It’s time to ditch our obsession with trade deficits. Here’s why

Arancha González Laya 2018

(International Trade Centre, 2013)

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Arancha González Laya, Executive Director, International Trade Centre.

The notion that trade surpluses are a measure of a country’s economic prowess dates back centuries. In 16th-century Europe, “mercantilists” from England to Venice sought to accumulate gold by promoting exports and discouraging imports. Their intellectual heirs today think trade surpluses boost national welfare, employment and economic growth, while deficits do the opposite.

The preoccupation with surpluses is based on dubious arithmetic: since one country’s exports are another’s imports, it is impossible for all countries to be net exporters. It also overlooks a more fundamental point about trade. The main benefit from trade is imports – foreigners sending the fruits of their labour for us to enjoy, allowing us to focus on what we do best. Working to produce exports is the price we pay to enjoy these benefits.

A better goal is to reduce the export effort needed to obtain a given quantity of imports. Economists call this “enhancing the terms of trade”. This makes intuitive sense in our own lives: you run a surplus with your employer in order to run deficits with your local grocery store, your daughter’s football league and your favourite restaurant. Now imagine if you could run those same deficits while spending only half as much time at the office.

Adam Smith recognized in 1776 that the true wealth of a nation was not the gold and silver in its coffers, but the productivity of its labour force. “Nothing can be more absurd than this whole doctrine of the balance of trade,” he wrote. Fast-forward to the present day, and his warning is once again going unheeded by policy-makers. Erecting protectionist barriers is unlikely to create jobs and prosperity, for two reasons.

 Three ways of looking at the US trade deficit with China (as % of GDP)

Three ways of looking at the US trade deficit with China (as % of GDP)
Image: Oxford Economics

First, current measures of trade on the basis of flows give a distorted view of bilateral trade balances, since they fail to account for components imported to make exported goods. Given the fragmentation of production across multi-country value chains, a far better gauge of a country’s trade performance is how much value it adds to inputs. Focusing exclusively on goods exacerbates the misperceptions since it excludes trade in services, which typically accounts for more than two-thirds of output in advanced economies.

Second, there is no straightforward relationship between a country’s trade balance and its economic health or labour-market dynamics. For example, US job creation since the 1990s has been fastest during periods when imports were growing rapidly. The trade balance narrowed dramatically in 2009 – mainly because GDP growth and job creation were plummeting due to the financial crisis, shrinking demand for imported goods and services. Germany has big trade surpluses rather than deficits, but manufacturing’s share of total employment there has been declining at more or less the same pace as in the US.

Percentage of employment in manufacturing in the US and Germany

Manufacturing jobs in the US and Germany
Image: US Bureau of Labor Statistics

Third, a country’s trade surplus or deficit is shaped less by the content of its trade agreements – tariff levels, quotas, regulatory rules and so on – than by the balance between domestic saving and investment within its own economy. Take the European Union: the entire bloc has exactly the same trade policy. Yet its member states perform very differently.

 Current account balance for European Union member states, as % of GDP, 2017

Current account balance for EU states, as % of GDP, 2017
Image: Eurostat

The current account balance – a broad measure of trade in goods and services that also includes net flows of income from foreign investments – is fundamentally a function of national saving and investment. Countries that run deficits spend more on imports than they earn from exports and borrow from the rest of the world to make up the difference. Conversely, surplus economies earn more from exports than they pay for imports; they lend the difference abroad, accumulating claims on foreigners in the process.

The only way to shift the current account balance is to alter savings and investment behaviour by households, firms and governments. Trade protectionism is an indirect way to accomplish this – but it could well miss the target or even backfire. For instance, when a country taxes steel imports, it hurts the export competitiveness of domestic makers of cars, planes, and anything else containing the metal.

Cross-country evidence suggests no clear link between tariff protection and current account balances. If anything, higher-tariff countries tend to have larger trade deficits. The World Trade Organisation rulebook authorizes countries to take protective action against import surges or predatory pricing, but while such measures can fight unfair trade, they have little effect on overall trade deficits.

Trying to tackle trade deficits bilaterally won’t work. Balancing trade with individual countries would, in practice, require constant interference with the purchase and sales decisions of thousands of companies and households, raising prices and generating distortions. Imagine if your supermarket had to buy something from you before it could sell you food.

None of this means policy-makers should ignore the existence of large trade surpluses and deficits. The cross-border financial flows these macro-economic imbalances entail are vulnerable to sudden stops that can destabilize countries and the global economy, as many Asian countries learned in 1997, followed by the Eurozone a decade later. But the solution is not trade restrictions: it lies in international cooperation to get countries that over-save to encourage more spending, and countries with big deficits to tighten their belts when circumstances allow it. The group of 20 leading nations is the logical forum in which to do just that. Similarly, broad negotiations among a number of countries are the most effective way to address unsatisfactory trade rules and industrial overcapacity.

Popular discontent over trade springs from genuine problems. Market-opening agreements have amplified technological trends that deliver outsized gains to small numbers of individuals, firms and regions. Closing markets solves none of these, but would hurt voters’ purchasing power, destabilize businesses and weaken future productivity.

Governments need to develop policies and institutions that cushion the blow from changes brought by both competition and technology, constrain runaway inequality, and equip people and businesses of all sizes to share in the opportunities presented by the global economy. This is the real challenge in trade. Current-account balances are merely a distraction – albeit one that could prove costly indeed.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Africa: Urgent action needed to mobilise domestic resources as tax revenues plateau

‘Dangerous nationalism’ seriously threatens efforts to tackle statelessness: UNHCR chief

Fair minimum wages: Commission launches second-stage consultation of social partners

2014 will bring more European Union for the big guys and less for the weak

Don’t underestimate the power of the fintech revolution

EP President at the European Youth Event: “Your ideas are key in shaping EU’s future”

A day in the life of a refugee: why should we care?

Is there a way out of the next financial crisis? Can more printed money or austerity save us all?

Palliative care and Universal Health Care

Greece bailout programme: Full agreement after marathon negotiations on debt relief between IMF and Eurozone

UN Committee says Ebola in DR Congo still an international public health emergency

Why the Fourth Industrial Revolution needs more arts graduates

The UK referendum has already damaged Europe: even a ‘remain’ result is not without cost to Britain and the EU

GSMA & UNDP announce an ‘Impact Partnership’ Advancing the Sustainable Development Goals at MWC Barcelona 2021

5 inventions that could transform the health of our ocean

Inaction over climate emergency ‘not an option’ says UN Assembly chief

Distributed ownership: what it means and how it could transform India

Contact the Sting

‘Everyone must be on board’ for peace in Central African Republic: UN’s Lacroix

Hungary’s emergency measures: MEPs ask EU to impose sanctions and stop payments

Antimicrobial resistance: how can an intersectoral approach between society and healthcare professionals be developed and applied?

A Sting Exclusive: “One year on from the VW scandal and EU consumers are still in the dark”, BEUC’s Head highlights from Brussels

UN rights chief welcomes new text to protect rights of peasants and other rural workers

Will we join hands for a tomorrow without antimicrobial resistance?

Coronavirus: Commission proposes €6.8 million in total to support 1,700 dismissed workers of air carriers KLM and Finnair

G20 LIVE: G20 leaders reaffirm OECD’s role in ensuring strong, sustainable and inclusive growth

US cities are going to keep getting hotter

Thursday’s Daily Brief: ambulance attack in Libya, #GlobalGoals defenders, human rights in Cambodia, Swine Fever

Where are the world’s nuclear weapons?

Trump’s blasting win causes uncertainty and turbulence to the global financial markets

‘Comprehensively include migrants’ or sustainable development won’t happen, warns General Assembly President

Rise in number of children killed, maimed and recruited in conflict: UN report

Improving coverage of mental health services

‘€1 million’ fines for rescue boats prompts UN concern for future sea operations

All for equality – 2020 is a pivotal year for Gender Equality

Monday’s Daily Brief: drug-resistant diseases, Venezuelan refugees, fighting in Tripoli, and hate speech

UN Forum examines three pillars of 2030 Global Goals

FROM THE FIELD: A UN peacekeepers-eye view of DR Congo

Digital education is both a necessity and an advantage for the Global South. Here’s why

“No labels for entrepreneurs!”, a young business leader from Italy cries out

‘More support’ vital to put Afghanistan back on a ‘positive trajectory’ – top UN officials

Germany hides its own banks’ problems

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “It is the implementation, Stupid!”, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaueble points the finger to Greece from Davos

COVID-19: latest on evaluation and authorisation of vaccines

Coronavirus has ‘pandemic potential’ – but what is a pandemic?

What Thailand can teach us about mental health

Final vote on European Solidarity Corps

Climate change update: consistent global actions urgently needed as we are running out of time

Financial services: Commission sets out its equivalence policy with non-EU countries

Why will Paris upcoming “loose” climate change agreement work better than the previous ones?

An U.S.-EU Agenda for Beating the Global Pandemic: Vaccinating the World, Saving Lives Now, and Building Back Better Health Security

Antitrust: Commission publishes report on implementation of Damages Directive

Q&A on extraordinary remote participation procedure

Next six months crucial for the EU, says von der Leyen at the start of the German Presidency of the Council of the EU

Further reforms in Japan needed to meet the challenges of population ageing and high public debt

Delivering masks across borders: EU Single Market protecting citizens’ health

Training for staff in early childhood education and care must promote practices that foster children’s learning, development and well-being

Changing the EU copyright law won’t bring us much closer to Digital Single Market

Mergers: Commission waives the commitments made by Takeda to obtain clearance of its acquisition of Shire

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: