Financial Transaction Tax: More money for future bank bailouts?

Press conference by Algirdas Šemeta, Member of the EC, on the Financial Transaction Tax, 14.2.2013. (EC Audiovisual Services)

Press conference by Algirdas Šemeta, Member of the EC, on the Financial Transaction Tax, 14.2.2013. (EC Audiovisual Services)

The European Commission announced today the details of the implementation of the Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), under the procedure of the enhanced cooperation. It must be noted that such a procedure may be launched at the request of at least nine EU member states. Incidentally, the eleven member states actually wishing to introduce a financial transaction tax through enhanced cooperation are Belgium, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia. Any other member state may join the enhanced cooperation, if they so wish.

Today’s Commission action comes after the decision of 22 January 2013 by the Ecofin council which regroups the 27 Financial ministers of the EU, to give the green light for this enhanced cooperation, leading to the introduction of an FTT. The European Parliament has already authorised the implementation of the tax, which is expected to be applied as from 1 January 2014.

The Commission announcement notes that, “As requested by the 11 Member States that will proceed with this tax, the proposed Directive mirrors the scope and objectives of the original FTT proposal put forward by the Commission in September 2011. The approach of taxing all transactions with an established link to the FTT-zone is maintained, as are the rates of 0.1% for shares and bonds and 0.01% for derivatives”.

In this way, the EU executive arm introduces the term “FFT-zone”, which describes the application area of the new tax. The FTT will not apply on day-to-day financial activities of citizens and businesses (e.g. loans, payments, insurance, deposits etc.). Nor will it apply to the traditional investment banking activities in the context of capital raising or to financial transactions carried out as part of restructuring operations.

Why a tax on financial transactions?

Algirdas Šemeta, Commissioner responsible for Taxation, said: “With today’s proposal, everything is in place to enable a common Financial Transaction Tax to become a reality in the EU. On the table is an unquestionably fair and technically sound tax, which will strengthen our Single Market and temper irresponsible trading. Eleven Member States called for this proposal, so that they can proceed with the FTT through enhanced cooperation. I now call on those same Member States to push ahead with ambition – to drive, decide and deliver on the world’s first regional FTT.”

Of the three objectives cited by the Commission, to be served by the FFT, the most important one is this: “the FTT will support regulatory measures in encouraging the financial sector to engage in more responsible activities, geared towards the real economy”. For one thing, with this observation the Commission recognises that the financial system does not function in a responsible way towards the real economy.

Unfortunately, it took five years for the Commission to accept that. After 2008, when the great credit crunch broke out and led to the gravest post war economic crisis, no serious measures have been introduced to stop the financial sector from being irresponsible towards the real economy. Banks are still free to go bankrupt and then ask for a government bailout, whenever their risky spinning of other people’s money turn sour. In short, the Commission and all the other regulatory authorities within and without the EU have let the banks free to continue pursuing their unholy practices. Let’s now examine what will happen with the new tax money.

Where the tax money goes?

According to predictions the revenues from the imposition of the FTT will amount to €31 billion yearly. It is important to analyse where all this money will go. Following the time cherished practice, tax collectors keep something for themselves. So the Commission proposes that a not yet defined part of that money “shall constitute an own resource for the EU Budget”.

What about the rest of it? According to the Commissions’ proposal the objective is, “to ensure that financial institutions make a fair and substantial contribution to covering the costs of the recent crisis, and to ensure even taxation of the sector vis-à-vis other sectors”.

If one takes this statement seriously, the financial institutions by paying this tax from their profits and not passing it on to their customers, they need at least 145 years to pay off the €4.5 trillion they have received from society as support. And this, without subtracting the part the EU budget will get out of the €31bn yearly.

Another drawback of this new tax is the possibility that the banks will certainly try to pass on part or whole of it to their customers, thus charging again the real economy. Then it is even more alarming  that the larger part of the proceeds may be used to formulate a fund, which will be used for future bank bailouts. If this is the case, taxpayers and the real economy as a whole, will be charged in advance for future imprudence of banks. In short, the Commission with this tax may be planning an additional tool of support to banks on the expenses of the real economy.

 

 

 

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Making money from meeting the SDGs? An overarching approach to sustainable development.

‘Humiliation was the worst’; Holocaust survivor at UN, asks world to act with ‘empathy and compassion’

Monday’s Daily Brief: Earth Day, looking for a solution to Libya crisis, focus on indigenous issues, Security Council on Sri Lanka, a high-level visit to Bangladesh

Do academia and banks favour a new Middle Ages period?

At Ministerial session, UN regional office in Beirut to focus on technology for sustainable development

Twenty days that may remold the future of Europe

The European Parliament double-checks the EU 2014-2020 budget

Crucial medical supplies airlifted to north-east Syria to meet ‘desperate need’

Brexit: Ensuring a smooth transition for car producers and safety on the roads

It’s Time to Disrupt Europe, Digital First

‘Global clarion call’ for youth to shape efforts to forge peace in the most dangerous combat zones

At last a good price for the Greek debt!

This is how much the US-China trade war could cost the world, according to new research

Why we need artists who strive for social change

Your chocolate can help save the planet. Here’s how

MEPs demand Bulgaria’s and Romania’s swift accession to Schengen area

Here’s how China is going green

From a refugee camp to Davos: one Co-Chair’s story

Cancer is a growing global threat and prevention is key, UN study shows

What Keynes can teach us about government debt today

5 things to know about the exploding world of pro gaming

ECB ready to counter the rise of the euro?

Action needed to end deadly clashes between African herders and farmers: UN chief

Climate change: ‘A moral, ethical and economic imperative’ to slow global warming say UN leaders, calling for more action

1 million citizens try to create a new EU institution

In this Tokyo cafe, the waiters are robots operated remotely by people with disabilities

These countries are the most peaceful – in 3 charts

Scores killed in ‘barbaric’ attack on Mali village, UN chief urges restraint, calls for ‘dialogue’ to resolve tensions

New rules to help consumers join forces to seek compensation

These five exercise trends will help society and your health

To improve women’s access to finance, stop asking them for collateral

JADE Testimonial #1: Marcello @ Enlargement

EC v Samsung: A whole year to compile a case

8 things we need to do to tackle humanitarian crises in 2019

Afghanistan: UN condemns blasts that leave 8 dead at cricket stadium

Niger population’s suffering ‘increasing with each passing month’: UN Refugee Agency

EU out to conquer African Union summit

New EU rules to thwart money laundering and terrorist financing

Ferry capsizes near Mosul, UN chief offers solidarity, support ‘as needed’

Deep chasm still divides Athens and Brussels; can Eurozone use the nuclear arm of liquidity against Greece?

Why is the World Health Organisation so much needed?

Cutting CO2 emissions from trucks: MEPs reach deal with Council

New chapters in EU-China trade disputes

These refugee children have danced in the snow for the first time

India is investing more money in solar power than coal for first time

Migration: Better travel safe than sorry

Fighting crime: faster EU-wide exchange of non-EU nationals’ criminal records

China is building 8 new airports a year

Sudan: Amidst deaths, injuries, imprisonments, UNICEF stresses children’s protection ‘at all times’

Greece: The new government of Alexis Tsipras shows its colors

This tiny new grain could save the planet

Artificial Intelligence: These 3 charts show what people really think

Wars have rules: 5 things the UN humanitarian chief wants countries to tackle so human suffering in conflict can be minimized

Businesses, governments and consumers to implement a more climate-friendly approach to #BeatPlasticPollution on World Environment Day 2018

European Commission adopts new list of third countries with weak anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regimes

How the gender commuting gap could be harming women’s careers

Practicing healthcare through a global lens

This tool shows you which cities will flood as ice sheets melt

Humanitarian visas would reduce refugees’ death toll

These are the countries that eat the most meat

More Stings?

Comments

  1. M Swallow says:

    Of course the banks will pass any tax costs to their customers.!!
    The only way not to, is to use legislation to FORCE them to reduce the obscene levels of senior staff salaries/bonuses, and also to restrict dividends. Otherwise of course it just falls out of their capacious behinds on to the punters who pay them.
    In UK we recently had the Chairman of Bank of Scotland speaking to a parliamentary committee, claiming his chief exec was under-paid on around £2m pa, and almost wondered why he sticks around. These guys are given FAAAAAR too much sycophantic support by ignorant politicians instead of treating them the same way as your gas or water supplier – they do nothing clever for their money, they merely exploit ruthlessly a system of taking a lot of money off businesses very subtly.

    • M Swallow says:

      oops typo -Chairman of ROYAL Bank of Scotland i meant

      • M Swallow says:

        “RBS, 82-percent owned by the taxpayer, has faced criticism over a deferred bonus of 780,000 pounds ($1.2 million) that Hester is set to receive in March. But Hampton told lawmakers on Monday that Hester’s pay was modest by the industry’s standards.
        Hampton said Hester’s pay was well below the average in world banking. “Relative to other people doing these jobs his pay has been modest,” he told the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards.
        Hester, who receives a basic salary of 1.2 million pounds, chose to give up his bonus last year after a computer systems meltdown affected millions of customers. This year he was set to receive a share-based payment of 780,000 pounds deferred from three years ago.”

        superstars !

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s