Financial Transaction Tax: More money for future bank bailouts?

Press conference by Algirdas Šemeta, Member of the EC, on the Financial Transaction Tax, 14.2.2013. (EC Audiovisual Services)

Press conference by Algirdas Šemeta, Member of the EC, on the Financial Transaction Tax, 14.2.2013. (EC Audiovisual Services)

The European Commission announced today the details of the implementation of the Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), under the procedure of the enhanced cooperation. It must be noted that such a procedure may be launched at the request of at least nine EU member states. Incidentally, the eleven member states actually wishing to introduce a financial transaction tax through enhanced cooperation are Belgium, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia. Any other member state may join the enhanced cooperation, if they so wish.

Today’s Commission action comes after the decision of 22 January 2013 by the Ecofin council which regroups the 27 Financial ministers of the EU, to give the green light for this enhanced cooperation, leading to the introduction of an FTT. The European Parliament has already authorised the implementation of the tax, which is expected to be applied as from 1 January 2014.

The Commission announcement notes that, “As requested by the 11 Member States that will proceed with this tax, the proposed Directive mirrors the scope and objectives of the original FTT proposal put forward by the Commission in September 2011. The approach of taxing all transactions with an established link to the FTT-zone is maintained, as are the rates of 0.1% for shares and bonds and 0.01% for derivatives”.

In this way, the EU executive arm introduces the term “FFT-zone”, which describes the application area of the new tax. The FTT will not apply on day-to-day financial activities of citizens and businesses (e.g. loans, payments, insurance, deposits etc.). Nor will it apply to the traditional investment banking activities in the context of capital raising or to financial transactions carried out as part of restructuring operations.

Why a tax on financial transactions?

Algirdas Šemeta, Commissioner responsible for Taxation, said: “With today’s proposal, everything is in place to enable a common Financial Transaction Tax to become a reality in the EU. On the table is an unquestionably fair and technically sound tax, which will strengthen our Single Market and temper irresponsible trading. Eleven Member States called for this proposal, so that they can proceed with the FTT through enhanced cooperation. I now call on those same Member States to push ahead with ambition – to drive, decide and deliver on the world’s first regional FTT.”

Of the three objectives cited by the Commission, to be served by the FFT, the most important one is this: “the FTT will support regulatory measures in encouraging the financial sector to engage in more responsible activities, geared towards the real economy”. For one thing, with this observation the Commission recognises that the financial system does not function in a responsible way towards the real economy.

Unfortunately, it took five years for the Commission to accept that. After 2008, when the great credit crunch broke out and led to the gravest post war economic crisis, no serious measures have been introduced to stop the financial sector from being irresponsible towards the real economy. Banks are still free to go bankrupt and then ask for a government bailout, whenever their risky spinning of other people’s money turn sour. In short, the Commission and all the other regulatory authorities within and without the EU have let the banks free to continue pursuing their unholy practices. Let’s now examine what will happen with the new tax money.

Where the tax money goes?

According to predictions the revenues from the imposition of the FTT will amount to €31 billion yearly. It is important to analyse where all this money will go. Following the time cherished practice, tax collectors keep something for themselves. So the Commission proposes that a not yet defined part of that money “shall constitute an own resource for the EU Budget”.

What about the rest of it? According to the Commissions’ proposal the objective is, “to ensure that financial institutions make a fair and substantial contribution to covering the costs of the recent crisis, and to ensure even taxation of the sector vis-à-vis other sectors”.

If one takes this statement seriously, the financial institutions by paying this tax from their profits and not passing it on to their customers, they need at least 145 years to pay off the €4.5 trillion they have received from society as support. And this, without subtracting the part the EU budget will get out of the €31bn yearly.

Another drawback of this new tax is the possibility that the banks will certainly try to pass on part or whole of it to their customers, thus charging again the real economy. Then it is even more alarming  that the larger part of the proceeds may be used to formulate a fund, which will be used for future bank bailouts. If this is the case, taxpayers and the real economy as a whole, will be charged in advance for future imprudence of banks. In short, the Commission with this tax may be planning an additional tool of support to banks on the expenses of the real economy.

 

 

 

 

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

A day that Berlin and Brussels would remember for a long time

The ‘abuse of food relief in Yemen’ must end now

Microplastics have been found in Rocky Mountain rainwater

How cultural understanding can help in the cultural shock

More beehives and beekeepers thanks to EU support

Repression, use of force risk worsening Bolivia crisis: UN human rights chief

Winter 2019 Economic Forecast: growth moderates amid global uncertainties

Volkswagen getting away with it in Europe

Public opinion misled by the Commission on air transport safety

FROM THE FIELD: A mountain of indigenous knowledge in Peru

MEPs condemn criminalisation of sex education in Poland

Here are 5 new green laws coming into force in 2020

COP21 Breaking News: Conference of Youth Focuses on Hard Skills to Drive Greater Climate Action

Drones, disinfectant, distancing – Europe’s beaches open up

Quashing myths on 2019-nCoV for better public management

Taking fast road to ‘e-mobility’ central to a sustainable future: COP24

Health services for Syrian women caught up in war, foster safety and hope: UNFPA

Our food system is no longer fit for the 21st century. Here are three ways to fix it

Chart of the day: This is how many animals we eat each year

Let’s Learn

MWC 2016 Live: Industrial world prepares to reap digital benefits

One-third of young people still optimistic despite COVID’s dramatic hit on education and jobs

Women’s empowerment ‘essential to global progress’ says Guterres, marking International Day

UN chief condemns explosion at election rally in Zimbabwe that injured dozens, including senior politicians

These 11 EU states already meet their 2020 renewable energy targets

Berlin Calling: DCX Expo on track to grow, in association with The European Sting

Online platforms required by law to be more transparent with EU businesses

Strengthening security through an EU-wide information system

2014 will bring more European Union for the big guys and less for the weak

FROM THE FIELD: Faces and Voices of Conflict

Brexit may finally not really happen; The Brits have second thoughts

Eurozone in trouble after Nicosia’s ‘no’

This is how many women have been nominated for best director in the Oscars’ entire history

South Sudan’s peace process ‘precarious, but progress in being made’, Security Council hears

If this is Globalization 4.0, what were the other three?

JADE Spring Meeting Live Coverage: Entrepreneurial skills in the digital markets

Parliamentary bid to democratize Myanmar constitution a ‘positive development’ says UN rights expert

5 droughts that changed human history

Pandemic: another look at the self

The European Youth Forum needs better signal for its “call” for Quality Internships

Sweden to reach its 2030 renewable energy target this year

The European reaction to the neo-fascist wind

A day in the life of a refugee: why should we care?

The US calls off globalization, targets Germany. Paris offer to Berlin comes at a cost

New EU rules and guidance for a fairer online economy

Young people struggling in digital world, finds latest OECD PISA survey

These refugee children have danced in the snow for the first time

EU adopts new €100 million assistance package to benefit refugees and local communities in Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq

Commission makes it easier for citizens to access health data securely across borders

These artists created a huge open library – and their idea’s gone global

Gender equality in STEM is possible. These countries prove it

Can green bonds help us manage climate risk?

UN condemns ‘cowardly’ attack on Libya’s national oil corporation headquarters

Newly-elected Nigerian UN General Assembly President pledges focus on ‘peace and prosperity’ for most vulnerable

Compensation for damages by the State for infringement of EU law: the European Commission refers Spain to the Court of Justice for its rules on the compensation for damages incurred by private parties

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

David Attenborough: The planet can’t cope with overpopulation

Israel is joining forces with Arab states to save coral from climate change destruction

Alarming number of Ebola deaths in DRC a ‘rallying cry’ to scale up treatment

Europe is no longer an innovation leader. Here’s how it can get ahead

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. M Swallow says:

    Of course the banks will pass any tax costs to their customers.!!
    The only way not to, is to use legislation to FORCE them to reduce the obscene levels of senior staff salaries/bonuses, and also to restrict dividends. Otherwise of course it just falls out of their capacious behinds on to the punters who pay them.
    In UK we recently had the Chairman of Bank of Scotland speaking to a parliamentary committee, claiming his chief exec was under-paid on around £2m pa, and almost wondered why he sticks around. These guys are given FAAAAAR too much sycophantic support by ignorant politicians instead of treating them the same way as your gas or water supplier – they do nothing clever for their money, they merely exploit ruthlessly a system of taking a lot of money off businesses very subtly.

    • M Swallow says:

      oops typo -Chairman of ROYAL Bank of Scotland i meant

      • M Swallow says:

        “RBS, 82-percent owned by the taxpayer, has faced criticism over a deferred bonus of 780,000 pounds ($1.2 million) that Hester is set to receive in March. But Hampton told lawmakers on Monday that Hester’s pay was modest by the industry’s standards.
        Hampton said Hester’s pay was well below the average in world banking. “Relative to other people doing these jobs his pay has been modest,” he told the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards.
        Hester, who receives a basic salary of 1.2 million pounds, chose to give up his bonus last year after a computer systems meltdown affected millions of customers. This year he was set to receive a share-based payment of 780,000 pounds deferred from three years ago.”

        superstars !

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s