EU Commission indifferent on Court of Auditors’ recommendations

Janusz Lewandowski, Member of the European Commission in charge of Financial Programming and Budget, gave a press conference following the agreement reached on the EU budget for 2014. (EC Audiovisual Services, 12/11/2013).

Janusz Lewandowski, Member of the European Commission in charge of Financial Programming and Budget, gave a press conference following the agreement reached on the EU budget for 2014. (EC Audiovisual Services, 12/11/2013).

Only a few days after the European Court of Auditors, the independent audit institution of the Union, said that EU money is spent with “little interest in the results achieved”, the Commission published its own assessment on the effectiveness of EU spending, alleging that the “EU budget (is) increasingly an investment tool”. The ECA is regularly auditing EU budget spending and publishes the relevant reports, but its recommendations rarely serve for corrections. The Commission is fortifying its policies behind the finding that EU budget money is spent by and large according to the letter of the law, but says nothing about the accusation, that “EU budget money is there to be spent not to create value”.

Debilitating auditing

During this month, ECA published two reports on the legality and the effectiveness of two of the largest spending chapters of EU budget, singling out inappropriate, ineligible and on many occasions illegal spending. One of the reports concerned spending on rural development, which is probably the second largest single budgetary item. The Court’s ruling was that “The European Union spent €100 billion on rural development projects (RDPs) during the seven year period 2007 – 2013 with “little interest in the results achieved””.

As for the cohesion funding, probably the largest spending line of EU budget, effectiveness seems to be of limited interest. Some time ago the European Sting writer Suzan A. Kane reported that, “Ovidiu Ispir, Member of the European Court of Auditors, gave yesterday a press conference following the publication of the ECA special report concluding, that only 11 of the 27 audited infrastructures projects co-financed by the Structural and Cohesion Funds in the 2000-06 programme period were effective”.

Pure ‘investment’

Despite all that criticism the European Commission issued yesterday a Press release, praising itself over the growth boost to EU economy resulting from EU budget spending. The relevant passage goes like that: “The 2012 Financial Report published today by the European Commission shows that 94% of the total €135.6bn of the EU 2012 budget was dedicated to beneficiaries across Europe such as researchers, students, small and medium enterprises, towns and regions and NGOs”.

With this statement the Commission wants to avoid the criticism that the Brussels bureaucracy has become very expensive for the European taxpayers. It subtracts from total spending the administrative expenditure (salaries, pensions, buildings…) amounting at 6% of the total EU budget. The remainder 94% is then swiftly termed as ‘investment’.

Unfortunately for the Commission some days earlier the ECA had audited the 2012 EU budget, amounting at €135.6bn as stated above. The results are not at all supportive of the Commission conclusions. The reason is that, expenditure in order to be termed as investment it has to create more value than its cost. Consequently every euro invested has to create an income stream for a number of years. This income doesn’t necessarily have to be directly pecuniary. It may contain measurable returns to the society as a whole, as for example is the case when an investment reduces road or rail transport costs, benefiting all users. This is more or less a definition of a socially effective investment, and this is exactly what the ECA contests about 2012 EU budget expenditure.

As if ECA doesn’t exist

At the beginning of this month, on 5 November, the Sting reported on the results of the ECA control of EU 2012 budget. It’s the same budgetary exercise the Commission considers as being 94% a European investment. Seemingly this is not at all the case. George Pepper, the Sting writer, observed that “The European Court of Auditors, the independent audit institution of the EU, today signed off the 2012 EU Budget, but it added a lot of asterisks and remarks over the Union’s payments for last year, singling out inappropriate, ineligible and illegal spending”.

After that the Commission’s allegation that 94% of EU 2012 budget spending was an ‘investment’ cannot stand. The EU’s executive arm should have been much more susceptible to criticism. The Commission should have at least mentioned the reserves of the ECA, concerning budget spending. It’s completely inappropriate to pretend that the ECA report on the same budgetary exercise never existed.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Trump questions US – Europe kinship, approaches Russia

“We are in Europe, but not of it”, from Churchill to Cameron: British Exceptionalism now threatens the entire EU Edifice

How we can work together in the fight against NCDs

First aid in six months reaches families in western Yemen, ‘timelines’ slip over Hudaydah ceasefire talks

This is how we make basic income a reality

Look Mom, even the House of Lords says the #righttobeforgotten is not right

World Retail Congress Dubai 2016: Retail’s night of nights

ECB with an iron hand disciplines the smaller Eurozone member states; latest victim: Greece

Tobacco in Pakistan: is it worth to burn your money?

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

Eurozone recession subsides

The EU Commission fails to draw the right conclusions about corruption

“Asia-Pacific takes stock of ambitious development targets”, written by the Heads of UNFPA and ESCAP

UN agriculture agency digs in to help forests and farms build resilience to climate change

What is inclusive capitalism, and why does it matter?

The United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union will impact young people’s future the most

Global ageing is a challenge – and an opportunity

The Chinese retail revolution is heading west

OECD joins with Argentina to fight financial crime

Europe’s richest regions actively seek investment from China’s biggest banks

The Oslo model: how to prepare your city for the electric-vehicle surge

The US banks drive the developing world to a catastrophe

Here’s how we solve the global crisis of tribalism and democratic decay

IPCC reports devastating climate consequences; US in denial while EU does not fully support the 2050 net zero emissions target

The Banking Union divides deeply the European Union

The Parliament paves the way for the creation of the European Banking Union

Improvements to pension systems have made them better placed to deliver pensions

Fragile countries risk being ‘stuck in a cycle of conflict and climate disaster,’ Security Council told

UK’s May stresses global cooperation at UN General Assembly

Easing funding woes for UN agency assisting Palestine refugees a ‘wise investment for today and the future’

Norway initiates WTO dispute complaint against US steel, aluminium duties

Why exchange programs are essential for the medical students of the 21st century

Millions of young people need better job skills. Here’s how businesses can help

How dearly will Germany pay for the Volkswagen emissions rigging scandal

“InvestEU”: MEPs support new programme to boost financing for jobs and growth

Why capital markets have no more reservetions about Eurozone

The DNA of the future retail CEO

EU Commission indifferent on Court of Auditors’ recommendations

The hidden cost of the electric car boom – child labour

Colombia: Santos thanks the EU for its support to the peace process

New EU rules to thwart money laundering and terrorist financing

‘Well-being of two million’ in Gaza at stake as emergency fuel runs dry: UN humanitarian coordinator

A Sting Exclusive: “Doing ourselves a favour”, Vice President Dombrovskis underscores that this time growth has to come from within the EU

Chatterbox Rome Declaration cannot save the EU; Germany has to pay more to do that

We need to talk about failure in the social sector

ECB to buy corporate bonds: Will government financing be the next step?

This crisis cannot be confronted with statistics

‘Multiplicity’ of rights violations in Ukraine as fifth winter of conflict bites

How leaders can use ‘agile governance’ to drive tech and win trust

Greece leaves EU aid program, gets last 15 billion euro

The secret weapon in the fight for sustainability? The humble barcode

Slight easing of G20 GDP growth in first quarter of 2018

First-ever UN report on disability and development, illustrates inclusion gaps

Russia and the West use the same tactics to dismember Ukraine

A skills gap is jeopardizing efforts to end energy poverty

Cancer research put at risk by General Data Protection Regulation? The possible dangers of a data privacy EU mania

Yemen: ‘Living hell’ for all children, says UNICEF; Angelia Jolie calls for ‘lasting ceasefire’

Roxane in Cambodia

Internet of Things: a Force for Good or Evil?

The EU seals CETA but plans to re-baptise TTIP after missing the 2016 deadline

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s