Parliament: Last compromise on bank single resolution mechanism

European Parliament. Plenary session, week 6, 2014 – Discussion on the Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund. Evangelos Venizelos, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Greece, has the floor. Greece holds the rotating Council Presidency during the first half of this year. (EP Audiovisual Services, 04/02/2014).

European Parliament. Plenary session, week 6, 2014 – Discussion on the Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Bank Resolution Fund. Evangelos Venizelos, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Greece, has the floor. Greece holds the rotating Council Presidency during the first half of this year. (EP Audiovisual Services, 04/02/2014).

Undeniably, the European Banking Union’s prime target is to definitely cut the umbilical cord between banks and sovereigns, through the creation of a uniform supervision and insolvency dealing environment for all Eurozone lenders. Yet, Germany and France insist that the final decision for the resolution of a failing bank must be taken by member state governments. In view of that, the European Parliament, while being a political institution par excellence, insists that governments and politicians should not have a say or at least not the final word in the procedure to take the difficult decision to resolve or recapitalize a bank.

From a legal point of view, as things stand now, the European Central Bank, being the supervisor of Eurozone’s banking industry, can singlehanded decide if a bank has or is close to fail. Then the supervisor delivers the lender to the next stage, where the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive prescribes the exact procedure and the use of resources in resolving or recapitalizing a bank (bail-in). There is really not much to discuss, except on the creation of solid backstop in case the bail-in funds are not enough to complete the recovery or the resolution. Still, Germany and France insist that decisions, including the resolution and the use of funds, should be placed under the authority of governments, through the time consuming and hazy procedures of the Council.

No more grey zones

This is a clear attempt to continue nurturing the gray dealings between governments and banks. Up to now the major commercial banks, practically in all member states, have indirectly or directly supported government policies by intervening in national sovereign bond markets. All that led to the 2010 financial crisis, where the major Eurozone banks had imprudently lent to sovereigns hundreds of billions.

Now, after the ECB has been definitively mandated with the task to supervise all Eurozone banks, and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive being in force, what is left is only to institutionalize the single resolution mechanism and fund. Exactly at this point the European Parliament rejects the invilvement of the Council in all the crucial steps in deciding and funding the resolution of a lender. Given that these procedures have to be institutionalize within this legislature, before the May elections, the Parliament has offered to Council a series of compromises.

Compromise or lose everything

However the ECOFIN council has made only minor concessions and yesterday the Parliament stated that, “We continue working constructively with the Greek Presidency and foresee that we are close to finding compromises on many technical aspects of the regulation. On the essential issues however, namely the decision-making processes and the single resolution fund, we remain far apart. The Presidency has been deprived of sufficient room to make more than cosmetic changes and, although we are ready to factor in some concerns raised by member states, we cannot sign off on a deal which establishes a mechanism which is unfit for purpose. The ECB, the Commission and many economists have raised these concerns too. A potentially unworkable resolution system will jeopardise banking union and leave taxpayers exposed”.

The truth is that while the European Parliament and the ECB have a European vision, the ECOFIN Council remains a ‘representative’ of the politically strong governments, namely of Germany and France. The Parliament now tries to remind to the Council that the “ECB must be the only authority to decide whether a bank is failing or likely to fail”. It is impressive that all the all the main political groups of the Parliament are unanimous in defending a truly European Banking Union. To underline this, the statement issued yesterday by the parliamentarians is signed by all the lead MEPs in charge of the negotiations for the second pillar of the banking union that is the single resolution mechanism. The Press release is signed by Sharon Bowles (ECON Committee Chair), Elisa Ferraira (S&D, PT), Corien Wortmann Kool (EPP, NL), Sylvie Goulard (ALDE, FR), Sven Giegold (Greens/EFA, DE) and Vicky Ford (ECR, UK).

No to a politically controlled Banking Union

The MEPs “restate that they will not sign up to a system with serious and evident flaws”. Their main concern is that the resolution mechanism as proposed by the Council leaves ample room for unequal treatment of banks, according to their country of origin. It is a crucial moment where the MEPs want a truly European bank resolution mechanism, while the strong member states want to install in Eurozone a kind of ‘financial directory’. The legislators point to the Council that “Resolution actions concerning a specific bank should be decided only at the executive board level to avoid political power-games and ensure that banks receive equal treatment, irrespective of their country of origin. A role for the Council in decisions on a bank’s resolution must be avoided”.

Concerning the resolution fund and the ten year period as the Council demands for the creation of a truly European backstop mechanism, the Parliament proposes to cut down to three years the time for full mutualisation of the financial responsibilities, stemming from a bank resolution. Underlining its decisiveness to work towards a transparent and effective bank resolution system, the legislators note that the “Parliament will in any case take a plenary vote in April to close its first reading, whether there is an agreement with member states or not”.

Now the ball is in the Council’s yard and Germany and France have to decide what kind of Banking Union they want.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Mozambique pledging conference hopes to soften devastating blow of back-to-back cyclones

This billion-dollar campaign wants to protect 30% of the planet by 2030

ILO welcomes new UNDP report that places decent work at the heart of sustainable development

UN rights chief calls for release of hundreds abducted and abused in South Sudan

The future of manufacturing is smart, secure and stable

European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, who gets it and who pays the bill?

4 innovative renewable energy projects powering Europe’s green future

The Europeans with a job diminish dangerously

Civil protection: Parliament strengthens EU disaster response capability

Drinking water: new plans to improve tap water quality and cut plastic litter

Global health challenges require global medical students

Brexit negotiations: back to square one, tougher words, no good faith

After this year’s Climate Action Summit, what happens next?

Parlamentarians to “break up” with reality in the Google antitrust case

3 ways governments and carmakers can keep up with the future of transport

10 things Europe does better than the rest of the world

“If they think they can slave an entire nation, then they will just have the opposite results!”, Alexis Tsipras cries out from the Greek parliament

How can we measure real progress on the Sustainable Development Goals?

Cambodia: Giving back to UN peacekeeping

UN chief condemns terror attack in Kismayo, Somalia

How public private partnerships must evolve to create social impact

Summer 2018 Interim Economic Forecast: Resilient Growth amid increased uncertainty

5 amazing people fighting to save the oceans

Chinese economy to raise speed and help the world grow

Somalia: UN congratulates Puntland region’s newly-elected President

We are close yet so far…

EU Youth Goals – we are shapers not listeners

The Commission unsuccessfully pretends to want curbing of tax evasion

FROM THE FIELD: Stopping aquatic hitchhikers to safeguard environments at sea

New roadmap toward healthier and cleaner oceans adopted by UN Environment and European Commission

5 facts to know about Africa’s powerhouse – Nigeria

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

European Defence Fund on track with €525 million for Eurodrone and other joint research and industrial projects

The relation of deforestation and respiratory diseases

Here’s how data can shine a light on financial crime

Why South Africa is on a path of economic renewal

Eurozone has practically entered a deflation trap

EU budget 2019 approved: focus on the young, innovation and migration

Yemen war: The battle rages on, children suffer most

Despite progress towards peace, Afghanistan facing ‘daunting challenges’ ahead of presidential vote

“Asia-Pacific takes stock of ambitious development targets”, written by the Heads of UNFPA and ESCAP

G7 summit: Trump Vs. G6 leaders on trade and climate change

Who will secure Lithuania?

Act now to end violence, Zeid urges Nicaraguan authorities

China is the first non-EU country to invest in Europe’s €315 billion Plan

Intel @ European Business Summit 2014: Better decisions now, the new business dashboard 

New forms of work: deal on measures boosting workers’ rights

Maros Sefcovic Canete European Commission Energy

Better late than never? Commission runs now to fight energy dependency on Russia with the sustainable energy security package

Warmongers ready to chew what is left of social protection spending

How can consumers be effectively protected from insurance sellers?

China and UK relations post Brexit as EU addresses Chinese takeovers

Manipulating privacy and reaping the benefits of technology

South Sudan ‘revitalized’ peace deal must be inclusive, Security Council hears

Conditions deteriorating alarmingly in Yemen, warns senior UN official

Malta: MEPs conclude fact-finding visit to assess Caruana Galizia murder inquiry

Investing in rural women and girls, ‘essential’ for everyone’s future: UN chief

At last Britain considers a super-soft Brexit

Long live Eurozone’s bank supervisor down with the EU budget supremo

Human health – litmus paper for the climate change?

MWC19 Wrap Up, in association with The European Sting, GSMA’s Brussels Media Partner for the 6th Consecutive Year

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s