Eurozone guarantees all banks with…taxpayers’ money

ECOFIN Council of 15/11/2013. From left to right: Anders Borg, Swedish Minister for Finance and Wolfgang Schauble, German Federal Minister for Finance. (Council of the European Union photographic library).

ECOFIN Council of 15/11/2013. From left to right: Anders Borg, Swedish Minister for Finance and Wolfgang Schauble, German Federal Minister for Finance. (Council of the European Union photographic library).

Last Friday the ECOFIN council made up by the 28 EU ministers of finance, confirmed that a permanent arrangement for the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) and the single resolution fund (SRF) meant to deal with failing banks, will be agreed on before the end of the year covering the period after 1 January 2015. In the mean-time, there will be a guarantee similar to the regular one in place. There is every indication that ECOFIN’s final decision will go along the lines of European Central Bank’s and Commission’s proposals. Let’s take one thing at a time.

It must be reminded that the ECB recently published its opinion on the Single Resolution Mechanism and Fund, largely supporting the European Commission’s position on their enactment, the last crucial step needed to accomplish the European Banking Union. The opinion contains the following three essential requirements for effective bank resolutions: a single system, a single authority with decision-making powers and a single resolution fund financed ex ante by the banking sector.

The time plan

If an agreement is reached within this year, the regulations on the single resolution mechanism and fund will be in force as from 1 January 2015. The ECB however, in view of carrying out its supervisory duty of Eurozone banks as from November 2014 (which is the official Single Supervision Mechanism) has already initiated a preliminary exercise, to be conducted during the next twelve months, in order to test the ground of Eurozone’s unexplored banking constellation.

To this effect, the ECB announced on 23 October that it starts a ‘comprehensive assessment’ of Eurozone banks in advance of its regular supervisory role. The assessment will cover 130 systemic euro area banks accounting for 85% of the total banking system. Those banks will undergo risk assessment, asset quality review and stress test. The exercise starts this month and will be concluded in November 2014.

Testing the banking ground

According to the ECB, the assessment “will consist of three elements: i) a supervisory risk assessment to review, quantitatively and qualitatively, key risks, including liquidity, leverage and funding; ii) an asset quality review (AQR) to enhance the transparency of bank exposures by reviewing the quality of banks’ assets, including the adequacy of asset and collateral valuation and related provisions; and iii) a stress test to examine the resilience of banks’ balance sheet to stress scenarios”.

In conducting this exercise the ECB may find that some banks need urgent recapitalisation or even that one or more of them are ‘beyond limit of repair’. Consequently, the central bank says that if this entire comprehensive assessment of Eurozone banks is to be credible, there has be an arrangement in place to deal with the difficult cases which may arise.

Last Friday’s ECOFIN answered this question as follows, “in the eventuality that the comprehensive assessments/stress tests reveal a capital shortfall, the established pecking order (first private sources, then national and euro area/EU instruments) will apply”. The meaning of this passage is obviously that whatever the capital needs of a certain problematic bank, at the end of the day, it will be the country’s or the European taxpayers (national and euro area/EU instruments) who will be called to foot the bill, for the recapitalisation or the resolution of any bank.

Always the taxpayers

As if this arrangement was not clear enough, the ECOFIN further explained that, “In a first instance, banks should raise capital in the market, retain profits, undertake capital accretive sales and restructuring…If this is revealed not to be sufficient…member states should mobilise all appropriate arrangements for recapitalising banks, if needed, including through the provision of public backstops where appropriate…In the second instance, if national backstops are not sufficient, instruments at the euro area/EU level will be available as appropriate: At the euro area level, European Stability Mechanism instruments may be used in the appropriate sequencing, according to their respective agreed rules and requirements: First, the ESM can provide through its normal procedures financial assistance for the recapitalisation of financial institutions in the form of a loan to a Member State, after appropriate bail-in, in full respect of EU State Aid rules. Second, the direct recapitalisation instrument with its €60 billion ESM exposure limit…”

In brief, if a bank is either to be recapitalised or resolved, at the end of the day the burden will weigh on the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (after appropriate bail-in), secondly on the country’s taxpayers (provision of public backstops) and thirdly on Eurozone taxpayers (the ESM). No provision is taken to hold the bankers accountable at least with what they have pocketed from the bank in question, during say the last five years. As for the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (above the threshold of €100,000) most of them are either pension funds or real economy businesses. In any case, it will be the civil society to bear the burden of banks’ recapitalisation or resolution (unsecured lenders and depositors, pension funds, real economy businesses, taxpayers).

‘Investors’ interest for banks

That is why there is actually strong interest from ‘investors’ to acquire some Eurozone’s ailing banks (the Greek institutions for example), despite the fact that many of them have been rescued recently with taxpayers money. The increasing devaluation of the banks’ assets (loans in the red and investments turning sour) is not then an impediment for ‘investors’ longing to cheaply buy those failing institutions, since the European taxpayers have undertaken to recapitalise them. It is as if the ECOFIN and the Eurogroup are paving the way for the next financial crisis, by covering the cost of the present one with other people’s money.

 

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Make this the year of ‘transformative solutions’ to avert disastrous climate change: UN Deputy Chief

Women in medical leadership: future perspectives of medicine

Further reforms in Sweden can drive growth, competitiveness and social cohesion

Robot inventors are on the rise. But are they welcomed by the patent system?

Brazilian officer a ‘stellar example’ of why more women are needed in UN peacekeeping

Commissioner McGuinness announces proposed way forward for central clearing

Syria: Commissioner Lenarčič visits Turkish border and calls for renewal of UN cross-border resolution

4 principles for securing the digital identity ecosystem

UN chief praises New Zealand premier’s ‘admirable’ response to Christchurch attacks

Why 2020 is a turning point for cybersecurity

COVID-19 tests rely on bacteria discovered in a natural pool in the 1960s – and it’s not the only slice of nature essential to medicine

Migration: Commission refers HUNGARY to the Court of Justice of the European Union over its failure to comply with Court judgment

Q&A: A on the EU COVID-19 certificate

Working with millennials, leaders say humility works better than bossing around

How Abu Dhabi found a way to grow vegetables in 40-degree heat

Russia and the EU ‘trade’ natural gas supplies and commercial concessions in and out of Ukraine

Eurozone’s central bank leadership prepares for shoddier prospects

Workplace bullies could now go to jail in South Korea

Biggest ever UN aid delivery in Syria provides relief to desperate civilians

Negotiations on new EU collective redress rules to begin

Why we are using these custom-built drones to collect whale snot

For video game addiction, now read official ‘gaming disorder’: World Health Organization

Ebola cases rising in DR Congo, but UN health agency cites progress in community trust-building

Antibiotics are contaminating the world’s rivers

British PM May’s Brexit proposal remains obscure while her government unravels

The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

5 lessons from Africa on how drones could transform medical supply chains

More people now plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine than in December

Turkey: Commission continues humanitarian support for refugees

Only one in five countries has a healthcare strategy to deal with climate change

Africa must use tech to chase corruption out of the shadows

Mergers: Commission approves Assa Abloy’s acquisition of Agta Record, subject to conditions

World’s human rights watchdog spotlights Afghanistan, Yemen and 12 others: Here’s the scoop

US-China trade war: Washington now wants control of the renminbi-yuan

ECB: Growth measures even before the German elections

Z, V or ‘Nike swoosh’ – what shape will the COVID-19 recession take?

Cultural diversity can drive economies. Here are lessons from India and South Asia

EU Member States test their cybersecurity preparedness for free and fair EU elections

This is how music festivals are tackling plastic waste

Malta: Human rights experts call for justice in case of murdered journalist

3 things to know about women in STEM

Q and A: This is how stakeholder capitalism can help heal the planet

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

These are the top 10 emerging technologies of 2019

Why EU’s working and unemployed millions remain uncertain or even desperate about their future

Europe again the black sheep at the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors

FROM THE FIELD: Changing world, changing families

The relationship between Dengue and the rainfall in Boa Vista, Brazil

EU, Canada and China co-host international meeting on climate cooperation and a sustainable economic recovery

Why is black plastic packaging so hard to recycle?

Raising the Scope of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Vulnerable Populations

Companies can help solve water scarcity. Here’s how

A new bioeconomy strategy for a sustainable Europe

Giving humanitarian help to migrants should not be a crime, according to the EP

European Solidarity Corps: three years on

Marriage equality boosted employment of both partners in US gay and lesbian couples

The West and Russia accomplished the dismembering and the economic destruction of Ukraine

State aid: Commission approves €1.4 billion Swedish scheme to support uncovered fixed costs of companies affected by coronavirus outbreak

Gaza: deadly violence continues to escalate, top UN officials work to restore calm

EU food watchdog: more transparency, better risk prevention

More Stings?

Comments

  1. great put up, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite specialists of this sector don’t notice this.
    You should proceed your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: