Is South Korea set to lose from its FTA with the EU?

Kim Jong-Hoon, Member of the South Korean National Assembly, José Manuel Barroso, President of the EC and Kim Chang-beom, Head of the Mission of South Korea to the EU (in the foreground, from left to right), participated in the public lecture to commemorate 50 years of EU/South Korea diplomatic relations. (EC Audiovisual Services).

Kim Jong-Hoon, Member of the South Korean National Assembly, José Manuel Barroso, President of the EC and Kim Chang-beom, Head of the Mission of South Korea to the EU (in the foreground, from left to right), participated in the public lecture to commemorate 50 years of EU/South Korea diplomatic relations. (EC Audiovisual Services).

The recent announcement (issued at the highest level by three presidents; Barack Obama, Herman Van Rompuy, Manuel Barroso), that the European Union and the United States were ready to start negotiations, aiming at the conclusion of a far-reaching Free Trade Agreement (FTA), sounded the alarm to other EU’s major trading partners and more so in South Korea. Seoul and Brussels have signed such a new generation FTA, which came in force on 1 July 2011. South Korea is the only Asian country the EU has concluded an FTA.

South Korea’s economy is the EU’s sixth most important trading partner outside Europe (behind the US, China, Japan, India and Brazil) and tenth overall. The EU is among South Korea’s top four largest export destinations together with China, Japan and USA.

When the EU-US initiative was announced a number of South Korean economists and researchers estimated that a possible conclusion of an AFT between the two world largest trading partners will harm their trade relations with South Korea and China. On top of that only a few days earlier, the South Korea statistical service published the 2012 foreign trade data from the country’s customs, showing that the FTA already in force between this major Asian economy and the European Union, has led to the first bilateral trade surplus in favour of the EU after 15 years.

Whatever the reasons for this negative turn in South Korea’s trade with the EU, it reminded everybody the criticism the FTA has provoked at the time of its conclusion. A number of analysts had strongly criticised it. However, if one analyses the causes of the South Korean trade balance deficit with the EU in 2012, it seems that the FTA has not much to do with it. The basic reason for this development was the fact that due to the crisis in Europe, South Korean exports to a number of EU countries of major items like ships and telecommunications devices and equipment dropped by 30%. At the same time, it must not be underestimated the fact that major Korean firms like the automotive companies KIA and Hyundai along with the electronics giant Samsung increased their production base in the EU.

The EU-South Korea FTA

In any case, this bilateral FTA has greatly helped EU exports to South Korea. The European Commission has published an account on the results of the first 9 months of the application of this FTA. The basic findings are quoted here below:

“…in the first 9 months of implementation EU exports to South Korea increased by €6.7 billion or 35% compared to the same period since 2007. EU exports to other countries also grew during this timeframe (by 25%) but the level of increase of exports to Korea (35%) indicates that the early tariff eliminations are already having some effect.

Exports of products where the tariff was eliminated on 1 July 2011 (such as wine, some chemical products, textiles and clothing, iron and steel products, machinery and appliances, representing 34% of EU exports to South Korea) increased by €2.7 billion or 46%.

For products that were only partially liberalised on 1 July 2011 (such as cars and agricultural products, representing 44% of EU’s exports to Korea), the increase is €3 billion or 36%.

For products where there was no change to the tariff (such as some agricultural products, representing 18% of EU exports) the increase is €1 billion or 23%.

This means that exports of the products affected by Korea’s tariff liberalisation in the agreement grew €1.7 billion more than they would have done otherwise.

Exports of some specific products have grown faster than the average, for example:

*Exports of pork are up by almost 120%, which translates into new trade of almost € 200 million.

* Leather bags and luggage exports increased by over 90%, worth € 150 million of extra trade.

*EU’s Machinery used for manufacturing of semiconductors proved to be very successful and it imports to Korea went up by 75% and represented € 650 million in additional exports.

*EU cars exports increased by over 70% a percentage which translates into € 670 million in new car sales in Korea”.

It is obvious that the FTA between the EU and the South Korea has greatly helped the EU products to penetrate further in this country’s markets. The problem is, however, in what way this FTA will be affected by a possible one between the EU and the US. Incidentally, Korea will not be the only country to have an interest on that.  The question is, if the EU-US negotiators will pay attention to the observations of the other nations?

 

 

 

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

OECD economic scenarios to 2060 illustrate the long-run benefits of structural reforms

Cybersecurity needs a holistic approach. Here are three ways to build protection

UN forum to bring ‘big space data’ benefits to disaster response in Africa

Schengen is losing ground fast revealing Europe’s clear inability to deal with migration crisis

Reception conditions for asylum-seekers agreed between MEPs and Council

Zuckerberg, a paella, and the mighty EU questionnaires that would stop Whatsapp acquisition by Facebook?

How India will consume in 2030: 10 mega trends

Bankers don’t go to jail because they are more equal than us all

US – Russia bargain on Syria, Ukraine but EU kept out

Mobile 360 Series – Russia & CIS: Empowering the Digital Economy

Action needed to end deadly clashes between African herders and farmers: UN chief

The time for cities to get smart is now

The missiles fired against Damascus, Syria divided Europe deeply

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

Germany is the world’s most innovative economy

4 steps towards wiping out cervical cancer

UN chief ‘following very closely’ reports of chemical weapons use in Syria’s Aleppo

5 ways blockchain can transform the world of impact investing

We could be sleepwalking into a new crisis. How should the business world prepare?

Donald Trump’s victory is a great opening for global EU leadership on the sustainability agenda

UN calls for support to implement Central Africa’s newly minted peace agreement

German opposition win in Lower Saxony felt all over Europe

Germany loses leading export place

EU agricultural production no more a self-sufficiency anchor

MEPs back plans to halt spread of drug resistance from animals to humans

Superbugs: MEPs advocate further measures to curb use of antimicrobials

Britain heading to national schism on exit from EU

Vaccine hesitancy: a pregnancy related issue?

EU deal on electricity market rules to benefit both consumers and environment

FROM THE FIELD: South Sudan’s green shoots, highlight environmental recovery from war

ECB: Growth measures even before the German elections

More women than ever before are running for political office in the US

The European Union’s Balkan Double Standard

The “Legend of the Sun” wishes you Happy Chinese New Year 2015 from Brussels

Social entrepreneurs can change the world – but these 6 things are holding us back

Migration crisis update: Greece could probably say goodbye to Schengen really soon

Innovation is the key to the pay-TV industry’s long-term growth

Bureaucracy in the member states again the obstacle for long due strong European Hedge Funds

EU car manufacturers worry about an FTA with Japan

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

Chart of the day: These are the cities where the World Cup threatens productivity the most

Crimea, a wicked game of political chess and a ‘big’ coincidence

Art has the power to change the world, says this renowned Iranian muralist

Infinite Oath

G7 summit: Trump Vs. G6 leaders on trade and climate change

Who really cares about the 26.2 million of EU jobless?

Euro celebrates its 20th birthday

World cannot be transformed without ‘ingenuity of the countries of the South’: UN Chief

Making the most of the Sustainable Development Goal 3: its overlooked role in medical education

ECB reaches the boundaries of its mandate to revive the entirety of Eurozone

South Sudan’s women caught up in ‘futile man’s war’ UN gender equality chief

Japan initiates WTO dispute complaint against Korean duties on steel

Fear casts again a cold, ugly shadow over Europe; Turkey sides with Russia

Is there a drug for every disease?

A Sting Exclusive: “Climate change-the biggest global health threat of the 21st century, yet overlooked in climate negotiations?” IFMSA wonders from COP21 in Paris

Parliament backs a modernised EU electoral law

Bitpay @ TheNextWeb 2014: Innovation’s Best Friend

Basel III rules relaxed: Banks got it all but become more prone to crisis

What will it take for the world’s third-largest economy to empower women?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s