Commission adopts White Paper on foreign subsidies in the Single Market

Breton

Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for Internal Market (Co-operators: Photographer: Jennifer Jacquemart European Union, 2020 Source: EC – Audiovisual Service)

This article is brought to you in association with the European Commission.


The European Commission has adopted a White Paper dealing with the distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies in the Single Market. The Commission now seeks views and input from all stakeholders on the options set out in the White Paper. The public consultation, which will be open until 23 September 2020, will help the Commission to prepare for appropriate legislative proposals in this area.

Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy and  responsible for the cluster Europe Fit for the Digital Age, said: “Europe’s economy is open and closely interlinked to the rest of the world. If this is to remain a strength, we must stay vigilant. That is why we need the right tools to ensure that foreign subsidies do not distort our market, just as we do with national subsidies. Today’s White Paper launches an important discussion on how to address effects caused by foreign subsidies. The Single Market is key to Europe’s prosperity and it only works well if there is a level playing field.”

Commissioner for the Internal Market, Thierry Breton, said: “With today’s White Paper we deliver a key element for our vision of Europe’s New Industrial Strategy based on competition, open markets and a strong Single Market. The level playing field in the Single market is at the heart of this initiative and will help our companies operate and compete globally and thus promote the EU’s open strategic autonomy. As part of our Single Market rule book we need to prevent foreign subsidies from distorting procurement procedures and ensure that firms benefit from fair access to public contracts.”

Commissioner for Trade Phil Hogan said “The EU is amongst the most open economies in the world, attracting high levels of investment from our trading partners. However, our openness is increasingly being challenged through foreign trade practices, including subsidies that distort the level playing field for companies in the EU. Along with other tools available at EU level such as foreign direct investment screening and trade defence measures, the White Paper is a welcome addition to the toolbox for our open strategic autonomy.”

EU competition rules, trade defence instruments and public procurement rules play an important role in ensuring fair conditions for companies in the Single Market.

Subsidies by Member States have always been subject to EU State Aid rules to avoid distortions. Subsidies granted by non-EU governments to companies in the EU appear to have an increasing negative impact on competition in the Single Market, but fall outside EU State aid control. There is a growing number of instances in which foreign subsidies seem to have facilitated the acquisition of EU companies or distorted the investment decisions, market operations or pricing policies of their beneficiaries, or distorted bidding in public procurement, to the detriment of non-subsidised companies.

Moreover, the existing trade defence rules relate only to exports of goods from third countries and thus do not address all distortions caused by foreign subsidies granted by non-EU countries. Where foreign subsidies take the form of financial flows facilitating acquisitions of EU companies or where they directly support the operation of a company in the EU, or facilitate bidding in a public procurement procedure, there appears to be a regulatory gap.

The White Paper therefore proposes solutions and calls for new tools to address this regulatory gap. In this context, it puts forward several approaches. The first three options (so-called “Modules”) aim at addressing the distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies (i) in the Single market generally (Module 1), (ii) in acquisitions of EU companies (Module 2) and (iii) during EU public procurement procedures (Module 3). These Modules may be complementary to each other, rather than alternatives. The White Paper also sets out a general approach to foreign subsidies in the context of EU funding.

General instrument to capture distortive effects of foreign subsidies (“Module 1”)

Module 1 proposes the establishment of a general market scrutiny instrument to capture all possible market situations in which foreign subsidies may cause distortions in the Single Market.

Under this Module, the supervisory authority, which would be a national authority or the Commission, could act upon any indication or information that a company in the EU benefits from a foreign subsidy. If the existence of a foreign subsidy is established, the authority would then impose measures to remedy the likely distortive impact, such as redressive payments and structural or behavioural remedies. However, it could also consider that the subsidised activity or investment has a positive impact, which outweighs the distortion and not pursue the investigation further (the “EU Interest Test”).

Foreign subsidies facilitating the acquisition of EU companies (“Module 2”)

The first module could be complemented by Module 2, which is intended to specifically address distortions caused by foreign subsidies facilitating the acquisition of EU companies. This module aims at ensuring that foreign subsidies do not confer an unfair benefit on their recipients when acquiring (stakes in) EU companies, either directly by linking a subsidy to a given acquisition or indirectly by de facto increasing the financial strength of the acquirer.

Under Module 2, companies benefitting from financial support of a non-EU government would need to notify their acquisitions of EU companies, above a given threshold, to the competent supervisory authority. The White Paper proposes that the Commission is the competent supervisory authority. Transactions could not be closed whilst the Commission’s review is pending. Should the supervisory authority find that the acquisition is facilitated by the foreign subsidy and distorts the Single Market, it could either accept commitments by the notifying party that effectively remedy the distortion or, as a last resort, it could prohibit the acquisition. Under this Module, the Commission could also apply the EU Interest Test.

Foreign subsidies in EU public procurement procedures (“Module 3”)

Foreign subsidies could also have a harmful effect on the conduct of EU public procurement procedures. This issue is addressed under Module 3. Foreign subsidies may enable bidders to gain an unfair advantage, for example by submitting bids below market price or even below cost, allowing them to obtain public procurement contracts that they would otherwise not have obtained. Under this Module, the White Paper proposes a mechanism where bidders would have to notify the contracting authority of financial contributions received from non-EU countries. The competent contracting and supervisory authorities would then assess whether there is a foreign subsidy and whether it made the procurement procedure unfair. In this case, the bidder would be excluded from the procurement procedure.

Foreign subsidies in the context of EU funding

Finally, the White Paper sets out ways to address the issue of foreign subsidies in the case of applications for EU financial support. All economic operators should compete for EU funding on an equal footing. Foreign subsidies may however distort this process by putting the beneficiaries of such subsidies in a better position to apply. The White Paper proposes options to prevent such unfair advantage. Among others, in case of funding distributed through public tenders or grants, a similar procedure would apply as the one foreseen for EU public procurement procedures. Moreover, the White Paper emphasises the importance of ensuring that international financial institutions that implement projects supported by the EU budget, like EIB or EBRD, mirror the approach to foreign subsidies.

Next Steps

The White Paper is now open for public consultation until 23 September 2020. In light of the input received, the Commission will present appropriate legislative proposals to tackle the distortive effects of foreign subsidies on the Single Market.

Background

The European Council in its Conclusions of the meeting on 21 and 22 March 2019 tasked the Commission to identify new tools to address the distortive effects of foreign subsidies on the Single Market.

In its Communication “A New Industrial Strategy for Europe” of 10 March 2020, the Commission confirmed that by mid-2020 it would adopt a White Paper on an Instrument on Foreign Subsidies, to address distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies within the Single Market.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

UN chief pays tribute to the courage of DR Congo citizens, and the sacrifice of blue helmets

Low productivity jobs continue to drive employment growth

How can we build a workforce for our digital future?

Why the ocean holds the key to sustainable development

One day your doctor might prescribe healthy food and a museum visit – here’s why

7 ways to break the fast fashion habit – and save the planet

EU invests more than €100 million in new LIFE Programme projects to promote a green and climate-neutral Europe

EC v Samsung: A whole year to compile a case

Autumn 2019 Economic Forecast: A challenging road ahead

3 ways to nurture collaboration between universities and industry

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

A 10-step plan to save our seas

After globalization what? Europe’s long, straining shake-up post Davos wreckage

What keeps me up at night? Two strategists reply

The Silent Pandemic: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health

5G networks: to slice or not to slice?

Migration Crisis: how to open the borders and make way for the uprooted

Stop wars disguised as peace missions

Ship Recycling is the Commission’s Titanic

Madagascar: UN Secretary-General reaffirms support for electoral process

Glasgow and Edinburgh race to become the UK’s first net-zero emissions city

Asking for more restriction on intra EU immigration: Unproductive and politically dangerous

3 tech design principles to help curb digital repression

Is your business model fit for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?

Plastic waste from Western countries is poisoning Indonesia

Why Europe is more competitive than the US

Commission reports on progress made by Albania and North Macedonia

Is Data Privacy really safe seen through Commissioner’s PRISM?

How can entrepreneurship tackle the migration crisis in the EU?

EU consumer rules: Airbnb cooperates with European Commission and EU consumer authorities improving the way it presents offers

5 of the world’s deadliest infectious diseases

The Banking Union divides deeply the European Union

3 reasons why responsibly-deployed technology is key to the COVID recovery

5 ways to make your organization a great sustainability partner

Soccer is back with strict COVID-19 rules. Here’s what you need to know

6 young leaders who are improving the state of the world on International Youth Day

Death as a Global Public Health Issue

Nearly half a billion people can’t find decent work; unemployment set to rise: new UN labour report

The road ahead to building a more sustainable world

These Indian fishermen take plastic out of the sea and use it to build roads

Somalia: UN congratulates Puntland region’s newly-elected President

The importance of Yellow September and suicide prevention in Brazil

EU announces €25 million for education in crisis contexts and €140 million to support research in sustainable food systems

Draghi tells the Parliament the ECB to use all its weaponry; euro slides to parity with the dollar

Financial support for workers affected by no-deal Brexit

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

Planes can now fly for 21 hours non-stop. But are people ready?

ECB readies itself for extraordinary monetary measures defying Germany

State aid: Commission approves €1 billion Cypriot scheme to support enterprises and self-employed individuals in context of coronavirus outbreak

Europe divided: 30 years on from the fall of the Berlin Wall

3 things to know about India’s space programme

European Youth Event 2020: giving a voice to young people to influence EU policy

Fairer and clearer rules on social benefits for EU mobile workers agreed

Gender Equality in Medicine: are we now so different from the Middle Ages?

COP21 Breaking News_12 December: The New Draft Agreement!

Common charger: a long-awaited proposal requested by Parliament

Kosovo elections: ‘Most significant change’ in 12 years, Security Council hears

International community urged to deliver on promise for better future for Bosnia and Herzegovina

EU decides “in absentia” of civil society

Europe’s far-right launches attacks on neighboring nations

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: