Commission paralysed before the banking leviathan

Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission in charge of Internal Market and Services, gave a press conference on the proposals regarding the structural reform of the EU banking sector. (EC Audiovisual Services, 29.1.2014).

Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission in charge of Internal Market and Services, gave a press conference on the proposals regarding the structural reform of the EU banking sector. (EC Audiovisual Services, 29.1.2014).

Although the “Structural reform of the EU banking sector”, as proposed yesterday by European Commission member Michel Barnier, undoubtedly goes halfway to fulfilling the suggestions of the Erkki Liikanen High Level Group Report, it agitated people on both sides of the spectrum. Those who protect the banks by profession said it is ‘irresponsible’, and those who want to see the lenders cornered in the main street taking deposits and lending to the towns’ households and SMEs commented that ‘it changes nothing’.

Unknown risks

As a principle, the EU’s executive arm was supposed to use the Erkki Liikanen High Level Group report it had commissioned in 2011. The Liikanen committee recommended the outright breaking up of banks in two, one risk investment company and a retail banking services firm, with a clearly set target to ban the use of other peoples’ money for banks’ proprietary trading. The high risk part would be able to continue in this line but without using depositors’ money.

In this way the high risk financial entities wouldn’t require taxpayers’ bailout. Today, the major European banking groups devote much less than one third of their balance sheets in loans to the real economy (companies and households). The rest is used to proprietary trading mainly in derivatives of any kind. Currently, Eurozone banks have accumulated assets of €42.9 trillion that is 3.5 times the GDP, while their American counterparts aggregated balance sheet is only 1.8 times the GDP.

Imprudent Eurozone lenders

Eight Eurozone banks out of the 6,000 portray assets above the one trillion benchmark each, three French (Crédit Agricole, BNP Parisbas, Société Générale Group), two German (Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank), one Dutch (ING Group), one Italian (UniCredit Group) and one Spanish (Banco Santander). Between them they control assets of €13.5 trillion or one third of total. They are the ‘too big to fail’ but the problem is that they are also ‘too big to bailout’. The top forty of Eurozone banks have assets of anything around €27 trillion. Understandably these are the banks the Commission plans to incorporate in the new Regulation.

In view of the gigantic proportions of this affair in every respect, financial, political even social, Bernier himself was reserved enough when presenting this Commission proposal. For one thing, the timetable for this initiative is very supple. The discussion in the Council is not supposed to begin before 2015. As for its full application, nobody can offer any credible prognosis. The Council will be the first legislative body where this discussion is to start and the mood there is already polemic. France and Germany will fight it all the way.

Barnier forced to compromise

In view of all that, Barnier indirectly accepted that the Commission doesn’t support a full application of the ground-breaking Liikanen Group report. That’s why the Press release issued after the presentation noted that “In drafting its proposals, the Commission has taken into account the useful report by the High Level Group chaired by the Governor of the Bank of Finland, Erkki Liikanen as well as existing national rules in some Member States, global thinking on the issue (Financial Stability Board principles) and developments in other jurisdictions”. In relation to this last observation about ‘developments in other jurisdictions’ it has to be noted that the Volcker Rule in the United States applies to all banks, while Commission targets only the 30-40 largest Eurozone banks. The passage goes like this: “The proposal on structural reform of EU banks will apply only to the largest and most complex EU banks”.

In any case, it proposes to “Ban proprietary trading in financial instruments and commodities, i.e. trading on own account for the sole purpose of making profit for the bank. This activity entails many risks but no tangible benefits for the bank’s clients or the wider economy”. Unquestionably, this is not a small thing at all to propose.

Forgetting Liikanen

However, it doesn’t go all the way through. While the Liikanen report demands for a clear distinction between traditional banking and modern times financial betting, the Commission doesn’t follow this path uphill. In the second paragraph it asks the supervisors to make sure that the bank transfers the risky activities in another entity, but within the group (“subsidiarisation”). This will allow the bank to use other people’s money to back its own risky bets. It also leaves another door open by allowing “the Banks to have the possibility of not separating activities if they can show to the satisfaction of their supervisor that the risks generated are mitigated by other means”. Everybody knows that the banks can always hide whatever they want from supervisors, probably with some additional cost.

It’s probably this additional cost that brought the champions of the banks to roof tops. The countries more strongly opposing this Commission initiative are understandably France and Germany, obviously because they have to protect the status quo. Already the two ministers of Finance Pierre Moscovici and Wolfgang Schauble have commented negatively.

Most vulnerable France

The Governor of the Bank of France and member of the European Central Bank Christian Noyer went as far as to accuse Barnier as “irresponcible”. This was expected from him because he is partly responsible for the fact that the three largest banks of his country can send France to the abyss. Crédit Agricole, BNP Parisbas and Société Générale have accumulated assets of €6.8 trillion, more than three times the country’s GPD. What about the rest of the French banking sector? So Noyer has every reason to be itchy.

In conclusion, the problems of the banking sector seem to bother France more than any other Eurozone country. Germany may have to face similar financial questions with Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, but it has a national cushion of at least one trillion and formidable foreign surpluses, while France is a deficit economy in every respect. That’s why France is much more vulnerable and itchy when it comes to lenders.

In any case Europe, including Britain, will have great difficulties in confronting the problems of its banks, starting with their capital needs. Poor Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain paid the price for that, by being forced to recognise and repay their crazy debts to German and French imprudent lenders at face value. Little Iceland had it its own way and let the lenders, not the people, in the cold.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

More urgency needed to help increasing numbers ‘locked out’, before 2030, says UN’s Bachelet

2013, a Political Odyssey: What future for Italy?

The Sting’s Team

Turkey’s foreign bribery enforcement framework needs to be urgently strengthened and corporate liability legislation reformed

Earth has more trees than it did 35 years ago – but there’s a huge catch

Talking the talk: the voice-recognition disruptors looking to outsmart big tech

How a possible EU budget deficit affects the migration crisis

Paris is building the world’s greenest business district. What can other cities learn from it?

“Access denied”: the Greek health system under pressure

Stricter rules and tougher sanctions for market manipulation and financial fraud

Three ways Finland leads the world – and education isn’t one of them

Novartis and Johnson & Johnson to deprive Europeans of their right to Health

Companies that put employees first perform better

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

DR Congo Ebola outbreak now a Public Health Emergency, UN health agency declares

The EU bows to Turkey in view of the talks for a political settlement in Syria

Immigrant integration policies have improved but challenges remain

ECB intervenes to clean May’s and Schäuble’s mess

Mozambique: UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador Orlando Bloom meets the child cyclone survivors who’ve lost everything

‘Stop and listen’ to victims of terrorism, UN chief urges in message marking international day

‘Step backwards’ for Bosnia’s autonomous Serb region as assembly reneges on Srebrenica genocide report

EU leaders agree to delay Brexit until 31 October

Climate change and health: Raising awareness is the key for greener actions

US-China trade war at point of no return: Washington’s demands go beyond tariffs

Reinforcing EU border security: Visa-exempt travelers will be pre-screened

EU trade agreements deliver on growth and jobs, support sustainable development

The developing countries keep the world going

Essential services on verge of shutdown in Gaza as emergency fuel set to run out

One small flight for a drone, one ‘big leap’ for global health

Crimea, a wicked game of political chess and a ‘big’ coincidence

Nitrate pollution of water sources: new impulses for EU Water Policy?

Activist investors are more powerful than ever. Here’s what that means for the economy

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

Getting African Women into the Boardroom

5 futuristic ways to fight cyber attacks

The horrific trend of the anti-vaccine movement in Turkey

Stronger partnerships with post-conflict countries needed to ensure ‘path towards durable peace’: UN chief

End racist discrimination against Afro-European people in the EU

This is how rice is hurting the planet

Entrepreneurship in a newly shaped Europe: what is the survival kit for a young Catalan and British entrepreneur in 2018?

Elections in Europe: No risks for the EU, leaders readying to face Trump-Brexit

Halt death sentences on children, UN rights expert urge Saudi authorities

Appreciation of euro to continue

A new European banking space is born this year

Pride in practice: Equality in access to health services for the LGBT community in a third-world country

Chart of the day: The internet has a language diversity problem

Indonesia’s imams are joining the fight against plastic bags

Venezuela: ‘A worrying destabilizing factor in the region’, Bachelet tells Human Rights Council

Primary Healthcare vs Specialization Careers, how to promote PHC to the Young Health Workforce?

What lessons to draw from the destruction of Syria

How to talk about climate change: 5 tips from the front lines

IMF: Sorry Greece, Ireland, Portugal we were wrong!

Haitian President at General Assembly calls for essential development aid as UN mission shifts away from peacekeeping

Vile act of torture prohibited ‘under all circumstances’, UN chief affirms on International Day to support victims

Monsanto lawsuit ruling a ‘significant recognition’ of victims’ human rights, say UN rights experts

Antitrust: Commission fines Google €1.49 billion for abusive practices in online advertising

Does Switzerland really need more medical students?

New UN rights report paints bleak picture in eastern DR Congo

We can build an inclusive workplace, and it starts with empathy

A day in the life of a Rohingya refugee

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Try to strike a discussion regarding the pans that you should be skeptical over
    becoming involved european union parliament with MLMs. Cash flow is different to the profit and loss
    account is complete by entering the sales turnover, deducting the coswt of operating
    a home based business, consider these important
    rules.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s