Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate deal is bad for US business. Here’s why.

Trump 19

(Credit, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Alexandre Lemille, Co-founder and general secretary, African Circular Economy Network


Earlier this month, the Trump administration decided to once again ignore increasingly urgent calls from businesses and investors to act on climate change, and instead initiated the formal process to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. Hundreds of major US businesses loudly objected when Trump first announced his plan to pull out of the agreement two years ago, and since then the economic case for climate action has only become even more clear.

In response to the growing urgency of the science and the growing costs of climate impacts, more and more US companies are taking action to reduce emissions in their own operations and supply chains. They are also calling for ambitious policies and bold targets to help drive innovation and investment in zero-carbon products, services and business models at scale. The transition to a zero-carbon economy has begun in every market and every sector in the world. The only question is how fast the transition will proceed, and which businesses and economies will lead the way.

 

The decision to leave the Paris Agreement is a threat to American economic competitiveness and a disservice to American businesses. It creates regulatory uncertainty and fragmentation while other countries race ahead with investment and innovation.

At the same time, leading businesses see that climate change is a core strategic concern for them and are forging ahead anyway, continuing to set and pursue ambitious climate goals to strengthen their own risk management, and increase competitiveness and growth as they look to the future.

To date, more than 130 US companies have set, or have committed to setting, science-based emission reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement. Among this group are many of America’s biggest brands and employers, such as AT&T, Best Buy, Dell, Kellogg, McDonald’s, PepsiCo, Mars, Nike and Walmart.

A growing number of these companies, including Guess?, Hewlett Packard Enterprises, Levi Strauss & Co and Salesforce, have gone even further, by committing to cutting their emissions in line with limiting global warming to 1.5°C. These companies are part of a rapidly growing global movement of over 1,000 businesses that have commited to bold climate action through We Mean Business coalition partner initiatives.

When Trump first announced his decision to withdraw in 2017, the We Are Still In declaration was formed to send a clear message of support for the Paris Agreement from across the US. Since then the number of signatories has surged to more than 3,800 leaders from the private sector, US local, tribal and state governments and other organizations including universities and faith groups, collectively representing more than half of all Americans and $9 trillion of the US economy.

Notably these companies are aligned with the significant bipartisan majorities of US voters who support US participation in the Paris Agreement and a wide variety of policies promoting renewable energy and emissions reductions.

The We Are Still In signatories are united in the knowledge that accelerating the transition to the zero-carbon economy will help deliver growth and innovation. A report from the New Climate Economy shows that shifting to a low-carbon economy could create a $26 trillion growth opportunity and 65 million new jobs by 2030. On the other hand, the US government’s own National Climate Assessment released last year found that unchecked climate change could cost the US hundreds of billions of dollars annually by the end of the century.

With the stakes this high, many companies are becoming increasingly vocal – not just about their backing of the Paris Agreement, but specifically which climate policies would be most useful domestically to drive progress. Earlier this year, over 75 US businesses met with a bipartisan group of federal lawmakers to call on Congress to pass meaningful climate legislation, including a price on carbon. These companies want to see the government implement clear and consistent policies that focus on accelerating the transition to a full decarbonization of the economy by 2050. This will enable leading companies to go further and faster with their climate action and will spur the entire market, ensuring a level playing field, and that no one gets left behind.

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about climate change?

Climate change poses an urgent threat demanding decisive action. Communities around the world are already experiencing increased climate impacts, from droughts to floods to rising seas. The World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report continues to rank these environmental threats at the top of the list.

To limit global temperature rise to well below 2°C and as close as possible to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, it is essential that businesses, policy-makers, and civil society advance comprehensive near- and long-term climate actions in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change.

The World Economic Forum’s Climate Initiative supports the scaling and acceleration of global climate action through public and private-sector collaboration. The Initiative works across several workstreams to develop and implement inclusive and ambitious solutions.

This includes the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, a global network of business leaders from various industries developing cost-effective solutions to transitioning to a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy. CEOs use their position and influence with policy-makers and corporate partners to accelerate the transition and realize the economic benefits of delivering a safer climate.

Time to double down

The already huge support for the Paris Agreement from US businesses, organizations and institutions, coupled with the growth opportunities of rapid decarbonization, are leading to progress in the real economy across key sectors including power, transport, agriculture and industry.

But it’s not happening fast enough. Now is the time for all US companies, states, cities and organizations to double down and commit to the most ambitious goals of the Paris Agreement.

For those that have already committed, now is the time to ratchet up that commitment by pledging to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 and cutting emissions in line with what science says is required to limit global warming to 1.5°C.

Even as President Trump continues to ignore the growing climate crisis, businesses are acting, and they are increasingly raising their voices in support of ambitious policy. While it has once again been made clear that they will not see that policy ambition at the federal level this year, it is equally clear that we must act now to have any chance of keeping global warming to a maximum of 1.5°C, as the IPCC’s special report shows. Businesses stand ready to work with government leaders across the US and around the world to accelerate ambition and action on climate and achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement, for the good of their businesses and of the global economy.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Coronavirus is creating retirement insecurity. These 10 steps can diffuse the timebomb of an ageing population

Europe and the tragicomic ‘black sovranismo’

Fed, ECB take positions to face the next global financial crisis; the Brits uncovered

New York high school students are getting free water bottles to cut plastic waste

Powering through the pandemic

Preferential tariffs to help Western Sahara to develop

COVID-19 is more deadly for some ethnic groups

How trade tariffs could help combat climate change

Science leads the response to COVID-19. These 25 scientists are tackling the other global challenges

How to make later life happy, healthy and meaningful

Migration: Commission steps up emergency assistance to Spain and Greece

“BEUC cautions against TTIP that would seek to align EU and US chemicals management frameworks”

Combatting terrorism: EP special committee calls for closer EU cooperation

Thursday’s Daily Brief: ambulance attack in Libya, #GlobalGoals defenders, human rights in Cambodia, Swine Fever

80 adolescents a day will still die of AIDS by 2030, despite slowdown in epidemic

WHO study reveals ‘game-changer’ drug with potential to save thousands of women’s lives in childbirth

Polish PM chooses to focus on economy, amid questions on rule of law in Poland

This new way of understanding disease is changing medicine

You’ve heard of 5G, but what about the quantum internet?

UN’s Guterres condemns ongoing airstrikes on Syria’s hospitals, medical workers

More ambition needed for EU recovery instruments, says majority of MEPs

Big impact vs big exit: the social side of the start-up game presented at the WSA Global Congress in Vienna

Three reasons to be optimistic for the future of Asia

The UK’s River Thames has come back to life – with a seal population to prove it

How to get young people in Europe to swipe right on voting

Investment Plan for Europe: European Investment Bank to provide BioNTech with up to €100 million in debt financing for COVID-19 vaccine development and manufacturing

25 years on from landmark conference, millions of women and girls still in danger: UN deputy chief

Bankers don’t go to jail because they are more equal than us all

Syria: A bloody tracer of Trump – Putin rapprochement

More state aid to big firms, no special provisions for the SMEs

Biodiversity ‘fundamental’ for global food systems, at “heart’ of development – UN agriculture chief

Refugee crisis update: EU lacks solidarity as migration figures drop

What does global health translate into?

Hunger, displacement and disease: 4.3 million people remain in dire need of aid in Chad

UN rights expert calls for end to ‘purgatory’ of ‘international inaction’ facing Myanmar’s remaining Rohingya

Destroying nuclear waste to create clean energy? It can be done

Human rights defenders, too often left defenceless themselves – UN expert

Climate change update: will the UN member states regain momentum despite the little progress at COP23?

Can Obama attract Iran close to the US sphere of influence?

As people return to work, here’s how we can make commuting more inclusive and sustainable

FROM THE FIELD: Niger supporting the most vulnerable, as crises mount

This is what the world’s CEOs think about the global outlook

Drones are saving lives in Tanzania’s remote communities

Venezuela: UN human rights office calls for ‘maximum restraint’ by authorities in face of new demonstrations

Hopes for Palestinian State hit by ‘facts on the ground’ : senior UN official

Missions of Our Time Shared by China and EU

German stock market is not affected by the Greek debt revolution while Athens is running out of time

‘Continuing deterioration’ leaves Mali facing critical security level: UN expert

World’s human rights watchdog spotlights Afghanistan, Yemen and 12 others: Here’s the scoop

Women’s leadership ‘critical’ to future of Niger

Final turnout data for 2019 European elections announced

Nearly three million more displaced year-on-year, warns refugee agency chief, but solutions are within reach

The world’s e-waste is a huge problem. It’s also a golden opportunity

UN chief welcomes re-opening of key Gaza border crossing

How drones can manage the food supply chain and tell you if what you eat is sustainable

DR Congo: With Ebola on the wane, UN agencies prepare to combat coronavirus

Libya’s migrants and refugees with tuberculosis ‘left to die’ in detention centres

The challenges of Chinese investment in Latin America

Europe is progressing most towards these UN Sustainability Goals: A report card for Europe

‘Many challenges to overcome’ at UN, in fight against abuse: victims’ advocate

More Stings?

Advertising

Trackbacks

  1. […] Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate deal is bad for US business. Here’s why. – The Europ… […]

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s