Commission adopts White Paper on foreign subsidies in the Single Market

Breton

Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for Internal Market (Co-operators: Photographer: Jennifer Jacquemart European Union, 2020 Source: EC – Audiovisual Service)

This article is brought to you in association with the European Commission.


The European Commission has adopted a White Paper dealing with the distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies in the Single Market. The Commission now seeks views and input from all stakeholders on the options set out in the White Paper. The public consultation, which will be open until 23 September 2020, will help the Commission to prepare for appropriate legislative proposals in this area.

Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy and  responsible for the cluster Europe Fit for the Digital Age, said: “Europe’s economy is open and closely interlinked to the rest of the world. If this is to remain a strength, we must stay vigilant. That is why we need the right tools to ensure that foreign subsidies do not distort our market, just as we do with national subsidies. Today’s White Paper launches an important discussion on how to address effects caused by foreign subsidies. The Single Market is key to Europe’s prosperity and it only works well if there is a level playing field.”

Commissioner for the Internal Market, Thierry Breton, said: “With today’s White Paper we deliver a key element for our vision of Europe’s New Industrial Strategy based on competition, open markets and a strong Single Market. The level playing field in the Single market is at the heart of this initiative and will help our companies operate and compete globally and thus promote the EU’s open strategic autonomy. As part of our Single Market rule book we need to prevent foreign subsidies from distorting procurement procedures and ensure that firms benefit from fair access to public contracts.”

Commissioner for Trade Phil Hogan said “The EU is amongst the most open economies in the world, attracting high levels of investment from our trading partners. However, our openness is increasingly being challenged through foreign trade practices, including subsidies that distort the level playing field for companies in the EU. Along with other tools available at EU level such as foreign direct investment screening and trade defence measures, the White Paper is a welcome addition to the toolbox for our open strategic autonomy.”

EU competition rules, trade defence instruments and public procurement rules play an important role in ensuring fair conditions for companies in the Single Market.

Subsidies by Member States have always been subject to EU State Aid rules to avoid distortions. Subsidies granted by non-EU governments to companies in the EU appear to have an increasing negative impact on competition in the Single Market, but fall outside EU State aid control. There is a growing number of instances in which foreign subsidies seem to have facilitated the acquisition of EU companies or distorted the investment decisions, market operations or pricing policies of their beneficiaries, or distorted bidding in public procurement, to the detriment of non-subsidised companies.

Moreover, the existing trade defence rules relate only to exports of goods from third countries and thus do not address all distortions caused by foreign subsidies granted by non-EU countries. Where foreign subsidies take the form of financial flows facilitating acquisitions of EU companies or where they directly support the operation of a company in the EU, or facilitate bidding in a public procurement procedure, there appears to be a regulatory gap.

The White Paper therefore proposes solutions and calls for new tools to address this regulatory gap. In this context, it puts forward several approaches. The first three options (so-called “Modules”) aim at addressing the distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies (i) in the Single market generally (Module 1), (ii) in acquisitions of EU companies (Module 2) and (iii) during EU public procurement procedures (Module 3). These Modules may be complementary to each other, rather than alternatives. The White Paper also sets out a general approach to foreign subsidies in the context of EU funding.

General instrument to capture distortive effects of foreign subsidies (“Module 1”)

Module 1 proposes the establishment of a general market scrutiny instrument to capture all possible market situations in which foreign subsidies may cause distortions in the Single Market.

Under this Module, the supervisory authority, which would be a national authority or the Commission, could act upon any indication or information that a company in the EU benefits from a foreign subsidy. If the existence of a foreign subsidy is established, the authority would then impose measures to remedy the likely distortive impact, such as redressive payments and structural or behavioural remedies. However, it could also consider that the subsidised activity or investment has a positive impact, which outweighs the distortion and not pursue the investigation further (the “EU Interest Test”).

Foreign subsidies facilitating the acquisition of EU companies (“Module 2”)

The first module could be complemented by Module 2, which is intended to specifically address distortions caused by foreign subsidies facilitating the acquisition of EU companies. This module aims at ensuring that foreign subsidies do not confer an unfair benefit on their recipients when acquiring (stakes in) EU companies, either directly by linking a subsidy to a given acquisition or indirectly by de facto increasing the financial strength of the acquirer.

Under Module 2, companies benefitting from financial support of a non-EU government would need to notify their acquisitions of EU companies, above a given threshold, to the competent supervisory authority. The White Paper proposes that the Commission is the competent supervisory authority. Transactions could not be closed whilst the Commission’s review is pending. Should the supervisory authority find that the acquisition is facilitated by the foreign subsidy and distorts the Single Market, it could either accept commitments by the notifying party that effectively remedy the distortion or, as a last resort, it could prohibit the acquisition. Under this Module, the Commission could also apply the EU Interest Test.

Foreign subsidies in EU public procurement procedures (“Module 3”)

Foreign subsidies could also have a harmful effect on the conduct of EU public procurement procedures. This issue is addressed under Module 3. Foreign subsidies may enable bidders to gain an unfair advantage, for example by submitting bids below market price or even below cost, allowing them to obtain public procurement contracts that they would otherwise not have obtained. Under this Module, the White Paper proposes a mechanism where bidders would have to notify the contracting authority of financial contributions received from non-EU countries. The competent contracting and supervisory authorities would then assess whether there is a foreign subsidy and whether it made the procurement procedure unfair. In this case, the bidder would be excluded from the procurement procedure.

Foreign subsidies in the context of EU funding

Finally, the White Paper sets out ways to address the issue of foreign subsidies in the case of applications for EU financial support. All economic operators should compete for EU funding on an equal footing. Foreign subsidies may however distort this process by putting the beneficiaries of such subsidies in a better position to apply. The White Paper proposes options to prevent such unfair advantage. Among others, in case of funding distributed through public tenders or grants, a similar procedure would apply as the one foreseen for EU public procurement procedures. Moreover, the White Paper emphasises the importance of ensuring that international financial institutions that implement projects supported by the EU budget, like EIB or EBRD, mirror the approach to foreign subsidies.

Next Steps

The White Paper is now open for public consultation until 23 September 2020. In light of the input received, the Commission will present appropriate legislative proposals to tackle the distortive effects of foreign subsidies on the Single Market.

Background

The European Council in its Conclusions of the meeting on 21 and 22 March 2019 tasked the Commission to identify new tools to address the distortive effects of foreign subsidies on the Single Market.

In its Communication “A New Industrial Strategy for Europe” of 10 March 2020, the Commission confirmed that by mid-2020 it would adopt a White Paper on an Instrument on Foreign Subsidies, to address distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies within the Single Market.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Force used against protestors in Gaza ‘wholly disproportionate’ says UN human rights chief

A more credible, dynamic, predictable and political EU accession process – Commission lays out its proposals

The world’s most vulnerable must be protected: WHO briefing

Special measures for Greece: 100% absorption rate

Quality education an ‘essential pillar’ of a better future, says UN chief

Iraq: Solutions needed ‘urgently’ to quell ongoing violence, break political deadlock

How banking with blockchain can stamp out corruption and increase financial inclusion

iSting: Change Europe with your Writing

Finland must focus on integrating migrant women and their children to boost their contribution to the economy and society

UN chief welcomes power-sharing deal between Sudanese military and opposition

Parliament sets up plan to fight the 3,600 criminal rings of EU

The developing countries keep the world going

On World Day to Combat Desertification, UN shines spotlight on ‘true value’ of land

Ukraine: turning challenges into opportunities


Bacteria vs. humans: how to fight in this world war?

World Retail Congress Dubai 2016: Retail’s night of nights

Global warming: our responsibility

UN chief welcomes ‘positive steps’ towards peace between Eritrea and Ethiopia

‘Undersea gardeners’ are restoring Jamaica’s lost coral reefs

Climate change and health: Raising awareness is the key for greener actions

George Floyd: these are the injustices that led to the protests in the United States

EU Parliament: It takes real banks to fight unemployment and recession

Smart city experts should be looking to emerging markets. Here’s why

EU approves disbursement of €500 million in Macro-Financial Assistance to Ukraine

Destabilizing Lebanon after burning Syria; plotting putsch at home: King and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia

Service and Sacrifice: For Ghana, UN peacekeeping is a ‘noble opportunity to serve humanity’

Emerging legislation on commercial uses of facial recognition shows the work ahead

FROM THE FIELD: South Sudan’s green shoots, highlight environmental recovery from war

FROM THE FIELD: Free tutorials in Mali, ‘a life-saver’ for Fatouma

These patients are sharing their data to improve healthcare standards

UN experts urge India to align new anti-trafficking bill with human rights law

Where America’s refugees came from in 2018

The importance of collaboration in the digital economy

Passwords should become a thing of the past. Here’s why

To entrepreneurship and beyond!

German egotistic inward turn to badly hurt Europe after Merkel’s exit

The importance of the strategy of health of a country working in accordance with the theory

Make the internet safer: stop using passwords

UN chief hopeful for Libya, after Quartet meeting in Tunis

Ahead of State of the Union the European Youth Forum highlights lack of action on youth employment

How will the NATO-EU competition evolve in the post Brexit era?

Friday’s Daily Brief: hunger in North Korea, human rights in Iran, updates on DR Congo and Benin

Macron in St. Petersburg didn’t oppose Trump on Iran, in Putin’s presence

Impact of high debt levels on least developed countries ‘cannot be overstated’, says UN

The built environment has a huge role to play in improving health and wellbeing

A rapid deterioration of the humanitarian situation in the war-torn Yemen

‘Terrorist Iranian regime’ must be checked; Saudi Foreign Minister urges financial pressure

EU Budget: InvestEU Programme to support jobs, growth and innovation in Europe

International community urged to deliver on promise for better future for Bosnia and Herzegovina

Cohesion Policy: involving citizens to ensure better results

UNICEF appeals for end to ‘war on children’ in Syria and Yemen

The sustainable fashion revolution is well underway. These 5 trends prove it

‘Negative forces’ at work in DR Congo threaten ‘largely peaceful’ relations across Great Lakes region, says outgoing UN envoy

The Commission tries to stop the ‘party’ with the structural funds

It’s a lie Eurozone isn’t competitive

Brexit must not put UK university research at risk

OECD joins with Argentina to fight financial crime

Ahead of key UN-backed Marrakech migration conference, youth recount harrowing journeys

Eurozone: Sovereign debt decreases for the first time since 2007

Youth and children in Europe set the new perspectives for the decades to come

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s