Commission challenges Council over EU 2014 budget

State of the Union Address 2013 by José Manuel Barroso, President of the EuropeanCommission. Several Members of the College of the Barroso II Commission, in front of the press in the 1st row Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the EC, and José Manuel Barroso, in the 2nd row Joaquín Almunia, Vice-President of the EC in charge of Competition, and Viviane Reding, Vice-President of the EC in charge of Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship (EC Audiovisual Services, 11/9/2013).

State of the Union Address 2013 by José Manuel Barroso, President of the EuropeanCommission. Several Members of the College of the Barroso II Commission, in front of the press in the 1st row Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the EC, and José Manuel Barroso, in the 2nd row Joaquín Almunia, Vice-President of the EC in charge of Competition, and Viviane Reding, Vice-President of the EC in charge of Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship (EC Audiovisual Services, 11/9/2013).

Another €460 million should be added to the 2014 EU budget spending said yesterday the European Commission. This is a direct challenge to the Council’s position presented last week in the European Parliament shaping a severely cut down 2014 EU budget. The Commission asks additional funding exactly for those programmes that the Council wants to cut down, namely Erasmus+ (EU’s new programme for education, training and youth, €130 million more), COSME (also a new programme promoting entrepreneurship, in particular for small and medium enterprises, €30 million more) and Horizon 2020 (research and innovation, €200 million). On top of that the Commission proposes that the Union invests an extra €200 million in the tormented Cypriot economy of which €100 million to be disbursed next year. All those extras add up to €460 million more spending for 2014.

To support this new proposal the Commission notes that, these “changes mainly reflect the political agreement reached on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2014-2020 between the leaders of the European Parliament, Council and Commission on 27-28 June”. At this point it has to be reminded that during the European Summit meetings of 27 and 28 June, the 27 EU leaders decided to “actively support youth employment and strengthen competitiveness, growth and jobs”. Following those directions from EU’s top leadership the Commission now proposes increased spending exactly for the relevant programmes, the same that the Council now wants to cut further.

Who pays for the party?

The idea behind this bold announcement is that the Commission in this way addresses itself directly to the 27 + 1 EU leaders reminding them what they decided last June and also avoiding pointless negotiations with the Lithuanian Presidency. Needless to say that the European Parliament backs all the way through the Commission’s proposal for the 2014 budget albeit restricted in relation to this year but not so severely cut as the Council wants.

This last new Commission action is a new episode in the long and difficult fight for the 2014 EU budget. The European Parliament and the Commission want to safeguard the EU’s financial strength at a time of austere fiscal policies in all member states. All the 28 EU leaders though staged last June a popular show, advertising their support for the young and unemployed, the SMEs and the students. Now that the time has come to pay for the party they try to hide behind the Lithuanian Presidency.

The Parliament insists

During the Budgets Committee meeting of the Parliament last Monday 9 September the Commission and the legislative joined forces, in repelling the Council’s decision for a severely crippled EU budget for 2014, as presented to them by a Lithuanian vice-minister. Janusz Lewandowki, the EU Commissioner for Budget on that occasion after strongly rejecting the Council proposal told the parliamentarians, “I would ask you, the Parliament, to take account of these concerns during the preparation of your reading of the 2014 budget”.

It is important to mention that during the same ungrateful day on 9/11 this Parliamentary Committee decided also to postpone the consent vote to the EU’s 2014-2020 budget regulation thus holding back the Union’s Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF) for the next seven years. When the full Parliament will give the MFF its final blessing remains to be seen, as the conditions set out in its resolution of 3 July are still not met. This was exactly the meaning of a statement issued on Tuesday 10 September by the three largest political groups of the Parliament, the EPP, S&D and ALDE. Obviously the legislators will continue holding back their approval of the MFF 2014-2020 until an agreement is reached also on the 2014 budget.

It is more than certain that the whole issue of the EU’s future spending will be resolved at the end year summit of the 28 leaders. The compromise to be achieved will be indicative of what kind of EU the member states want.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Turkey’s Erdogan provokes the US and the EU by serving jihadists and trading on refugees

The battle for the 2016 EU Budget to shake the Union; Commission and Parliament vs. Germany

China’s stock markets show recovery signs while EU is closely watching in anticipation of the €10bn investment

The EU Diplomacy in North Korea promotes peace or war?

Refugee crisis update: EU still lacks solidarity as Hungary and Slovakia refuse to accept EU Court’s decision

Brussels enraged with Swiss referendum result to keep out EU citizens

Twenty days that may remold the future of Europe

The London City-EU connection holds despite of Brexit and the ban of LSE-Deutsche Börse merger

‘Two pack’ austerity package in force but with less vigor

Berlin wants to break South’s politico-economic standing

Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson: who forced the two ‘brave’ Brexiteers to quit?

Can one FTA and 110 lobby meetings make the dirty oil clean in Europe?

Easier Schengen Visas for non-EU holiday makers: A crucial issue for south Eurozone countries

Trump to subject the Fed, challenge the ECB and make Wall St. bankers even richer

Juncker Investment Plan for Europe welcomed by European Youth Forum

Is our brave new world about to burst?

Is Data Privacy really safe seen through Commissioner’s PRISM?

Greece may offer to China a European gateway

Youth unemployment: think out of the box

Auditors say EU spending delivers limited value for money but the timing of their report poses questions

EU budget agreement rejected by the European Parliament

Who is responsible for public health? The tendencies and its benefits –or not– on Health Education around the world

The EU Parliament slams Commission on economic governance

Road to Brexit: the UK seeks early agreement on Data Privacy with the EU

Two major EU projects falter; the Schengen Agreement now freezes and Eurozone fails to resolve the Greek enigma

It ain’t over until Google says it’s over

A Trumpist squad shook Davos and the world

The International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations (IFMSA) on the arrest of Turkish Medical Association leaders

What will Germany look like after the next election?

Council Presidency: Floundering with the EU 2014 budget

Is deflation a real danger for Eurozone?

Banking on sunshine: world added far more solar than fossil fuel power generating capacity in 2017

Vestager vs. Google: a fight to ensure a competitive innovation framework

Economic sentiment and business climate stagnate in miserable euro area

At last some rules on banks

What do Europeans believe about the crisis and the possible way out?

Macron has the deputies but not the people’s consent for his far reaching reforms

A health of all and for all based on the Ecuadorian reality

How close is Eurozone to a new recession which may trigger formidable developments?

How will Brexit affect higher education in the EU?

COP21 Breaking News: Paris Pact on Water and Climate Change Adaptation Announced

Civil society organisations disenchanted with “Youth Guarantee”

ECB’s €1.14 trillion again unifies Eurozone; Germany approves sovereign debt risks to be pooled

EU Commission accuses Germany of obstructing growth and the banking union

Draghi sees inflationary bubbles

Can the US deal a blow to EU and Russia together over Ukraine?

Banks promise easing of credit conditions in support of the real economy

ECOFIN: Choosing between the re-unification of Eurozone and a stalemate

The Council unblocks all EU budgets

Why the ECB suddenly decided to flood banks with money?

Mixed news about the Eurozone economy

What UK and EU risk if Brexit “wins” these elections

European Banking Union: no one is perfect

Healthcare for refugees: a necessary symbiosis of medicine and politics

Parliament sets conditions on EU-China investment deal

JADE Testimonial #2: Jacques @ Process mapping

EU: Turkey to shelter Syrian refugees and turn other immigrants back in return of €3 billion

How Greece was destroyed

ECB tied in the anti-monetary German ideology

What has changed in the French politico-economic horizon

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s