Commission considers anti-dumping duty on Chinese solar glass imports

Androulla Vassiliou, Member of the European Commission, while in official visit to China adopted, together with Cai Wu, Chinese Minister for Culture, the new joint declaration on cultural cooperation between the two sides. (EC Audiovisual Services).

Androulla Vassiliou, Member of the European Commission, while in official visit to China adopted, together with Cai Wu, Chinese Minister for Culture, the new joint declaration on cultural cooperation between the two sides. (EC Audiovisual Services).

The European Commission launched today (Thursday 28 February), an anti-dumping investigation into imports of solar glass from China. According to the relevant official announcement, “The initiation is based on a complaint lodged by the association European Union ProSun Glass, which claims solar glass from China is being dumped in the EU at prices below market value and causing material injury to the EU solar glass industry”.

The same source clarified that the investigation could take up to 15 months, “although under trade defence rules the EU could impose provisional anti-dumping duties within nine months if it considers these necessary”.

Solar glass is a special glass used mainly for the production of solar panels. It is an essential component not just of solar panels, but of many solar energy products. This is a different investigation than the ongoing one over the imports of solar panels and equipment launched by the European Commission last September. The EU solar glass market is valued at less than €200m.

The investigation

The Commission says it is legally obliged to open an anti-dumping investigation when it receives a duly substantiated complaint from EU producers, which provides ‘prima facie’ evidence that exporting producers from one or more countries outside the EU are dumping a product on to the EU market and causing material injury to the EU industry.

EU ProSun Glass, an ad hoc association representing European solar glass manufacturers, lodged just such an anti-dumping complaint on 15 January 2013. EU ProSun Glass’s collective output represents considerably more than the 25% of Union production required by law. The Commission also notes that the EU ProSun Glass is not formally affiliated with EU ProSun, a separate coalition of solar equipment manufacturers which launched the solar panel complaint last year. The Commission observes, “it found that the complainant brought sufficient elements showing:

(1) possible price dumping by the exporting producers on the EU market;

(2) injury suffered by the Union industry; and

(3) a possible causal link between the dumped imports and the   injury suffered by the Union industry.

The Commission concluded that there was sufficient prima facie evidence to warrant the opening of an investigation”.

What next?

The EC will send out questionnaires to various interested parties, such as exporting producers, Union producers, importers and associations. It will ask for information relating to the exports, production, sales and imports of solar glass. Once the interested parties have responded to the questionnaires, the Commission will verify the data, often by going to the premises of the companies.

On the basis of the information it has collected, the Commission will establish if dumping has taken place and whether the injury claimed is a result of the dumped imports. This examination will also include consider possible other factors that might have contributed to the injury.

In addition, the Commission will carry out the so-called “Union interest test”. The Commission will consider whether the potential imposition of measures would be more costly to the EU economy as a whole than the benefit of the measures would be to the complainants.

All that means the Commission would take into account the possible cost from retaliating measures imposed by China on European Union products.

Within nine months of the start of the investigation, the Commission will issue its provisional findings. There are three possible scenarios:

(a) impose provisional anti-dumping duties (normally for a six months period);

(b) continue the investigation without imposing provisional duties; or

(c) terminate the investigation.

Throughout the investigation, all interested parties have a right to make their views and arguments heard by sending in comments to the Commission and/or taking part in hearings. The Commission takes account of the comments received and addresses these in the remainder of the investigation.

The European Council is legally obliged to take a final decision over the imposition of any definitive measures within 15 months of the investigation being started. In the present case, that means before 28 May 2014.

Solar panels

As noted above the European Commission has initiated a similar anti-dumping investigation on solar panels and equipment of Chinese origin in September 2012. The nine month period provided by the EU procedure for the decision to impose the duty or not expires on June 2013. This is a much broader issue given that the value of solar panels and equipment imported in the EU from China, are of a much larger value. The European Sting has been monitoring this last affair very closely.

Only yesterday the Sting wrote: “The problem is, however, that the Chinese authorities do not seem to take this issue lightly. Towards the end of January, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce announced the imposition of anti-dumping duties with effect as from 1 February on two products originating from the EU and the US. Imports into China of the widely used solvents ethylene glycol monobutyl and diethylene glycol monobutyl ethers, produced by a number of European and American companies, will be penalised with anti-dumping duties ranging from 9.3% to 18.8%.

This is obviously a reaction to the recent anti-dumping investigations and measures introduced by the EU and the US against very important Chinese products and companies. The Chinese officials, after announcing this decision, commented that in no way they wish to start a trade war”.

It is obvious that the intentions of the Chines authorities were clarified by the swift imposition of anti-dumping duties, on solvents imported in China from the EU and the US. It is for this reason that today’s Commission announcement states the general interest point, by noting that, “The Commission will consider whether the potential imposition of measures would be more costly to the EU economy as a whole, than the benefit of the measures would be to the complainants”.

In short the Commission says that it will take into account the cost of possible counter action by the Beijing authorities against EU products imported into China. Obviously, if this cost to the EU economy as a whole appears of a greater value than the possible damage to the plaintiffs in the solar glass case, then the final decision for the imposition of anti-dumping duty may be withheld.

 

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

How Hawaii plans to be the first US state to run entirely on clean energy

Wednesday’s Daily Brief: Syrian detainees, Zimbabwe hunger crisis, Kabul attack, Mexico disappearances, new tech to feed the world

The world’s coastal cities are going under. Here’s how some are fighting back

Brexit effect: Public opinion survey shows that EU is more appreciated than ever

Missions of Our Time Shared by China and EU

EU to gain the most from the agreement with Iran

Fresh airstrikes kill dozens in conflict-ravaged Syria

Aviation Safety: Commission adopts new EU Air Safety List

Long-term EU budget: Parliament wants safety net for beneficiaries

The impossible end of the war in Syria

Asia and Pacific on course to miss all Sustainable Development Goals, says UN region chief

Costa Coffee products (Copyright: Costa Coffee; Source: Costa Coffee website, Press area)

The start of the “Caffeine rush”: Coca-Cola acquires Costa Coffee days after Nestlé-Starbucks deal

These are the world’s most tree-covered countries

‘Undersea gardeners’ are restoring Jamaica’s lost coral reefs

Coronavirus emergency: here’s what we know so far

Is the English language too powerful?

UN agency plan tackles ‘hidden cost’ of gold, paves way for safer, mercury-free mining

FROM THE FIELD: Changing world, changing families

Japan should reform retirement policies to meet challenge of ageing workforce

COVID-19 has accelerated the digital transformation of higher education

End ‘shame, isolation and segregation’ of fistula sufferers, urges UN reproductive health chief

Countering illegal hate speech online – EU Code of Conduct ensures swift response

Nauru President warns of possible climate change ‘economic Armageddon’

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

Commission presents review of EU economic governance and launches debate on its future

The financial war touches Frankfurt and Berlin

As a rising global power, what is India’s vision for the world?

4 things President Trump could learn from Jimmy Carter

This is how the world can get routine vaccinations back on track

UN investigates systematic sexual violence across South Sudan

How COVID-19 might help us win the fight against climate change

Coronavirus: EU global response to fight the pandemic

Deal agreed to protect consumers against misleading and unfair practices

Is flexible working here to stay? We asked 6 companies how to make it work

Asking for more restriction on intra EU immigration: Unproductive and politically dangerous

UN human rights office urges Egypt to immediately release detained protestors

UN global education envoy urges new funding for ‘lost generation’ of children forced out of classrooms by conflict

EU leading in global agri-food trade

These are the world’s 10 most competitive economies in 2019

‘Starvation’ now a reality for displaced Syrians stranded in camp near Jordanian border

Parliament commemorates the liberation of Auschwitz 75 years ago

MEPs vote to limit negative impact of no-deal Brexit on citizens

Reasons to hope and reasons to keep perspective on a vaccine

Here’s why the tech sector could be the next target for Chinese investment in Africa

To entrepreneurship and beyond!

The business case for investing in sustainable plastics

Here are three ways Africa’s youth are defeating corruption

Prisons are failing. It’s time to find an alternative

Mobile technology saving lives: Changing healthcare systems with simple technological solutions

What do toilets have to do with climate change?

UN Middle East Coordinator strongly condemns ‘arrests and violence’ by Hamas security forces during Gaza protests

Starbucks and FIAT again under Commission’s microscope: is Europe ready to kick multinationals out of the house?

How to change the world at Davos

Earth already has a perfect recycling system. So why not use it?

5 things you might not know about forests – but should

Why the world needs the youth revolution more than ever

FROM THE FIELD: Photos highlight agony of West African civil wars

Higher education becoming again a privilege of the wealthy?

Deal on protecting workers from exposure to harmful substances

EntEx Organises 5 Summer Schools for Young Entrepreneurs across Europe in June/July 2014

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. I was looking through some of your articles on this website and I believe this website is really instructive! Keep on putting up.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s