Europe enters uncharted waters with Kiev-Moscow standoff

Yesterday the EU Council of Foreign Ministers held an extraordinary meeting to discuss the recent developments in Ukraine. The Council urged Russia to immediately withdraw its armed forces to their areas of permanent stationing. In the absence of de-escalating steps by Russia, the Council agreed that it will decide about consequences such as suspension of bilateral talks on visa matters. From left to right: José Manuel Garcia-Margallo Marfil, Spanish Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Laurent Fabius, French Minister for Foreign Affairs, Federica Mogherini, Italian Minister for Foreign Affairs. (The Council of the European Union Audiovisual Services 3/3/2014).

Yesterday the EU Council of Foreign Ministers held an extraordinary meeting to discuss the recent developments in Ukraine. The Council urged Russia to immediately withdraw its armed forces to their areas of permanent stationing. In the absence of de-escalating steps by Russia, the Council agreed that it will decide about consequences such as suspension of bilateral talks on visa matters. From left to right: José Manuel Garcia-Margallo Marfil, Spanish Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Laurent Fabius, French Minister for Foreign Affairs, Federica Mogherini, Italian Minister for Foreign Affairs. (The Council of the European Union Audiovisual Services 3/3/2014).

With a brief announcement of the G7, the West is practically recognising the occupation of Crimea by the Russian armed forces as a ‘fait accompli’ and by the same token the dismembering of Ukraine. The announcement signed yesterday by the G7 heads of states or governments, even accepts that Russia has “security or human rights concerns…with Ukraine”. As for the consequences and the next day after the occupation of Ukrainian territory by the Russian army, the G7 leaders plus the two Presidents of the European Council and the Commission, propose to…mediate between Ukraine and Russia to “address… the Russian security or human right concerns”. This is a ‘de facto’ acceptance of the occupation.

Of course Crimea is geographically far away from the West, and historically until 1954 it was Russian soil, offered from Russia to the then sister Soviet Republic of Ukraine as a gift by the USSR leader Nikita Khrushchev. In any case, the West today seems to accept that Russia can take back that gift and the strong words about safeguarding the territorial integrity of Ukraine are just utmost hypocrisy and cynicism. All the major European governments in London, Berlin, Paris and of course Washington, when they started arming and financing the fascist and the other militant groups in Kiev, they knew very well that the dismembering of Ukraine will be the end game.

G7 = G8 minus Russia

Not surprisingly the G7 Press release is crystal clear. It goes like that “We, the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States and the President of the European Council and President of the European Commission, join together today to condemn the Russian Federation’s clear violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, in contravention of Russia’s obligations under the UN Charter and its 1997 agreement with Ukraine. We call on Russia to address any ongoing security or human rights concerns that it has with Ukraine through direct negotiations, and/or via international observation or mediation under the auspices of the UN or the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. We stand ready to assist with these efforts. We also call on all parties concerned to behave with the greatest extent of self-restraint and responsibility, and to decrease the tensions”.

This is the first paragraph of the relevant Press release containing the important parts, while the rest of the statement is just words. The G7 also tells Putin that they won’t attend the G8 Sochi Summit in June and they insist, quite hypocritically, that they support the territorial integrity of poor Ukraine. Seemingly the Western governments mean it in the same manner as they recently supported the territorial integrity of Libya and Syria and before them of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Russia can keep Crimea

However, the last sentence of the above quote is unbelievable. The leaders of almost all the developed countries of the world are behaving so cynically as to place on the same footing, the quite impotent and obscurely motivated Kiev government with the powerful autocratic regime of Moscow. What else can the following sentence mean? “We also call on all parties concerned to behave with the greatest extent of self-restraint and responsibility and to decrease the tensions”. In short, the West accepts to freeze the situation in its present phase which is tantamount with a ‘de facto’ incorporation of Crimea in Russia.

Of course, the Kiev government has nothing to complain about the West’s real stance and intentions. All those Tymoshenko’s men and one or two fascists in the Kiev government are now trapped by their foreign masters and will be obliged to play the game till the end. The end though may mean more losses for Ukraine but for Russia too. The intentions of the West and more so of the US and Britain in this Ukrainian crisis, are not so difficult to understand, because out of this country’s destruction the US and Britain have nothing to lose. As they say ‘if they lose I win’.

Who will pay the price?

For one thing, if Putin continues dismembering Ukraine, Russia will probably lose all the $80 billion it has lent to Kiev so far. This is the kind of loss that any country would do everything to avoid, but Russia may be pressed towards this direction by the Kiev government, under the instructions abroad. Not to say anything about the pipelines which transport a large part of the Russian natural gas to Western Europe, through the Ukrainian soil. If those sales will be at risk, Russia may lose some very good customers who pay billions in strong euros. In short Russia has a lot to lose if Ukraine disintegrates.

On top of that, North America, Western Europe and Japan have started to threaten Russia with tough financial and other measures, starting with a suspension of talks with the EU on visa matters. It is certain though that to a large degree the Russian problems from the Ukrainian crisis and the cost of supporting Kiev would surely have severe repercussions on the rest of continental Europe. But not to Britain and North America. In any case the possible incorporation of whatever will be left from Ukraine into the NATO structures is not at all certain that it will be for the good of Western Europe. Not to forget that the dear cost of the Cold War, which started in Greece in 1946 and ended in 1990 with the fall of the Berlin Wall, was borne by Europe. On the contrary it helped both the US and the USSR to confirm their spheres of influence in Europe and the rest of the world.

Undoubtedly the Ukrainian crisis is going to poison the European atmosphere for a long time.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

5 things you might not know about Leonardo da Vinci

Devastating storms like Hurricane Florence ‘unusual this far north’: UN weather agency

Global aid appeal targets more than 93 million most in need next year

Peace icon Mahatma Gandhi’s message of ‘mutual understanding, equality’ reverberates on Day of Non-Violence

5 ways for scientists and clinicians to double up on healthcare

5 things fighting malaria can teach us about Universal Health Coverage

MWC 2016: IoT experts fret over fragmentation

The ITU Telecom World on 14-17 November in Bangkok, Thailand

While EU Open Days 2013 discuss the 2020 strategy, Microsoft shares a glimpse of EU 2060

7 ways for businesses to capture the youth dividend

Four things Turkey did for business in the G20

5 libraries doing innovative things to help their communities

Education critical to ensure future of forests, and reverse their destruction

Retirees will outlive their savings by a decade

Learn from the margin, not the center: digital innovation with social impact as transformative force bridging digital divide

South Sudan famine threat: UN food security agency in ‘race against time’

Better training ‘a necessary and strategic investment’ in peacekeeping that saves lives: Guterres

Globalization 4.0 must build a better world for working people

Joris in Indonesia

5G in Russia: a local and global view on the way forward, in association with The European Sting

US-EU trade negotiations: pointless tariffs against real economic growth

Mali peace process in a ‘critical phase’, says head of UN Mission

Brazilian health: right or privilege?

Spending another 3 billion euros on Turkey feels better than admitting EU’s failure

This Chinese tech giant’s latest gadget is… a bus

How Costa Rica’s environment minister talks to his daughter about climate change

Take action on air pollution to save lives, and the planet, urges UN chief

The Europe we want: Just, Sustainable, Democratic and Inclusive

Confidence-building measures continue in new Yemen prisoner-swap talks

Yemen hospital airstrike under investigation amid resurgence of deadly cholera

World Food Programme accesses Yemeni frontline district for first time since conflict began

UN health emergency committee to re-convene on global threat posed by China coronavirus

Cyprus banks under scrutiny

Where are the world’s nuclear weapons?

State aid: Commission finds Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Engie; has to recover around €120 million

Why are so few women buying into Bitcoin?

3 ways blockchain can revolutionize global supply chains

EP Group leaders on Brexit: “the agreement is not open to renegotiation”

Pushing for tax fairness in a digital world

UN-based World Summit Award (WSA) presents its master list on digital innovation with impact on society from 24 countries

How will the NATO-EU competition evolve in the post Brexit era?

SMEs are the most valuable partners. Here’s why

Japan should reform retirement policies to meet challenge of ageing workforce

Macron in St. Petersburg didn’t oppose Trump on Iran, in Putin’s presence

Italy should boost investment in training for the future of work

UN chief calls for ‘green and clean’ development in message for Africa Industrialization Day

Trade, taxes and other takeaways from Li Keqiang’s speech to the World Economic Forum

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: #GlobalGoals progress, essential meds, updates from Cox’s Bazar, Sudan and DR Congo

The 4 biggest challenges to our higher education model – and what to do about them

EU Parliament: Deposit guarantee and trading platform transparency sought

The power of partnership: joining forces to fight financial crime

Spanish vote – bad luck for Greece: Does Iphigenia need to be sacrificed for favourable winds to blow in Eurozone?

Trump aims trade offensive solely to China, renews truce with EU

Tsipras imposes more austerity on insolvent Greece; plans to win new early election soon

‘Never give up’: UN chief urges all who serve, marking UN Day

UN should be ‘exemplary’ in defending judicial independence, top Judge tells Security Council

Preventing and resolving conflicts must form ‘backbone’ of collective efforts – UN chief

Parlamentarians to “break up” with reality in the Google antitrust case

Why collective action is the key to saving our forests

Hostages to a rampant banking system

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s