IMF: How To Deal With Failed Banks

Seminar – Restoring Trust by Curbing Corruption. International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde (3rd Left) joins a seminar on “Restoring Trust by Curbing Corruption” with moderator Greg Ip (L), Finance Minister of Paraguay Lea Gimenez Durate (2nd L), Benin Minister of Planning and Development Abdoulaye Bio-Tchane (3rdR), Secretary of State for International Development Penny Mordaunt (2nd R) and Managing Director of the International Secretariat of Transparency International Patricia Moreira (R) during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings at the IMF Headquarters April 22, 2018. IMF Staff Photo/Stephen Jaffe.

This article is brought to you in association with the International Monetary Fund

Written by Deniz Igan, July 3, 2018

During the global financial crisis, policymakers faced a steep trade-off in handling bank failures. Using public funds to rescue failing banks (bail-outs) could weaken market discipline and lead to excessive risk taking—the moral hazard effect.

Letting private investors absorb the losses (bail-ins) could destabilize the financial sector and the economy as a whole—the spillover effect. In most cases, banks were bailed out.

This created public resentment and prompted policymakers to introduce measures to shift the burden of bank resolution away from taxpayers to private investors.

“Resolving a failing bank should rely

on bail-ins: private stakeholders

should bear the losses”

Our recent study, also featured in an Analytical Corner in the 2018 Spring Meetings, looks at the question of what to do when a bank fails.

We advocate a resolution framework that carefully balances the moral hazard and spillover effects and improves the trade-off. Such a framework would make bail-outs the exception rather than the rule.

Balancing moral hazard and spillover effects

Not all crises are alike. Some are isolated, with little or no spillover effect. In those cases, bail-outs would merely create moral hazard. Resolving a failing bank should rely on bail-ins: private stakeholders should bear the losses.

Other crises are systemic, and affect all corners of an economy or many countries at the same time.

The destabilizing spillovers associated with bank failures in such a situation would justify the use of public resources: moral hazard still exists but is bearable compared to the alternative of a severe crisis that hurts all, including those without a stake in the troubled bank.

So, the framework should commit to using bail-ins in most cases and allow use of public funds only when the risks to macro-financial stability from bail-ins are exceptionally severe.

Improving the trade-off

The best way to avoid such dilemmas is to reduce spillovers and the need for bail-outs in the first place. This can be achieved through two mutually re-enforcing mechanisms.

The first mechanism is reducing the likelihood of crises and minimizing costs should a crisis occur. This translates into having a more resilient banking system: less leverage and risk taking, and more capital and liquidity. Then the odds that a bank runs into trouble are smaller. And, if there is trouble, banks can absorb the losses without help from the government.

The second mechanism is making the bail-in option viable. The problem is that policymakers may make the promise to bail in a troubled bank but, in a crisis, they will be tempted to bail them out. So people will not believe that bail-ins will happen and continue to expect bail-outs.

This is the worst of both worlds, because it has spillover and moral hazard effects.

How do policymakers make a credible commitment that there really will be bail-ins?

First, ensure that banks have enough buffers to absorb losses and clarify upfront which investor claims (such as bonds and deposits) will in the event of failure be written down and in what order. Second, only allow sophisticated investors who can understand and absorb the losses to hold these bail-in-able claims. Third, improve systemic banks’ resolvability by periodic assessments, living wills that spell out how the bank will be resolved, and domestic and cross-border drills to assess the impact of a threat.

Turning to the other side of the trade-off, how do we limit moral hazard?

First, credibly commit to using bail-outs only in exceptional cases and on a temporary basis with a clear exit plan. Second, use public funds only after those that can absorb the losses have been bailed in. Third, recover these bail-out funds after the storm has passed and ensure that all is executed in a transparent, accountable manner.

The way forward

Reforms since the crisis have improved the trade-off by seeking to make bail-ins a credible option and to make bail-outs less likely.

New frameworks—such as those in the United States and the European Union—introduce comprehensive powers to resolve banks, including through bail-ins. These measures also seek to contain spillovers from bail-ins by ensuring that banks have adequate buffers to absorb losses, and aim to make them more resolvable via effective resolution planning.

We support the ongoing reform agenda and stress that resolution frameworks should minimize moral hazard. That said, we also emphasize the need to allow for sufficient, albeit constrained, flexibility to be able to use public resources in systemic crises—when spillovers are deemed likely to severely jeopardize macro-financial stability.

Deniz Igan is Deputy Chief of the Macro-Financial Division in the IMF’s Research Department. Previously, she worked in the IMF’s Western Hemisphere and European departments. Her research interests include corporate finance, banking, real estate markets, and political economy. She holds a PhD from Princeton University.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

At Ministerial session, UN regional office in Beirut to focus on technology for sustainable development

Love unlimited

Marco Polo’s Dream

The EU checks the multinationals for tax fraud but Britain may sail out of the EU via Panama

The EU moulds a new compromise for growth and financial sustainability

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

The European Council takes more measures to stem illegal migration

Japan to invest in euro values

Which EU countries have to correct their economic policies?

A young European voice on Grexit: too high a bill and too big a deal!

Tools of asset development: Renewable Energy Projects case

A Sting Exclusive: “Paris is indeed our best bet for a secure climate future”, EU Commissioner for Environment Karmenu Vella cries out from Brussels

Challenges remain in DPRK despite ‘slight’ improvements in health, wellbeing: UNICEF

Main results of EU-Japan summit: Tokyo, 17/07/2018

The big challenge of leadership and entrepreneurship in Europe

Employers’ organizations work towards improving the enabling environment for sustainable enterprises

Here’s what keeps CEOs awake at night (and why it might be bad news for your next job)

GDPR and the World Cup have these 4 things in common

Eurozone: How can 200 banks find €400 billion?

A young student discusses the determinants of migration in the European Union

How Eurozone consumers spend their income when they have one…

“Leaked” TTIP document breaks post 8th negotiations round silence and opens door to critics

Italian banks: It’s Rome’s turn to confront Berlin’s aggressiveness

FIAT Chrysler: from Geneva Motor show to the World, and back

Google’s bare truth: Europe’s Chief denies EU accusations but admits they “don’t always get it right”

An entrepreneurial point-of view on tackling the migration crisis and the risks of abolishing Schengen

Is Eurozone preparing to abandon austerity and stagnation?

A Sting Exclusive: “Regional Policy: a fully-fledged investment policy”, Commissioner Cretu reveals live from European Business Summit 2015

ECB’s unconventional monetary measures give first tangible results

‘Laser-sharp focus’ needed to achieve Global Goals by 2030, UN political forum told

Drugs cost too much. There is a better way to fund medical innovation

The West and Russia impose a new order on the world

The “Legend of the Sun” wishes you Happy Chinese New Year 2015 from Brussels

European Agenda on Migration: Still fragile situation gives no cause for complacency

FEATURE: Niger’s girls find sanctuary in fistula treatment centres

EU lawmakers vote to reintroduce visas for Americans over “reciprocity principle”

How to provide health education and thus create better health systems

Russia won’t let Ukraine drift westwards in one piece

Britain, EU take edgy steps to unlock Brexit talks as the war of words rages

Switzerland to introduce strict restrictions on executive pay

Europe rethinking its severe austerity policies

What options the new President of Ukraine has?

How well you age depends on what you think of old age

A European young student shares his thoughts on Quality Education

“A global threat lies ahead worsened after the EU’s green light to the Bayer-Monsanto merger”, a Sting Exclusive by the President of Slow Food

ECB offers cheaper money despite reactions from Germany

COP21 Breaking News_08 December: Cities & Regions Launch Major Five-Year Vision to Take Action on Climate Change

Eurozone: In vicious cycle of disinflation and unemployment?

G20 LIVE: “ISIL is the face of evil; our goal is to degrade and ultimately destroy this barbaric terrorist organisation”, US President Barack Obama cries out from Antalya Turkey

ECB asks for more subsidies to banks

This AI is working with a fleet of drones to help us fight ocean plastic

The EU has to prove it can remain one piece

Eurozone: GDP development heads to naught; the expensive euro serves only Germany

EU prepares a banking union amidst financial ruins

ECB: The bastion of effective and equitable Europeanism keeps up quantitative easing

Population in crisis hit EU countries will suffer for decades

JADE Generations Club: Connecting perspectives, changing Europe.

Chauvinism and xenophobia will lead to global assertiveness and more wars

Pharmaceuticals conceal drug side effects with the EU’s Court blessing

Why and how did ISIS and Muslim fundamentalism gain momentum this year?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s