Antitrust: Commission fines Google €1.49 billion for abusive practices in online advertising

Vestager 2019

Margrethe Vestager, Member of the EC in charge of Competition, will held a press conference on an antitrust case.The European Commission has fined Google €1.49 billion for breaching EU antitrust rules. Google has abused its market dominance by imposing a number of restrictive clauses in contracts with third-party websites which prevented Google’s rivals from placing their search adverts on these websites. © European Union, 2019.

This article is brought to you in association with the European Commission.


The European Commission has fined Google €1.49 billion for breaching EU antitrust rules. Google has abused its market dominance by imposing a number of restrictive clauses in contracts with third-party websites which prevented Google’s rivals from placing their search adverts on these websites.

Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said: “Today the Commission has fined Google €1.49 billion for illegal misuse of its dominant position in the market for the brokering of online search adverts. Google has cemented its dominance in online search adverts and shielded itself from competitive pressure by imposing anti-competitive contractual restrictions on third-party websites. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules. The misconduct lasted over 10 years and denied other companies the possibility to compete on the merits and to innovate – and consumers the benefits of competition.”

 

Google’s strategy for online search advertising intermediation

Websites such as newspaper websites, blogs or travel sites aggregators often have a search function embedded. When a user searches using this search function, the website delivers both search results and search adverts, which appear alongside the search result.

Through AdSense for Search, Google provides these search adverts to owners of “publisher” websites. Google is an intermediary, like an advertising broker, between advertisers and website owners that want to profit from the space around their search results pages. Therefore, AdSense for Search works as an online search advertising intermediation platform.

Google was by far the strongest player in online search advertising intermediation in the European Economic Area (EEA), with a market share above 70% from 2006 to 2016. In 2016 Google also held market shares generally above 90% in the national markets for general search and above 75% in most of the national markets for online search advertising, where it is present with its flagship product, the Google search engine, which provides search results to consumers.

It is not possible for competitors in online search advertising such as Microsoft and Yahoo to sell advertising space in Google’s own search engine results pages. Therefore, third-party websites represent an important entry point for these other suppliers of online search advertising intermediation services to grow their business and try to compete with Google.

Google’s provision of online search advertising intermediation services to the most commercially important publishers took place via agreements that were individually negotiated. The Commission has reviewed hundreds of such agreements in the course of its investigation and found that:

  • Starting in 2006, Google included exclusivity clauses in its contracts. This meant that publishers were prohibited from placing any search adverts from competitors on their search results pages. The decision concerns publishers whose agreements with Google required such exclusivity for all their websites.
  • As of March 2009, Google gradually began replacing the exclusivity clauses with so-called “Premium Placement” clauses. These required publishers to reserve the most profitable space on their search results pages for Google’s adverts and request a minimum number of Google adverts. As a result, Google’s competitorswere prevented from placing their search adverts in the most visible and clicked on parts of the websites’ search results pages.
  • As of March 2009, Google also included clauses requiring publishers to seek written approval from Google before making changes to the way in which any rival adverts were displayed. This meant that Google could control how attractive, and therefore clicked on, competing search adverts could be.

Therefore, Google first imposed an exclusive supply obligation, which prevented competitors from placing any search adverts on the commercially most significant websites. Then, Google introduced what it called its “relaxed exclusivity” strategy aimed at reserving for its own search adverts the most valuable positions and at controlling competing adverts’ performance.

Google’s practices covered over half the market by turnover throughout most of the period. Google’s rivals were not able to compete on the merits, either because there was an outright prohibition for them to appear on publisher websites or because Google reserved for itself by far the most valuable commercial space on those websites, while at the same time controlling how rival search adverts could appear.

image_EN

 

Breach of EU antitrust rules

Google’s practices amount to an abuse of Google’s dominant position in the online search advertising intermediation market by preventing competition on the merits.

Market dominance is, as such, not illegal under EU antitrust rules. However, dominant companies have a special responsibility not to abuse their powerful market position by restricting competition, either in the market where they are dominant or in separate markets.

Today’s decision concludes that Google is dominant in the market for online search advertising intermediation in the EEA since at least 2006. This is based in particular on Google’s very high market shares, exceeding 85% for most of the period. The market is also characterised by high barriers to entry. These include very significant initial and ongoing investments required to develop and maintain general search technology, a search advertising platform, and a sufficiently large portfolio of both publishers and advertisers.

Google has abused this market dominance by preventing rivals from competing in the online search advertising intermediation market.

Based on a broad range of evidence, the Commission found that Google’s conduct harmed competition and consumers, and stifled innovation. Google’s rivals were unable to grow and offer alternative online search advertising intermediation services to those of Google. As a result, owners of websites had limited options for monetizing space on these websites and were forced to rely almost solely on Google.

Google did not demonstrate that the clauses created any efficiencies capable of justifying its practices.

 

Consequences of the Decision

The Commission’s fine of €1 494 459 000 (1.29% of Google’s turnover in 2018) takes account of the duration and gravity of the infringement. In accordance with the Commission’s 2006 Guidelines on fines (see press release and MEMO), the fine has been calculated on the basis of the value of Google’s revenue from online search advertising intermediation in the EEA.

Google ceased the illegal practices a few months after the Commission issued in July 2016a Statement of Objections concerning this case. The decision requires Google to, at a minimum, stop its illegal conduct, to the extent it has not already done so, and to refrain from any measure that has the same or equivalent object or effect.

Finally, Google is also liable to face civil actions for damages that can be brought before the courts of the Member States by any person or business affected by its anti-competitive behaviour. The new EU Antitrust Damages Directive makes it easier for victims of anti-competitive practices to obtain damages.

 

Other Google cases

In June 2017, the Commission fined Google €2.42 billion for abusing its dominance as a search engine by giving an illegal advantage to Google’s own comparison shopping service.

In July 2018, the Commission fined Google €4.34 billion for illegal practices regarding Android mobile devices to strengthen the dominance of Google’s search engine.

 

Background

Today’s decision is addressed to Google LLC (previously Google Inc.) and Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company.

The Commission’s investigation into the conduct covered by the present decision began as part of the broader Google Search investigation (case 39740).

On 14 July 2016, the Commission sent a Statement of Objections to Google setting out its preliminary views that the company had abused its dominant position by artificially restricting the possibility of third party websites to display search advertisements from Google’s competitors.

Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement prohibit the abuse of a dominant position.

Fines imposed on companies found in breach of EU antitrust rules are paid into the general EU budget. This money is not earmarked for particular expenses, but Member States’ contributions to the EU budget for the following year are reduced accordingly. The fines therefore help to finance the EU and reduce the burden for taxpayers.

More information on today’s decision is available on the Commission’s competition website in the public case register under the case number 40411.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Libya: EU efforts should focus on protecting migrants, MEPs say

This new way of understanding disease is changing medicine

Action needed to end deadly clashes between African herders and farmers: UN chief

The four top Americans who flew to Europe perplexed things about Trump’s intentions

“A Junior Enterprise is run only by students.. there are no professors or managers that can help you solve your problems”

EU-India summit: Will the EU manage to sign a free trade agreement with India before Britain?

Africa-Europe Alliance: first projects kicked off just three months after launch

The German automotive industry under the Trump spell

Fight against climate change and poverty will fail without overhaul of global financial system, says major UN report

Eurozone closer to a deflation – stagnation trap

Why Commissioner Rehn wants us all to work more for less

Syrian Refugees in Germany face distinctly different challenges than those in Lebanon

Consumers suffer three defeats

Is a full course lunch, a new Commissioner and 2 million anti-TTIP citizens what you would call a “Fresh Start”?

What we take for granted: The EU is not perfect

Who the US and China have trade disputes with

EU makes key TTIP document public as protests get louder

ILO’s Bureau for Employers´Activities to publish new study on women in business and management

3 autonomous vehicle trends to follow in 2019

Second Facebook-Cambridge Analytica hearing: impact on privacy, voting and trust

This is what a planet-wide network of ocean sanctuaries could look like

EU budget: the Common Agricultural Policy beyond 2020

‘Global care crisis’ set to affect 2.3 billion people warns UN labour agency

Guatemala: UN anti-corruption body will continue working, as Constitutional Court blocks Government expulsion

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Unprecedented Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction to Combat Climate Change

Why the ECB prepares to flood the markets with more and free of charge euro; everybody needs that now

This is our chance to completely redefine the meaning of work

Greece and Ukraine main items on EU28 menu; the course is set

Eurozone: The crisis hit countries are again subsidizing the German and French banks

The Indian miracle state pointing the way to global sustainability

EU Commission: Germany can make Eurozone grow again just by helping itself

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang’s speech from World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting of New Champions

Press coverage of migration crisis in Europe: a call for collaborative action

Parliament demands ban on neo-fascist and neo-Nazi groups in the EU

Climate change recognized as ‘threat multiplier’, UN Security Council debates its impact on peace

2 trillion drinks containers are made every year – so where do they go?

Water supply a human right but Greeks to lose their functioning utilities

Darfur: Inter-communal tensions still high despite improved security, Mission head tells Security Council

Brexit: when the hubris of one man can set the UK, the EU and the entire world on fire

Marking Sir Brian Urquhart’s 100th birthday, UN honours life-long servant of ‘we the peoples’

Mandela, ‘true symbol of human greatness’, celebrated on centenary of his birth

ECB’s first flight in Eurozone’s banking universe will be just a reconnaissance

Syria: ‘Violence, displacement’ and cold kill 11 infants ‘in the past two days’

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: Bicycles for the environment, new leader for the UN General Assembly, UN values, Ebola, Syria and Libya

EU-China Light Bridge in Brussels signals the bright coming of the Year of The Dog

‘Never give up’: UN chief urges all who serve, marking UN Day

Venezuela: UN human rights office calls for ‘maximum restraint’ by authorities in face of new demonstrations

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

MEPs want to ensure sufficient funding for Connecting Europe’s future

We need to talk about failure in the social sector

Long live Eurozone’s bank supervisor down with the EU budget supremo

Why Obama asks approval from Congress to bomb Syria?

UK voters sent strong message to May and Corbyn for soft Brexit

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: Ban Ki-Moon Closing Address at COP21 Action Day Innovation, Imagination, Faster Climate Action

The 28 EU leaders show contempt for the European Elections results

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “No other problem has jeopardised the EU as much as the refugee question” Joachim Gauck, President of the Federal Republic of Germany, cries out from Davos

Love unlimited

Medical students of today, technological doctors of tomorrow

Why Eurozone urgently needs the ECB to print and distribute at least €500 billion

European Youth Forum welcomes the European Commission’s proposed revision of the Union Code on Visas, however it does not go far enough

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s