This is what is still holding social entrepreneurs back

CEO 19

(Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Kyle Zimmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, First Book & Kristine Pearson, Founder and CEO, Lifeline Energy


In an increasingly polarised world, obtaining 100% agreement for anything seems impossible. Yet, in our survey of leading social entrepreneurs across the world, 100% of respondents agreed on one point. Every social entrepreneur said they would do it all over again, despite:

• 75% reporting use of personal funds to support their social enterprise

• 75% revealing personal financial hardships from earning a lower-than-private sector salary

• 63% saying they had no time for hobbies or interests

• And others citing missed family celebrations, burnout, stress, feeling cheated, exhausted and isolated, and having no time for personal health or development.

Are we gluttons for punishments? Closet masochists? Well, maybe.

We are a group driven by something bigger than ourselves, by feeling like we’ve made a difference in the world and to those we serve.

In a world where social issues are proliferating, where governments and countries are looking inward instead of outward and where geographic boundaries are becoming blurred, the role of social entrepreneur has never been more vital.

The first ever practitioner-driven social entrepreneurship survey

After nearly five decades of combined experience leading social enterprises, we’ve become increasingly troubled by what we see as significant barriers to the field of social innovation. Last August, we highlighted 6 obstacles that are holding the social enterprise sector back. The article, followed by a standing room-only discussion at the Schwab Foundation Social Entrepreneurs’ Summit in New York in September, marked the first phase of a practitioner-led initiative to engage fellow social entrepreneurs in identifying sector-wide challenges. Our aim is to foster forthright discussion and initiate ideas to propel our collective work forward.

To expand input from social sector practitioners, over the last few months we invited fellow Schwab Foundation social entrepreneurs to share their candid responses in a deep-dive survey. In addition to the personal costs listed above, here is some of what our peers shared as the key factors hindering the sector’s ability to scale:

1. Consistent and patient capital

While two-thirds of respondents said that the ability to scale is “very important” for addressing social issues, 47% of respondents said that the lack of consistent access to capital is the #1 barrier to scaling their organization. No one in the sector is likely to find this response surprising. In fact, the only surprise to us is that this number isn’t higher.

For far too long, serendipity and personal connections have largely influenced access to funding. Yet funders’ decisions often determine where, what and how much progress is made on key issues confronting our world. The system does not consistently identify the best solutions, help to refine them and support scaling.

In a 2013 article in Harvard Business Review entitled Social Impact Investing Will Be the New Venture Capital, Sir Ronald Cohen and William A. Sahlman contend that the issue isn’t a lack of available money per se. Instead they cite three factors: massive inefficiencies in capital allocation; funders who refuse to cover overhead; and a lack of effective funding models – all of which make it impossible for social organizations to scale. We agree. And so do our peers, who shared comments like these:

“Operating capital for innovation and R&D is hard to access. The sector, at least in Africa, is still not considered a viable place to launch and create a career. Also, there is too much unnecessary competition and redundancy created by donors and the ‘vanity’ of wanting ‘name-branded’ solutions.”

“One of the key stresses within the social sector is the decision by most programmatic donors to pay below costs. To break even, social change implementers must spend tremendous amounts of time raising unrestricted funding to make up the shortfall.”

While there has been early experimentation with social impact bonds, these and related funding innovation efforts remain in their infancy – and consequently, unavailable to the majority of the social sector.

2. Fear of failure

“We reported failure honestly: We had a large percentage of device failure in one of our early pilots which has since been totally solved. But the funder used it to dismiss the value of the project long term.”

Nearly 30% of respondents cited a fear of failure as a primary barrier to scaling the sector. This fear is part of managing risk in any enterprise – but in the social sector it is impeding more significant impact field-wide. The failure of products and services is an assumed part of the private sector. In fact, “fail fast” has become a theory of corporate innovation. But that is not true in the social sector, where social entrepreneurs perceive funders as being risk-averse. In this environment, the concept of failure becomes an even bigger impediment, with social entrepreneurs feeling that if they don’t meet or exceed expectations, they will lose already limited sources of future funding.

This fear has a cascade of consequences. It stifles innovation. Attempting to address an unjust status quo or bring about systemic change requires innovation – and, by definition, innovative strategies have a higher failure rate. Rather than playing it safe and executing plans that only create change at the margins, the sector needs to collectively come to grips with what real change looks like. We need to think big, test-drive new ways to approach the issues, and know that we may hit some brick walls. The concept of failure needs to be normalized and elevated as a prerequisite in any learning organization.

It also exacerbates a lack of transparency. If failure directly jeopardizes funding, and funding is the #1 scarce resource, there is an elevated impulse to inflate impact reports and a reluctance to fully disclose problems. Social entrepreneurs may not admit what has gone wrong. The field then loses the collective learning that failures can teach.

Actions needed

• This and other input expressed throughout the survey underscore the acute need for candid conversations between social entrepreneurs and the funding community – conversations that forge new kinds of relationships. It is important that this dialogue takes place first at a sector level, which can then set the stage for more authentic discussions to percolate between individual social entrepreneurs and funders.

• A parallel effort is needed to create stronger sector support – on the part of funders and peers – to detoxify the fear of failure for social entrepreneurs. Reinforcing the value of failure is an important learning tool and cultural norm in the innovation process.

• Social entrepreneurs can promote internal cultures to detoxify failure. At First Book, for example, we give an annual “Brick Wall” award to the person who develops a great idea, when for some reason or another, the idea hits a brick wall. The goal is to promote innovation and acknowledge that not every new idea will succeed, but it’s important to keep trying. And it works.

3. A lack of collaboration

Social entrepreneurs identified the lack of collaboration between social enterprises as an urgent challenge within the sector that needs to change. Respondents specifically noted that the pressure for funding often fosters competition between organizations, instead of collaboration, potentially mitigating the impact that social entrepreneurs have on those they serve. This was a consistent theme, with comments like:

“The sector is not collaborating well – not exploring how we co-design solutions; how we co-fund initiatives; how we leverage our unique expertise to drive a networked approach to scale. I continue to hear that we are still in competition with each other to source revenues – this is disappointing, but real. The sector needs to explore innovative partnerships/collaborations with the private sector, governments, other social enterprises.”

This finding mirrors our own experience. The design of the social sector disincentivizes collaboration. While social entrepreneurs share a dedication to resolving urgent social issues and market failures, limited funds and a highly competitive environment created by the philanthropic community cultivate and reward competition, rather than collaboration. Pivoting between the rollercoaster demands of managing an enterprise, meeting payroll, preparing board reports and other activities make it difficult to reserve the mental and physical bandwidth necessary for collaboration.

Actions needed

• Establish a framework to explore further collaboration within the social sector. This includes looking at new sector approaches for cost-sharing and cost-efficiencies that leverage economies of scale. The cost of not doing so means social entrepreneurs continue to work in silos. Among the suggestions were Exploring technologies or services that could be shared; sharing ideas around revenue generation, leading to sustainability and less dependency on the philanthropic community

• Funders can leverage their position to incentivize collaboration by building in an expectation and funds to support collaboration into existing grant awards. This could include creating opportunities for cross-learning within their funding portfolio of grantees.

A 21st-century model of social entrepreneurship

Social entrepreneurs remain dedicated to their cause; they are proud of what they do. But the sector remains a work in progress. While we are encouraged by the candor, commitment and creativity of our peers, we cannot build a field where leaders exist hand-to-mouth, where capital for innovation and growth is woefully inadequate, where fear of failure encourages only incremental change, and where competition overrides our vested interest in collaboration.

It’s time for the philanthropic community, academics, ecosystem support networks and social entrepreneurs to roll up our sleeves and tackle issues head on, to create long-overdue changes such as:

• A merit-based system for funders to consider best practices and models

• A human-centered design approach to tackle challenges within the sector – applying the same principles we as social entrepreneurs use to address social issues

• An analysis of social impact measurement: are social enterprises measuring the right things? Are donors measuring the right things?

• A media presence for scaling/scaled solutions – not just start-ups

• A system for honoring notable failures and sharing the learnings from those failures.

Collaborative discussions on ideas like these are critical. Only then can we ensure the broader development of the sector and its ability to build the capacity and capabilities of social sector leaders to address the challenges we face.

About the survey respondents

This deep-dive survey, completed between December 2018-February 2019, reflects the experience of 56 fellows awarded over the past two decades by the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship, the sister organization of the World Economic Forum:

• Approximately 87% of the survey participants are founders or co-founders of their social enterprises.

• Almost half of respondents lead nonprofits (48%), followed by hybrids (34%), and for-profits (18%).

• 57% have a leadership tenure of 16+ years; 55% manage a staff that ranges in size between 1-100 members.

• 63% of the survey participants are male; 68% are 50+ years of age. The latter mirrors the makeup of the Schwab Foundation, which is largely comprised of later stage social enterprises.

• 38% of the respondents identified as Caucasian/white; 18% Asian; 7% Latino; 4% black/African/African American; 32% did not provide a response (this question was optional).

• 27% of the survey respondents lead social enterprises that serve Africa; 25% serve Asia; 20% serve globally; 18% serve South/Central America; 5% serve the Middle East; 4% serve North America; and 2% serve Europe.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Eliminating hepatitis calls for ‘bold political leadership, with investments to match,’ UN health chief says

UN chief calls for ‘enlightened self-interest’ from world leaders to save ‘the whole planet’ from climate change

UN rights chief ‘strongly’ condemns ‘shocking’ mass executions in Saudi Arabia

China’s lead in the global solar race – at a glance

Palestine refugees’ relief chief warns Security Council money to fund Gaza operations will run out in mid-June

Tax Inspectors Without Borders making significant progress toward strengthening developing countries’ ability to effectively tax multinational enterprises

Women’s voices must be heard in the battle to save the ocean

EU adopts new €100 million assistance package to benefit refugees and local communities in Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq

IMF: European banks do not perform their duty to real economy

EU Trust Fund for Africa: new migration-related actions to protect vulnerable people and foster resilience of host communities in North of Africa

Food safety: more transparency, better risk prevention

Iran: UN rights chief ‘deeply disturbed’ by continuing executions of juvenile offenders

EU Commission indifferent on Court of Auditors’ recommendations

How each country’s share of global CO2 emissions changes over time

Which countries have the highest unemployment rates?

Health & Sustainable Development Goals: it’s about doing what we can

Here are 5 security challenges Nigeria’s leader must tackle

At COP24, countries agree concrete way forward to bring the Paris climate deal to life

Main results of Environment Council of 09 October 2018

Release of prize-winning Reuters journalists in Myanmar welcomed by UN

Is the EU competent enough to fight human smuggling in 2015?

Three ways Finland leads the world – and education isn’t one of them

A Monday to watch the final act of a Greek tragedy; will there be catharsis or more fear?

EU Council: The US airlines may freely pollute the European air

Slovakia and its failure to abide by the European law

From cheeseburgers to coral reefs, the science of decision-making can change the world

European Commission: the LED lights of your Audi A6 shall save our planet

Better training ‘a necessary and strategic investment’ in peacekeeping that saves lives: Guterres

COP24: World sports join team UN in race against climate change

‘We need to do more’ to transform the world, deputy UN chief tells African audiences

ECB guarantees the liquidity of the Atlantic financial volume

These countries are pioneering hydrogen power

Businesses, governments and consumers to implement a more climate-friendly approach to #BeatPlasticPollution on World Environment Day 2018

European Development Days 2013

The mother of all fights about inflation, growth and banks

Europe on the Move: Commission completes its agenda for safe, clean and connected mobility

Tunisia wants to change inheritance rules to boost gender equality

ECB indicates south Europeans can endure more austerity

The movement of anti-vaccers: taking humanity back 200 years

What if big-tech companies became non-profits?

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

Spotlight Initiative – EU and UN fight against domestic violence in the Pacific region

Global economy to see ‘steady’ growth of three per cent in 2019 despite risks, says UN

The Ecofin Council creates officially the clan of ‘undead’ banks

Collaboration: the key to success in the digital economy

Boosting adult learning essential to help people adapt to future of work

EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?

Outgoing UN official praises Iraq’s ‘exemplary peaceful transfer of power’ at the top

EU Commission draws the wrong conclusions

Robots will soon be a necessity but they won’t take all our jobs

Tackling ‘deeply worrying’ global rise in anti-Semitism is a job for all societies everywhere, says UN chief

Mankind’s first tool to fight malaria also kills

Euro celebrates its 20th birthday

How smarter machines can make us smarter humans

G20: Less growth, more austerity for developing countries

Our healthcare systems are ailing. Here’s how to make them better

From drones to health data, how Japan can power ahead

ECB offers plenty and cheap liquidity to support growth in all Eurozone countries

Accountability in Sudan ‘crucial’ to avoid ‘further bloodshed’, says UN rights office

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s