Eurozone close to agreeing on a Banking Union

ECOFIN Council. Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission, Vitor Constancio, Vice-President of the European Central Bank, (from left to right). The central banker may look timid before the French showman but he clarified that the ECB needs clear-cut procedures. (Council of the European Union, 18/12/2013).

ECOFIN Council. Michel Barnier, Member of the European Commission and Vitor Constancio, Vice-President of the European Central Bank, (from left to right) shake hands. The central banker may look timid before the French showman but he clarified that the ECB needs clear-cut procedures. (Council of the European Union, 18/12/2013).

In the small hours of yesterday night, the ECOFIN Council agreed on a general approach over the single resolution board (SRB) and a single fund for the resolution of banks in Eurozone. These are the main tools of the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), which constitutes the second pillar of the grandiose European Banking Union project. The agreement reached at the ECOFIN, largely follows the German proposal and doesn’t diverge much from the position the European Parliament adopted on Tuesday.

If the ECOFIN compromise is approved today by the 28 EU leaders, during their year-end European Council, then negotiations will start between legislators and the Greek presidency of the Council as from 1st January. The target is that negotiations between the Council, as represented by the Presidency, and the European Parliament are concluded on time and an agreement is reached over this regulation on the SRM at first reading, before the end of the Parliament’s current legislature (May 2014).

The ECOFIN compromise

The compromise reached yesterday by the ECOFIN Council contains the following basic elements:

*Member states are committed to conclude an intergovernmental agreement by 1 March on the functioning of the single resolution fund and come up with a draft regulation on the single resolution mechanism.

*This intergovernmental agreement would include arrangements for the transfer of national contributions to the fund and their progressive mutualisation over a ten-year transitional phase. It would endorse the bail-in rules established in the bank recovery and resolution directive as applicable to the use of the single fund.

*The single resolution fund would be financed by bank levies raised at national level. It would initially consist of national compartments that would be gradually merged over ten years. During this ten-year period, mutualisation between national compartments would progressively increase. So, while during the first year the cost of resolving banks (after bail-in) would mainly come from the compartments of the member states where the banks are located, the share would gradually decrease as the contribution from other countries’ compartments increases.

The Eurogroup and ECOFIN ministers also adopted a statement on the design of a backstop to the single resolution fund. The statement specifies that during the initial build-up phase of the fund, bridge financing will be available from national sources, backed by bank levies, or from the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), according to existing procedures.

This funding process of bank resolutions and recoveries may look tortuous, but the reference to the ESM clarifies that during the transitional period there would be a reliable backstop. However, there seems to be a problem in the decision-making procedure to conclude that a bank will be resolved. The implication of three bodies in this procedure (Resolution Board, Commission and Council) could be ineffective and time-consuming. The ECB insists that this decision has to be agreed upon in 24 hours, within a weekend. This is probably the weakest point of the compromise reached yesterday by the member states. The Parliament will attack it for sure.

The Parliament’s position

However, the Parliament‘s position doesn’t differ greatly from the compromise reached yesterday at the ECOFIN. The proposal of the legislators has the following main characteristics:

*The supervisor (European Central Bank) would be the sole body empowered to propose initiating a resolution. The Resolution Board composed of national resolution authority representatives and others, would then evaluate this proposal and suggest that the Commission initiate such action. The Commission would then take the official decision to initiate a resolution and the Board would decide on the details for its execution.

*Within 10 years a European Fund, fed by bank contributions and representing 1% of covered deposits, should be up and running… Until the Fund reaches its target level, it could be financed by loans from a “European public instrument”, MEPs suggest. This would include, for example, loans from the European Stability Mechanism or the EU budget.

Common points

The two approaches coincide in the following crucial points:

*The ECB will single out which bank is about to fail and would recommend its resolution to the Bank Resolution Board.

*The Bank Resolution Board comprising the member states and some others will give the final accord for the resolution, in coordination with the Commission and the Council. Upon this issue the Parliament longs for a clear-cut decision-making procedure, supporting the position of the ECB. A decision has to be produced within 24 hours.

*There will be a Resolution Fund, initially divided in national branches. The Fund will be capitalised in 10 years, through a levy on all banks. In the transition period if the Fund needs extra money, it will borrow from national sources and the ESM. At the end of the 10 year period all the national branches of the Fund will merge in one.

There is no question that Germany had it its own way. For at least the next four years member states will be responsible for the resolution and the recovery of banks in their territory. A truly common liability, resembling to a Eurobond, will start emerging after the fourth year that is towards 2020. The SRM would enter into force on 1 January 2015. According to yesterday’s decision in the ECOFIN bail-in and resolution functions would apply from 1 January 2016. The SRM regulation wouldn’t apply before the intergovernmental agreement enters into force.

 

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Better sanitation for India is in the pipeline

As India’s lockdown ends, a mental health crisis is just beginning

Fighting against the Public Health System dismantling means guaranteeing assistance to all

Under fire, UN refugee agency evacuates 135 detained in Libya to Niger

Safe spaces offer security and dignity for youth, and help make the world ‘better for all’: Guterres

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “If we do not do properly the Paris agreement, then all 16 remaining goals will be undermined”, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon cautions from Davos

‘Spectre of poverty’ hangs over tribes and indigenous groups: UN labour agency

The staggering loss of the Arctic Ocean’s oldest sea ice shown in time-lapse

Rare earths are the new battlefront in the US-China trade war. But what are they?

Indonesia has a plan to deal with its plastic waste problem

Eurasian Union begins: the giant modelled on the EU is Moscow’s biggest challenge

A day that Berlin and Brussels would remember for a long time

Preparing Africa for ravages of climate change ‘cannot be an afterthought’ – COP24

How the United States can win back its manufacturing mojo

European Accessibility Act: Parliament and Council negotiators strike a deal

Millions at risk if Syria’s war moves to last redoubt of Idlib, warns senior aid official

South Eurozone needs some…inflation and liquidity

Three ways the world must tackle mental health

How can we produce enough protein to feed 10 billion people?

Future-proofing the European banking market – removing the obstacles to exit

Millions denied citizenship due to ideas of national, ethnic or racial ‘purity’: UN rights expert

“As long as we work together through thick and thin, more benefits can be delivered to the people of Eurasia”, China’s Premier Li Keqiang highlights from ASEM in Brussels

10 Downing street: Another desperate attempt to unite Britain on Brexit

Humanitarian Aid: EU allocates €55 million in Sudan

UN report sheds light on ‘unimaginable horrors’ faced by migrants and refugees in Libya, and beyond

Biblioburro: The amazing donkey libraries of Colombia

These floating homes could protect people from flooding as sea levels rise

Nigeria: Top UN officials say more support needed to ease humanitarian crisis and rebuild lives in conflict-ravaged north-east

Trump’s blasting win causes uncertainty and turbulence to the global financial markets

Malaysia can show the way towards a holistic model for human rights

Have we reached peak smartphone?

JADE Handover Ceremony at the European Parliement

This start-up is 3D-printing an entire neighbourhood in Mexico

The mental health of health professionals: is it worth it?

Trade, entrepreneurship and the future of ASEAN’s economy

Coronavirus: Pandemic alert should be trigger for countries to do more against COVID-19

European Youth Forum on Summit on Jobs and Growth

Service and Sacrifice: Guinean peacekeepers make their mark in Mali

These are the world’s best universities for recycling and sustainability

Yemen blast kills 14 children, leaves others fighting for their lives in Sana’a

Almost there: Equal healthcare for LGBTQI+

Spring 2020 Economic Forecast: A deep and uneven recession, an uncertain recovery

Ebola: EU provides an additional €30 million to tackle the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Japan’s workforce will be 20% smaller by 2040

Mali: Presidential elections critical to consolidate democracy, says UN peacekeeping chief

Gender is where the feminist and LGBTI movements meet. Here’s why

Who should pay for workers to be reskilled?

Global economy: ‘we must do everything possible’ to avoid global ‘fracture’ caused by US-China tensions, urges Guterres

Trump reshapes the Middle East at the expenses of Europe

European Youth Forum warns of a Peter Pan generation as a result of financial crisis and response to it

What does the world really think about the UN Sustainable Development Goals?

5 ways blockchain can transform the world of impact investing

24 new European Universities reinforce the European Education Area

Siemens-Alstom merger: Will the EC succumb to Franco-German pressures for the sake of May’s EU Elections?

UN evaluates progress in improving peacekeeping performance

This graphene battery can recharge itself to provide unlimited clean energy

Doctors vs. Industry 4.0: who will win?

COVID-19 and German constitutional court decision top meeting with ECB’s Lagarde

Tanzania’s Dual Burden

Waste-free consumption: 3 reasons why cities will lead

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s