Draghi proposes timeframe for full Banking Union in five years

European Parliament. Plenary Session Week 50, 2013 - European Central Bank annual report for 2012, presented by its President Mario Draghi, pictured here in the foreground (on the right). (EP Audiovisual Services 12/12/2013).

European Parliament. Plenary Session Week 50, 2013 – European Central Bank annual report for 2012, presented by its President Mario Draghi, pictured here in the foreground (on the right). (EP Audiovisual Services 12/12/2013).

Yesterday Mario Draghi, the President of European Central Bank, proposed that the time horizon for the full mutualisation of all bank resolution costs among the EU Banking Union member states, should be cut by half from ten to five years. Also yesterday, in a different occasion, Benoît Cœuré, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB explained how this can be done. He said “We’ve suggested for instance that shortening the timeframe for mutualisation of the single resolution fund would be helpful…you can build up the (resolution) fund within a certain timeframe and have a different timeframe for mutualisation within the fund”. Let’s take one thing at a time.

Draghi offers a way out

Draghi was speaking early on Wednesday at the conference for the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the European Monetary Institute in Brussels. He delivered a speech entitled “Financial Integration and Banking Union”. Touching the issue of the Single Resolution Mechanism and the Single Resolution Fund, he observed that “the proposed ten-year period to mutualise national compartments into a single fund “creates uncertainty””. Then Draghi added “We would see merits in doubling the pace of mutualisation to have a genuine European fund within five years.”

Also yesterday Benoît Cœuré, gave an interview to Thomson Reuters. At a certain point he was asked “What are your expectations as regards the recent proceeding in the European Parliament’s on the Single Resolution Mechanism?” He answered: “The ECB deems the single resolution mechanism a necessary complement to the single supervision mechanism, so it’s very important that an agreement is reached in this parliamentary session…We’ve suggested for instance that shortening the timeframe for mutualisation of the single resolution fund would be helpful…That does not necessarily imply that the contributions of banks would be accelerated, because you can build up the fund within a certain timeframe and have a different timeframe for mutualisation within the fund”. At this point it has to be reminded how those ten years of the ‘frozen’ Banking Union came about.

The beginning of the ten years…

On 18 December the ECOFIN Council, made up by the EU ministers of Finance, agreed that only after ten years, that is towards 2025, the national bank resolution funds would merge into one single truly mutual backstop for the entire Banking Union, able to take care of every bank failure. Until then, every country would pay for the sins of the banks in its own jurisdiction. This solution was backed by Germany and France together. The two countries do not want to share even the smallest part of the cost of winding down a Greek or Italian bank, during the next four to five years.

In this way, the ECOFIN has actually postponed the creation of the real Banking Union for a full ten year period, in which time every country will continue baring the responsibility and the cost of eventual recapitalisations or resolutions of any banks that operate in their jurisdiction. The national chapters of the Resolution Fund would start merging their resources after the fifth year and will fully merge only in the tenth year.

The ECOFIN wants it all

The European Sting has repeatedly observed that during this ECOFIN meeting Berlin and Paris decided that the cost of winding down a Eurozone bank should be covered almost exclusively with resources of the member state, where the bank is based. The idea is that that the Resolution Fund(s) will be capitalized by a levy paid by all banks. But in the first years of the Banking Union and until the Resolution Fund is fully funded with a round sum of €55 billion, the actual burden of resolving a bank should fall on the national segments of this Resolution Fund(s). If their capital is not enough to cover the cost of winding down a bank, and very predictably it won’t be, other national resources would be tapped, like the Bank Deposit Guarantee schemes which exist in most EU countries. Still if those resources also prove inadequate, then the country’s exchequer and the taxpayers should cover the rest.

Germany and France have bitterly denied the option of sharing the cost of recapitalising or resolving a foreign bank in the next four to five years. Berlin and Paris believe that towards 2020 all Eurozone banks will be able to shed their risky placements and stop financing the government deficits of their country, thus dismantling “the infamous bank sovereign nexus”.

The interventions of Draghi and Cœuré, come at a critical point of time. Presently, the European Parliament and the Presidency of the Council are at a stalemate. Almost unanimously the legislative has rejected the proposal of the ECOFIN for a ‘nationalised’ and highily ‘politicised’ Banking Union, in which every member state will be almost solely responsible for its own banks. Along those lines the ECOFIN has planned an Intergovernmental Conference, which will decide about the ten year deferment of the full Banking Union. During that time, the Conference will also overlook the gradual merger of the national Resolution Funds into one. Of course, all along this procedure, the Intergovernmental will decide which bank will be resolved or saved and recapitalized and who will pay for that.

Breaking the stalemate

The Intergovernmental Conference having the value of a common international agreement would be completely outside the EU standard functions, and will be governed exclusively by the representatives of governments. No other EU institution like the Parliament or the Commission would participate in it. In this way, Germany and France, the two major political and economic powers of Eurozone, by controlling the functions of the Conference, will be able to impose their will on decisions regarding bank resolutions and recapitalisations, despite the fact that the cost will be borne by the relevant member states.

All the major political groups of the European Parliament have definitely rejected these dreadful prospects. As a result, the two institutions, the ECOFIN Council and the Parliament, are desperately looking for a way out, given that everybody wants the issue to be resolved in this Parliament, before the May elections. Draghi and the ECB may have offered such a way out by proposing different timeframes for the capitalization of the Resolution Fund(s) and the mutualisation of its obligations.

The logic behind is not to burden the banks with double levies towards the Funds’ capital of €55bn and at the same time cut the time needed to make it fully operational by half. However, for that to become real, somebody has to lend money to the Fund(s). This somebody, can be nobody else than the wealthy European Stability Mechanism, the heir of the European Financial Stability Facility.















the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

How Britain’s backyard bird feeders are shaping evolution

Spending another 3 billion euros on Turkey feels better than admitting EU’s failure

European Youth cries out: Sustainable Development Goals ambitious, but lack focus on youth

UN condemns deadly attack against G5 Sahel force headquarters in Mali

The role of public affairs in student NGOs

Gender parity has a huge role to play in the fight to save our oceans

International Court of Justice orders Pakistan to review death penalty for Indian accused of spying

Drug laws must be amended to ‘combat racial discrimination’, UN experts say

EU Budget 2019 deal: EP boosts support for researchers and the young

Tobacco-free public space – how is the European law executed in my country?

‘Negative forces’ at work in DR Congo threaten ‘largely peaceful’ relations across Great Lakes region, says outgoing UN envoy

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

Colombia: New Congress marks rebel group’s transition ‘from weapons to politics’, says UN

UN chief ‘alarmed’ by violations of UN-backed ceasefire in Libya

Security Council urged to act with ‘one strong voice’ on raft of ills plaguing Middle East and North Africa

Eurozone: Economic sentiment-business climate to collapse without support from exports

In Japan, if you’re 76 you’re biologically 65

Haitian President at General Assembly calls for essential development aid as UN mission shifts away from peacekeeping

How to make primary healthcare a favourable career choice for medical students: Strategies and reflections

Making money from meeting the SDGs? An overarching approach to sustainable development.

Utmost hypocrisy emitted by EU’s energy regulation

Greece bailout programme: Full agreement after marathon negotiations on debt relief between IMF and Eurozone

What have the banks done to the markets making them unable to bear cheap oil?

EU and Japan select first Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Programmes

UN global education envoy urges new funding for ‘lost generation’ of children forced out of classrooms by conflict

The IMF overstates the risks for Eurozone and downgrades the threats for the US economy

Execution of juvenile offender in Iran ‘deeply distressing’ – UN rights chief

Drugs cost too much. There is a better way to fund medical innovation

No barriers to free flow of non-personal data in the EU

UN allocates $20 million in emergency funding, as Cyclone Idai disaster unfolds

Shanghai has tough new recycling rules – and it will stop collecting trash from communities that don’t comply

The cost of generating renewable energy has fallen – a lot

TTIP’s 11th round starts in Miami but EU-US businesses see no sunny side

iSting: a reader’s thoughts on the UN Environment Assembly 2017

Scaling for success: SMEs, tech innovations and the ITU Telecom World Awards 2019, in association with The European Sting

Youth and Participation: are the people rising up in Spain? 

This start-up is making a palm oil alternative from used coffee grounds

Why exchange programs are essential for the medical students of the 21st century

Illegal fishing: EU lifts Taiwan’s yellow card following reforms

Madagascar: UN chief commends nation on first round of peaceful elections

Environment Committee MEPs push for cleaner trucks and electric buses

This Dutch company has devised an innovative way to deal with food waste

Venezuela must guarantee judicial impartiality – UN human rights expert

The world’s most expensive places to own a home

Draghi’s top new year resolution: Quantitative Easing

Security Council condemns attacks on Afghan security forces which killed at least 27

Former Chilean President Bachelet put forward by UN chief as next High Commissioner for Human Rights

ILO warns of widespread insecurity in the global labour market

3 ways activists are being targeted by cyberattacks

New chapters in EU-China trade disputes

Three ways the world must tackle mental health

Improvements to pension systems have made them better placed to deliver pensions

Everybody against Japan over yen’s devaluation

Refugee crisis update: EU lacks solidarity as migration figures drop

What could a no-deal Brexit mean for developing countries?

Parliaments broadly agree on next steps for economic, monetary union

A machine din

Four major resources for new European young entrepreneurs

G20 LIVE: “Our response needs to be robust…otherwise we will only find the fire we are trying to put out”, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon just lit up G20 in Antalya Turkey

Weather reports could soon be telling us about the role of climate change

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s