EU Parliament and Council: Close to agreement on the bank resolution mechanism

European Parliament Plenary session in Strasbourg on the ‘Single Resolution Mechanism and the Single Bank Resolution Fund’. MEP Pervenche Beres (S&D, FR) has the floor, in a not so plenary meeting of 04/02/2014 (EP Audiovisual Services).

European Parliament Plenary session in Strasbourg on the ‘Single Resolution Mechanism and the Single Bank Resolution Fund’. MEP Pervenche Beres (S&D, FR) has the floor, in a not so plenary meeting of 04/02/2014 (EP Audiovisual Services).

During this past week the European Parliament had been working hard on its position over the bank resolution mechanism (the last building block to complete the Banking Union), in the context of the ongoing negotiations between the legislative and the Greek Presidency of the Council. In two consecutive plenaries the MEPs approved resolutions making a compromise with Germany and France more plausible. The key phrase was that “taxpayers should not be first in line to pay, when banks ran into trouble”. The noble cause is to enact the grandiose project of the Banking Union before the May European Election. The fact that on Thursday 6 February the Parliament negotiators had their original mandate confirmed by 441 votes to 141, with 17 abstentions, means that almost all the political groups of the house back the negotiating position of the team under MEP Elisa Ferreira (S&D, PT). This said, it will be very difficult for the Council to overrun the main points of the Parliaments’ positions.

At this point it has to be reminded that the legislative has rejected the idea of institutionalising an Intergovernmental Conference, made up by government representatives, who will decide almost on everything for a bank resolution, from authorizing to the coverage of the cost. Berlin and Paris insist that for the next five years those costs will be covered exclusively by the member state where the bank is based (including the taxpayers), and only in the tenth year of the Banking Union’s life this cost could be shared by all participating countries. Clearly, the governments of Germany and France, while reigning politically in the Council, would have the prerogative on all those decisions. This Intergovernmental Conference is a simple international agreement having no relation whatsoever with the European Union functions. Exactly for not being an EU institution, this Intergovernmental Conference couldn’t oblige the rich countries to share the bank resolution cost with the poor.

Taxpayers tapped

However, this key phrase referred to above, that the Parliament’s negotiating team promoted last week, means that if taxpayers should not be first in line to pay for the cost of a bank resolution, they can at least contribute to it as second or third providers. This clearly opens a new possibility for a compromise between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission, to the extent of the powers of this Intergovernmental Conference and Agreement.

To speed up the negotiations and repel the accusation of delaying the whole process, the Parliament last week threw the ball to the Council’s court. To this effect, last Thursday, EP President Martin Schulz said that upon request of the political groups, he would send a request to Council for an extraordinary ECOFIN meeting to be convened earlier than the one scheduled for the 17th February, so as to avoid a two-week delay to the negotiations. In this way the Parliament paves the way for a timely and acceptable by all political parties agreement.

Still the key position remains that taxpayers should not be first in line to pay, when banks run into trouble. The truth is that the Council has never asserted that taxpayers should be the first to pay for the cost of a bank resolution or recapitalization. Actually, during the ECOFIN Council of 15 November last year, the 28 EU ministers of Finance accepted that, in case a bank is either to be recapitalized or resolved, the burden will weigh first on the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (after appropriate bail-in). Of course, this is provided by the already in force Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) which also ensures that all banking institutions hold sufficient amount of own funds and bail-inable liabilities. In conclusion, what the Parliament sets as its main request is already met. Taxpayers won’t be the first to pay for the cost of recapitalizing or winding down a bank, they will simply be the second and the third parties to be tapped for this reason.

Closer to ECOFIN’s position

In relation to what was decided during last November’s ECOFIN Council, the European Sting had published a very clear and brief appraisal. In the core of it this writer on November 18 last year concluded, “In brief, if a bank is either to be recapitalised or resolved, at the end of the day the burden will weigh on the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (after appropriate bail-in), secondly on the country’s taxpayers (provision of national backstops) and thirdly on Eurozone taxpayers (the ESM)”. In short, this is tantamount with the prospect of Eurozone taxpayers being the unwilling guarantors of last resort for the entire banking system. And by God, this system has a combined balance sheet of €42 trillion, that is the more than the triple of the total income of all citizens. Again God help us with what lies hidden in those accounts.

Despite all that, the Parliament seems to be stuck in its demand that taxpayers should not the first to be tapped. A Press release issued by the Parliament on 6 February states, “the (Parliament) negotiators, led by Elisa Ferreira (S&D, PT) have insisted that the member states’ (ECOFIN Council) position has significant drawbacks which endanger the system’s core objective – that of ensuring that the taxpayer is not first in line to bail out for banks that run into trouble. The principal drawbacks are an overly complex and politicised decision-making process for winding up banks, and a bank-financed fund which MEPs say would struggle to be credible in the first years of its life”.

Negotiating what?

Having in mind that there won’t be any negotiation about the target of the whole system, because everybody hypocritically agrees that taxpayers shouldn’t be the first to be tapped, understandably the Parliament negotiators will focus on complexity and the politicization of the whole procedure. But on both those accounts, there are many levels of complexity and political interference that the Greek Council Presidency could negotiate, being of course in touch with France and Germany. That’s why the negotiations may be closer to an agreement than what many think.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Indonesian tsunami death toll climbs over 400 as Government-led relief efforts are stepped up

Policymakers can ensure the 4IR is fairer than the last three

Ahead of UN summit, leading scientists warn climate change ‘hitting harder and sooner’ than forecast

“Working together to make a change at the COP 21 in Paris”, an article by Ambassador Yang of the Chinese Mission to EU

3 ways to ensure the internet’s future is creative, collaborative and fair

The 5 biggest challenges cities will face in the future

UN and partners call for solidarity, as Venezuelans on the move reach 4.5 million

‘No country, no region’ can tackle global challenges alone says UN’s Mohammed

Now’s the time to take up cycling – here are 6 reasons why

‘Provocative actions and inflammatory rhetoric’ destabilizing Middle East, warns top UN official

A voice from Syria: the positive prospect of clinical research despite the excruciating circumstances

Philanthropy is at a turning point. Here are 6 ways it could go

How do we really feel about women leaders?

Roxane in Cambodia

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: Ban Ki-Moon Closing Address at COP21 Action Day Innovation, Imagination, Faster Climate Action

Four major resources for new European young entrepreneurs

As a rising global power, what is India’s vision for the world?

UN agency chiefs condemn Saudi-coalition led air strike that killed dozens in western Yemen

Energy of African youth ‘propelling’ new development era as UN ties bear fruit

Climate change: Will COP23 be able to accelerate the implementation of the Paris agreement?

Spring 2019 Economic Forecast: Growth continues at a more moderate pace

‘Humiliation was the worst’; Holocaust survivor at UN, asks world to act with ‘empathy and compassion’

Canada needs to increase foreign aid flows in line with its renewed engagement

UN, world leaders, condemn Sri Lanka terrorist attacks targeting churches, hotels, which leave more than 200 dead

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed wins Nobel Peace Prize

How to get young people in Europe to swipe right on voting

Annual UN women activists’ summit opens with focus on services, infrastructure

What meat consumption has brought to the environment and how herbal diets can help human health

Special measures for Greece: 100% absorption rate

In Tokyo, UN chief expresses full support for US-Japan dialogue with North Korea

OECD joins with Japan to fight financial crime by establishing new academy

These are the countries where most adults still don’t have a smartphone

Six children among 53 confirmed fatalities after Libya detention centre airstrikes: Security Council condemns attack

FROM THE FIELD: New sensors protect vulnerable Malawians against deadly lightning

Medical Doctors in Industry 4.0: pure science fiction

3 charts to help you understand the American shale boom

Saving the whales is more important than planting trees to stop climate change. This is why

EU Youth Report casts stark light on life for young Europeans

UN Envoy ‘confident’ deal can be reached to avert further violence around key Yemeni port city

Politics needs to “Youth UP” in order the ensure the future of our democracies

Brexit may finally not really happen; The Brits have second thoughts

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile World Congress shows off planes, trams and automobiles

Engaging ‘head and mind’, key for effective learning, says UNESCO chief on Literacy Day

How can we build a workforce for our digital future?

Eliminating hepatitis calls for ‘bold political leadership, with investments to match,’ UN health chief says

7 shocking statistics that show the cost of corruption

Rule of Law: Commission launches infringement procedure to protect the independence of the Polish Supreme Court

Across the world, women outlive men. This is why

America’s student debt crisis explained

MEPs criticise “America first” policy

Will Eurozone be able to repay its debts? Is a bubble forming there?

FROM THE FIELD: A mountain of indigenous knowledge in Peru

The Mobile World Congress in Shanghai will take place on 27-29 June 2018

The banks want now free capital from taxpayers

Libya: Thousands seek shelter in health clinics from Tripoli fighting, UN warns

Erdogan vies to become Middle East Sultan over Khashoggi’s killing

Syrian Refugees in Germany face distinctly different challenges than those in Lebanon

Finland has a new eco-fashion line – clothes made from trees

These 5 industries can drive digital financial inclusion

What do Europeans believe about the crisis and the possible way out?

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Introduction to Banking Recapitalization

    http://iakal.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/bank-recapitalization/

  2. all the time i used to read smaller content which as well clear their motive,
    and that is also happening with this paragraph which I
    am reading here.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s