Commission considers anti-dumping duty on Chinese solar glass imports

Androulla Vassiliou, Member of the European Commission, while in official visit to China adopted, together with Cai Wu, Chinese Minister for Culture, the new joint declaration on cultural cooperation between the two sides. (EC Audiovisual Services).

Androulla Vassiliou, Member of the European Commission, while in official visit to China adopted, together with Cai Wu, Chinese Minister for Culture, the new joint declaration on cultural cooperation between the two sides. (EC Audiovisual Services).

The European Commission launched today (Thursday 28 February), an anti-dumping investigation into imports of solar glass from China. According to the relevant official announcement, “The initiation is based on a complaint lodged by the association European Union ProSun Glass, which claims solar glass from China is being dumped in the EU at prices below market value and causing material injury to the EU solar glass industry”.

The same source clarified that the investigation could take up to 15 months, “although under trade defence rules the EU could impose provisional anti-dumping duties within nine months if it considers these necessary”.

Solar glass is a special glass used mainly for the production of solar panels. It is an essential component not just of solar panels, but of many solar energy products. This is a different investigation than the ongoing one over the imports of solar panels and equipment launched by the European Commission last September. The EU solar glass market is valued at less than €200m.

The investigation

The Commission says it is legally obliged to open an anti-dumping investigation when it receives a duly substantiated complaint from EU producers, which provides ‘prima facie’ evidence that exporting producers from one or more countries outside the EU are dumping a product on to the EU market and causing material injury to the EU industry.

EU ProSun Glass, an ad hoc association representing European solar glass manufacturers, lodged just such an anti-dumping complaint on 15 January 2013. EU ProSun Glass’s collective output represents considerably more than the 25% of Union production required by law. The Commission also notes that the EU ProSun Glass is not formally affiliated with EU ProSun, a separate coalition of solar equipment manufacturers which launched the solar panel complaint last year. The Commission observes, “it found that the complainant brought sufficient elements showing:

(1) possible price dumping by the exporting producers on the EU market;

(2) injury suffered by the Union industry; and

(3) a possible causal link between the dumped imports and the   injury suffered by the Union industry.

The Commission concluded that there was sufficient prima facie evidence to warrant the opening of an investigation”.

What next?

The EC will send out questionnaires to various interested parties, such as exporting producers, Union producers, importers and associations. It will ask for information relating to the exports, production, sales and imports of solar glass. Once the interested parties have responded to the questionnaires, the Commission will verify the data, often by going to the premises of the companies.

On the basis of the information it has collected, the Commission will establish if dumping has taken place and whether the injury claimed is a result of the dumped imports. This examination will also include consider possible other factors that might have contributed to the injury.

In addition, the Commission will carry out the so-called “Union interest test”. The Commission will consider whether the potential imposition of measures would be more costly to the EU economy as a whole than the benefit of the measures would be to the complainants.

All that means the Commission would take into account the possible cost from retaliating measures imposed by China on European Union products.

Within nine months of the start of the investigation, the Commission will issue its provisional findings. There are three possible scenarios:

(a) impose provisional anti-dumping duties (normally for a six months period);

(b) continue the investigation without imposing provisional duties; or

(c) terminate the investigation.

Throughout the investigation, all interested parties have a right to make their views and arguments heard by sending in comments to the Commission and/or taking part in hearings. The Commission takes account of the comments received and addresses these in the remainder of the investigation.

The European Council is legally obliged to take a final decision over the imposition of any definitive measures within 15 months of the investigation being started. In the present case, that means before 28 May 2014.

Solar panels

As noted above the European Commission has initiated a similar anti-dumping investigation on solar panels and equipment of Chinese origin in September 2012. The nine month period provided by the EU procedure for the decision to impose the duty or not expires on June 2013. This is a much broader issue given that the value of solar panels and equipment imported in the EU from China, are of a much larger value. The European Sting has been monitoring this last affair very closely.

Only yesterday the Sting wrote: “The problem is, however, that the Chinese authorities do not seem to take this issue lightly. Towards the end of January, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce announced the imposition of anti-dumping duties with effect as from 1 February on two products originating from the EU and the US. Imports into China of the widely used solvents ethylene glycol monobutyl and diethylene glycol monobutyl ethers, produced by a number of European and American companies, will be penalised with anti-dumping duties ranging from 9.3% to 18.8%.

This is obviously a reaction to the recent anti-dumping investigations and measures introduced by the EU and the US against very important Chinese products and companies. The Chinese officials, after announcing this decision, commented that in no way they wish to start a trade war”.

It is obvious that the intentions of the Chines authorities were clarified by the swift imposition of anti-dumping duties, on solvents imported in China from the EU and the US. It is for this reason that today’s Commission announcement states the general interest point, by noting that, “The Commission will consider whether the potential imposition of measures would be more costly to the EU economy as a whole, than the benefit of the measures would be to the complainants”.

In short the Commission says that it will take into account the cost of possible counter action by the Beijing authorities against EU products imported into China. Obviously, if this cost to the EU economy as a whole appears of a greater value than the possible damage to the plaintiffs in the solar glass case, then the final decision for the imposition of anti-dumping duty may be withheld.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Mozambique pledging conference hopes to soften devastating blow of back-to-back cyclones

This billion-dollar campaign wants to protect 30% of the planet by 2030

ILO welcomes new UNDP report that places decent work at the heart of sustainable development

UN rights chief calls for release of hundreds abducted and abused in South Sudan

The future of manufacturing is smart, secure and stable

European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, who gets it and who pays the bill?

4 innovative renewable energy projects powering Europe’s green future

The Europeans with a job diminish dangerously

Civil protection: Parliament strengthens EU disaster response capability

Drinking water: new plans to improve tap water quality and cut plastic litter

Global health challenges require global medical students

Brexit negotiations: back to square one, tougher words, no good faith

After this year’s Climate Action Summit, what happens next?

Parlamentarians to “break up” with reality in the Google antitrust case

3 ways governments and carmakers can keep up with the future of transport

10 things Europe does better than the rest of the world

“If they think they can slave an entire nation, then they will just have the opposite results!”, Alexis Tsipras cries out from the Greek parliament

How can we measure real progress on the Sustainable Development Goals?

Cambodia: Giving back to UN peacekeeping

UN chief condemns terror attack in Kismayo, Somalia

How public private partnerships must evolve to create social impact

Summer 2018 Interim Economic Forecast: Resilient Growth amid increased uncertainty

5 amazing people fighting to save the oceans

Chinese economy to raise speed and help the world grow

Somalia: UN congratulates Puntland region’s newly-elected President

We are close yet so far…

EU Youth Goals – we are shapers not listeners

The Commission unsuccessfully pretends to want curbing of tax evasion

FROM THE FIELD: Stopping aquatic hitchhikers to safeguard environments at sea

New roadmap toward healthier and cleaner oceans adopted by UN Environment and European Commission

5 facts to know about Africa’s powerhouse – Nigeria

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

European Defence Fund on track with €525 million for Eurodrone and other joint research and industrial projects

The relation of deforestation and respiratory diseases

Here’s how data can shine a light on financial crime

Why South Africa is on a path of economic renewal

Eurozone has practically entered a deflation trap

EU budget 2019 approved: focus on the young, innovation and migration

Yemen war: The battle rages on, children suffer most

Despite progress towards peace, Afghanistan facing ‘daunting challenges’ ahead of presidential vote

“Asia-Pacific takes stock of ambitious development targets”, written by the Heads of UNFPA and ESCAP

G7 summit: Trump Vs. G6 leaders on trade and climate change

Who will secure Lithuania?

Act now to end violence, Zeid urges Nicaraguan authorities

China is the first non-EU country to invest in Europe’s €315 billion Plan

Intel @ European Business Summit 2014: Better decisions now, the new business dashboard 

New forms of work: deal on measures boosting workers’ rights

Maros Sefcovic Canete European Commission Energy

Better late than never? Commission runs now to fight energy dependency on Russia with the sustainable energy security package

Warmongers ready to chew what is left of social protection spending

How can consumers be effectively protected from insurance sellers?

China and UK relations post Brexit as EU addresses Chinese takeovers

Manipulating privacy and reaping the benefits of technology

South Sudan ‘revitalized’ peace deal must be inclusive, Security Council hears

Conditions deteriorating alarmingly in Yemen, warns senior UN official

Malta: MEPs conclude fact-finding visit to assess Caruana Galizia murder inquiry

Investing in rural women and girls, ‘essential’ for everyone’s future: UN chief

At last Britain considers a super-soft Brexit

Long live Eurozone’s bank supervisor down with the EU budget supremo

Human health – litmus paper for the climate change?

MWC19 Wrap Up, in association with The European Sting, GSMA’s Brussels Media Partner for the 6th Consecutive Year

More Stings?

Comments

  1. I was looking through some of your articles on this website and I believe this website is really instructive! Keep on putting up.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s