The European Parliament fails to really restrict the rating agencies

Michel Barnier, member of the European Commission responsible for Internal Market and Services speaks in the Plenary Session of the European Parliament in favour of tougher rules for credit rating agencies. (European Parliament Audiovisual Services, 16.1.2013).

Michel Barnier, member of the European Commission responsible for Internal Market and Services speaks in the Plenary Session of the European Parliament in favour of tougher rules for credit rating agencies. (European Parliament Audiovisual Services, 16.1.2013).

The European Parliament adopted yesterday tougher rules for the issuance of creditworthiness ratings on governments and private businesses by the relevant agencies. Obviously the new legislation was voted in relation with and aims to set new restrictions on the activities of the three largest of them, namely Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch IBCA. But let’s see for ourselves, if there will be any real impact on the activities of those agencies.

Not to forget that all three are registered in the United States and are an integral part of the American and the world financial system. The idea of this new legislation is to reduce the role those three play on the management of the sovereign debt crisis in the Eurozone. Is it possible? Or the Parliamentarians just flatter themselves?

A first and quick appreciation of this European Parliament initiative is that it comes too late and allows the numerous European Union institutions to continue use the services of those three American firms until the year 2020, a very long time for such a pressing matter.

ESM/EFSF

The European Stability Mechanism which defines itself as “an important component of the comprehensive EU strategy designed to safeguard financial stability within the euro area”, posts in the first page of its Internet location, the appreciation of its creditworthiness by the Fitch agency. Along the same lines the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) which was created to “safeguard financial stability in Europe by providing financial assistance to euro area Member States”, praise itself about the good ratings by the three agencies.

A Press release by EFSF makes detailed references to the ratings of the three agencies, presumably because the Facility’s directors consider the three agencies as very important for the activities of EFSF/ESM, which mainly consists of convincing investors to buy their debt paper.

The press release goes like this: “the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) take note of the decision by Moody’s to change both entities’ long-term rating from Aaa to Aa1. Moody’s decision follows the recent change of France’s long term rating from Aaa to Aa1. ESM and EFSF continue to be assigned the best possible long-term by Fitch (AAA) and the best and short-term credit rating by Fitch and Moody’s. This underlines ESM’s uniquely robust capital structure and the solidity of EFSF”.

No wonder why EFSF/ESM, the two most important financial instruments of the European Union, with a combined endowment of at least €700 billion, do not seem ready to abandon the services of the three rating agencies. Not in the foreseeable future.

In any case the European parliamentarians voted some very pertinent restrictions. Or at least this is what they believe they did. According to the Parliament’s press release the new rules “will allow agencies to issue unsolicited sovereign debt ratings only on set dates, and enable private investors to sue them for negligence. Agencies’ shareholdings in rated firms will be capped, to reduce conflicts of interest. MEPs also ensured that the ratings are clearer by requiring agencies to explain the key factors underlying them. Ratings must not seek to influence state policies, and agencies themselves must not advocate any policy changes, adds the text. The rules have already been provisionally agreed with the Council”.

All those restrictions are very well conceived. The problem is however that the three agencies are based in New York and this fact presents certain practical difficulties. It is also a fact that in the United States do not exist such restrictions on the activities of the rating agencies. Actually in the US there are very few restrictions on the entire financial sector.

As a result these new rules voted by the European Parliament and agreed with the Council, would have a very restricted, if any at all, practical impact on the activities of the European Union’s financial industry. It is inconceivable the financial markets of London, Frankfort, Paris and all over the 27 EU countries to change even slightly their attitude towards the three rating agencies.

Unfortunately the role that those agencies play for our Western financial system is so “systemic”, that the European Parliament cannot touch them. The three agencies are a constitutional part of the triangle US-Europe-Japan financial system and they feed directly the banking leviathan.

Consequently the title given to this story by the press services of the European Parliament, “Tougher credit rating rules confirmed by Parliament’s vote”, does not reflect reality. They are tougher but in order to be “rules” they must have a direct and immediate impact, which they don’t. So at the end they are not rules at all and the Parliament confirmed once more it’s rather decorative character.

 

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Cultural tolerance is a must: “No sir, I’m not inferior!”

Will Merkel ever steer the EU migration Titanic and restore her power in Germany?

Entrepreneur India Convention 2016: Bringing together Entrepreneurs, Investors, Startups and SMEs

Gains by Abyei interim force can help advance resolution of border issues between Sudan and South Sudan, UN peacekeeping chief says

How public private partnerships must evolve to create social impact

‘Transformational benefits’ of ending outdoor defecation: Why toilets matter

UN condemns Syrian ‘war on children’ as up to 30 reportedly killed in clashes

The results of Finland’s basic income experiment are in. Is it working?

COVID-19: Managing Our Mental Health

Human rights in Brussels and in Beijing: a more balanced approach needed

Syria: Why did the US-Russia brokered ceasefire collapse? What does the duo care for?

October’s EU strong digital mix: From Safe Harbour to Net Neutrality, Roaming and Snowden

To what extent can renewable energy empower women in rural communities?

Phone lines open between Ethiopia and Eritrea, and people are calling strangers

After John Lewis: 21 civil rights leaders who are shaping America

EU Border and Coast Guard: new corps of 10 000 border and coast guards by 2027

IMF: World cup and productivity

MEPs call for EU Magnitsky Act to impose sanctions on human rights abusers

Coronavirus: Commission Statement on consulting Member States on proposal to further expand State aid Temporary Framework to recapitalisation measures

What will higher education in Africa look like after COVID-19?

Societies must unite against ‘global crisis of antisemitic hatred’, Guterres urges

At UN, France’s Macron says more ‘political courage’ is needed to face global challenges

EU lawmakers vote to reintroduce visas for Americans over “reciprocity principle”

South African women’s fury at gender-based attacks spills onto the streets

Khashoggi case highlights ‘very worrying practice’ of overseas abductions, says UN expert

How can coronavirus lockdowns end safely and effectively? – WHO briefing

These 4 trends are shaping the future of your job

The Catcher in the Rice

Sweden gives all employees time off to be entrepreneurs

Draghi: Germany has to spend if Eurozone is to exit recession

These technologies are playing a major role at the Cricket World Cup

Yemen: Escalation in fighting must stop ‘before it’s too late’, Griffiths tells Security Council

EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?

EU continues targeting on Chinese steel imports instead of the revival of its own economy

Coronavirus: Pandemic alert should be trigger for countries to do more against COVID-19

Respect people’s peaceful assembly and fair trail rights, UN human rights wing urges Nicaragua

COVID-19 has accelerated the digital transformation of higher education

How to provide health education and thus create better health systems

Economic Outlook: Weak trade and investment threaten long-term growth

The company of the future must do well by doing good

Finance for SMEs: Alternative supply mechanisms do exist

Bill Gates: How HIV/AIDS prepared us to tackle COVID-19

We need to rethink the way we heat ourselves. Here’s why

The EU Parliament slams Commission on economic governance

How to promote Primary Healthcare to the Young Healthcare Workforce?

We should look to nature for solutions to the global water crisis. Here’s why

Children suffering ‘atrocities’ as number of countries in conflict hits new peak: UNICEF

France v Croatia: How the World Cup finalists stack up off the pitch

We must stop choking the ocean with plastic waste. Here’s how

First-ever global conference of national counter-terrorism chiefs will strengthen cooperation, build ‘resilient’ States, says top UN official

70 years on, landmark UN human rights document as important as ever

The vital role played by logistics during humanitarian crises

Intervene, don’t overthink – the new mantra of systems design

In tech-driven 21st century, achieving global development goals requires closing digital gender divide

How to create responsible supply chains in the age of globalization 4.0

An ECB banker wants to change the European social model

UN investigates systematic sexual violence across South Sudan

Matthias in Canada

It’s time to gang up: a personal conflict on discrepancies in the medical community

Postal workers in France are helping elderly people fight loneliness

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s