EU Parliament and Council: Close to agreement on the bank resolution mechanism

European Parliament Plenary session in Strasbourg on the ‘Single Resolution Mechanism and the Single Bank Resolution Fund’. MEP Pervenche Beres (S&D, FR) has the floor, in a not so plenary meeting of 04/02/2014 (EP Audiovisual Services).

European Parliament Plenary session in Strasbourg on the ‘Single Resolution Mechanism and the Single Bank Resolution Fund’. MEP Pervenche Beres (S&D, FR) has the floor, in a not so plenary meeting of 04/02/2014 (EP Audiovisual Services).

During this past week the European Parliament had been working hard on its position over the bank resolution mechanism (the last building block to complete the Banking Union), in the context of the ongoing negotiations between the legislative and the Greek Presidency of the Council. In two consecutive plenaries the MEPs approved resolutions making a compromise with Germany and France more plausible. The key phrase was that “taxpayers should not be first in line to pay, when banks ran into trouble”. The noble cause is to enact the grandiose project of the Banking Union before the May European Election. The fact that on Thursday 6 February the Parliament negotiators had their original mandate confirmed by 441 votes to 141, with 17 abstentions, means that almost all the political groups of the house back the negotiating position of the team under MEP Elisa Ferreira (S&D, PT). This said, it will be very difficult for the Council to overrun the main points of the Parliaments’ positions.

At this point it has to be reminded that the legislative has rejected the idea of institutionalising an Intergovernmental Conference, made up by government representatives, who will decide almost on everything for a bank resolution, from authorizing to the coverage of the cost. Berlin and Paris insist that for the next five years those costs will be covered exclusively by the member state where the bank is based (including the taxpayers), and only in the tenth year of the Banking Union’s life this cost could be shared by all participating countries. Clearly, the governments of Germany and France, while reigning politically in the Council, would have the prerogative on all those decisions. This Intergovernmental Conference is a simple international agreement having no relation whatsoever with the European Union functions. Exactly for not being an EU institution, this Intergovernmental Conference couldn’t oblige the rich countries to share the bank resolution cost with the poor.

Taxpayers tapped

However, this key phrase referred to above, that the Parliament’s negotiating team promoted last week, means that if taxpayers should not be first in line to pay for the cost of a bank resolution, they can at least contribute to it as second or third providers. This clearly opens a new possibility for a compromise between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission, to the extent of the powers of this Intergovernmental Conference and Agreement.

To speed up the negotiations and repel the accusation of delaying the whole process, the Parliament last week threw the ball to the Council’s court. To this effect, last Thursday, EP President Martin Schulz said that upon request of the political groups, he would send a request to Council for an extraordinary ECOFIN meeting to be convened earlier than the one scheduled for the 17th February, so as to avoid a two-week delay to the negotiations. In this way the Parliament paves the way for a timely and acceptable by all political parties agreement.

Still the key position remains that taxpayers should not be first in line to pay, when banks run into trouble. The truth is that the Council has never asserted that taxpayers should be the first to pay for the cost of a bank resolution or recapitalization. Actually, during the ECOFIN Council of 15 November last year, the 28 EU ministers of Finance accepted that, in case a bank is either to be recapitalized or resolved, the burden will weigh first on the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (after appropriate bail-in). Of course, this is provided by the already in force Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) which also ensures that all banking institutions hold sufficient amount of own funds and bail-inable liabilities. In conclusion, what the Parliament sets as its main request is already met. Taxpayers won’t be the first to pay for the cost of recapitalizing or winding down a bank, they will simply be the second and the third parties to be tapped for this reason.

Closer to ECOFIN’s position

In relation to what was decided during last November’s ECOFIN Council, the European Sting had published a very clear and brief appraisal. In the core of it this writer on November 18 last year concluded, “In brief, if a bank is either to be recapitalised or resolved, at the end of the day the burden will weigh on the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (after appropriate bail-in), secondly on the country’s taxpayers (provision of national backstops) and thirdly on Eurozone taxpayers (the ESM)”. In short, this is tantamount with the prospect of Eurozone taxpayers being the unwilling guarantors of last resort for the entire banking system. And by God, this system has a combined balance sheet of €42 trillion, that is the more than the triple of the total income of all citizens. Again God help us with what lies hidden in those accounts.

Despite all that, the Parliament seems to be stuck in its demand that taxpayers should not the first to be tapped. A Press release issued by the Parliament on 6 February states, “the (Parliament) negotiators, led by Elisa Ferreira (S&D, PT) have insisted that the member states’ (ECOFIN Council) position has significant drawbacks which endanger the system’s core objective – that of ensuring that the taxpayer is not first in line to bail out for banks that run into trouble. The principal drawbacks are an overly complex and politicised decision-making process for winding up banks, and a bank-financed fund which MEPs say would struggle to be credible in the first years of its life”.

Negotiating what?

Having in mind that there won’t be any negotiation about the target of the whole system, because everybody hypocritically agrees that taxpayers shouldn’t be the first to be tapped, understandably the Parliament negotiators will focus on complexity and the politicization of the whole procedure. But on both those accounts, there are many levels of complexity and political interference that the Greek Council Presidency could negotiate, being of course in touch with France and Germany. That’s why the negotiations may be closer to an agreement than what many think.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Central Africa: Security Council concerned by ‘grave security situation’, calls for better agency cooperation

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “You just don’t know if the oil price will be 20$ or 100$ in the next 2-3 years!” top Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff underscores from Davos

What Ghana can teach us about integrating refugees

More women and girls needed in the sciences to solve world’s biggest challenges

Parliament’s proposal to reinforce flagship programmes is worth 39 billion euros

More accessible products and services for disabled and elderly people

Claude Akpokavie, Senior ILO Adviser:“Engaging in policy debates and organizing workers, are two key challenges faced by unions in Export processing zones”

COP25 climate talks: What just happened, and what lies ahead?

Time to pay up: UN summit to push for development finance breakthrough

Peatlands are under threat. Here’s why we must act now to save them

MEPs approve deal on tap water and demand that EU water legislation be respected

Coronavirus Global Response: EU Humanitarian Air Bridge supports Venezuela

Electronic cigarettes, a better alternative or a well-advertised product

Digitalization is changing banking – These 3 trends will help shape its future

Social, cultural diversity ‘an enormous richness, not a threat’ Guterres declares calling on investment for a harmonious future

At global health forum, UN officials call for strong, people-focused health systems

Secure 5G networks: Commission endorses EU toolbox and sets out next steps

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

We need better alignment between climate and trade. Here’s a roadmap

Germany rules the banking industry of Eurozone

Rehn very reserved about growth in Eurozone

Taxation: Commission refers Portugal to the Court for discriminatory legislation on car registration tax

The Ukrainian crisis to destabilize Europe and the world for a long time

Brexit update: Tusk’s proposal is out and Cameron takes it all

In Libya, Guterres ‘deeply concerned’ by risk of fresh military confrontation, urges restraint

Gender inequality in the medicine field: two commonly issues

‘Deteriorating’ human rights in Belarus amounts to ‘wholescale oppression’: UN expert

Humanitarian aid: EU mobilises over €18 million for the Central African Republic in 2019

Stricter rules and tougher sanctions for market manipulation and financial fraud

‘Antagonistic gestures and accusations’ drown out Kosovo dialogue hopes, Security Council hears

New seat projections for the next European Parliament EU28

EU to set up new European Partnerships and invest nearly €10 billion for the green and digital transition

New US President: MEPs hope for a new dawn in transatlantic ties

Reject passivity and embrace ‘responsibility for our future,’ Lithuania’s President tells UN Assembly

Tax revenues continue increasing as the tax mix shifts further towards corporate and consumption taxes

JADE Spring Meeting 2017 – day 3: JADE Academy trainings, networking session and gala dinner – Excellence Awards winners revealed

Commission report: EU data protection rules empower citizens and are fit for the digital age

UN chief appeals for calm as Mali presidential election draws to a close

EU humanitarian budget for 2020 to help people in over 80 countries

How we can embrace the electrical vehicle transition by adopting smart charging

EU Budget 2019 to focus on young people

“Access denied”: the Greek health system under pressure

No agreement in sight on EU budget

‘Address root causes’ of instability in Mali through ‘aid and support’ urges UN chief

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed wins Nobel Peace Prize

Eurozone and Britain heading in different directions

Trump aims trade offensive solely to China, renews truce with EU

Portuguese Presidency outlines priorities to EP committees

Unemployment and exclusion brings EU cities to boiling point

Brain Drain remains a crucial and unresolved issue

Climate change and health – can medical students be the solution?

Ηealth’s foundation is falling apart: what can we do about it?

Ebola Outbreak in Democratic Republic Congo is ‘largely contained’: WHO

Facebook changes its terms and clarify its use of data for consumers following discussions with the European Commission and consumer authorities

This fascinating map shows how food moves around the US

The new EU “fiscal compact” an intimidation for all people

State aid: Commission approves €840 million German guarantee scheme to protect consumers and support the travel industry in the context of the coronavirus outbreak

How migrants who send money home have become a global economic force

Hackers can use public USB chargers to steal personal data. Here’s what you need to know about ‘juice jacking’

Threats from mammoth banks and Brussels fuel May’s poll rates

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Introduction to Banking Recapitalization

    http://iakal.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/bank-recapitalization/

  2. all the time i used to read smaller content which as well clear their motive,
    and that is also happening with this paragraph which I
    am reading here.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s