€5 billion of EU energy efficiency project money spent on “comfort”

Press conference by Harald Wögerbauer, Member of the European Court of Auditors (on the left), on the cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy investments in energy efficiency. (EC Audiovisual Services)

Press conference by Harald Wögerbauer, Member of the European Court of Auditors (on the left), on the cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy investments in energy efficiency. (EC Audiovisual Services)

The European Commission does not spare big words and photographic opportunities for Commissioners, whenever launching a new initiative or securing political agreement for a regulation. And they are doing this all the time. It seems like they spent all their energy and resources in conceiving new rules on everything. And of course they always need more personnel to write down all those new proposals.

What about results? Very rarely we see announcements about the results achieved after some years of application of a certain regulation. It will be a very interesting subject even for a PhD degree research, to count how many new rules, initiatives and spending programmes the Commission is announcing every year and how many debriefings on the achievements or the failures of the old ones are being organised in the Berlaymont building. Thank God there is the European Court of Auditors (ECA) which monitors regularly all EU legislation that entails spending of EU taxpayers’ money.

Energy efficiency

Incidentally it was yesterday 14 January 2013 when the ECA announced the findings of its audits on energy efficiency projects in a number of EU member states, which cost €5 billion. Of course the Brussels Commission had approved everything and all those “investments” were realised according to the rules set by the relevant EU legislation, introduced and monitored by the Commission.

What was the outcome of all those costly projects? Let the ECA speak: “EU Energy Efficiency investment targets not achieved; average pay back period exceeds 50 years (in extreme cases 150 years)”.

There is more on that from the ECA:”…the European Union, through its Cohesion Policy funds, spent almost €5 billion for co-financing energy efficiency measures in the Member States. The European Commission and the Member States are both responsible for the sound financial management of these funds…The Court found that the projects selected by Member State authorities for financing did not have rational objectives in terms of cost-effectiveness, i.e. cost per unit of energy saved. Their objectives were to save energy and improve comfort, but they were not selected for financing on the basis of their potential to produce financial benefits through energy savings, but rather that the buildings were typically regarded as being ‘ready’ for funding, if they were in need of refurbishment and their documentation complied with the requirements”.

Mind you the “documentation complied with the requirements”, says the Court’s auditor, so the responsibility lies entirely on the Commission side, because it was its services that wrote down those requirements and approved their application.

The Press Release of the ECA fortunately found a place in the Europa>Newsroom internet location, but understandably there were no celebrations by the co-responsible Commissioner Günther Oettinger.

More projects

On the other hand this last Commission member dully celebrated some time ago the political agreement on the new Energy Efficiency Directive. He must have been very proud of it. Commissioners are always proud in announcements. He made however no reference to what had happened to €5bn of European taxpayers’ money, which was used not for energy efficiency projects as it was planned by the Commission, but rather to “improve comfort”. Seemingly the EU Commission is always seduced by comfort.

The ECA however doesn’t stop here. Its Press Release continues as follows: ““None of the projects we looked at had a needs assessment or even an analysis of the energy savings potential in relation to investments”, said Harald Wögerbauer, the ECA member responsible for the report, “The Member States were essentially using this money to refurbish public buildings while energy efficiency was, at best, a secondary concern.”

And all that with the seal of the Brussels Commission, otherwise there would have being no disbursement of funds. It is an appalling fact, the ECA to have found that €5bn had being spent on “comfort” and “refurbishments”, totally outside the scope of the programme they meant to finance and the European Commission did nothing to change this.

That kind of money is a good part of the annual EU budget and actually they went down the drain. Is it possible that nobody can be held responsible for that? It might not be a penal case but aren’t there some internal rules in the Commission’s statutes for the waste of €5bn?

 

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Closing the gaps in accelerating women’s rights: the role of medical students

MEPs propose measures to combat mobbing and sexual harassment

Chinese economy to raise speed and help the world grow

A bad marriage can be as unhealthy as smoking and drinking

This company is combining video calls with pop-up clinics to help more people get the care they need

Fostering defence innovation through the European Defence Fund

Are we at the edge of anti-vaccination health crisis?

It’s Trump’s anti-globalization and inward-looking rhetoric that perturbs GOP and US

Fossil fuel support is rising again in a threat to climate change efforts

Plastic Oceans: MEPs back EU ban on polluting throwaway plastics by 2021

Ursula von der Leyen: ‘We must not hold onto yesterday’s economy as we rebuild’

NextGenerationEU: Questions and answers on the Recovery and Resilience Facility

How can you or your organization support the Hour of Pride initiative?

After the Italian ‘no’ and the Brexit, Germans must decide which Europe they want

How learning in a crisis can build more resilient leadership

Croatian Presidency priorities discussed in the European Parliament

How technology and play can power high-quality learning in schools

MEPs want ambitious funding for cross-border projects to connect people

Solitary Britain sides with US aggressing Russia and chooses hard Brexit

This New York store is selling Christmas presents for refugees

LGBTQI+ and medicine, in the Land of the Pure

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “European unity and cooperation is being called on question”, Vice President Joe Biden criticizes from Davos

How regenerative agroforestry could solve the climate crisis

Environment Committee MEPs vote to upgrade EU civil protection capacity

The refugee crisis brings to light EU’s most horrible flaws and nightmares

This is how to future-proof your company, according to McKinsey

Why precision medicine won’t transform healthcare – but governance could

Capital Markets Union: Commission reports on progress achieved ahead of European Council

Trump’s self-centered politics unravels

COP24: Huge untapped potential in greener construction, says UN environment agency

How LA plans to be 1.6°C cooler by 2050

AI looks set to disrupt the established world order. Here’s how

Coronavirus: Commission issues guidelines on testing

Guatemala: UN anti-corruption body will continue working, as Constitutional Court blocks Government expulsion

5 facts you should know about the world’s refugees

Press coverage of migration crisis in Europe: a call for collaborative action

New systemic approach needed to tackle global challenges

COVID-19 vaccines: MEPs call for more clarity and transparency

Terrorist content online: companies to be given just one hour to remove it

The next 48 hours may change the European Union

Summer 2018 Interim Economic Forecast: Resilient Growth amid increased uncertainty

Ramped-up emergency preparedness, part of ‘changing the DNA’ of the UN’s health agency

Pumping more money into banks but leaving them unregulated doesn’t help

David McAllister underlines the need for rapid progress in EU-UK negotiations

Next time you fly, could you be boarding a train instead of a plane?

4 crazy things that are happening in the Arctic right now

Commission caps charges on card and Internet payments and enforces competition

Germany is the world’s most innovative economy

UN condemns attack on Ebola treatment centre in DR Congo which left doctor dead, two others injured

SCADA Security Conference 2017 in Prague, Czech Republic

EU-Russia relations: the beginning of a warmer winter?

Western Sahara: a ‘peaceful solution’ to conflict is possible, says UN envoy

Costa Coffee products (Copyright: Costa Coffee; Source: Costa Coffee website, Press area)

The start of the “Caffeine rush”: Coca-Cola acquires Costa Coffee days after Nestlé-Starbucks deal

UN spotlights ‘explosive’ obesity rates, hunger in Latin America and Caribbean

Radioactive material ‘a magnet for groups with malicious intent’, warns UN nuclear watchdog chief

End ‘cycle of violence’ in Gaza, UN deputy chief tells forum on Palestine

Why collaboration will be key to creating the workforce of the future

Big oil’s climate pledges will fail without workforce equality

Coronavirus: the Commission mobilises all of its resources to protect lives and livelihoods

Banking on sustainability – what’s next?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s