IMF: How To Deal With Failed Banks

Seminar – Restoring Trust by Curbing Corruption. International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde (3rd Left) joins a seminar on “Restoring Trust by Curbing Corruption” with moderator Greg Ip (L), Finance Minister of Paraguay Lea Gimenez Durate (2nd L), Benin Minister of Planning and Development Abdoulaye Bio-Tchane (3rdR), Secretary of State for International Development Penny Mordaunt (2nd R) and Managing Director of the International Secretariat of Transparency International Patricia Moreira (R) during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings at the IMF Headquarters April 22, 2018. IMF Staff Photo/Stephen Jaffe.

This article is brought to you in association with the International Monetary Fund

Written by Deniz Igan, July 3, 2018

During the global financial crisis, policymakers faced a steep trade-off in handling bank failures. Using public funds to rescue failing banks (bail-outs) could weaken market discipline and lead to excessive risk taking—the moral hazard effect.

Letting private investors absorb the losses (bail-ins) could destabilize the financial sector and the economy as a whole—the spillover effect. In most cases, banks were bailed out.

This created public resentment and prompted policymakers to introduce measures to shift the burden of bank resolution away from taxpayers to private investors.

“Resolving a failing bank should rely

on bail-ins: private stakeholders

should bear the losses”

Our recent study, also featured in an Analytical Corner in the 2018 Spring Meetings, looks at the question of what to do when a bank fails.

We advocate a resolution framework that carefully balances the moral hazard and spillover effects and improves the trade-off. Such a framework would make bail-outs the exception rather than the rule.

Balancing moral hazard and spillover effects

Not all crises are alike. Some are isolated, with little or no spillover effect. In those cases, bail-outs would merely create moral hazard. Resolving a failing bank should rely on bail-ins: private stakeholders should bear the losses.

Other crises are systemic, and affect all corners of an economy or many countries at the same time.

The destabilizing spillovers associated with bank failures in such a situation would justify the use of public resources: moral hazard still exists but is bearable compared to the alternative of a severe crisis that hurts all, including those without a stake in the troubled bank.

So, the framework should commit to using bail-ins in most cases and allow use of public funds only when the risks to macro-financial stability from bail-ins are exceptionally severe.

Improving the trade-off

The best way to avoid such dilemmas is to reduce spillovers and the need for bail-outs in the first place. This can be achieved through two mutually re-enforcing mechanisms.

The first mechanism is reducing the likelihood of crises and minimizing costs should a crisis occur. This translates into having a more resilient banking system: less leverage and risk taking, and more capital and liquidity. Then the odds that a bank runs into trouble are smaller. And, if there is trouble, banks can absorb the losses without help from the government.

The second mechanism is making the bail-in option viable. The problem is that policymakers may make the promise to bail in a troubled bank but, in a crisis, they will be tempted to bail them out. So people will not believe that bail-ins will happen and continue to expect bail-outs.

This is the worst of both worlds, because it has spillover and moral hazard effects.

How do policymakers make a credible commitment that there really will be bail-ins?

First, ensure that banks have enough buffers to absorb losses and clarify upfront which investor claims (such as bonds and deposits) will in the event of failure be written down and in what order. Second, only allow sophisticated investors who can understand and absorb the losses to hold these bail-in-able claims. Third, improve systemic banks’ resolvability by periodic assessments, living wills that spell out how the bank will be resolved, and domestic and cross-border drills to assess the impact of a threat.

Turning to the other side of the trade-off, how do we limit moral hazard?

First, credibly commit to using bail-outs only in exceptional cases and on a temporary basis with a clear exit plan. Second, use public funds only after those that can absorb the losses have been bailed in. Third, recover these bail-out funds after the storm has passed and ensure that all is executed in a transparent, accountable manner.

The way forward

Reforms since the crisis have improved the trade-off by seeking to make bail-ins a credible option and to make bail-outs less likely.

New frameworks—such as those in the United States and the European Union—introduce comprehensive powers to resolve banks, including through bail-ins. These measures also seek to contain spillovers from bail-ins by ensuring that banks have adequate buffers to absorb losses, and aim to make them more resolvable via effective resolution planning.

We support the ongoing reform agenda and stress that resolution frameworks should minimize moral hazard. That said, we also emphasize the need to allow for sufficient, albeit constrained, flexibility to be able to use public resources in systemic crises—when spillovers are deemed likely to severely jeopardize macro-financial stability.

Deniz Igan is Deputy Chief of the Macro-Financial Division in the IMF’s Research Department. Previously, she worked in the IMF’s Western Hemisphere and European departments. Her research interests include corporate finance, banking, real estate markets, and political economy. She holds a PhD from Princeton University.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Fostering global citizenship in medical students through exchanges

Main results of Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) – 18-19/10/2018

How to turn Africa’s manufacturing sector into a high-tech powerhouse

Plastic Oceans: MEPs back EU ban on throwaway plastics by 2021

Recession: the best argument for growth

How cities are failing to be inclusive – and what they can do about it

Parliament sets conditions on EU-China investment deal

The EU Commission vies to screen Chinese investment in Europe

EU invests in green projects and bans single-use plastics while climate change requires more to be done

Italian voters put again the European Peoples in the Brussels picture

Greening the Belt and Road is essential to our climate’s future

Our indispensable problem: the paradox of modern plastics

Why private investment in deforestation-free commodity production needs to be scaled up

Fighting for minds of youth in Latvia

Does the “climate change” require ombudsman services for environment?

Here’s a reason to feel cheerful – the world is full of Good Samaritans

UN chief hopeful for Libya, after Quartet meeting in Tunis

European Commission requests that Italy presents a revised draft budgetary plan for 2019

It’s down to cities to limit global warming to 1.5°C by 2030

Close to final agreement on the EU Banking Union

UN agency chiefs condemn Saudi-coalition led air strike that killed dozens in western Yemen

Road injuries leading cause of death for the young, despite safety gains: UN report

Fossil fuel support is rising again in a threat to climate change efforts

‘Disaster resilient’ farming reduces agriculture risks, yields economic gains, says new UN agriculture agency report

Back to the basics for the EU: Investment equals Growth

Syria: Thousands of children ‘hemmed in’ by ‘brutal and gratuitous’ spike in violence

‘Perseverance is key’ to Iraq’s future, UN envoy tells Security Council

Humanitarian Aid: EU mobilises €6 million for people in need in Colombia

Ensuring the ‘lungs of the planet’ keep us alive: 5 things you need to know about forests and the UN

Finland has giant supermarkets that only stock second-hand goods

A shocking new report reveals what we’ve done to the natural world

Why your next car is a bike

Engaging ‘head and mind’, key for effective learning, says UNESCO chief on Literacy Day

Zuckerberg preaches that Artificial Intelligence will protect Data Privacy in Facebook whereas Verhofstadt demands the big European state to take charge

Healing of ozone layer gives hope for climate action: UN report

Food choices today, impact health of both ‘people and planet’ tomorrow

‘More time’ agreed for buffer zone, to spare three million Syrian civilians in Idlib

Marginalized groups hit hardest by inequality and stigma in cities

Women in Switzerland have gone on strike – this is why

Backed by UN, Asia-Pacific countries to advance space technology for ‘development transformation’

Not a single child spared the ‘mind-boggling violence’ of Yemen’s war

Further reforms will promote a stronger and more inclusive Hungarian economy

Millions in Idlib ‘counting on your support to make the violence stop’, UN relief chief tells Security Council

Guinea-Bissau: Upcoming elections vital to prevent ‘relapse’ into instability, says UN envoy

‘Essential step’ towards universal health care made at pivotal UN conference

Telemedicine and the Brazilian reality

First Western Sahara talks at UN in six years, begin in Geneva

Can the world take the risk of a new financial armageddon so that IMF doesn’t lose face towards Tsipras?

Data is the fuel of mobility. Don’t spill it for nothing

Deal on protecting workers from exposure to harmful substances

Galileo funding: A ‘small’ difference of €700 million

Is the West gradually losing Africa?

Why collective action is the key to saving our forests

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed wins Nobel Peace Prize

Sexual exploitation and abuse: latest UN quarterly update

ITU Telecom World 2017 on 25-28 September in Busan, Republic of Korea

Distributed ownership: what it means and how it could transform India

Scotland wants to create an ethical stock exchange (Post Brexit)

A woman would have to be born in the year 2255 to get equal pay at work

Why global collaboration is needed to protect against a new generation of cyber threats

More Stings?

Comments

  1. vanwoodard says:

    Nice post, well said

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s