Draghi proposes timeframe for full Banking Union in five years

European Parliament. Plenary Session Week 50, 2013 - European Central Bank annual report for 2012, presented by its President Mario Draghi, pictured here in the foreground (on the right). (EP Audiovisual Services 12/12/2013).

European Parliament. Plenary Session Week 50, 2013 – European Central Bank annual report for 2012, presented by its President Mario Draghi, pictured here in the foreground (on the right). (EP Audiovisual Services 12/12/2013).

Yesterday Mario Draghi, the President of European Central Bank, proposed that the time horizon for the full mutualisation of all bank resolution costs among the EU Banking Union member states, should be cut by half from ten to five years. Also yesterday, in a different occasion, Benoît Cœuré, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB explained how this can be done. He said “We’ve suggested for instance that shortening the timeframe for mutualisation of the single resolution fund would be helpful…you can build up the (resolution) fund within a certain timeframe and have a different timeframe for mutualisation within the fund”. Let’s take one thing at a time.

Draghi offers a way out

Draghi was speaking early on Wednesday at the conference for the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the European Monetary Institute in Brussels. He delivered a speech entitled “Financial Integration and Banking Union”. Touching the issue of the Single Resolution Mechanism and the Single Resolution Fund, he observed that “the proposed ten-year period to mutualise national compartments into a single fund “creates uncertainty””. Then Draghi added “We would see merits in doubling the pace of mutualisation to have a genuine European fund within five years.”

Also yesterday Benoît Cœuré, gave an interview to Thomson Reuters. At a certain point he was asked “What are your expectations as regards the recent proceeding in the European Parliament’s on the Single Resolution Mechanism?” He answered: “The ECB deems the single resolution mechanism a necessary complement to the single supervision mechanism, so it’s very important that an agreement is reached in this parliamentary session…We’ve suggested for instance that shortening the timeframe for mutualisation of the single resolution fund would be helpful…That does not necessarily imply that the contributions of banks would be accelerated, because you can build up the fund within a certain timeframe and have a different timeframe for mutualisation within the fund”. At this point it has to be reminded how those ten years of the ‘frozen’ Banking Union came about.

The beginning of the ten years…

On 18 December the ECOFIN Council, made up by the EU ministers of Finance, agreed that only after ten years, that is towards 2025, the national bank resolution funds would merge into one single truly mutual backstop for the entire Banking Union, able to take care of every bank failure. Until then, every country would pay for the sins of the banks in its own jurisdiction. This solution was backed by Germany and France together. The two countries do not want to share even the smallest part of the cost of winding down a Greek or Italian bank, during the next four to five years.

In this way, the ECOFIN has actually postponed the creation of the real Banking Union for a full ten year period, in which time every country will continue baring the responsibility and the cost of eventual recapitalisations or resolutions of any banks that operate in their jurisdiction. The national chapters of the Resolution Fund would start merging their resources after the fifth year and will fully merge only in the tenth year.

The ECOFIN wants it all

The European Sting has repeatedly observed that during this ECOFIN meeting Berlin and Paris decided that the cost of winding down a Eurozone bank should be covered almost exclusively with resources of the member state, where the bank is based. The idea is that that the Resolution Fund(s) will be capitalized by a levy paid by all banks. But in the first years of the Banking Union and until the Resolution Fund is fully funded with a round sum of €55 billion, the actual burden of resolving a bank should fall on the national segments of this Resolution Fund(s). If their capital is not enough to cover the cost of winding down a bank, and very predictably it won’t be, other national resources would be tapped, like the Bank Deposit Guarantee schemes which exist in most EU countries. Still if those resources also prove inadequate, then the country’s exchequer and the taxpayers should cover the rest.

Germany and France have bitterly denied the option of sharing the cost of recapitalising or resolving a foreign bank in the next four to five years. Berlin and Paris believe that towards 2020 all Eurozone banks will be able to shed their risky placements and stop financing the government deficits of their country, thus dismantling “the infamous bank sovereign nexus”.

The interventions of Draghi and Cœuré, come at a critical point of time. Presently, the European Parliament and the Presidency of the Council are at a stalemate. Almost unanimously the legislative has rejected the proposal of the ECOFIN for a ‘nationalised’ and highily ‘politicised’ Banking Union, in which every member state will be almost solely responsible for its own banks. Along those lines the ECOFIN has planned an Intergovernmental Conference, which will decide about the ten year deferment of the full Banking Union. During that time, the Conference will also overlook the gradual merger of the national Resolution Funds into one. Of course, all along this procedure, the Intergovernmental will decide which bank will be resolved or saved and recapitalized and who will pay for that.

Breaking the stalemate

The Intergovernmental Conference having the value of a common international agreement would be completely outside the EU standard functions, and will be governed exclusively by the representatives of governments. No other EU institution like the Parliament or the Commission would participate in it. In this way, Germany and France, the two major political and economic powers of Eurozone, by controlling the functions of the Conference, will be able to impose their will on decisions regarding bank resolutions and recapitalisations, despite the fact that the cost will be borne by the relevant member states.

All the major political groups of the European Parliament have definitely rejected these dreadful prospects. As a result, the two institutions, the ECOFIN Council and the Parliament, are desperately looking for a way out, given that everybody wants the issue to be resolved in this Parliament, before the May elections. Draghi and the ECB may have offered such a way out by proposing different timeframes for the capitalization of the Resolution Fund(s) and the mutualisation of its obligations.

The logic behind is not to burden the banks with double levies towards the Funds’ capital of €55bn and at the same time cut the time needed to make it fully operational by half. However, for that to become real, somebody has to lend money to the Fund(s). This somebody, can be nobody else than the wealthy European Stability Mechanism, the heir of the European Financial Stability Facility.













the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

How to get young people in Europe to swipe right on voting

EU Commission: Growth first then fiscal consolidation

Brexit effect: Public opinion survey shows that EU is more appreciated than ever

Forty-two countries adopt new OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence

Innovation can transform the way we solve the world’s water challenges

Israel @ MWC14: Israel The Start App Nation

Globalization 4.0 must build a better world for working people

Take medical use of cannabis seriously, say MEPs

Facebook wins EU approval for WhatsApp acquisition; just a sign of the times

What lessons to draw from the destruction of Syria

The Fourth Industrial Revolution must not leave farming behind

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “We need more Schengen but reinforce control!”, France’s Minister of Economy Emmanuel Macron emphasises from Davos

Can the EU last long if it cuts Cyprus out?

5 ways blockchain can transform the world of impact investing

Seize the opportunities of digital technology to improve well-being but also address the risks

Breaking news on European Youth Employment: European Youth Forum Guide tackles poor quality internships!

Turkey caught in a vicious Syrian circle bringing terror and war at home

The Parliament rejects cultivating the wrong seeds of the Commission

EU free-trade agreements with Canada and US: imagine the fallout if put to national referendums

Half of all mental illness begins by the age of 14

Gender Equality as a platform to improve Medicine

Hydrogen isn’t the fuel of the future. It’s already here

Prosecution of Paraguay judges over peasant ‘massacre’ ruling could undermine rule of law: UN expert

EU migrant crisis: Germany, France and UK to show the way. Will the rest of the EU follow?

Eurozone: Even good statistics mean deeper recession

These patients are sharing their data to improve healthcare standards

In Washington D.C., Guterres signs pact with World Bank, meets US President Trump

Why today’s leaders need to know about the power of narratives

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: hate speech, dementia, Libya and Yemen, human rights in Brazil and Lebanon

Health conditions for citizens of Yemen’s key port city ‘remain critical’ says UN agency

Cancer research put at risk by General Data Protection Regulation? The possible dangers of a data privacy EU mania

Latin America is a mass-transit powerhouse. But it needs fine-tuning

Clean energy will do to gas what gas has done to coal

The ITU Telecom World on 14-17 November in Bangkok, Thailand

Migration: Better travel safe than sorry

Margrethe Vestager, EU Commissioner in charge of competition policy, during a recent press conference in Brussels / Berlaymont. (Copyright: EU, 2018 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart)

EU opens investigation into Qatar Petroleum over potentially restrictive gas contracts

Why exchange programs are essential for the medical students of the 21st century

DRC ‘calm but tense’ as country awaits presidential election result

Trump’s trade wars: Aiming at long term gains for America

Refugee crisis update: EU fails to relocate immigrants from Greece and Italy

A Valentine’s Special: we can never overdose on love

Brexit update: Leave campaign leads race but undecided voters will determine the outcome of the EU referendum

Western Balkans: European Parliament takes stock of 2018 progress

The miserables and the untouchables of the economic crisis

UN chief urges India and Pakistan to dial down tensions in wake of Kashmir attack

Climate change and its adverse impacts on health

“ASEM: Global Partners for Global Challenges”, a Sting Exclusive by China’s Ambassador to the EU

FROM THE FIELD: Rohingya babies conceived out of ‘incomprehensible brutality’

Egypt is building one of the world’s largest solar parks

The EU Parliament sidesteps the real issues about banks, while the US target the Eurozone lenders

The unpleasant truth of plastic straws

Social Committee slams the 28 EU leaders for false promises

UN chief condemns suspected Boko Haram attacks targeting Eid al-Fitr celebrations in Nigeria

The historic accomplishment of a seamless EU patent and intellectual property space

The Syrian knot cannot be cut without devastating consequences

Who is culpable in the EU for Ukraine’s defection to Russia?

Civilians ‘must never be a target,’ says UN in Afghanistan, amid troubling number of casualties during Ramadan

Can the US-Iran rapprochement change the world?

UN chief calls for Security Council to work with Myanmar to end ‘horrendous suffering’ of Rohingya refugees

Energy Union: EU invests a further €800 million in priority energy infrastructure

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s