Eurozone guarantees all banks with…taxpayers’ money

ECOFIN Council of 15/11/2013. From left to right: Anders Borg, Swedish Minister for Finance and Wolfgang Schauble, German Federal Minister for Finance. (Council of the European Union photographic library).

ECOFIN Council of 15/11/2013. From left to right: Anders Borg, Swedish Minister for Finance and Wolfgang Schauble, German Federal Minister for Finance. (Council of the European Union photographic library).

Last Friday the ECOFIN council made up by the 28 EU ministers of finance, confirmed that a permanent arrangement for the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) and the single resolution fund (SRF) meant to deal with failing banks, will be agreed on before the end of the year covering the period after 1 January 2015. In the mean-time, there will be a guarantee similar to the regular one in place. There is every indication that ECOFIN’s final decision will go along the lines of European Central Bank’s and Commission’s proposals. Let’s take one thing at a time.

It must be reminded that the ECB recently published its opinion on the Single Resolution Mechanism and Fund, largely supporting the European Commission’s position on their enactment, the last crucial step needed to accomplish the European Banking Union. The opinion contains the following three essential requirements for effective bank resolutions: a single system, a single authority with decision-making powers and a single resolution fund financed ex ante by the banking sector.

The time plan

If an agreement is reached within this year, the regulations on the single resolution mechanism and fund will be in force as from 1 January 2015. The ECB however, in view of carrying out its supervisory duty of Eurozone banks as from November 2014 (which is the official Single Supervision Mechanism) has already initiated a preliminary exercise, to be conducted during the next twelve months, in order to test the ground of Eurozone’s unexplored banking constellation.

To this effect, the ECB announced on 23 October that it starts a ‘comprehensive assessment’ of Eurozone banks in advance of its regular supervisory role. The assessment will cover 130 systemic euro area banks accounting for 85% of the total banking system. Those banks will undergo risk assessment, asset quality review and stress test. The exercise starts this month and will be concluded in November 2014.

Testing the banking ground

According to the ECB, the assessment “will consist of three elements: i) a supervisory risk assessment to review, quantitatively and qualitatively, key risks, including liquidity, leverage and funding; ii) an asset quality review (AQR) to enhance the transparency of bank exposures by reviewing the quality of banks’ assets, including the adequacy of asset and collateral valuation and related provisions; and iii) a stress test to examine the resilience of banks’ balance sheet to stress scenarios”.

In conducting this exercise the ECB may find that some banks need urgent recapitalisation or even that one or more of them are ‘beyond limit of repair’. Consequently, the central bank says that if this entire comprehensive assessment of Eurozone banks is to be credible, there has be an arrangement in place to deal with the difficult cases which may arise.

Last Friday’s ECOFIN answered this question as follows, “in the eventuality that the comprehensive assessments/stress tests reveal a capital shortfall, the established pecking order (first private sources, then national and euro area/EU instruments) will apply”. The meaning of this passage is obviously that whatever the capital needs of a certain problematic bank, at the end of the day, it will be the country’s or the European taxpayers (national and euro area/EU instruments) who will be called to foot the bill, for the recapitalisation or the resolution of any bank.

Always the taxpayers

As if this arrangement was not clear enough, the ECOFIN further explained that, “In a first instance, banks should raise capital in the market, retain profits, undertake capital accretive sales and restructuring…If this is revealed not to be sufficient…member states should mobilise all appropriate arrangements for recapitalising banks, if needed, including through the provision of public backstops where appropriate…In the second instance, if national backstops are not sufficient, instruments at the euro area/EU level will be available as appropriate: At the euro area level, European Stability Mechanism instruments may be used in the appropriate sequencing, according to their respective agreed rules and requirements: First, the ESM can provide through its normal procedures financial assistance for the recapitalisation of financial institutions in the form of a loan to a Member State, after appropriate bail-in, in full respect of EU State Aid rules. Second, the direct recapitalisation instrument with its €60 billion ESM exposure limit…”

In brief, if a bank is either to be recapitalised or resolved, at the end of the day the burden will weigh on the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (after appropriate bail-in), secondly on the country’s taxpayers (provision of public backstops) and thirdly on Eurozone taxpayers (the ESM). No provision is taken to hold the bankers accountable at least with what they have pocketed from the bank in question, during say the last five years. As for the unsecured lenders and depositors of the bank (above the threshold of €100,000) most of them are either pension funds or real economy businesses. In any case, it will be the civil society to bear the burden of banks’ recapitalisation or resolution (unsecured lenders and depositors, pension funds, real economy businesses, taxpayers).

‘Investors’ interest for banks

That is why there is actually strong interest from ‘investors’ to acquire some Eurozone’s ailing banks (the Greek institutions for example), despite the fact that many of them have been rescued recently with taxpayers money. The increasing devaluation of the banks’ assets (loans in the red and investments turning sour) is not then an impediment for ‘investors’ longing to cheaply buy those failing institutions, since the European taxpayers have undertaken to recapitalise them. It is as if the ECOFIN and the Eurogroup are paving the way for the next financial crisis, by covering the cost of the present one with other people’s money.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

The ethical dilemmas of medicine

What fighting malaria can teach us about linking purpose and business

20th EU-China Summit in Beijing, 16/07/2018

At last some rules on banks

UN agency chief calls Ethiopia’s revised refugee law ‘one of most progressive’ in Africa

Marginalized groups hit hardest by inequality and stigma in cities

Aid funding for Occupied Palestinian Territories at ‘all-time low’

Can India reduce deaths on one hazardous road to zero? This group is trying

This new form of currency could transform the way we see money

Is your business model fit for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?

Feeding families remains complex task in war-torn Syria – UN relief agency

EU is now giving Google new monopolies to the detriment of European citizens and Internet companies

Why is the EU launching a doomed policy in stopping immigrant waves? What are the real targets?

Tsipras doesn’t seem to have learned his “almost Grexit” lesson and Greece faces again financial and political dead end

These are the top 10 emerging technologies of 2019

Three things Nigeria must do to end extreme poverty

A day that Berlin and Brussels would remember for a long time

UN chief seeking ‘renewed commitment’ to global rules and values, as world leaders head to New York

Asia’s plastic problem is choking the world’s oceans. Here’s how to fix it

Everybody for himself in G20 and IMF

5 lessons from China on how to drive sustainable growth

SMEs are driving job growth, but need higher investment in skills, innovation and tech to boost wages and productivity

How each country’s share of global CO2 emissions changes over time

Syria: ‘Violence, displacement’ and cold kill 11 infants ‘in the past two days’

Volkswagen getting away with it in Europe

MEPs demand end to EU arms exports to Saudi Arabia

Abu Dhabi is investing $250 million in tech start-ups

Deal on protecting workers from exposure to harmful substances

Turning waste into wealth: World Habitat Day focus on cleaning up cities

MWC 2016 LIVE: Ericsson/Cisco partnership on track, insist execs

‘Safe Eurobonds’: a new trick to betray the south euro area countries

Countering illegal hate speech online – EU Code of Conduct ensures swift response

Top UN official urges Russia and Ukraine to step away from further confrontation at sea

Trump beats Clinton but Americans will learn the hard way that the US can’t change with an election

Germany’s strong anti-bribery enforcement against individuals needs to be matched by comparably strong enforcement against companies

Blockchain will make sure green pledges aren’t just greenwash: a new initiative by young leaders at the World Economic Forum

‘We won’t get to zero cases of Ebola without a big scale-up in funding,’ UN relief chief warns

China is among the 20 most innovative economies for the first time

Austrian Presidency priorities discussed in committees

Work to make the world a better place: 5 things you need to know about ‘green jobs’

State aid: Commission invites comments on simplified rules for State aid combined with EU support

Amending Guatemala ‘reconciliation law’ would lead to unjust amnesty, warns Bachelet

EU plans pan-European network of cybersecurity services

Who can unlock the stalled Brexit negotiations? UK Premier sticks to her proposal

‘A global measles crisis’ is well underway, UN agency chiefs warn

Malaria could be gone by the middle of the century. Here’s how

Mexico cannot move forward ‘without addressing the shadows of the past’, says UN rights chief

EU-China relations under investigation?

UN chief hopes for new agreement after Israel concludes international observation mission

The new crisis is already creeping into the financial system

The Brussels bureaucracy blocks the Youth Guarantee scheme

Could switching between summer and winter time end in 2021?

Everyone has ‘a moral imperative’ to uphold the rights of persons with disabilities, says UN chief

FROM THE FIELD: facing up to the extreme mental health pressures of conflict

Trump’s MAGA policy remains unchanged as EU warns to impose additional retaliation tariffs on US products

Volkswagen scandal update: “We want clarity fast, but it is equally important to have the complete picture”, Commission’s spokesperson underscores from Brussels

‘Alarming levels’ of methamphetamine trafficking in Asia’s Mekong, UN warns

European Youth Forum @ European Business Summit 2015: Why interns should matter to business

Concern rising over fate of Rohingya refugees sent home by India: UNHCR

Community Manager – 1289

More Stings?

Comments

  1. great put up, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite specialists of this sector don’t notice this.
    You should proceed your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s