This is how we make basic income a reality

United Nations World Poverty 2018

(United Nations Mission in Kossovo, 2012)

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Rutger Bregman, Correspondent, De Correspondent, Netherlands

Five years ago, when I first heard about it, the idea had been all but forgotten. Most people I talked to had never heard of it either.

Now, suddenly, it’s everywhere.

Finland conducted a major trial, Canada has just launched an even bigger experiment and a test in Kenya is the mother of them all.

What I’m referring to is, of course, basic income. This is an unconditional cash transfer that is enough to your cover basic needs. It is guaranteed to everyone, whether young or old, rich or poor, overworked or out of work.

From Scotland to India, and from Silicon Valley to Kenya, policymakers all over the world have become interested in basic income as an answer to poverty, unemployment and the bureaucratic behemoth of the modern welfare state.

The idea is also attracting growing popular support. In a public referendum, 68% of Europeans would vote in favour of basic income (up from 64% the previous year), revealed a large survey conducted in 28 European countries.

Faster than I could have dared to hope, the discussion has catapulted into a new phase.

In 2017, I published my book Utopia for Realists. Since then, I have seen the focus of the discussion shift, from utopian dreams to real first steps. We have reached the point where it is no longer enough to philosophise about what could be. The time has come to start putting together concrete plans.

I realise that is easier said than done. Firstly, we have to establish what we actually mean by basic income. Proponents differ widely on how much it should be, how we should fund it, and who should be eligible to receive it.

By now, I have talked to many people on the other side of the debate – the opponents of basic income. Their objections, I have discovered, consistently hinge on two fundamental concerns.

Their first concern is mainly practical. How would we pay for it? How can we afford to simply give everyone free cash? Wouldn’t that be astronomically expensive?

Their other main concern is ethical and centres on the ‘universality’. What do you mean Bill Gates and Richard Branson would get cash handouts too?

Don’t make it universal

Both of these objections, I believe, can be overcome with a simple solution.

Don’t give a basic income to everybody – yet.

By that, I mean we shouldn’t start out with a universal basic income for poor and rich alike. This would eliminate concerns over affordability, and Mr Gates and Mr Branson would know to keep their day jobs.

I know that there are many excellent arguments for a universal form of basic income. Since everyone would get it, it would remove the stigma that dogs recipients of assistance and ‘entitlements’.

However, in recent months, I have also become convinced that the practical concerns still loom too large. A universal basic income means not only that millions of people would receive unconditional cash payments, but also that millions of people would have to cough up thousands more in taxes to fund it. This will make basic income politically a harder sell.

Not only that, it would also inflate marginal tax rates, or the tax you pay over every additional pound you earn. I know that sounds technical, but bear with me, because it’s crucial. Imagine you decide to work one extra hour every day, and that you earn £10 an hour. Under a marginal tax rate of 40%, you would take home £6. In other words: working more pays off.

Introduction of a universal basic income would change that, significantly inflating not average, but marginal, tax rates, and leaving you with only £3-4 of the original £10. Understandably, a lot of people would probably think “forget it – it’s not worth the extra work”.

But make it a guarantee

The good news? There is an alternative.

Instead of a universal basic income, we could have a basic income guarantee. Or, as economists prefer to call it, a negative income tax.

Again, this sounds technical, but it’s really just basic maths. In the current system, everybody who works pays taxes. A negative income tax flips that around. If you work, but your wages still leave you below the poverty level, you don’t have to pay taxes. Instead, the taxman pays you.

Think of it as building a massive floor underneath the economy. Anyone who falls below the poverty line, employed or not, is lifted back to security, no conditions attached. Protection against poverty would be a right, not a privilege. Meanwhile, working would always pay off, because above the poverty line, basic income would be stepped down incrementally, instead of cut off.

Imagine what a massive leap this would be.

For example, in Great Britain, more than 14 million people, including four million children, would be freed from the prison of poverty. To be clear: 60% of those people work in paid jobs.

This is an idea that could rally voters across the board, with something to please both the left and the right:

For the left, a world without poverty.

For the right, no more nanny state.

For the left, livelihood security for all.

For the right, an economy that always rewards hard graft.

Here’s the kicker: in terms of costs, there is absolutely no difference between a basic income guarantee and a universal basic income. The net expense of both amounts to exactly the same.

When it comes to making the sell however, I think the latter has a big advantage. It is no coincidence that just such a scheme was once almost enacted in the US. In the 1970s, President Nixon got his basic income bill through the House of Representatives twice before it ultimately became stranded in the Senate. It was voted down by the Democrats, not because they hated the idea, but because they felt the basic income guarantee wasn’t high enough!

At this point, there will be readers who will object, arguing that handing out cash is an invitation to mass laziness. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. Large-scale experiments have already been done in Canada and the US. The data show that people hardly work less. Rather, healthcare costs plummet and children’s school performance soars.

At what price?

The million dollar question, of course, is how much will it cost?

Now, this is where it gets really interesting. In a ground-breaking study, three US economists calculated what a negative income tax (a.k.a. basic income guarantee) would cost their country. After crunching the numbers, it was revealed that – surprise! – it would be amazingly cheap.

A negative income tax system that totally eliminated poverty would cost, at most, $336 billion, the researchers found. That is, a measly 1% of US GDP. To put this into perspective, the costs of child poverty alone, and its effects such as higher healthcare expenditure, more crime and worse performance at school, were pegged at $500 billion.

Yes, you read that right. It is cheaper to eradicate poverty than to sustain it.

A basic income guarantee is brilliantly affordable. So affordable, that implementing it would be less expensive than not implementing it.

Basic security

Finally, I believe there is something else that has to change. We need a new term.

I have been struck time and again by the unjustified associations attached to the term ‘basic income’. Whereas the word ‘income’ is something we associate with a conditional payment that has to be ‘earned’, what we are talking about here is the right to livelihood security.

Therefore, I would like to propose that we call this variant simply what it is: basic security. A trampoline that you can always fall back on, whatever else happens.

One thing is certain: the time for philosophising is past.

Every milestone of civilization begins with a crackpot idea once dismissed as unreasonable and unrealistic. But there comes a time when Utopian dreams become ripe enough to turn them into real-world policy. For basic income, that time is now.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

As rural communities age, their public transport is shrinking. It’s time to fix this

Russia to cut gas supplies again: can the EU get back to growth without a solid energy market?

Women vital for ‘new paradigm’ in Africa’s Sahel region, Security Council hears

Transition between education and employment: how the internship culture is threatening the foundations of our education

Talent is worldwide. Opportunity is not. How can we redistribute it?

From Russia with love: Brussels and Moscow close to an agreement on Ukraine’s gas supplies

Confronting neo-mercantilism: why regulation is critical to global trade

A Sting Exclusive: “Digital and mobile technologies are helping to achieve an economic success in Spain”, the Spanish Secretary of State for Telecommunications and Information Society Víctor Calvo-Sotelo reveals to the Sting at Mobile World Congress 2015

Charges against Baha’i in Yemen must be dropped: UN experts urge release of detainees

Towards a European Republic

OECD household income up 0.7% in first quarter of 2018, outpacing GDP growth

EU leaders agree on 2030 Climate and Energy Package: is “flexible” brave enough?

Food safety: more transparency, better risk prevention

Is euro to repeat its past highs with the dollar?

Solutions for cultural understanding: medical students’ perspective

This is why Dutch teenagers are among the happiest in the world

As monsoon rains pound Rohingya refugee camps, UN food relief agency steps up aid

EU’s social crisis and unemployment to deteriorate

This is the world’s biggest mental health problem – and you might not have heard of it

A Sting Exclusive: “Doing ourselves a favour”, Vice President Dombrovskis underscores that this time growth has to come from within the EU

Ebola: EU provides an additional €30 million to tackle the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Interview with ourselves: the mental health of health professionals

Doctors are humans too: the benefits of embracing your mental status

Women-Friendly Spaces for Rohingya refugees: A place for protection and care

Commission: Do it like the Americans in the food sector

President Juncker temporarily transfers portfolio responsibilities following departure of two Members of the European Commission

Latest tragedy in the Mediterranean claims over 100 lives – UN refugee agency

rescEU assets mobilised to help Greece fight devastating forest fires

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: Venezuela-Colombia baby breakthrough, Italy piles on rescue boat pressure, States must combat hate, Kashmir rights latest and a musical plea to combat CAR hunger

Eurozone: Even good statistics mean deeper recession

More than four in 10 women, live in fear of refusing partner’s sexual demands, new UN global study finds

Conflict prevention, mediation: among ‘most important tools’ to reduce human suffering, Guterres tells Security Council

3 reasons why most Africans aren’t on the internet – and how to connect them

Further reforms needed for a stronger and more integrated Europe

25 years after population conference, women still face challenges to ‘well-being and human rights’, says UN chief

70 years on, landmark UN human rights document as important as ever

‘Huge’ stakes, ‘daunting’ job to tackle gender-based violence, UNICEF chief tells ground-breaking conference

South Africa still hasn’t won LGBTQ+ equality. Here are 5 reasons why

Commission launches two projects to support cooperation and innovation in Romanian regions and cities

3 ways to fight stress at work

EU Top Jobs summit ended with no agreement: welcome to Europe’s quicksand!

EU to spend €6 billion on youth employment and training futile schemes

The good news on pensions: sustainable equals profitable

Women must be at ‘centre of peacekeeping decision-making’, UN chief tells Security Council

Leading Palestinian legislator calls for ‘new international engagement’ in two-state solution

The Ukrainian crisis to destabilize Europe and the world for a long time

Millennials aren’t voting – but these young leaders have a plan to change that

The role of students in a migration crisis in Roraima, Brazil

IPCC reports devastating climate consequences; US in denial while EU does not fully support the 2050 net zero emissions target

Spotlight Initiative – EU and UN fight against domestic violence in the Pacific region

Healing of ozone layer gives hope for climate action: UN report

End ‘shame, isolation and segregation’ of fistula sufferers, urges UN reproductive health chief

The European Union and Central Asia: New opportunities for a stronger partnership

The health of the human being in coexistence with a transformative biosphere

‘Rare but devastating’ tsunamis underscore need for better preparation, UN chief urges on World Day

Service and Sacrifice: Guinean peacekeepers make their mark in Mali

EU–US: What is the real exchange in a Free Trade Agreement?

€5 billion of EU energy efficiency project money spent on “comfort”

To flourish in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, we need to rethink these 3 things

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s