How wealthy people transmit this advantage to their children and grand children

José Manuel Barroso, President of the EC, Herman van Rompuy, President of the European Council, and Martin Schulz, President of the EP, went to Oslo to participate in the award ceremony of the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize® to the EU. The three Presidents then participated in the "Save the children" event organised by Redd Barna, in the presence of Mette-Marit, Princess of Norway. (EC Audiovisual Services)

José Manuel Barroso, President of the EC, Herman van Rompuy, President of the European Council, and Martin Schulz, President of the EP, went to Oslo to participate in the award ceremony of the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize® to the EU. The three Presidents then participated in the “Save the children” event organised by Redd Barna, in the presence of Mette-Marit, Princess of Norway. (EC Audiovisual Services)

Eurostat, the European Union’s statistical service, published data on poverty and social exclusion risks for EU citizens in 2011, showing completely disappointing results. The interesting thing, however, is that Eurostat didn’t release similar data for previous years for comparison reasons. Given that the much-advertised by the Brussels EU bureaucracy, “Europe 2020 strategy”, has set as its main target the reduction of the number of persons at risk of poverty and social exclusion in the EU, this could lead a suspicious researcher to think that this strategy is a complete failure.

If this is the case, the European Commission must be held responsible for withholding vital information over a crucial issue, by not publishing older data permitting time comparisons. The same suspicious researcher could think that this quite unacceptable practice of hiding statistical data could be related to a severe deterioration of the poverty and social exclusion risks during the past few years.

Hiding data

Obviously, this deplorable development may be related to the other completely failed strategy imposed by the Commission on many EU member states and more so in those countries under direct Commission’s guidance, namely Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy. Obviously, the front loaded fiscal correction programmes imposed by Brussels and Berlin with an iron hand on many EU countries, is leading to a severe deterioration of poverty and social exclusion data. It is probably exactly this Eurostat wants to hide from the eyes of journalists and researches.

Let’s return, however, to the data for 2011 and their presentation as released by Eurostat. The conclusion Eurostat chooses to promote as its most important observation is the fact, which the risks of poverty and social exclusion for children less than 18 years of age are decreasing with the educational level of their parents. As if such a costly operation was needed, for a sound minded statistician, to arrive at this conclusion.

Eurostat promotes ideology?

Seemingly, Eurostat follows in this affair the ideological guidelines of Commission’s leadership, to advertise the rightfulness of the prerogative of the upper and more educated classes. The problem is, however, that Eurostat tells nothing about the inverse relationship that is between education attainments and parents’ income. In short, Eurostat again is caught not to tell the whole truth, because it hides the well-known and long-established by educational economists positive relation between parents’ income and education achievements.

In short, the grand parents’ income defined the risks of poverty and social exclusion of today’s children of less than 18 years of age, through the strong relation between their grand-parents income and the educational level of their parents. Yes, Mr Ollie Rehn, in our brave new world the basic variable is the income and not the educational level, as you want to make us believe.

Let’s now give the floor to Eurostat. The most important parts of its press release go as follows: “In the EU27 in 2011, 27% of children aged less than 18 were at risk of poverty or social exclusion. Risk of poverty decreases with increasing education level of parents…compared with 24% of adults (aged 18-64) and 21% of the elderly (aged 65 and over). Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion are those who are at least in one of the following three conditions: living with disposable income below 60% of the national median or being severely materially deprived or live in households with very low work intensity.

In 2011, the highest shares of those age d less than 18 who were at risk of poverty or social exclusion were registered in Bulgaria (52%), Romania (49%), Latvia (44%), Hungary (40%) and Ireland (38% in 2010), and the lowest in Sweden, Denmark and Finland (all 16%), followed by Slovenia (17%), the Netherlands (18%) and Austria (19%)”.

More ideology

Eurostat keeps relating parents’ educational level with the risks of poverty and social exclusion for children under 18 as follows: “Looking in more detail at monetary poverty, almost half of all children whose parents had a low education level (at the most lower secondary education) were at risk of poverty in the EU27 in 2011, compared with 22% of children residing with parents who had a median education level (at the most upper secondary education) and 7% of children with parents with a higher education level (tertiary education)”.

The insistence of Eurostat to relate parents’ income with the risk of poverty and social exclusion of children is an infallible witness that this is an ideologically imposed tactic. As we proved above, family income is the first and prime causality for children’s welfare and not parents’ education. The educational level is just an interfering variable, which transmit the prerogative of wealth through education. If there were a better way to transmit this prerogative, the wealthy people would have chosen that one. Isn’t it like that Mr Rehn? Think about your parents and grand-parents.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

MWC 2016 LIVE: GTI shifts to phase two – 5G – after hitting milestones

IMF: How can Eurozone avoid stagnation

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

When is Berlin telling the truth about the EU banking union?

EU sets ambitious targets for the Warsaw climate conference

Parliament votes reform for better European Co2 market but critics want it sooner than later

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

Europe is now practically divided as in the Cold War

It’s EU vs. Google for real: the time is now, the case is open

A sterilised EMU may lead to a break up of Eurozone

European financial values on the rise

The European Parliament floating over the South China Sea

Can the banking union help Eurozone counter its imminent threats?

Regional competitiveness and growth: a Gordian knot for Europe

Access to health in the developping world

A week to decide if the EU is to have a Banking Union

American negotiators can’t pay for their trip to Brussels, EU-US trade agreement freezes

Samsung’s profits fall as cheaper smartphones gain market share

EU opens a third antitrust file against Google

Eurozone: GDP development heads to naught; the expensive euro serves only Germany

EU Parliament shows its teeth in view of 2014 elections

More solidarity and interaction between generations needed to challenge age stereotypes and ingrained ageism

“Only through energy policy we can trigger competitiveness”. The Sting live from #EBS2015: Energy Union – When will it happen?

Eurozone: A crucial January ahead again with existential questions

The strong version of the EU banking union gains momentum

China-EU Special Report: Chinese Premier Li Keqiang endorses China’s big investment on Juncker’s plan at 10th China-EU Business Summit

Britain in and out of the EU

The three sins the EU committed in 2015

The ASEAN Community sees the light: the genesis of a new powerful economic and political bloc and EU’s big opportunity

Bureaucracy in the member states again the obstacle for long due strong European Hedge Funds

ECB’s Draghi favours a cheaper euro to serve all Eurozone countries

Amazon, a pair of shoes and my Data Privacy walks away

Draghi will not hesitate to zero ECB’s basic interest rate

Can Eurozone’s uncertain growth answer the challenges that lie ahead?

Does the EU want GMOs and meat with hormones from the US?

The banks want now free capital from taxpayers

The ECB tells Berlin that a Germanic Eurozone is unacceptable and doesn’t work

Public opinion misled by the Commission on air transport safety

European welfare states are failing young people

Draghi drafts a plan to donate more money to bankers, the era of ‘money for nothin’ is flourishing

No better year for the EU’s weak chain links

The EU moulds a new compromise for growth and financial sustainability

The EU finally seizes the opportunity to support the sharing economy?

How much time has the ‘European Union of last chance’ left?

Youth policy in Europe not delivering for young people

Counting spillovers from the fast track EU-US free trade agreement

Utmost hypocrisy emitted by EU’s energy regulation

Snowden is the “EU nomination” for this year’s Oscars

The European Sting at the Retail Forum for Sustainability live from Barcelona

“We need to use the momentum globally to ensure that corporations pay their fare share of taxation”, EU Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis outlines from the World Economic Forum 2017.

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s