Commission paralysed before the banking leviathan

Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission in charge of Internal Market and Services, gave a press conference on the proposals regarding the structural reform of the EU banking sector. (EC Audiovisual Services, 29.1.2014).

Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission in charge of Internal Market and Services, gave a press conference on the proposals regarding the structural reform of the EU banking sector. (EC Audiovisual Services, 29.1.2014).

Although the “Structural reform of the EU banking sector”, as proposed yesterday by European Commission member Michel Barnier, undoubtedly goes halfway to fulfilling the suggestions of the Erkki Liikanen High Level Group Report, it agitated people on both sides of the spectrum. Those who protect the banks by profession said it is ‘irresponsible’, and those who want to see the lenders cornered in the main street taking deposits and lending to the towns’ households and SMEs commented that ‘it changes nothing’.

Unknown risks

As a principle, the EU’s executive arm was supposed to use the Erkki Liikanen High Level Group report it had commissioned in 2011. The Liikanen committee recommended the outright breaking up of banks in two, one risk investment company and a retail banking services firm, with a clearly set target to ban the use of other peoples’ money for banks’ proprietary trading. The high risk part would be able to continue in this line but without using depositors’ money.

In this way the high risk financial entities wouldn’t require taxpayers’ bailout. Today, the major European banking groups devote much less than one third of their balance sheets in loans to the real economy (companies and households). The rest is used to proprietary trading mainly in derivatives of any kind. Currently, Eurozone banks have accumulated assets of €42.9 trillion that is 3.5 times the GDP, while their American counterparts aggregated balance sheet is only 1.8 times the GDP.

Imprudent Eurozone lenders

Eight Eurozone banks out of the 6,000 portray assets above the one trillion benchmark each, three French (Crédit Agricole, BNP Parisbas, Société Générale Group), two German (Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank), one Dutch (ING Group), one Italian (UniCredit Group) and one Spanish (Banco Santander). Between them they control assets of €13.5 trillion or one third of total. They are the ‘too big to fail’ but the problem is that they are also ‘too big to bailout’. The top forty of Eurozone banks have assets of anything around €27 trillion. Understandably these are the banks the Commission plans to incorporate in the new Regulation.

In view of the gigantic proportions of this affair in every respect, financial, political even social, Bernier himself was reserved enough when presenting this Commission proposal. For one thing, the timetable for this initiative is very supple. The discussion in the Council is not supposed to begin before 2015. As for its full application, nobody can offer any credible prognosis. The Council will be the first legislative body where this discussion is to start and the mood there is already polemic. France and Germany will fight it all the way.

Barnier forced to compromise

In view of all that, Barnier indirectly accepted that the Commission doesn’t support a full application of the ground-breaking Liikanen Group report. That’s why the Press release issued after the presentation noted that “In drafting its proposals, the Commission has taken into account the useful report by the High Level Group chaired by the Governor of the Bank of Finland, Erkki Liikanen as well as existing national rules in some Member States, global thinking on the issue (Financial Stability Board principles) and developments in other jurisdictions”. In relation to this last observation about ‘developments in other jurisdictions’ it has to be noted that the Volcker Rule in the United States applies to all banks, while Commission targets only the 30-40 largest Eurozone banks. The passage goes like this: “The proposal on structural reform of EU banks will apply only to the largest and most complex EU banks”.

In any case, it proposes to “Ban proprietary trading in financial instruments and commodities, i.e. trading on own account for the sole purpose of making profit for the bank. This activity entails many risks but no tangible benefits for the bank’s clients or the wider economy”. Unquestionably, this is not a small thing at all to propose.

Forgetting Liikanen

However, it doesn’t go all the way through. While the Liikanen report demands for a clear distinction between traditional banking and modern times financial betting, the Commission doesn’t follow this path uphill. In the second paragraph it asks the supervisors to make sure that the bank transfers the risky activities in another entity, but within the group (“subsidiarisation”). This will allow the bank to use other people’s money to back its own risky bets. It also leaves another door open by allowing “the Banks to have the possibility of not separating activities if they can show to the satisfaction of their supervisor that the risks generated are mitigated by other means”. Everybody knows that the banks can always hide whatever they want from supervisors, probably with some additional cost.

It’s probably this additional cost that brought the champions of the banks to roof tops. The countries more strongly opposing this Commission initiative are understandably France and Germany, obviously because they have to protect the status quo. Already the two ministers of Finance Pierre Moscovici and Wolfgang Schauble have commented negatively.

Most vulnerable France

The Governor of the Bank of France and member of the European Central Bank Christian Noyer went as far as to accuse Barnier as “irresponcible”. This was expected from him because he is partly responsible for the fact that the three largest banks of his country can send France to the abyss. Crédit Agricole, BNP Parisbas and Société Générale have accumulated assets of €6.8 trillion, more than three times the country’s GPD. What about the rest of the French banking sector? So Noyer has every reason to be itchy.

In conclusion, the problems of the banking sector seem to bother France more than any other Eurozone country. Germany may have to face similar financial questions with Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, but it has a national cushion of at least one trillion and formidable foreign surpluses, while France is a deficit economy in every respect. That’s why France is much more vulnerable and itchy when it comes to lenders.

In any case Europe, including Britain, will have great difficulties in confronting the problems of its banks, starting with their capital needs. Poor Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain paid the price for that, by being forced to recognise and repay their crazy debts to German and French imprudent lenders at face value. Little Iceland had it its own way and let the lenders, not the people, in the cold.

 

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

3 ways the coronavirus is affecting animals around the world

As Dubai switches on its first 5G, what is all the fuss about?

EU Blue Card: Commission welcomes political agreement on new rules for highly skilled migrant workers

Central banking in times of complexity

The European Parliament x-rays the troika’s doings

Single Market Scoreboard 2020: Member States need to do more to ensure the good functioning of the EU Single Market*

All at sea during COVID-19 lockdown? Try these sailor survival tips

Climate Change and Human Health: Two Faces of The Same Coin

One-in-five suffers mental health condition in conflict zones, new UN figures reveal

Atomic agency cites concerns over Iran testing sites, offers COVID-19 assistance

Stable growth momentum in the OECD area

Alarm over violent attacks on lawmakers, opposition in Malawi, ahead of elections

Soccer is back with strict COVID-19 rules. Here’s what you need to know

Why diversity needs your star power, as well as sponsors

How do we design an inclusive energy transition?

5 ways Coca-Cola is cleaning up its plastic footprint in Africa

Bolivia: UN underlines support for ‘credible, transparent and inclusive’ election

World Digital Media Awards winners announced at WNMC.19 in Glasgow, in association with The European Sting

Closing the gap in accelerating women’s rights: the role of medical students

Cambodia: Giving back to UN peacekeeping

These 5 charts reveal the gender and diversity gaps start-ups must bridge

With Caribbean island life under threat, UN chief pushes to face ‘headwinds together’

More women and girls needed in the sciences to solve world’s biggest challenges

MEPs adopt revised rules for road haulage operations in another EU country

Sudan military committed to ‘ensuring stability’ and ‘peaceful transition’ says senior diplomat, as UN rights chief appeals for protesters’ rights to be upheld

Electronic cigarette – is it really a safer alternative to smoking?

Here’s how private investors can turn plastic into gold

Croatian Presidency priorities discussed in the European Parliament

Removing sweets from supermarket checkouts could help fight obesity

JADE Romania Celebrates the 4th Anniversary

A neo-liberal toll free Paradise for the super rich and tax hell for wage earners

Coronavirus COVID-19 wipes $50 billion off global exports in February alone, as IMF pledges support for vulnerable nations

New seat projections for the next European Parliament

London is becoming the world’s first National Park City

Discussions kick off among MEPs and national MPs on economic governance

To build the workforce of the future, we need to revolutionize how we learn

EU elections 2019: Rise of nationalist trends and populism in Europe challenges the EU edifice

Infrastructural and system barriers to Universal Health Coverage: get in my patient’s shoes

How can newspapers survive? By measuring their social impact

From inconvenience to opportunity: the importance of international medical exchanges

Few countries are pricing carbon high enough to meet climate targets

EU boosts sustainable cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Cameroon

The hidden downsides of autonomous vehicles – and how to avoid them

Mergers: Commission clears acquisition of Eaton Hydraulics by Danfoss, subject to conditions

A silent killer: the impact of a changing climate on health

These are America’s most dangerous jobs

European Union: More taxes out of less income

The battle for the 2016 EU Budget to shake the Union; Commission and Parliament vs. Germany

Lithuania finds the ways to maintain its energy security

To be fair or to be sustainable? That is the (retirement) question

How to end overfishing in the global South

Almost there: Equal healthcare for LGBTQI+

If you want to make progress on all the major global challenges, start with water

Latest tragedy in the Mediterranean claims over 100 lives – UN refugee agency

Could play be a game-changer for the world’s forests?

EU budget 2022: Speeding up Europe’s recovery and progressing towards a green, digital and resilient future

3 things to know about India’s space programme

8th Euronest Assembly: the future of relations with Eastern partners

How Islamic finance can build resilience to climate change

How drones can unlock greener infrastructure inspection

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Try to strike a discussion regarding the pans that you should be skeptical over
    becoming involved european union parliament with MLMs. Cash flow is different to the profit and loss
    account is complete by entering the sales turnover, deducting the coswt of operating
    a home based business, consider these important
    rules.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s