An FTA between EU-US to hurt South Korea

José Manuel Barroso, President of the EC on the right, and Kim Jong-Hoon, Member of the South Korean National Assembly, participated in the public lecture to commemorate 50 years of EU/South Korea diplomatic relations, (21/02/2013). EC Audiovisual Services).

José Manuel Barroso, President of the EC on the right, and Kim Chang-beom Head of the Mission of South Korea to the EU, participated in the public lecture to commemorate 50 years of EU/South Korea diplomatic relations, (21/02/2013). (EC Audiovisual Services).

Ten days ago, Brussels and Washington issued a joint statement signed by three Presidents, namely the US leader Barack Obama, the European Council President Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission President José Manuel Barroso. With it, the EU and the US announced their decision to conclude a bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) by the end of 2014. The tight time schedule for its conclusion and the fact that this FTA will cover the trade between two partners, who account for half the world’s GDP, triggered the alarms all over the business world.

South Korea was the first country to start thinking about the repercussions on its own affairs of a possible FTA between the EU and the US. The fact is that South Korea is the only country of the world to have concluded and currently applying an FTA with the EU. So, this country had to come up with an early evaluation of this new major development in international trade. Reportedly, this first evaluation is negative. South Korea is also running a free trade agreement with the US. Let’s follow the facts.

EU and S. Korea

Last year, on 1 July 2012, the EU and South Korea marked the one year anniversary of the implementation of their own FTA. The EU-South Korea FTA has been in force since 1 July 2011. As the FTA has lowered import tariffs for European products at the Korean border, it’s estimated that EU firms have already made cash savings of €350 million in duties after just 9 months.

The EU-South Korea FTA is the first of its kind the EU concludes with a third country, after the World Trade Organisation Doha Round collapsed in July 2009. According to a Commission’s assessment, this FTA is unprecedented in terms of the scope and speed of tariff liberalisation and breaks new ground in tackling significant non-tariff barriers across all sectors, including automotive, pharmaceutical and consumer electronics. South Korea and the EU will eliminate 98.7% of duties in trade value within 5 years from the entry into force of the FTA. By the end of the transitional periods, import tariffs will be eliminated on all industrial products, and most agricultural products, with a few exceptions, such as rice. Let’s return however to the side effects from the EU-US possible FTA.

Side effects

South Korean media reported last Friday a statement by Lim Noh-Jong, an analyst at I’M Investment & Securities Co. who said, “South Korea stands to benefit from a situation where there are trade barriers between the U.S. and the EU”. Understandably, if those trade barriers between EU and US are lifted South Korea will suffer a blow. As a result, Lim concluded, “We may lose advantages in the two markets should they sign an FTA.” The same sources also reported Kim Hyung-Joo, a researcher at the LG Economic Research Institute as saying that such a deal between EU and US could also hurt China, which is South Korea’s largest trading partner.

On the official level, Park Jong-Han, a representative of the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, also commented negatively by saying that, “South Korea may no longer benefit from preferential tariffs. Local exporters must utilize South Korea’s free trade pact with the two regions to beef up their competitiveness.” Last but not least, it has to be noted that in the first months of South Korea’s trade agreements with the EU and the US the country’s exports to the former shrunk, while they grew towards the latter.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Eurozone banks to separate risky activities: Can they stay afloat?

Commission’s action against imports from China questioned

Migration crisis update: The “Habsburg Empire” comes back to life while EU loses control

EU agrees on Ukraine – Georgia visa-free travel amid veto risks and populist fears

Eurozone 2013: Where to?

Facebook wins EU approval for WhatsApp acquisition; just a sign of the times

ECB again to subsidize euro area banks with more than one trillion euro

Youth Forum welcomes positive ruling on non-EU student visas

MWC 2016 LIVE: GTI shifts to phase two – 5G – after hitting milestones

EU responds to terror fallout by eroding borderless Europe and molesting the refugees

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

The West definitively cuts Russia off from the developed world

Do academia and banks favour a new Middle Ages period?

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

On Youth Education: “Just a normal day in the life of a medical student”

Businesses succeed internationally

Let your fingers do the walking

The inhumane face of crisis mirrored in numbers

EU to spend €135.5 billion in 2014 or 6.5% less than this year

China is the first non-EU country to invest in Europe’s €315 billion Plan

The JADE Spring Conference 2017 is casting its shadows before

Why will Paris upcoming “loose” climate change agreement work better than the previous ones?

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

The EU Commission by serving the banks offers poor support to European mainstream political parties

eGovernmnet for more efficiency, equality and democracy

“These Romans are crazy”, the “Greek Gauls” will be shouting today in Brussels hoping Caesar backs off

De Gucht: More gaffes with the talks on the EU-US free trade agreement

FIAT Chrysler: from Geneva Motor show to the World, and back

A Sting Exclusive: EU Commissioner Mimica looks at how the private sector can better deliver for international development

EU economic governance: More exploitation for the weaker countries

A Monday to watch the final act of a Greek tragedy; will there be catharsis or more fear?

Fair completion rules and the law of gravity don’t apply to banks

European Youth Capital 2018 : Cascais

The European giant tourism sector in constant growth

Is the EU competent enough to fight human smuggling in 2015?

Italy’s Letta: A European Banking Union soon or Eurozone collapses

Paris agreed with Berlin over a loose and ineffective banking union

Fostering global citizenship in medicine

Bertelsmann Stiftung @ European Business Summit 2014: Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TTIP) needs balanced approach

The Ecofin Council creates officially the clan of ‘undead’ banks

It’s EU vs. Google for real: the time is now, the case is open

EU crisis aggravates structural differences, threatens cohesion

The New Year 2016 will not be benevolent to Europe

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

ECB’s unconventional monetary measures give first tangible results

TTIP 9th Round marked by American disappointment: Will some optimism save this trade agreement?

More Stings?

Comments

  1. hey there and thank you for your info – I have certainly picked up anything new from right here.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s