
(Christine Roy, Unsplash)
Cross-border capital flows are an integral component of international finance, but require a balanced framework for removing unnecessary barriers to the movement of capital while providing governments flexibility to cope with instances of economic or financial instability, OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria said today. The recently revised OECD Code of Liberalisation of Capital Movements remains the sole multilateral agreement among states dedicated to openness, transparency and mutual accountability in cross-border capital flow management, Mr Gurria said during a press briefing with Japanese Finance Minister Taro Aso in the margins of the meeting of G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, taking place June 8-9 in Fukuoka, Japan. “Ten years after the global financial crisis, all adherents to the Code have agreed that an enhanced and modern multilateral framework for managing capital flows is needed, and have taken action to make the Code stronger, giving it better governance, transparency, and decision-making capacity,” Mr Gurria said. The OECD Code of Liberalisation of Capital Movements (the Code) was born with the OECD in 1961, at a time when many OECD countries were in the process of economic recovery and development and when the international movement of capital faced many barriers. It provides the world’s only multilateral agreement covering the full range of cross-border capital flows, and is binding for the 36 OECD countries, including eleven G20 members. The Code has been open to non-OECD members since 2012. The Code is based on several key premises:
- an open multilateral regime for international capital flows serves the global economy better than closed capital accounts, particularly as financial markets play an increasing role in allocating cross-border saving and investment efficiently in support of a sustainable global recovery.
- an adhering country should benefit from the liberalisation measures of other adhering countries regardless of its own degree of openness.
- reintroducing capital flow restrictions can play a role in specific circumstances, but transparency, accountability and proportionality are critical.
Discover more from The European Sting - Critical News & Insights on European Politics, Economy, Foreign Affairs, Business & Technology - europeansting.com
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.







































Why don't you drop your comment here?