Banking Union: ECOFIN and Parliament ready to compromise

Ecofin Council of 18/2/2014. Yesterday the EU finance ministers discussed the possible adjustments to the Council's general approach reached in December 2013, on the single resolution mechanism. (The Council of the European Union, audiovisual services).

Ecofin Council of 18/2/2014. Yesterday the EU finance ministers discussed the possible adjustments to the Council’s general approach reached in December 2013, on the single resolution mechanism. (The Council of the European Union, audiovisual services).

The absolute necessity to conclude before May the trilateral negotiations on the functioning of the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) for failing banks and clarify the role of the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) (in relation to the control and the use of the Single Resolution Fund), united yesterday all the representatives of three decision-making bodies of the EU, namely the Council (ECOFIN), the Parliament and the Commission. One reason that the May deadline appears final is political. Undoubtedly, the next Parliament which is to be formed after the May European election will certainly be much less cooperative with the rest of the Brussels institutions. By the way this IGA body is composed by representatives of the participating member states and has now been baptized Eurogroup+.

In any case, even if the next legislative is not uncooperative, the complexity and the extent of the legal and financial infrastructure of the European Banking Union will be a real ordeal for the new MEPs to grasp. The present negotiation team members of the European Parliament are familiar with the issues at stake after almost three years of hard labour. The lead negotiators for the European Parliament are Elisa Ferreira (rapporteur) (S&D, PT), Corien Wortmann-Kool (EPP, NL), Sylvie Goulard (ALDE, FR), Sven Giegold (Greens, DE), Vicky Ford (ECR, UK), Thomas Handel (GUE/NGL, DE), Sharon Bowles (committee Chair) (ALDE, UK).

The stalemate

As things stand now, the IGA, which according to the ECOFIN wish will manage the Single Resolution Fund, is totally estranged from the Parliament. Legally, it is a common international agreement between independent countries, outside the EU institutions. However the close interconnections between the IGA and the SRM make the concession of the Parliament quite indispensable for the creation of the Intergovernmental. Understandably, the non-EU nature of the IGA has caused strong reactions from the Parliamentarians, who are now trying to confine its authority.

The other and more important reason that the EU must come up with a solid Banking Union within the next two months is economic and financial. The Eurozone banking sector as it stands now cannot support the real economy, with the much-needed credits, especially as the SMEs are concerned. The anemic growth in the euro area, among other things, is a direct result of the lack of bank loans to SMEs. Apart from the South, a lot more central countries like Holland and Austria suffer of this lack of credits. Every month, the European Central Bank announces a new decrease of the overall loan balance. Without the Banking Union all Eurozone banks will continue functioning in a sea of uncertainty and they will abstain from their regular activities.

In such a banking environment the European financial markets have come to a stand-still. Only the very big business groups can find finance outside the regular banking industry. The SMEs which account for more than 95% of all business entities and produce almost three-quarters of new jobs are facing a total loan scarcity. In the south of Eurozone the entire business sector is practically cut off from any form of financing. One after the other the large Greek companies transfer their seat to core EU countries, in the hope to find financing through the stock market or otherwise.

The Parliament compromise

In view of this situation the European Parliament negotiators appear ready to compromise with the ECOFIN Council. The Parliament issued a Press release to put all that in a new framework. It goes like this: “The EP negotiators reiterate their strong resolve to reach a compromise with Council during the current electoral mandate. But such a compromise must be a ‘good’ one … This means that the following principles, among others, should be ensured:
* Decision making on individual resolution cases must be credible, efficient and predictable…the political interference through the involvement of Member States should be avoided since it adds complexity, slows down the processes, and inevitably leads to power-politics…
*The Single Resolution Fund must be single and equally accessible from the start…The ‘national compartments’ of the Council model creates an un-level playing field. Council’s mechanism also allows taxpayer money to be brought in before exhausting the fund… To enable credibility, a repayable loan facility should be established from the beginning of the building up of the Fund.
*The resolution mechanism will rely on the Single Rule Book established in the bank recovery and resolution directive (BRRD)…
*The legal framework on which to base the mechanism (SRM) and fund (SRF) is the Regulation.

For one thing the Parliament seems now ready to compromise on the last issue; the legal framework, and accept a role for the IGA outside the EU standards, but tied to the SRM Regulation. The idea is to cut the powers of Intergovernmental Agreement and of the Council. The ECOFIN wants the IGA to decide almost on everything when it comes to the Single Resolution Fund. It also demands that the Council and its member states to be able to reverse even the decisions of the Single Resolution Board, when it comes to resolving a bank after the ECB has defined it as beyond limit of repair. It must be noted that the SRB is foreseen in the draft Regulation of the Single Resolution Mechanism, as proposed by the Commission on 10 July 2013. According to it, the SRB is made up by representatives from the ECB, the European Commission and the relevant national authorities.

The ECOFIN backs off

Yesterday however the ECOFIN left to be understood that it may accept “A possibly better framing of the Council’s (ECOFIN) role in order to limit its discretion and the grounds on which it can raise objections to the SRB’s decisions, as well as a simplification and, if possible, shortening of the decision-making process”. This is what Ioannis Stournaras the Greek minister of Finance and President of the ECOFIN clearly proposed. In this way the ECOFIN comes nearer to Parliamentarians who demand that, “the political interference through the involvement of Member States (ECOFIN) should be avoided, since it adds complexity and slows down the processes”.

The ECOFIN seems also to accept a better framing of the control of the SRB over the Fund. To this effect Stournaras estimated that there might be “A review of the thresholds for the involvement of the plenary (of the SRB), and of voting modalities, especially during the initial transitional phase of the single resolution fund (SRF), to have a balanced solution for the use of the SRF”. This means that the Council may accept checks and balances on the role of the IGA in controlling the Fund. Now it accepts that the SRB may have a say on the SRF. That’s why the Parliament stressed, “The Single Resolution Fund must be single and equally accessible from the start”. Obviously a lot of compromise is needed in this chapter for an agreement to be finally reached.

ECB’s role sterengthened

Last but not least the ECOFIN appears now ready to accept an increased role for the ECB. In this respect Stournaras noted that “A central role for the European Central Bank in determining whether a banking institution is failing or likely to fail, while the SRB should ultimately maintain a possibility to effectively influence that function too”. The ECOFIN seems also ready to follow ECB’s advice and cut down to five from ten years, the time needed for the full mutualisation between the member states of the burden of winding down a bank.

In short, the ECOFIN Council is ready to accept a compromise on its absolute control on deciding and funding a bank resolution. By the same token the Parliament is ready to recognize the need for an Intergovernmental Agreement, which will have a well-defined and restricted control on the resolution fund.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

The European Brain Drain: a truth or a myth?

EU Parliament: No EU-US trade agreement without safe data

Harnessing the power of nature in the fight against climate change

DR Congo: Restore internet services as ‘a matter of urgency’, urges UN expert

‘Score a goal’ for humanity, says Mohammed, celebrating winning link between sport and development

5 ways to fast-track the transition to a carbon neutral world

19th EU-China Summit: A historical advance in the Chino-European rapprochement

IMF: Sorry Greece it was a mistake of 11% of your GDP

Nicaragua: MEPs condemn brutal repression and demand elections

Caravan of Mothers of Missing Migrants kick off a global migration search movement

Parliament cuts own spending to facilitate agreement on EU budget

What the world will look like after the Iran and 5+1 deal; the US emerges as major power broker in Middle East

UN, African Union make significant joint commitment to global health

At UN, Somalia’s President spotlights country’s progress, but cautions eradicating terrorism ‘will not be easy’

Will the French let Macron destroy their party political system?

EU Council: The US airlines may freely pollute the European air

The German banks first to profit from public subsidies of trillions

How digital remittances can help drive sustainable development

Why exchange programs are essential for the medical students of the 21st century

‘Catastrophic’ healthcare costs put mothers and newborns at risk

Thousands of Syrians in ‘life and death’ struggle amid harsh conditions in remote desert camp, UN warns

Yemen conflict: ‘Fragile’ hopes rise, as violence decreases and life-saving humanitarian funding surges

MEPs demand Bulgaria’s and Romania’s swift accession to Schengen area

Let Nagasaki remain ‘the last city’ to suffer nuclear devastation says museum director, as UN chief arrives

The Fourth Industrial Revolution needs a social revolution, too. Here’s how we can make this happen

Facebook-Cambridge Analytica: MEPs demand action to protect citizens’ privacy

Women’s empowerment ‘essential to global progress’ says Guterres, marking International Day

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile World Congress shows off planes, trams and automobiles

The financial sector cripples Eurozone growth prospects

UN chief pays tribute to Egypt’s role in avoiding ‘dramatic’ escalation in conflict across the Gaza-Israel border

Antitrust: Commission imposes interim measures on Broadcom in TV and modem chipset markets

Tobacco-free Public Space in Africa’s Most Populous Country

London wants new skyscrapers to protect cyclists from wind tunnels

The banks first to benefit from the new euro trillion ECB plans to print

‘Unconscionable’ to kill aid workers, civilians: UN Emergency Coordinator

The EU adopted €297 million in concrete actions for refugees and local communities in Jordan and Lebanon

Parmesan cheese on shelves in Italy (Copyright: European Union, 2014 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Daniela Giusti)

CETA at risk again: Italy says it won’t ratify EU-Canada trade deal over product protection fears

What cryptocurrencies will do to the integrity of politics

From Kenya to China, here’s why countries should start working together on AI

How smart tech helps cities fight terrorism and crime

‘Three-country crisis’ across central Sahel puts whole generation at risk, warns UN food agency

Where will evolution take us in the Fourth Industrial Revolution?

How video games can reunite a divided world

Overseas investment falling, developing countries largely unscathed: UN trade agency

How to unleash the enormous power of global healthcare data

Superconductors: the miracle materials powering an energy revolution

How a more integrated approach could help to end energy poverty

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

The end of the 404? Why we need to repair the internet’s crumbling infrastructure

ECB’s €1.14 trillion again unifies Eurozone; Germany approves sovereign debt risks to be pooled

UN launches ‘South-South Galaxy’ knowledge-sharing platform in Buenos Aires

250+ senior claims leaders under one roof, exchanging transformation strategy

Syrians ‘exposed to brutality every day’ as thousands continue fleeing ISIL’s last stand

Syrian Government’s ‘different understanding’ of UN role, a ‘very serious challenge’ – Special Envoy

Preserving biodiversity vital to reverse tide of climate change, UN stresses on International Day

Commission presents ways to further strengthen the euro’s global role

Switzerland to favour EU citizens in immigration quotas as the risk of a new referendum looms

The India–U.S. trade dispute and India’s evolving geopolitical role

TTIP wins Merkel’s endorsement ahead of 2016 tough deadline

Commission criticised member states on blocking financial transaction tax

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s