Commission paralysed before the banking leviathan

Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission in charge of Internal Market and Services, gave a press conference on the proposals regarding the structural reform of the EU banking sector. (EC Audiovisual Services, 29.1.2014).

Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission in charge of Internal Market and Services, gave a press conference on the proposals regarding the structural reform of the EU banking sector. (EC Audiovisual Services, 29.1.2014).

Although the “Structural reform of the EU banking sector”, as proposed yesterday by European Commission member Michel Barnier, undoubtedly goes halfway to fulfilling the suggestions of the Erkki Liikanen High Level Group Report, it agitated people on both sides of the spectrum. Those who protect the banks by profession said it is ‘irresponsible’, and those who want to see the lenders cornered in the main street taking deposits and lending to the towns’ households and SMEs commented that ‘it changes nothing’.

Unknown risks

As a principle, the EU’s executive arm was supposed to use the Erkki Liikanen High Level Group report it had commissioned in 2011. The Liikanen committee recommended the outright breaking up of banks in two, one risk investment company and a retail banking services firm, with a clearly set target to ban the use of other peoples’ money for banks’ proprietary trading. The high risk part would be able to continue in this line but without using depositors’ money.

In this way the high risk financial entities wouldn’t require taxpayers’ bailout. Today, the major European banking groups devote much less than one third of their balance sheets in loans to the real economy (companies and households). The rest is used to proprietary trading mainly in derivatives of any kind. Currently, Eurozone banks have accumulated assets of €42.9 trillion that is 3.5 times the GDP, while their American counterparts aggregated balance sheet is only 1.8 times the GDP.

Imprudent Eurozone lenders

Eight Eurozone banks out of the 6,000 portray assets above the one trillion benchmark each, three French (Crédit Agricole, BNP Parisbas, Société Générale Group), two German (Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank), one Dutch (ING Group), one Italian (UniCredit Group) and one Spanish (Banco Santander). Between them they control assets of €13.5 trillion or one third of total. They are the ‘too big to fail’ but the problem is that they are also ‘too big to bailout’. The top forty of Eurozone banks have assets of anything around €27 trillion. Understandably these are the banks the Commission plans to incorporate in the new Regulation.

In view of the gigantic proportions of this affair in every respect, financial, political even social, Bernier himself was reserved enough when presenting this Commission proposal. For one thing, the timetable for this initiative is very supple. The discussion in the Council is not supposed to begin before 2015. As for its full application, nobody can offer any credible prognosis. The Council will be the first legislative body where this discussion is to start and the mood there is already polemic. France and Germany will fight it all the way.

Barnier forced to compromise

In view of all that, Barnier indirectly accepted that the Commission doesn’t support a full application of the ground-breaking Liikanen Group report. That’s why the Press release issued after the presentation noted that “In drafting its proposals, the Commission has taken into account the useful report by the High Level Group chaired by the Governor of the Bank of Finland, Erkki Liikanen as well as existing national rules in some Member States, global thinking on the issue (Financial Stability Board principles) and developments in other jurisdictions”. In relation to this last observation about ‘developments in other jurisdictions’ it has to be noted that the Volcker Rule in the United States applies to all banks, while Commission targets only the 30-40 largest Eurozone banks. The passage goes like this: “The proposal on structural reform of EU banks will apply only to the largest and most complex EU banks”.

In any case, it proposes to “Ban proprietary trading in financial instruments and commodities, i.e. trading on own account for the sole purpose of making profit for the bank. This activity entails many risks but no tangible benefits for the bank’s clients or the wider economy”. Unquestionably, this is not a small thing at all to propose.

Forgetting Liikanen

However, it doesn’t go all the way through. While the Liikanen report demands for a clear distinction between traditional banking and modern times financial betting, the Commission doesn’t follow this path uphill. In the second paragraph it asks the supervisors to make sure that the bank transfers the risky activities in another entity, but within the group (“subsidiarisation”). This will allow the bank to use other people’s money to back its own risky bets. It also leaves another door open by allowing “the Banks to have the possibility of not separating activities if they can show to the satisfaction of their supervisor that the risks generated are mitigated by other means”. Everybody knows that the banks can always hide whatever they want from supervisors, probably with some additional cost.

It’s probably this additional cost that brought the champions of the banks to roof tops. The countries more strongly opposing this Commission initiative are understandably France and Germany, obviously because they have to protect the status quo. Already the two ministers of Finance Pierre Moscovici and Wolfgang Schauble have commented negatively.

Most vulnerable France

The Governor of the Bank of France and member of the European Central Bank Christian Noyer went as far as to accuse Barnier as “irresponcible”. This was expected from him because he is partly responsible for the fact that the three largest banks of his country can send France to the abyss. Crédit Agricole, BNP Parisbas and Société Générale have accumulated assets of €6.8 trillion, more than three times the country’s GPD. What about the rest of the French banking sector? So Noyer has every reason to be itchy.

In conclusion, the problems of the banking sector seem to bother France more than any other Eurozone country. Germany may have to face similar financial questions with Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, but it has a national cushion of at least one trillion and formidable foreign surpluses, while France is a deficit economy in every respect. That’s why France is much more vulnerable and itchy when it comes to lenders.

In any case Europe, including Britain, will have great difficulties in confronting the problems of its banks, starting with their capital needs. Poor Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain paid the price for that, by being forced to recognise and repay their crazy debts to German and French imprudent lenders at face value. Little Iceland had it its own way and let the lenders, not the people, in the cold.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

OECD economic scenarios to 2060 illustrate the long-run benefits of structural reforms

Cybersecurity needs a holistic approach. Here are three ways to build protection

UN forum to bring ‘big space data’ benefits to disaster response in Africa

Schengen is losing ground fast revealing Europe’s clear inability to deal with migration crisis

Reception conditions for asylum-seekers agreed between MEPs and Council

Zuckerberg, a paella, and the mighty EU questionnaires that would stop Whatsapp acquisition by Facebook?

How India will consume in 2030: 10 mega trends

Bankers don’t go to jail because they are more equal than us all

US – Russia bargain on Syria, Ukraine but EU kept out

Mobile 360 Series – Russia & CIS: Empowering the Digital Economy

Action needed to end deadly clashes between African herders and farmers: UN chief

The time for cities to get smart is now

The missiles fired against Damascus, Syria divided Europe deeply

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

Germany is the world’s most innovative economy

4 steps towards wiping out cervical cancer

UN chief ‘following very closely’ reports of chemical weapons use in Syria’s Aleppo

5 ways blockchain can transform the world of impact investing

We could be sleepwalking into a new crisis. How should the business world prepare?

Donald Trump’s victory is a great opening for global EU leadership on the sustainability agenda

UN calls for support to implement Central Africa’s newly minted peace agreement

German opposition win in Lower Saxony felt all over Europe

Germany loses leading export place

EU agricultural production no more a self-sufficiency anchor

MEPs back plans to halt spread of drug resistance from animals to humans

Superbugs: MEPs advocate further measures to curb use of antimicrobials

Britain heading to national schism on exit from EU

Vaccine hesitancy: a pregnancy related issue?

EU deal on electricity market rules to benefit both consumers and environment

FROM THE FIELD: South Sudan’s green shoots, highlight environmental recovery from war

ECB: Growth measures even before the German elections

More women than ever before are running for political office in the US

The European Union’s Balkan Double Standard

The “Legend of the Sun” wishes you Happy Chinese New Year 2015 from Brussels

Social entrepreneurs can change the world – but these 6 things are holding us back

Migration crisis update: Greece could probably say goodbye to Schengen really soon

Innovation is the key to the pay-TV industry’s long-term growth

Bureaucracy in the member states again the obstacle for long due strong European Hedge Funds

EU car manufacturers worry about an FTA with Japan

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

Chart of the day: These are the cities where the World Cup threatens productivity the most

Crimea, a wicked game of political chess and a ‘big’ coincidence

Art has the power to change the world, says this renowned Iranian muralist

Infinite Oath

G7 summit: Trump Vs. G6 leaders on trade and climate change

Who really cares about the 26.2 million of EU jobless?

Euro celebrates its 20th birthday

World cannot be transformed without ‘ingenuity of the countries of the South’: UN Chief

Making the most of the Sustainable Development Goal 3: its overlooked role in medical education

ECB reaches the boundaries of its mandate to revive the entirety of Eurozone

South Sudan’s women caught up in ‘futile man’s war’ UN gender equality chief

Japan initiates WTO dispute complaint against Korean duties on steel

Fear casts again a cold, ugly shadow over Europe; Turkey sides with Russia

Is there a drug for every disease?

A Sting Exclusive: “Climate change-the biggest global health threat of the 21st century, yet overlooked in climate negotiations?” IFMSA wonders from COP21 in Paris

Parliament backs a modernised EU electoral law

Bitpay @ TheNextWeb 2014: Innovation’s Best Friend

Basel III rules relaxed: Banks got it all but become more prone to crisis

What will it take for the world’s third-largest economy to empower women?

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Try to strike a discussion regarding the pans that you should be skeptical over
    becoming involved european union parliament with MLMs. Cash flow is different to the profit and loss
    account is complete by entering the sales turnover, deducting the coswt of operating
    a home based business, consider these important
    rules.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s