€5 billion of EU energy efficiency project money spent on “comfort”

Press conference by Harald Wögerbauer, Member of the European Court of Auditors (on the left), on the cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy investments in energy efficiency. (EC Audiovisual Services)

Press conference by Harald Wögerbauer, Member of the European Court of Auditors (on the left), on the cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy investments in energy efficiency. (EC Audiovisual Services)

The European Commission does not spare big words and photographic opportunities for Commissioners, whenever launching a new initiative or securing political agreement for a regulation. And they are doing this all the time. It seems like they spent all their energy and resources in conceiving new rules on everything. And of course they always need more personnel to write down all those new proposals.

What about results? Very rarely we see announcements about the results achieved after some years of application of a certain regulation. It will be a very interesting subject even for a PhD degree research, to count how many new rules, initiatives and spending programmes the Commission is announcing every year and how many debriefings on the achievements or the failures of the old ones are being organised in the Berlaymont building. Thank God there is the European Court of Auditors (ECA) which monitors regularly all EU legislation that entails spending of EU taxpayers’ money.

Energy efficiency

Incidentally it was yesterday 14 January 2013 when the ECA announced the findings of its audits on energy efficiency projects in a number of EU member states, which cost €5 billion. Of course the Brussels Commission had approved everything and all those “investments” were realised according to the rules set by the relevant EU legislation, introduced and monitored by the Commission.

What was the outcome of all those costly projects? Let the ECA speak: “EU Energy Efficiency investment targets not achieved; average pay back period exceeds 50 years (in extreme cases 150 years)”.

There is more on that from the ECA:”…the European Union, through its Cohesion Policy funds, spent almost €5 billion for co-financing energy efficiency measures in the Member States. The European Commission and the Member States are both responsible for the sound financial management of these funds…The Court found that the projects selected by Member State authorities for financing did not have rational objectives in terms of cost-effectiveness, i.e. cost per unit of energy saved. Their objectives were to save energy and improve comfort, but they were not selected for financing on the basis of their potential to produce financial benefits through energy savings, but rather that the buildings were typically regarded as being ‘ready’ for funding, if they were in need of refurbishment and their documentation complied with the requirements”.

Mind you the “documentation complied with the requirements”, says the Court’s auditor, so the responsibility lies entirely on the Commission side, because it was its services that wrote down those requirements and approved their application.

The Press Release of the ECA fortunately found a place in the Europa>Newsroom internet location, but understandably there were no celebrations by the co-responsible Commissioner Günther Oettinger.

More projects

On the other hand this last Commission member dully celebrated some time ago the political agreement on the new Energy Efficiency Directive. He must have been very proud of it. Commissioners are always proud in announcements. He made however no reference to what had happened to €5bn of European taxpayers’ money, which was used not for energy efficiency projects as it was planned by the Commission, but rather to “improve comfort”. Seemingly the EU Commission is always seduced by comfort.

The ECA however doesn’t stop here. Its Press Release continues as follows: ““None of the projects we looked at had a needs assessment or even an analysis of the energy savings potential in relation to investments”, said Harald Wögerbauer, the ECA member responsible for the report, “The Member States were essentially using this money to refurbish public buildings while energy efficiency was, at best, a secondary concern.”

And all that with the seal of the Brussels Commission, otherwise there would have being no disbursement of funds. It is an appalling fact, the ECA to have found that €5bn had being spent on “comfort” and “refurbishments”, totally outside the scope of the programme they meant to finance and the European Commission did nothing to change this.

That kind of money is a good part of the annual EU budget and actually they went down the drain. Is it possible that nobody can be held responsible for that? It might not be a penal case but aren’t there some internal rules in the Commission’s statutes for the waste of €5bn?

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

‘World’s deadliest sea crossing’ claimed six lives a day in 2018: UN refugee agency

Victims of terrorism remembered

2019 EU Budget: Commission proposes a budget focused on continuity and delivery – for growth, solidarity, security

A Sting Exclusive: China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi on South China Sea issue at the ASEAN Regional Forum

Macron leads EU-wide minimum wage call as Merkel, Medvedev warn of global injustice

EU elections: The louder the threats and the doomsaying the heavier the weight of the vote

I have a rare disease. This is my hope for the future of medicine

5 ways to #BeatAirPollution

‘Deteriorating’ human rights in Belarus amounts to ‘wholescale oppression’: UN expert

Parliament ready to fight for a different EU budget

Here’s how we solve the global crisis of tribalism and democratic decay

Terrorism ‘spreading and destabilizing’ entire regions, Guterres warns States, at key Kenya conference

Health should be central to the conversation around climate change

Is the ECB enforcing the will of the big Eurozone member states on the small? Can the euro area live with that?

Russia must urgently step up fight against foreign bribery

Eurozone’s bank resolution mechanism takes a blow

Insecurity and violence turn Nigeria into a ‘pressure cooker’ that must be addressed, says UN rights expert

As human genome editing moves from the lab to the clinic, the ethical debate is no longer hypothetical

Gender inequality in the medicine field: two commonly issues

A long German political winter is on the way

EU and Japan select first Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Programmes

With millions of girls ‘at risk’ today of genital mutilation, UN chief calls for zero tolerance

Three UN workers killed following Benghazi car bomb attack, as Security Council meets in emergency session, honours their ‘ultimate sacrifice’

Charlotte in Ghana

Parliament to ask for the suspension of EU-US deal on bank data

Parliament criticises Council’s rejection of money laundering blacklist

European Solidarity Corps: Commission opens new call for project proposals

AI can wreak havoc if left unchecked by humans

The Eurogroup offered a cold reception to IMF’s director for Europe

Half of all mental illness begins by the age of 14

Female African coders ‘on the front-line of the battle’ to change gender power relations: UN chief

Health & Sustainable Development Goals: it’s about doing what we can

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “It is the implementation, Stupid!”, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaueble points the finger to Greece from Davos

Gloomy new statistics signify no end to Eurozone’s economic misery

The business case for diversity in the workplace is now overwhelming

The psychology of pandemics

Here’s how data could make our cities safer

The Parliament sets the way for the European Banking Union

The deforestation risks lurking in the banking sector

European Commission: the LED lights of your Audi A6 shall save our planet

Thousands risk lives fleeing fighting in Syria’s last ISIL stronghold

UN chief calls for ‘far greater support’ for Cyclone Idai response

This is what happened to CO2 emissions in the EU last year

Hydrogen power is here to stay. How do we convince the public that it’s safe?

What lessons to draw from the destruction of Syria

Greece will probably stay in the Eurozone but at what cost?

FROM THE FIELD: Hardy seeds bear fruit to protect Colombia’s environment

Mental Health Policy, a significant driver for growth

Children suffering ‘atrocities’ as number of countries in conflict hits new peak: UNICEF

UN says ‘many humanitarian achievements’, one year after ouster of ISIL from Mosul

Convincing the Germans to pay also for the unification of Eurozone

Antitrust: Commission fines US chipmaker Qualcomm €242 million for engaging in predatory pricing

Iran: women hunger strikers entitled to medical care, UN rights experts urge

Second Ebola death confirmed in Uganda as UN health agency mulls global emergency call

Technology can help solve the climate crisis – but it will need our help

Direction Wakanda: finance methods to make Africa a superhero continent

4 things President Trump could learn from Jimmy Carter

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Europe’s children urge leaders to commit to climate action at UN Climate Summit in Paris

The secret weapon in the fight for sustainability? The humble barcode

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s