EU summit: Are the London Tories planning an exit from the EU?

The British Prime Minister David Cameron bites his lips. Wonder why?

 

It’s not the first time that the European Union leaders are divided between the paymasters and the receivers. However during their last Summit of Thursday and Friday 22 and 23 November the 27 heads of states and governments were divided in more than three groups and left the conference room blaming each other, for the complete failure to set the EU budget lines for the next seven years.

Once more the main dissident was the British Prime Minister, David Cameron, but this time he was alone without the usual backing London gets from some central European member states like Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary. The three, love whatever is not German or Russian having paid dearly their geographical position between the two and believe whatever is written in English. Not now though. Money makes the old enmities to be forgotten.

All central and southern European Union members want a generous EU budget that Berlin doesn’t deny, which is quite the opposite Cameron could have brought happily back home. His Eurosceptic Tory colleagues would have torn him apart, not because he had forfeited the interests of the country, that he didn’t, but rather just because he had agreed with what Brussels proposed.

Cameron also suffered of solitude in the Belgian capital a year ago, towards the end of 2011, when he couldn’t find a fellow EU leader to have together a glass of trappist beer. At that time again Cameron was alone in opposing the creation of the European Stability Mechanism, despite the fact that all the other 26 EU leaders made clear to him, that the London City’s interests were not to be compromised. At that time the head of the Confederation of British Industry observed bitterly, that out of the hundreds of thousands of square miles of British soil the Prime Minister choose to protect the interests of the one on which the City seats.

What the Tories want

Tory Eurosceptic deputies and militants like Cameron’s crony but political enemy, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, the London Mayor, advertise their anti-Brussels sentiments on every occasion. Why? To answer this is not a difficult task. Those guys come from the same quarters of Tories that made Margaret Thatcher a glorious leader. What she did very successfully in the 1980s it was to abandon the industrial heart of Britain to its fate, at a time when all the other major European countries were spending billions to help their own outdated steel, iron and engineering industries to modernise and survive.

Why Thatcher did this dreadful thing, destroying industrial Britain? The answer is simple. Her likes were afraid of socialism! What socialism? The Labour Party’s socialism, and also because the industrial constituencies of Britain were voting Labour. Imagine the party of Tony Blair to turn Britain into a socialist country? Unthinkable! Yet still the Tories were afraid of that. This insanity cost Britain its solid industrial base. Now the country tries to survive selling real estate and catering to wealthy Arabs.

It seems however that the insanity is indigenous in the Conservative Party. Now again, despite the fact that what is left of the industrious Britain considers the EU membership as “sine qua non” for the country’s wellbeing and the people of the Confederation of British Industry point out that Britain without the EU will suffer, the Tories play again a card against those of their countrymen, who labour and produce goods and services sellable to the EU.

Unfortunately it seems that the London aristocracy, the back bone of the Tory Eurosceptic faction, will do whatever it takes to protect the financial industry of the City, even if this will cost dearly to the country as a whole. Why? Because the financiers of the City have made this square mile of the English soil worth its weight in gold. And guess what! This land belongs to the London aristocracy. Their children can also find lucrative jobs, actually doing nothing, in the City’s financial monsters.

One though cannot deny that there is an argument in favour of the City. It goes like that; this square mile produces almost one tenth of the British Gross National Product. However this is a total fallacy.  The last world credit crunch which culminated with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in New York in September 2008, had started in Britain during the spring of that year, with the failure of the Northern Rock Bank.

Today all the major banks of the country have being nationalised, swallowing hundreds of billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money. In reality the British financial industry is a ghost and the money it “produces” comes from the government coffers. Truly the role of the City is to redistribute the British GDP in favour of the few at the expenses of the many. This is what Cameron now protects, but understandably he does it with a good dose of unwillingness. If the English Eurosceptis have it their way, the country will end up in ruins.

There will be no other “deus ex machina” in the form of the oil discoveries in the North Sea, as last time when the country was saved by the black crude stuff after the Thatcherite calamity. Remember that the Thatcher era left Britain more indebted than before. It will be a tragedy if the crazy Tories drive their country out of the EU. Fortunately the Scots may have abandoned the ship before it sinks. Not to forget that the referendum for Scotland’s secession is scheduled for 2014.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

‘Every ventilator becomes like gold’ – a doctor’s stark warning from Italy’s Coronavirus outbreak

Medical Education is #NotATarget

Indonesian tsunami death toll climbs over 400 as Government-led relief efforts are stepped up

Supply chains have been upended. Here’s how to make them more resilient

World food security increasingly at risk due to ‘unprecedented’ climate change impact, new UN report warns

Bank resolutions set to remain a national affair

UN Children’s Fund chief condemns ‘horrific’ Kabul bomb attack

‘Terrorist Iranian regime’ must be checked; Saudi Foreign Minister urges financial pressure

UN rights office calls on Zimbabwe Government to end ‘crackdown’ in response to fuel protests

UN agriculture agency digs in to help forests and farms build resilience to climate change

The EU Parliament and the ECB unknowingly or unwillingly fail to protect our financial assets

Korea should adapt its migration programmes to ensure continued success in the face of expected challenges

COVID-19 is a threat to waste pickers. Here’s how to help them

Those who produce food are among world’s hungriest – UN rights expert

Job automation risks vary widely across different regions within countries

Counterfeiters are taking advantage of the pandemic. Here’s how to stop them

As fighting in Libya escalates, so does number of children ‘at imminent risk of injury or death’

10 of Albert Einstein’s best quotes

Draghi: A bridge from Brussels to Berlin

Draghi’s top new year resolution: Quantitative Easing

TTIP: why it is worth not to pull the covers over your head?

How to future-proof India’s economy

The children’s continent: keeping up with Africa’s growth

How energy infrastructure is shaping geopolitics in East Asia

Protection of transported animals: Parliament establishes inquiry committee

Budget Committee backs €2.3 million worth of aid to help 550 redundant media workers in Greece

Amid pandemic detours, mental health matters

FROM THE FIELD: Liberia boosts efforts to guard against rising seas

Vaccination: European Commission and World Health Organization join forces to promote the benefits of vaccines

Who’s promised net-zero, and who looks likely to get there?

‘Ghost fishing’ is threatening our oceans. Here’s how we can tackle it

Brazil: A strategic partner for the EU

Mental health in the pandemic: it’s no Rubik’s cube

A clean energy future with hydrogen could be closer than we think

These 5 charts show our shifting behaviour around coronavirus

If a virus could sing … Could this musical version of COVID-19 help us defeat the disease?

Venezuela migrant crisis begs a ‘coherent, predictable and harmonized’ response: UNHCR

5 ways students can graduate fully qualified for the Fourth Industrial Revolution

REACT-EU: EU support to mitigate immediate effects of the COVID-19 crisis

The EU stops being soft with 10 Downing Street about Brexit

Europe’s dirty air kills 400,000 people every year

Why the world is not as globalized as you think

“Be aware where you put your I Agree signature on and something else”; now Facebook by default opts you in an unseen private data bazar

State aid: Commission approves €286 million Finnish measure to recapitalise Finnair

Topic: Mental Health in times of pandemic: What can each individual do to lessen the burden?

The European Brain Drain: a truth or a myth?

How data can help mining companies tackle their trust deficit

Algorithmic warfare is coming. Humans must retain control

EU prepares a banking union amidst financial ruins

Efforts to save the planet must start with the Antarctic

How digital identity can improve lives in a post-COVID-19 world

Medical ethics in the age of the social media influencers

Three reasons to be optimistic for the future of Asia

Commission supports normalisation in Greece through activation of post-programme framework

Execution of juvenile offender in Iran ‘deeply distressing’ – UN rights chief

Chernobyl nuclear disaster-affected areas spring to life, 33 years on

Blockchain could boost global trade by $1 trillion

Why rich countries are seeing more poverty

5 charts that explain big challenges facing Italy’s new government

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Denis Hicks says:

    Terrible article. And does little to advance the fundamental debate about what the EU should be which is at the heart of the current conflict of opinions. Of course the UK has its national politics – does not every country? – and do they not all influence what happens in Brussels?

    The analysis of the Thatcher years is far to simplistic and, frankly naive. I was there. Please check what would have been required to save those industries for a country which was close to bankrupcy at the time and held hostage to union power which would directly benefit from goverment involvement.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s