EU Commission indifferent on Court of Auditors’ recommendations

Janusz Lewandowski, Member of the European Commission in charge of Financial Programming and Budget, gave a press conference following the agreement reached on the EU budget for 2014. (EC Audiovisual Services, 12/11/2013).

Janusz Lewandowski, Member of the European Commission in charge of Financial Programming and Budget, gave a press conference following the agreement reached on the EU budget for 2014. (EC Audiovisual Services, 12/11/2013).

Only a few days after the European Court of Auditors, the independent audit institution of the Union, said that EU money is spent with “little interest in the results achieved”, the Commission published its own assessment on the effectiveness of EU spending, alleging that the “EU budget (is) increasingly an investment tool”. The ECA is regularly auditing EU budget spending and publishes the relevant reports, but its recommendations rarely serve for corrections. The Commission is fortifying its policies behind the finding that EU budget money is spent by and large according to the letter of the law, but says nothing about the accusation, that “EU budget money is there to be spent not to create value”.

Debilitating auditing

During this month, ECA published two reports on the legality and the effectiveness of two of the largest spending chapters of EU budget, singling out inappropriate, ineligible and on many occasions illegal spending. One of the reports concerned spending on rural development, which is probably the second largest single budgetary item. The Court’s ruling was that “The European Union spent €100 billion on rural development projects (RDPs) during the seven year period 2007 – 2013 with “little interest in the results achieved””.

As for the cohesion funding, probably the largest spending line of EU budget, effectiveness seems to be of limited interest. Some time ago the European Sting writer Suzan A. Kane reported that, “Ovidiu Ispir, Member of the European Court of Auditors, gave yesterday a press conference following the publication of the ECA special report concluding, that only 11 of the 27 audited infrastructures projects co-financed by the Structural and Cohesion Funds in the 2000-06 programme period were effective”.

Pure ‘investment’

Despite all that criticism the European Commission issued yesterday a Press release, praising itself over the growth boost to EU economy resulting from EU budget spending. The relevant passage goes like that: “The 2012 Financial Report published today by the European Commission shows that 94% of the total €135.6bn of the EU 2012 budget was dedicated to beneficiaries across Europe such as researchers, students, small and medium enterprises, towns and regions and NGOs”.

With this statement the Commission wants to avoid the criticism that the Brussels bureaucracy has become very expensive for the European taxpayers. It subtracts from total spending the administrative expenditure (salaries, pensions, buildings…) amounting at 6% of the total EU budget. The remainder 94% is then swiftly termed as ‘investment’.

Unfortunately for the Commission some days earlier the ECA had audited the 2012 EU budget, amounting at €135.6bn as stated above. The results are not at all supportive of the Commission conclusions. The reason is that, expenditure in order to be termed as investment it has to create more value than its cost. Consequently every euro invested has to create an income stream for a number of years. This income doesn’t necessarily have to be directly pecuniary. It may contain measurable returns to the society as a whole, as for example is the case when an investment reduces road or rail transport costs, benefiting all users. This is more or less a definition of a socially effective investment, and this is exactly what the ECA contests about 2012 EU budget expenditure.

As if ECA doesn’t exist

At the beginning of this month, on 5 November, the Sting reported on the results of the ECA control of EU 2012 budget. It’s the same budgetary exercise the Commission considers as being 94% a European investment. Seemingly this is not at all the case. George Pepper, the Sting writer, observed that “The European Court of Auditors, the independent audit institution of the EU, today signed off the 2012 EU Budget, but it added a lot of asterisks and remarks over the Union’s payments for last year, singling out inappropriate, ineligible and illegal spending”.

After that the Commission’s allegation that 94% of EU 2012 budget spending was an ‘investment’ cannot stand. The EU’s executive arm should have been much more susceptible to criticism. The Commission should have at least mentioned the reserves of the ECA, concerning budget spending. It’s completely inappropriate to pretend that the ECA report on the same budgetary exercise never existed.

 

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

THE ROAD TO GANESHA

At Davos, UN chief urges ‘big emitters’ to take climate action

In Bahrain, Global Forum for Entrepreneurs and Investment examines empowerment of women, youth through innovation

UN chief hails victory of ‘political will’ in historic Republic of North Macedonia accord

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: UN Secretary-General Announces “Climate Action 2016” Partnership

‘Repeated attacks’ could close down key hospital in eastern Libya, says WHO

UN chief highlights action across borders for ‘stable and prosperous Eurasia’

Half the world’s population is still offline. Here’s why that matters

Here’s why China’s trade deal with Mauritius matters

Bangladesh, South Africa and Bolivia all beat the US for women’s representation in politics

Climate change and its adverse impacts on health

Autonomous vehicles could clog city centres: a lesson from Boston

Speeches of Vice Premier LIU He and Vice President of the European Commission Jyrki Katainen at the Press Conference of the Seventh China-EU High-level Economic and Trade Dialogue

Time to make a fundamental choice about the future of healthcare

Thinking throughout HIV: changing a perspective

OECD Steel Committee concerned about excess capacity in steel sector

Building a European Health Union: Stronger crisis preparedness and response for Europe

4 rules to stop governments misusing COVID-19 tech after the crisis

Syrian Government’s ‘different understanding’ of UN role, a ‘very serious challenge’ – Special Envoy

Illicit trade endangers the environment, the law and the SDGs. We need a global response

LGBTQ+: The social evolution of a minority

Seaweed, enzymes and compostable cups: Can ‘Big Food’ take on plastic and win?

Coronavirus: the Commission mobilises all of its resources to protect lives and livelihoods

The EU prepares for the end of LIBOR: the Commission welcomes the agreement reached between the European Parliament and the Council on financial benchmarks

Our healthcare systems are ailing. Here’s how to make them better

Hiring more female leaders is good for profits. Here’s the evidence

Which countries get the most sleep – and how much do we really need?

Cancer research put at risk by General Data Protection Regulation? The possible dangers of a data privacy EU mania

Finland has just published everyone’s taxes on ‘National Jealousy Day’

Fighting against the Public Health System dismantling means guaranteeing assistance to all

8th Euronest Assembly: the future of relations with Eastern partners

Germany may prove right rejecting Commission’s bank resolution scheme

Parliament criticises Council’s rejection of money laundering blacklist

Revamp collective bargaining to prevent rising labour market inequalities in rapidly changing world of work

Summer pause gives time to rethink Eurozone’s problems

China in my eyes

Why 2020 will see the birth of the ‘trust economy’

Costa Rica is one of the world’s happiest countries. Here’s what it does differently

Providing mental health during pandemic times

Four ways Artificial Intelligence can make healthcare more efficient and affordable

Closing the gaps in accelerating women’s rights: the role of medical students

Does Draghi have another ace up his sleeve given his Quantitative Easing failure?

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

The link between air pollution and COVID-19 deaths

Execution of juvenile offender in Iran ‘deeply distressing’ – UN rights chief

Protecting farmers and quality products: vote on EU farm policy reform plans

What’s needed to ensure maternal health for women in vulnerable populations

Historical success for the First ever European Presidential Debate

Trump declares emergency and WHO urges speed – latest coronavirus updates

Joint U.S.-EU Statement following President Juncker’s visit to the White House

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

European Junior Enterprises to address the significant skills mismatch in the EU between school and employment

Schools must look to the future when connecting students to the internet

The European Sting’s 2018 in most critical review

Mental health in midst of a pandemic: can we help?

EU ready to relinquish its internal tax havens

Why youth unemployment is so difficult to counter

‘Maintain calm’ and ‘exercise patience’ UN envoy urges, as Nigeria heads to polls

Why the 21st century’s biggest health challenge is our shared responsibility

Eurozone: Negative statistics bring deflation and recession closer

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s