Banking Union: ECOFIN and Parliament ready to compromise

Ecofin Council of 18/2/2014. Yesterday the EU finance ministers discussed the possible adjustments to the Council's general approach reached in December 2013, on the single resolution mechanism. (The Council of the European Union, audiovisual services).

Ecofin Council of 18/2/2014. Yesterday the EU finance ministers discussed the possible adjustments to the Council’s general approach reached in December 2013, on the single resolution mechanism. (The Council of the European Union, audiovisual services).

The absolute necessity to conclude before May the trilateral negotiations on the functioning of the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) for failing banks and clarify the role of the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) (in relation to the control and the use of the Single Resolution Fund), united yesterday all the representatives of three decision-making bodies of the EU, namely the Council (ECOFIN), the Parliament and the Commission. One reason that the May deadline appears final is political. Undoubtedly, the next Parliament which is to be formed after the May European election will certainly be much less cooperative with the rest of the Brussels institutions. By the way this IGA body is composed by representatives of the participating member states and has now been baptized Eurogroup+.

In any case, even if the next legislative is not uncooperative, the complexity and the extent of the legal and financial infrastructure of the European Banking Union will be a real ordeal for the new MEPs to grasp. The present negotiation team members of the European Parliament are familiar with the issues at stake after almost three years of hard labour. The lead negotiators for the European Parliament are Elisa Ferreira (rapporteur) (S&D, PT), Corien Wortmann-Kool (EPP, NL), Sylvie Goulard (ALDE, FR), Sven Giegold (Greens, DE), Vicky Ford (ECR, UK), Thomas Handel (GUE/NGL, DE), Sharon Bowles (committee Chair) (ALDE, UK).

The stalemate

As things stand now, the IGA, which according to the ECOFIN wish will manage the Single Resolution Fund, is totally estranged from the Parliament. Legally, it is a common international agreement between independent countries, outside the EU institutions. However the close interconnections between the IGA and the SRM make the concession of the Parliament quite indispensable for the creation of the Intergovernmental. Understandably, the non-EU nature of the IGA has caused strong reactions from the Parliamentarians, who are now trying to confine its authority.

The other and more important reason that the EU must come up with a solid Banking Union within the next two months is economic and financial. The Eurozone banking sector as it stands now cannot support the real economy, with the much-needed credits, especially as the SMEs are concerned. The anemic growth in the euro area, among other things, is a direct result of the lack of bank loans to SMEs. Apart from the South, a lot more central countries like Holland and Austria suffer of this lack of credits. Every month, the European Central Bank announces a new decrease of the overall loan balance. Without the Banking Union all Eurozone banks will continue functioning in a sea of uncertainty and they will abstain from their regular activities.

In such a banking environment the European financial markets have come to a stand-still. Only the very big business groups can find finance outside the regular banking industry. The SMEs which account for more than 95% of all business entities and produce almost three-quarters of new jobs are facing a total loan scarcity. In the south of Eurozone the entire business sector is practically cut off from any form of financing. One after the other the large Greek companies transfer their seat to core EU countries, in the hope to find financing through the stock market or otherwise.

The Parliament compromise

In view of this situation the European Parliament negotiators appear ready to compromise with the ECOFIN Council. The Parliament issued a Press release to put all that in a new framework. It goes like this: “The EP negotiators reiterate their strong resolve to reach a compromise with Council during the current electoral mandate. But such a compromise must be a ‘good’ one … This means that the following principles, among others, should be ensured:
* Decision making on individual resolution cases must be credible, efficient and predictable…the political interference through the involvement of Member States should be avoided since it adds complexity, slows down the processes, and inevitably leads to power-politics…
*The Single Resolution Fund must be single and equally accessible from the start…The ‘national compartments’ of the Council model creates an un-level playing field. Council’s mechanism also allows taxpayer money to be brought in before exhausting the fund… To enable credibility, a repayable loan facility should be established from the beginning of the building up of the Fund.
*The resolution mechanism will rely on the Single Rule Book established in the bank recovery and resolution directive (BRRD)…
*The legal framework on which to base the mechanism (SRM) and fund (SRF) is the Regulation.

For one thing the Parliament seems now ready to compromise on the last issue; the legal framework, and accept a role for the IGA outside the EU standards, but tied to the SRM Regulation. The idea is to cut the powers of Intergovernmental Agreement and of the Council. The ECOFIN wants the IGA to decide almost on everything when it comes to the Single Resolution Fund. It also demands that the Council and its member states to be able to reverse even the decisions of the Single Resolution Board, when it comes to resolving a bank after the ECB has defined it as beyond limit of repair. It must be noted that the SRB is foreseen in the draft Regulation of the Single Resolution Mechanism, as proposed by the Commission on 10 July 2013. According to it, the SRB is made up by representatives from the ECB, the European Commission and the relevant national authorities.

The ECOFIN backs off

Yesterday however the ECOFIN left to be understood that it may accept “A possibly better framing of the Council’s (ECOFIN) role in order to limit its discretion and the grounds on which it can raise objections to the SRB’s decisions, as well as a simplification and, if possible, shortening of the decision-making process”. This is what Ioannis Stournaras the Greek minister of Finance and President of the ECOFIN clearly proposed. In this way the ECOFIN comes nearer to Parliamentarians who demand that, “the political interference through the involvement of Member States (ECOFIN) should be avoided, since it adds complexity and slows down the processes”.

The ECOFIN seems also to accept a better framing of the control of the SRB over the Fund. To this effect Stournaras estimated that there might be “A review of the thresholds for the involvement of the plenary (of the SRB), and of voting modalities, especially during the initial transitional phase of the single resolution fund (SRF), to have a balanced solution for the use of the SRF”. This means that the Council may accept checks and balances on the role of the IGA in controlling the Fund. Now it accepts that the SRB may have a say on the SRF. That’s why the Parliament stressed, “The Single Resolution Fund must be single and equally accessible from the start”. Obviously a lot of compromise is needed in this chapter for an agreement to be finally reached.

ECB’s role sterengthened

Last but not least the ECOFIN appears now ready to accept an increased role for the ECB. In this respect Stournaras noted that “A central role for the European Central Bank in determining whether a banking institution is failing or likely to fail, while the SRB should ultimately maintain a possibility to effectively influence that function too”. The ECOFIN seems also ready to follow ECB’s advice and cut down to five from ten years, the time needed for the full mutualisation between the member states of the burden of winding down a bank.

In short, the ECOFIN Council is ready to accept a compromise on its absolute control on deciding and funding a bank resolution. By the same token the Parliament is ready to recognize the need for an Intergovernmental Agreement, which will have a well-defined and restricted control on the resolution fund.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Rare Disease Day: a new EU platform to support better diagnosis and treatment

UN chief welcomes ‘first concrete step’ in normalizing Eritrea-Ethiopia relationship

Brexit: UK to suffer from EU’s uncompromising stance

Drug laws must be amended to ‘combat racial discrimination’, UN experts say

Your chocolate can help save the planet. Here’s how

Baby foods high in sugar, inappropriately marketed in Europe, reveal two UN studies

11 lessons the history of business can teach us about its future

The Banking Union divides deeply the European Union

Brexit update: Will Theresa May’s last-minute desperate efforts procrastinate Brexit?

GradList Launched At TheNextWeb 2014

Medical students: The need for emigration

More answers from Facebook ahead of Parliament hearing today

JADE President opens JADE Spring Meeting 2014

Want more climate action? Let’s show how good a planet-friendly life can be

The key takeaways of G7 Summit in Canada

New rules for short-stay visas: EP and Council reach a deal

Now doctors can manipulate genetics to modify babies, is it ethical?

More billions needed to help Eurozone recover; ECB sidesteps German objections about QE

Eurozone: Black economy loves the South

Brands can be a force for good and for growth. Here’s how

Six children among 53 confirmed fatalities after Libya detention centre airstrikes: Security Council condemns attack

3 reasons why business leaders can’t afford to ignore diversity

A Sting Exclusive: “Europe needs decisive progress for stronger cybersecurity”, EU Commissioner Gabriel highlights from Brussels

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: Cameron corroborates that Britain should remain in the EU

European Parliament the most trusted EU institution

Close to 7,000 evacuated from Syrian towns after enduring nearly 3-year siege

Young people worldwide can ‘determine the future of migration,’ says UN senior official

OECD joins with Japan to fight financial crime by establishing new academy

Russia can no longer be considered a ‘strategic partner’, say MEPs

COP24: Paris agreement remained alive but fragile while the EU attempts to slow down CO2 emissions for new cars

Entrepreneurial leadership: what does it take to become a leader?

The challenges of mental health: an inconvenient reality

Illegal fishing: EU lifts Taiwan’s yellow card following reforms

MEPs propose more transparent legislative drafting and use of allowances

IMF: Sorry Greece it was a mistake of 11% of your GDP

The Sting’s Values

How bad is the Eurozone economy? The ECB thinks too bad

Why women aren’t allowed to work

Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon

Venezuela: Parliament recognises Guaidó, urges EU to follow suit

How civil society can adapt to the Fourth Industrial Revolution

The financial war touches Frankfurt and Berlin

What have the banks done to the markets making them unable to bear cheap oil?

Climate change hits the poor hardest. Mozambique’s cyclones prove it

SPB TV @ MWC14: The TV of the Future

Pollution could be harming every part of your body. Here’s how

ISIS fighters fleeing Mosul for Syria can topple Assad. Why did the US now decide to uproot them from Iraq?

Mediterranean migrant drownings should spur greater action by European countries, urge UN agencies

Three ways China can make the New Silk Road sustainable

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile World Congress shows off planes, trams and automobiles

Who really cares for the environment?

Budget MEPs approve €34m in EU aid to Greece, Poland, Lithuania and Bulgaria

World cannot be transformed without ‘ingenuity of the countries of the South’: UN Chief

Knowledge management and entrepreneurship: short term vs. long term perspective

Germany resists Macron’s plan for closer and more cohesive Eurozone; Paris and Berlin at odds

3 charts that show how global carbon emissions hit a record high in 2018

How India’s globalized cities will change its future

The world’s most expensive places to own a home

Appalling overall unemployment in Eurozone at 20.6%

Donor countries need to reform development finance to meet 2030 pledge

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s