The European Parliament wants to stay in one place

European Parliament. Strasburg, France one of the three sits of the House. Committee on Constitutional Affairs - European political parties and European political foundations: statute and funding (COD) - vote on a proposal for a regulation (EP Audiovisual Service).

European Parliament. Strasburg, France, one of the three seats of the House. Committee on Constitutional Affairs – European political parties and European political foundations: statute and funding (COD) – vote on a proposal for a regulation (EP Audiovisual Service).

At last – it was high time that the European Parliament took the responsibility to determine its own agenda and of course to decide where it sits! For decades now legislators travel incessantly to and from between Brussels, Strasbourg and Luxembourg, running after timetables and squandering taxpayers’ money in travel expenses and hotel bookings. Thank God last Monday the Constitutional Affairs Committee of the European Parliament bravely decided that the legislative should have the right to decide where and when it meets. With 22 votes to 4 it decided that, “The European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment, if it were located in a single place”. No wonder that those 4 votes came from French MEPs.

Last June a Parliament working document, drafted by Rapporteurs, Ashley Fox (ECR, UK) and Gerald Häfner (Greens/EFA, DE) concluded that the multi seat character of the European Parliament is not any more sustainable. The turning point was, that under the Treaty of Lisbon the Parliament is upgraded to equal footing with the other three legislative bodies of the EU, namely the Commission and the Council. Parliament’s decision making procedures however are much more time-consuming and need an exact application of procedures. Consequently the work load of parliamentarians has multiplied and travelling between the three sites is not any more tolerable.

Travelling circus

That being given, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs took action and started working to solve this problem. The report drafted by the above mentioned two MEPs concludes that the European Parliament, “in order to fulfil its function deriving from the treaties and the expectations of its electorate – Parliament needs the right to organize itself in a modern and appropriate way – and therefore should initiate an ordinary treaty revision procedure in order to amend Article 341 and Protocol 6, granting Parliament the right to decide itself on matters relating to its internal organisation and calendar, and hence the question of its seat“.

In view of that, this Committee last Monday after hearing its two rapporteurs decided that “The European Parliament should have the right to decide where and when it meets”. Rapporteur Fox went one step ahead to describe what is happening now as a “travelling circus”. He said “Today’s vote is excellent news…it will be seen as a landmark in that process and a key achievement in our campaign to impose some sanity on this system. This house must be allowed to determine for itself where it sits. The will of the people must not be ignored on this issue, nor must the wishes of MEPs“. Co-rapporteur Häfner added “In times of crisis, it is not credible for the EU to expect only citizens to accept changes and budget cuts”.

How much does it cost?

The report estimates that additional annual costs resulting from Parliament’s geographic dispersion have been estimated at between €156 million and €204 million, equivalent to around 10% of Parliament’s annual expenditures. The CO2 emissions associated with moving among the three working locations have been estimated at between 11,000 and 19,000 tonnes. This is the recurrent costs weighing only on Parliament’s budget though. The triple seat working arrangements also imposes additional spending and travel on the other EU institutions and on journalists.

All that, however, was more or less known, probably not in that detail, but, in general terms, the wasteful character of the triple Parliament seat was evident long ago. The problem is that France has been traditionally regarding the issue as a key question of national sovereignty. Paris wants to see the European Parliament to convene also in Strasbourg, on French soil, that is, under French jurisdiction. Last time the issue was raised at the European Summit, the then French President Nicola Sarkozy, didn’t accept it as an item of the agenda.

This is obviously a left over from the post WW II (a continuation of WW I) era winners’ ideology, that plays no role whatsoever in today’s brave new world, where the economy and markets reign. If the triple seat of the EU Parliament is non-productive, it is definitive that it has to go. Of course France will not accept this change easily. It seems, though, the time is ripe for that to change also. France is no longer the political academy and the strategic anchor of the European Union. The economic might of Germany and the British support for the one Parliament seat solution will overcome Paris’s reaction. The fact that the two rapporteurs originate from Germany and Britain must be considered as a first defeat of France, foreshadowing the final outcome.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Libya: EU efforts should focus on protecting migrants, MEPs say

This new way of understanding disease is changing medicine

Action needed to end deadly clashes between African herders and farmers: UN chief

The four top Americans who flew to Europe perplexed things about Trump’s intentions

“A Junior Enterprise is run only by students.. there are no professors or managers that can help you solve your problems”

EU-India summit: Will the EU manage to sign a free trade agreement with India before Britain?

Africa-Europe Alliance: first projects kicked off just three months after launch

The German automotive industry under the Trump spell

Fight against climate change and poverty will fail without overhaul of global financial system, says major UN report

Eurozone closer to a deflation – stagnation trap

Why Commissioner Rehn wants us all to work more for less

Syrian Refugees in Germany face distinctly different challenges than those in Lebanon

Consumers suffer three defeats

Is a full course lunch, a new Commissioner and 2 million anti-TTIP citizens what you would call a “Fresh Start”?

What we take for granted: The EU is not perfect

Who the US and China have trade disputes with

EU makes key TTIP document public as protests get louder

ILO’s Bureau for Employers´Activities to publish new study on women in business and management

3 autonomous vehicle trends to follow in 2019

Second Facebook-Cambridge Analytica hearing: impact on privacy, voting and trust

This is what a planet-wide network of ocean sanctuaries could look like

EU budget: the Common Agricultural Policy beyond 2020

‘Global care crisis’ set to affect 2.3 billion people warns UN labour agency

Guatemala: UN anti-corruption body will continue working, as Constitutional Court blocks Government expulsion

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Unprecedented Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction to Combat Climate Change

Why the ECB prepares to flood the markets with more and free of charge euro; everybody needs that now

This is our chance to completely redefine the meaning of work

Greece and Ukraine main items on EU28 menu; the course is set

Eurozone: The crisis hit countries are again subsidizing the German and French banks

The Indian miracle state pointing the way to global sustainability

EU Commission: Germany can make Eurozone grow again just by helping itself

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang’s speech from World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting of New Champions

Press coverage of migration crisis in Europe: a call for collaborative action

Parliament demands ban on neo-fascist and neo-Nazi groups in the EU

Climate change recognized as ‘threat multiplier’, UN Security Council debates its impact on peace

2 trillion drinks containers are made every year – so where do they go?

Water supply a human right but Greeks to lose their functioning utilities

Darfur: Inter-communal tensions still high despite improved security, Mission head tells Security Council

Brexit: when the hubris of one man can set the UK, the EU and the entire world on fire

Marking Sir Brian Urquhart’s 100th birthday, UN honours life-long servant of ‘we the peoples’

Mandela, ‘true symbol of human greatness’, celebrated on centenary of his birth

ECB’s first flight in Eurozone’s banking universe will be just a reconnaissance

Syria: ‘Violence, displacement’ and cold kill 11 infants ‘in the past two days’

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: Bicycles for the environment, new leader for the UN General Assembly, UN values, Ebola, Syria and Libya

EU-China Light Bridge in Brussels signals the bright coming of the Year of The Dog

‘Never give up’: UN chief urges all who serve, marking UN Day

Venezuela: UN human rights office calls for ‘maximum restraint’ by authorities in face of new demonstrations

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

MEPs want to ensure sufficient funding for Connecting Europe’s future

We need to talk about failure in the social sector

Long live Eurozone’s bank supervisor down with the EU budget supremo

Why Obama asks approval from Congress to bomb Syria?

UK voters sent strong message to May and Corbyn for soft Brexit

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: Ban Ki-Moon Closing Address at COP21 Action Day Innovation, Imagination, Faster Climate Action

The 28 EU leaders show contempt for the European Elections results

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “No other problem has jeopardised the EU as much as the refugee question” Joachim Gauck, President of the Federal Republic of Germany, cries out from Davos

Love unlimited

Medical students of today, technological doctors of tomorrow

Why Eurozone urgently needs the ECB to print and distribute at least €500 billion

European Youth Forum welcomes the European Commission’s proposed revision of the Union Code on Visas, however it does not go far enough

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s