Why we can’t afford to dismiss carbon offsetting in a climate crisis

(Credit: Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Bronson Griscom, Senior Director, Natural Climate Solutions at Conservation International


  • We have 10 years to prevent irreversible damage to the planet due to climate change.
  • Despite this urgency, critical tools such as carbon offsetting, have been tarnished by claims of greenwashing.
  • We have a moral imperative to act now and harness the potential of carbon projects.

Given their potential, you’d think investments in nature would be a key priority? Well, you’d be wrong. Investments in nature represent just 3% of global finance dedicated to protecting the climate – a frustratingly small proportion.

As a scientist, I prefer to stick to data rather than debate questions of morality. Yet, I can no longer avoid wading into an argument that is consuming the environmental community. My fellow climate scientists tell us that we have about 10 years to reverse the growing concentration of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere or face catastrophe.

Carbon offsets, a critical tool for doing this, is hung-up in a dispute over whether offsets are just greenwashing. These criticisms resurfaced recently after UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance Mark Carney detailed a blueprint for expanding the global carbon offsets market.

So, what are carbon offsets and what’s the debate about?

The idea is this: companies or individuals can buy and trade credits to offset a portion of their carbon emissions, with the revenue paid to landowners and communities as an incentive to protect and restore forests. This prevents emissions from deforestation – the second-leading cause of climate change – and absorbs the carbon in the atmosphere.

Land-based sinks in 1.5. pathways
Land-based sinks in 1.5. pathways Image: Griscom et al., 2017

The trouble is, some critics, many of them my fellow environmentalists, see these investments in nature as a license for corporations to pollute — moral hazards, they claim, that amount to greenwashing.

I can sympathize with this reasoning. Many corporations have assiduously worked against responsible climate and environmental policies, but that tide is turning.

Leading companies now acknowledge their foundational dependence on nature and a stable climate, and recognize the need to protect it by buying carbon offsets – a pragmatic and effective tool. Any further delay in deploying this tool will plunge humanity into a climate catastrophe of much greater impact. That’s the real moral hazard we face today.

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about deforestation?

Halting deforestation is essential to avoiding the worst effects of global climate change.

The destruction of forests creates almost as much greenhouse gas emissions as global road travel, and yet it continues at an alarming rate.

In 2012, we brought together more than 150 partners working in Latin America, West Africa, Central Africa and South-East Asia – to establish the Tropical Forest Alliance 2020: a global public-private partnership to facilitate investment in systemic change.

The Alliance, made up of businesses, governments, civil society, indigenous people, communities and international organizations, helps producers, traders and buyers of commodities often blamed for causing deforestation to achieve deforestation-free supply chains.

The Commodities and Forests Agenda 2020, summarizes the areas in which the most urgent action is needed to eliminate deforestation from global agricultural supply chains.

The Tropical Forest Alliance 2020is gaining ground on tackling deforestation linked to the production of four commodities: palm oil, beef, soy, and pulp and paper.

Get in touch to join our mission to halt to deforestation.

The science is clear. We must do two things to avoid a complete climate breakdown: dramatically reduce emissions and rapidly remove carbon that is already in the atmosphere. The vast majority of emissions cuts must come from ending the use of fossil fuels but we will not reach our emissions reductions goals without addressing deforestation, the second leading cause of climate change. High quality forest carbon projects provide the financing needed to ensure governments and local communities keep their forests standing.

In 2017, I published a study with colleagues which found that nature can deliver a third of the emissions cuts needed by 2030 to avert climate disaster. Not only do carbon offsets support natural climate solutions, like reforestation or the restoration of mangroves – the businesses that invest in them tend to take their climate commitments seriously.

Mitigation potential by ecosystem
Mitigation potential by ecosystem Image: Griscom et al. 2017

The CDP Climate Change Report 2016 found that companies that bought voluntary carbon credits also made more ambitious emissions cuts compared with companies that did not. Furthermore, despite the name, “offsets” are not just a one-to-one trade for dodging emissions cuts. Carbon trading brings in lower-cost options from nature, enabling much more climate mitigation “bang for the buck.” To be sure, carbon offset claims need to be verified. Fortunately, carbon verification systems have significantly improved.

Critics who remain unconvinced of the importance of carbon credits might consider how some local and underserved communities have benefited.

Success stories

A successful forest-carbon project in an area of the Peruvian Amazon that had some of the country’s highest deforestation rates has reduceddeforestation by 75%, resulting in the avoidance of more than 6 million tons of carbon emissions – the equivalent of taking more than 1 million cars off the road each year. Some 70% of the local community in this area benefitted from this programme through better healthcare and agricultural training.

Those benefits have real payoffs. Take Alto Mayo’s coffee crop – income provided by the carbon project has helped the local shade-grown coffee cooperative invest in productivity and quality, and establish access to new markets. Even as the pandemic has wrecked Peru’s economy, the cooperative’s exports grew by 50% in 2020 and since 2016 has earned $3 million dollars in revenue.

Another carbon offsets programme in California has seen more than 100 million credits traded to date, generating more than $500 million in revenue – with most of that going directly to local communities.

The government of Costa Rica, meanwhile, generates $30 million a year for forest conservation through the sale of carbon credits, and has conserved more than 2.5 million acres of its forests to date.

This is exactly why carbon offsets are so important: they create positive incentives that upend the conventional economic motivations that render tropical forests more valuable dead than alive. Increasing the demand for offsets can generate much needed action to test effective and socially responsible solutions, and scale them up globally through policy reforms.

In other words, carbon offsets are essential because they provide a simple way to keep, replenish and expand forests. Once a company or other entity has reduced their emissions as much as possible with existing technology, they can buy credits to deploy the most widely available but underfunded climate technology in existence, photosynthesis, thereby compensating for the environmental impact of energy sources such as jet fuel that do not yet have cost-effective alternatives.

Carbon offsets are not a silver bullet. They are no substitute for massive, comprehensive reductions in fossil fuel emissions. As with all innovative climate solutions, there have been successes, some of which I mentioned, and failures. We must be disciplined in learning from both.

Here’s the bottom line – the destruction of nature is the second largest driver of climate change, and we will not avert a climate crisis without investments that halt and reverse this destruction. We have a tool that does just that. To not use it is immoral.

The World Economic Forum’s effort to accelerate change

Unlocking large-scale carbon finance for nature, whether through voluntary or compliance action, requires close collaboration between governments, businesses, investors and civil society. The World Economic Forum and World Business Council for Sustainable Development co-convene the Natural Climate Solutions Alliance to bring together public and private stakeholders to identify opportunities and barriers to investment into carbon offsets in new and existing markets to increase financing for nature.

The NCS Alliance complements the work of the World Economic Forum’s Platform to Accelerate Nature-Based Solutions, where other projects like the Tropical Forest Alliance, 1t.org and Nature Action Agenda are fostering net-zero and nature-positive economies.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

From Sweden to India, School climate strikes have gone global

Close to final agreement on the EU Banking Union

Mergers: Commission fines Canon €28 million for partially implementing its acquisition of Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation before notification and merger control approval

Environment Committee MEPs push for cleaner trucks and electric buses

Here are six bold ideas to accelerate sustainable energy innovation

Employment MEPs want to ensure more flexibility and clarity for EU mobile workers

July was the hottest month ever – what does that actually mean?

Gender is where the feminist and LGBTI movements meet. Here’s why

Bold measures needed to protect cross-border and seasonal workers in EU, MEPs say

China’s New Normal and Its Relevance to the EU

Where are the charities in the great Artificial Intelligence debate?

European Youth Forum welcomes steps towards raising awareness of youth rights by EU ministers

How a bionic arm is helping one little girl enjoy the things most take for granted

3 leaders on creating a pipeline for female talent in business

‘Nothing left to go back for’: UN News hears extraordinary stories of loss, and survival as Mozambique rebuilds from deadly cyclones

Canada needs to increase foreign aid flows in line with its renewed engagement

Climate change: Another year of record gas emissions, warns UN meteorological agency

JADE Generations Club: Connecting perspectives, changing Europe.

Banks can fight financial crime. But we can’t do it alone

Smoking VS Vaping: is it a battle?

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

EU to Telcos: Stop Mergers and Acquisitions but please help me urgently with 5G development

UN receives ‘Humanium’ wristwatch gift, symbolizing peaceful transformation

COVID-19 and natural disasters: €823 million in EU aid for eight member states

The blackened white coat of the doctors

5 Black heroes of the environmental movement

Here are five ways we can make mental healthcare better

Is 2019 the beginning of the end for coal in Europe?

Primary Healthcare vs Specialization Careers, how to promote PHC to the Young Health Workforce?

ECB with an iron hand disciplines the smaller Eurozone member states; latest victim: Greece

The green hydrogen revolution has started, and it won’t be stopped

German banks suffer of nausea amidst rough seas

What is behind the wide reach of  fake news about Coronavirus?

Who will secure Lithuania?

After Rio Grande tragedy, UNICEF chief highlights ‘dire’ detention centres on US-Mexico border

US-China trade war: Washington now wants control of the renminbi-yuan

Portugal wants its emigrants back – so it’s paying them to return

Coronavirus: Commission presents “Staying safe from COVID-19 during winter” strategy

Why Obama asks approval from Congress to bomb Syria?

A quarter of Americans have no retirement savings

How to build an entrepreneurial university

European Commission launches infringement proceedings against the UK following its failure to name a candidate for EU Commissioner

10 ways COVID-19 could reshape offices

Eurozone closer to a deflation – stagnation trap

90% of European Jews say antisemitism is getting worse

The clothes of the future could be made from pineapples and bananas

Security Council gravely concerned by Ebola outbreak in DR Congo, demands immediate end to violence hampering response

Safer products: EP and Council close deal to beef up checks and inspections

“Unequivocal support” for the people of Bulgaria in their legitimate demands

How Cameron unwillingly helped Eurozone reunite; the long-term repercussions of two European Council decisions

European research priorities for 2021-2027 agreed with member states

Western Sahara: a ‘peaceful solution’ to conflict is possible, says UN envoy

Serious concerns over Sahel, require ‘urgent action’: Senior UN Africa official

We don’t know how autonomous vehicles will depreciate – and that’s a problem

Bayer-Monsanto merger: the story of the rise of the “endless company”

UN launches new fund to advance sustainable development in Aral Sea region

More countries are making progress on corruption – but there’s much to be done, says a new report

Strong multilateral institutions key to tackling world’s dramatic challenges, UN chief says In Moscow

The Italian crisis may act as a catalyst for less austerity

State aid: Commission approves Belgian scheme deferring payment by Walloon airports of concession fees to mitigate economic impact of coronavirus outbreak

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s