matter, to prove the way Google results operate is unfair to competitors like Bing, to the huge money spent by the Google lobbyists in Brussels or the unwillingness of Commissioner Almunia to take the full responsibility of the most important case in the history of Internet in the EU and his sly tactics to give away this welcome present to the next Commissioner soon to come.

Don’t get me wrong here. Google’s antitrust case needs to be examined to the fullest and if there is the slightest issue of unfair competition, it needs to be settled yesterday, but not only to put 6 billion euros in the EU pocket but most importantly to secure a free and neutral Web. But an antitrust investigation is one thing and to tell Google not to show the photo of an ex-con is another. Coming back to the “right to be forgotten”, which certainly makes sense, I would like to remind here to the judges of ECJ the huge “right to be remembered” and their duty to compose the balanced magic formula that will have the right significant coefficients to decide which of the two “rights” prevail per case. Setting free an immense flow of random claims to a search engine, with no specific legal frame on how to process and react on them, is not serious enough, I think.

At the end of the day, why our friend Mario did not contact directly the publisher of this ‘unfair’ information about him? Why should the search engine be blamed because the publisher has good back link SEO strategy and brings anything to the Google top or there were little things written for Mario on the Web? Overall, yes check the antitrust investigations thoroughly, make sure that there is a profitable Web market for everyone to grow, but in general don’t shoot the search engines! We can make sure their code does not create monopolies of information accessibility but once this is alright we should not filter them by any means.

Not in democracies! Certainly not in Europe!

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Visa liberalisation: Commission reports on fulfilment of visa-free requirements by Western Balkans and Eastern Partnership countries

Don’t dismiss start-ups founded by millennials. This is how they succeed

Parliament leads the way on first set of EU rules for Artificial Intelligence

EU growth in 2015 to be again sluggish; Can the Juncker Commission fight this out?

End ‘shame, isolation and segregation’ of fistula sufferers, urges UN reproductive health chief

Is this a turning point in the fight against slavery?

How to close the gender pay gap in three steps

On Google antitrust case: “Let’s face it, some companies want to hurt Google and it goes as simple as that”

The digital revolution will transform the steel industry

The Commission offers exit from the EU budget stalemate

These 11 companies are leading the way to a circular economy

EU and Airbus Member States take action to ensure full compliance in the WTO aircraft dispute

Antitrust: Commission fines car parts suppliers of € 18 million in cartel settlement

Soil pollution ‘jeopardizing’ life on Earth, UN agency warns on World Day

MWC 2016 LIVE: Orange targets VoLTE and Voice over Wi-Fi; strikes Google partnership

Investing in rural women and girls, ‘essential’ for everyone’s future: UN chief

Humanitarian visas would reduce refugees’ death toll

EU budget for 2021-2027: Commission welcomes provisional agreement on Horizon Europe, the future EU research and innovation programme

IMF asks Europe to decide on bank resolutions and the Greek Gordian knot

Healthcare guidance apps to professional’s continued education?

ILO warns of widespread insecurity in the global labour market

World-famous cultural institutions closed due to coronavirus are welcoming virtual visitors

Trade with the United States: Council authorises negotiations on elimination of tariffs for industrial goods and on conformity assessment

Green Deal: Commission adopts new Chemicals Strategy towards a toxic-free environment

The London City-EU connection holds despite of Brexit and the ban of LSE-Deutsche Börse merger

Coronavirus: a cultural escape goat or the next Big Five

EU Emissions Trading System does not hurt firms’ profitability

These EU countries have the most government debt

Conditions deteriorating alarmingly in Yemen, warns senior UN official

DR Congo: Restore internet services as ‘a matter of urgency’, urges UN expert

UN celebrates books as ‘bridges across cultures’

Tackle ‘tsunami of hatred’ across the world urges Guterres, to counter anti-Semitism, racism and intolerance

EU leaders slammed on anti-tax evasion inaction and expensive energy

EU to Telcos: Stop Mergers and Acquisitions but please help me urgently with 5G development

China-EU Summit on 16-17 July 2018: “Work together to address common challenges”, by China’s Ambassador to the EU

How can we measure real progress on the Sustainable Development Goals?

UN health agency highlights lifestyle choices that can prevent onset of dementia, as millions more succumb each year

Brexit: European Commission intensifies preparedness work and outlines contingency action plan in the event of a no deal scenario with the UK

July was the hottest month ever – what does that actually mean?

Landmark agreement will protect 100 European Geographical Indications in China

Could switching between summer and winter time end in 2021?

Greferendum: the biggest political gaffe in western modern history to tear Europe apart? #Grexit #Graccident

“Financial crisis will not happen in China!”, the Chinese Premier underlines from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

A brief history of cryptography and why it matters

State aid: Commission opens investigation into proposed public support for Peugeot plant in Spain

Escalation in Syria fighting cause for ‘great concern’ says UN chief, dozens more civilians dead or injured

Afghanistan: Civilian casualties exceed 10,000 for sixth straight year

Last year, this coral reef was teeming with life. Now it’s dying – and it’s up to us to save it

Free flow of non-personal data: Parliament approves EU’s fifth freedom

UN chief welcomes ‘positive steps’ towards peace between Eritrea and Ethiopia

After swallowing effortlessly the right to be forgotten time for Google Ads now to behave

Respect people’s peaceful assembly and fair trail rights, UN human rights wing urges Nicaragua

‘Refrain from violence’ UN chief urges, as presidential election result is announced in DR Congo

We spend half our time at work in meetings – and that’s not necessarily a bad thing

“911, What’s your emergency?”

Why the ECB had to clarify it caters for the entire Eurozone not just Germany?

Amid ‘volatile’ environment, UN mission chief urges Iraqi leaders to ‘listen to the voice of the people’

Why activist athletes are needed today more than ever

EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa: new actions of almost €150 million to tackle human smuggling, protect vulnerable people and stabilise communities in North Africa

Why Africa must be ready to take the quantum leap

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s