Commission adopts White Paper on foreign subsidies in the Single Market

Breton

Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for Internal Market (Co-operators: Photographer: Jennifer Jacquemart European Union, 2020 Source: EC – Audiovisual Service)

This article is brought to you in association with the European Commission.


The European Commission has adopted a White Paper dealing with the distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies in the Single Market. The Commission now seeks views and input from all stakeholders on the options set out in the White Paper. The public consultation, which will be open until 23 September 2020, will help the Commission to prepare for appropriate legislative proposals in this area.

Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy and  responsible for the cluster Europe Fit for the Digital Age, said: “Europe’s economy is open and closely interlinked to the rest of the world. If this is to remain a strength, we must stay vigilant. That is why we need the right tools to ensure that foreign subsidies do not distort our market, just as we do with national subsidies. Today’s White Paper launches an important discussion on how to address effects caused by foreign subsidies. The Single Market is key to Europe’s prosperity and it only works well if there is a level playing field.”

Commissioner for the Internal Market, Thierry Breton, said: “With today’s White Paper we deliver a key element for our vision of Europe’s New Industrial Strategy based on competition, open markets and a strong Single Market. The level playing field in the Single market is at the heart of this initiative and will help our companies operate and compete globally and thus promote the EU’s open strategic autonomy. As part of our Single Market rule book we need to prevent foreign subsidies from distorting procurement procedures and ensure that firms benefit from fair access to public contracts.”

Commissioner for Trade Phil Hogan said “The EU is amongst the most open economies in the world, attracting high levels of investment from our trading partners. However, our openness is increasingly being challenged through foreign trade practices, including subsidies that distort the level playing field for companies in the EU. Along with other tools available at EU level such as foreign direct investment screening and trade defence measures, the White Paper is a welcome addition to the toolbox for our open strategic autonomy.”

EU competition rules, trade defence instruments and public procurement rules play an important role in ensuring fair conditions for companies in the Single Market.

Subsidies by Member States have always been subject to EU State Aid rules to avoid distortions. Subsidies granted by non-EU governments to companies in the EU appear to have an increasing negative impact on competition in the Single Market, but fall outside EU State aid control. There is a growing number of instances in which foreign subsidies seem to have facilitated the acquisition of EU companies or distorted the investment decisions, market operations or pricing policies of their beneficiaries, or distorted bidding in public procurement, to the detriment of non-subsidised companies.

Moreover, the existing trade defence rules relate only to exports of goods from third countries and thus do not address all distortions caused by foreign subsidies granted by non-EU countries. Where foreign subsidies take the form of financial flows facilitating acquisitions of EU companies or where they directly support the operation of a company in the EU, or facilitate bidding in a public procurement procedure, there appears to be a regulatory gap.

The White Paper therefore proposes solutions and calls for new tools to address this regulatory gap. In this context, it puts forward several approaches. The first three options (so-called “Modules”) aim at addressing the distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies (i) in the Single market generally (Module 1), (ii) in acquisitions of EU companies (Module 2) and (iii) during EU public procurement procedures (Module 3). These Modules may be complementary to each other, rather than alternatives. The White Paper also sets out a general approach to foreign subsidies in the context of EU funding.

General instrument to capture distortive effects of foreign subsidies (“Module 1”)

Module 1 proposes the establishment of a general market scrutiny instrument to capture all possible market situations in which foreign subsidies may cause distortions in the Single Market.

Under this Module, the supervisory authority, which would be a national authority or the Commission, could act upon any indication or information that a company in the EU benefits from a foreign subsidy. If the existence of a foreign subsidy is established, the authority would then impose measures to remedy the likely distortive impact, such as redressive payments and structural or behavioural remedies. However, it could also consider that the subsidised activity or investment has a positive impact, which outweighs the distortion and not pursue the investigation further (the “EU Interest Test”).

Foreign subsidies facilitating the acquisition of EU companies (“Module 2”)

The first module could be complemented by Module 2, which is intended to specifically address distortions caused by foreign subsidies facilitating the acquisition of EU companies. This module aims at ensuring that foreign subsidies do not confer an unfair benefit on their recipients when acquiring (stakes in) EU companies, either directly by linking a subsidy to a given acquisition or indirectly by de facto increasing the financial strength of the acquirer.

Under Module 2, companies benefitting from financial support of a non-EU government would need to notify their acquisitions of EU companies, above a given threshold, to the competent supervisory authority. The White Paper proposes that the Commission is the competent supervisory authority. Transactions could not be closed whilst the Commission’s review is pending. Should the supervisory authority find that the acquisition is facilitated by the foreign subsidy and distorts the Single Market, it could either accept commitments by the notifying party that effectively remedy the distortion or, as a last resort, it could prohibit the acquisition. Under this Module, the Commission could also apply the EU Interest Test.

Foreign subsidies in EU public procurement procedures (“Module 3”)

Foreign subsidies could also have a harmful effect on the conduct of EU public procurement procedures. This issue is addressed under Module 3. Foreign subsidies may enable bidders to gain an unfair advantage, for example by submitting bids below market price or even below cost, allowing them to obtain public procurement contracts that they would otherwise not have obtained. Under this Module, the White Paper proposes a mechanism where bidders would have to notify the contracting authority of financial contributions received from non-EU countries. The competent contracting and supervisory authorities would then assess whether there is a foreign subsidy and whether it made the procurement procedure unfair. In this case, the bidder would be excluded from the procurement procedure.

Foreign subsidies in the context of EU funding

Finally, the White Paper sets out ways to address the issue of foreign subsidies in the case of applications for EU financial support. All economic operators should compete for EU funding on an equal footing. Foreign subsidies may however distort this process by putting the beneficiaries of such subsidies in a better position to apply. The White Paper proposes options to prevent such unfair advantage. Among others, in case of funding distributed through public tenders or grants, a similar procedure would apply as the one foreseen for EU public procurement procedures. Moreover, the White Paper emphasises the importance of ensuring that international financial institutions that implement projects supported by the EU budget, like EIB or EBRD, mirror the approach to foreign subsidies.

Next Steps

The White Paper is now open for public consultation until 23 September 2020. In light of the input received, the Commission will present appropriate legislative proposals to tackle the distortive effects of foreign subsidies on the Single Market.

Background

The European Council in its Conclusions of the meeting on 21 and 22 March 2019 tasked the Commission to identify new tools to address the distortive effects of foreign subsidies on the Single Market.

In its Communication “A New Industrial Strategy for Europe” of 10 March 2020, the Commission confirmed that by mid-2020 it would adopt a White Paper on an Instrument on Foreign Subsidies, to address distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies within the Single Market.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EU budget: Stepping up the EU’s role as a security and defence provider

Statement by President von der Leyen on recent developments related to Iran and Iraq

The energy industry is changing. Are governments switched on?

Myanmar military leaders must face genocide charges – UN report

The MH17 tragedy to put a tombstone on Ukrainian civil war

Climate change and health: Raising awareness is the key for greener actions

We have a space debris problem. Here’s how to solve it

The US reject EU proposal for prudential financial controls

The EU has to prove it can remain one piece

Will Merkel ever steer the EU migration Titanic and restore her power in Germany?

The EU Commission openly repudiates the austere economic policies

Drones, disinfectant, distancing – Europe’s beaches open up

Unemployment worries spike around the world as coronavirus remains top global concern

The European Commission cuts roaming charges. But “it’s not enough”…

Post the pandemic: keeping our worlds turning

These rules could save humanity from the threat of rogue AI

Unemployment is down across the world’s largest economies

COVID-19: EU co-finances the delivery of more protective equipment to China

Global leaders and companies pledge to reduce the gender pay gap by 2030

Climate change: new rules agreed to determine which investments are green

The EU’s Response to COVID-19

Dangers of poor quality health care revealed ‘in all countries’: WHO report

Mergers: Commission opens in-depth investigation into joint ventures proposed by Boeing and Embraer

4 things ISPs can do to reduce the impact of cybercrime

Implementation of EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey: EU mobilises €663 million in humanitarian assistance

Palestine refugee crisis ‘expanding’; leaving highest number at risk this century across Gaza

European Commission requests that Italy presents a revised draft budgetary plan for 2019

ECB’s new money bonanza handed out to help the real economy or create new bubbles?

From ‘dead on the inside’ to ‘truly alive’: Survivor of genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda recounts her story as UN marks 25th anniversary

On Youth Participation: Are we active citizens?

Huge data gaps’ hampering ‘evidence-based’ national migration policies

COP24: A million lives could be saved by 2050 through climate action, UN health agency reveals

EU-U.S. Privacy Shield: Second review shows improvements but a permanent Ombudsperson should be nominated by 28 February 2019

EU Commission indifferent on Court of Auditors’ recommendations

First-ever global conference of national counter-terrorism chiefs will strengthen cooperation, build ‘resilient’ States, says top UN official

COVID-19 tracing apps: MEPs stress the need to preserve citizens’ privacy

Almost there: Equal healthcare for LGBTQI+

Palestine refugees’ relief chief warns Security Council money to fund Gaza operations will run out in mid-June

We must learn and change after Haiti sexual abuse scandal -Oxfam chief

Online radio and news broadcasts: Parliament and Council reach deal

Health is nothing but the main consequence of climate change

Marco Polo’s Dream

Rural Bangladesh has already embraced renewable energy. Here’s what the rest of the world can learn

Europe plans to send satellites into space to monitor CO2 emissions

US now has most coronavirus cases in the world – Today’s coronavirus updates

UN chief lauds Fijians as ‘natural global leaders’ on climate, environment, hails ‘symbiotic relationship’ with land and sea

The 28 EU leaders care more about fiscal orthodoxy than effectively fighting youth unemployment

Lagarde: Keep feeding the banks cut down wages and food subsidies

Recognizing, protecting and empowering youth rights in Europe and the world

Should Europe be afraid of the developing world?

Most fish consumers support a ban on fishing endangered species, poll finds

New rules allow EU consumers to defend their rights collectively

The Great Reset needs great leaders to help the most vulnerable

A bad marriage can be as unhealthy as smoking and drinking

EU job-search aid worth €9.9 million for 1,858 former Air France workers

From Model T to EV: a short history of motor vehicle manufacturing

African elephants under continued threat of poaching, warns UN-backed report

This Dutch company has devised an innovative way to deal with food waste

Quicker freezing and confiscation of criminal assets in the EU

Euro celebrates its 20th birthday

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s