It’s time to ditch our obsession with trade deficits. Here’s why

Arancha González Laya 2018

(International Trade Centre, 2013)

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Arancha González Laya, Executive Director, International Trade Centre.

The notion that trade surpluses are a measure of a country’s economic prowess dates back centuries. In 16th-century Europe, “mercantilists” from England to Venice sought to accumulate gold by promoting exports and discouraging imports. Their intellectual heirs today think trade surpluses boost national welfare, employment and economic growth, while deficits do the opposite.

The preoccupation with surpluses is based on dubious arithmetic: since one country’s exports are another’s imports, it is impossible for all countries to be net exporters. It also overlooks a more fundamental point about trade. The main benefit from trade is imports – foreigners sending the fruits of their labour for us to enjoy, allowing us to focus on what we do best. Working to produce exports is the price we pay to enjoy these benefits.

A better goal is to reduce the export effort needed to obtain a given quantity of imports. Economists call this “enhancing the terms of trade”. This makes intuitive sense in our own lives: you run a surplus with your employer in order to run deficits with your local grocery store, your daughter’s football league and your favourite restaurant. Now imagine if you could run those same deficits while spending only half as much time at the office.

Adam Smith recognized in 1776 that the true wealth of a nation was not the gold and silver in its coffers, but the productivity of its labour force. “Nothing can be more absurd than this whole doctrine of the balance of trade,” he wrote. Fast-forward to the present day, and his warning is once again going unheeded by policy-makers. Erecting protectionist barriers is unlikely to create jobs and prosperity, for two reasons.

 Three ways of looking at the US trade deficit with China (as % of GDP)

Three ways of looking at the US trade deficit with China (as % of GDP)
Image: Oxford Economics

First, current measures of trade on the basis of flows give a distorted view of bilateral trade balances, since they fail to account for components imported to make exported goods. Given the fragmentation of production across multi-country value chains, a far better gauge of a country’s trade performance is how much value it adds to inputs. Focusing exclusively on goods exacerbates the misperceptions since it excludes trade in services, which typically accounts for more than two-thirds of output in advanced economies.

Second, there is no straightforward relationship between a country’s trade balance and its economic health or labour-market dynamics. For example, US job creation since the 1990s has been fastest during periods when imports were growing rapidly. The trade balance narrowed dramatically in 2009 – mainly because GDP growth and job creation were plummeting due to the financial crisis, shrinking demand for imported goods and services. Germany has big trade surpluses rather than deficits, but manufacturing’s share of total employment there has been declining at more or less the same pace as in the US.

Percentage of employment in manufacturing in the US and Germany

Manufacturing jobs in the US and Germany
Image: US Bureau of Labor Statistics

Third, a country’s trade surplus or deficit is shaped less by the content of its trade agreements – tariff levels, quotas, regulatory rules and so on – than by the balance between domestic saving and investment within its own economy. Take the European Union: the entire bloc has exactly the same trade policy. Yet its member states perform very differently.

 Current account balance for European Union member states, as % of GDP, 2017

Current account balance for EU states, as % of GDP, 2017
Image: Eurostat

The current account balance – a broad measure of trade in goods and services that also includes net flows of income from foreign investments – is fundamentally a function of national saving and investment. Countries that run deficits spend more on imports than they earn from exports and borrow from the rest of the world to make up the difference. Conversely, surplus economies earn more from exports than they pay for imports; they lend the difference abroad, accumulating claims on foreigners in the process.

The only way to shift the current account balance is to alter savings and investment behaviour by households, firms and governments. Trade protectionism is an indirect way to accomplish this – but it could well miss the target or even backfire. For instance, when a country taxes steel imports, it hurts the export competitiveness of domestic makers of cars, planes, and anything else containing the metal.

Cross-country evidence suggests no clear link between tariff protection and current account balances. If anything, higher-tariff countries tend to have larger trade deficits. The World Trade Organisation rulebook authorizes countries to take protective action against import surges or predatory pricing, but while such measures can fight unfair trade, they have little effect on overall trade deficits.

Trying to tackle trade deficits bilaterally won’t work. Balancing trade with individual countries would, in practice, require constant interference with the purchase and sales decisions of thousands of companies and households, raising prices and generating distortions. Imagine if your supermarket had to buy something from you before it could sell you food.

None of this means policy-makers should ignore the existence of large trade surpluses and deficits. The cross-border financial flows these macro-economic imbalances entail are vulnerable to sudden stops that can destabilize countries and the global economy, as many Asian countries learned in 1997, followed by the Eurozone a decade later. But the solution is not trade restrictions: it lies in international cooperation to get countries that over-save to encourage more spending, and countries with big deficits to tighten their belts when circumstances allow it. The group of 20 leading nations is the logical forum in which to do just that. Similarly, broad negotiations among a number of countries are the most effective way to address unsatisfactory trade rules and industrial overcapacity.

Popular discontent over trade springs from genuine problems. Market-opening agreements have amplified technological trends that deliver outsized gains to small numbers of individuals, firms and regions. Closing markets solves none of these, but would hurt voters’ purchasing power, destabilize businesses and weaken future productivity.

Governments need to develop policies and institutions that cushion the blow from changes brought by both competition and technology, constrain runaway inequality, and equip people and businesses of all sizes to share in the opportunities presented by the global economy. This is the real challenge in trade. Current-account balances are merely a distraction – albeit one that could prove costly indeed.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Opening Remarks by H.E. Ambassador Yang Yanyi, Head of the Chinese Mission to the EU at the Chinese Fashion Night

FROM THE FIELD: South Sudan’s green shoots, highlight environmental recovery from war

European Commission determined to conclude EU-Mercosur trade deal this year despite French concerns

Refugee crisis: Commission proposes a new plan urging EU countries to help Italy

Rising insecurity in Central Africa Republic threatens wider region, Security Council told

PM May fosters chauvinism, declares trade war on Europe

Statement by Cecilia Malmström, Member of the EC in charge of Trade, on the successful conclusion of the final discussions on the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) – Brussels, 08 Dec 2017. (Copyright: European Union; Source: EC - Audiovisual Service; Photo: Georges Boulougouris)

The EU and Japan seal free trade pact that will cover 30% of global GDP

World Cancer Day: Early cervical cancer diagnosis could save lives of over 300,000 women

The ECB again takes care of the bankers not the people

MWC 2016 LIVE: Ingenu steps up efforts to build LPWA networks across the globe

The EU Commission by serving the banks offers poor support to European mainstream political parties

We know ethics should inform AI. But which ethics?

It’s ‘time for concrete action’ says UN chief, welcoming inter-Korean agreement

“Financial crisis will not happen in China!”, the Chinese Premier underlines from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

How will the NATO-EU competition evolve in the post Brexit era?

Third Facebook-Cambridge Analytica hearing: data breach prevention and cures

May led Britain to chaos, now looks for way out with unpredictable DUP

How can consumers be effectively protected from insurance sellers?

EU decides “in absentia” of civil society

New energy security framework will help meet growing needs in East Africa, sustainably – UN economic wing

Close to 7,000 evacuated from Syrian towns after enduring nearly 3-year siege

Chart of the day: The internet has a language diversity problem

Reality Shock

Intel @ European Business Summit 2014: Better decisions now, the new business dashboard 

EU, Brazil to hold high level Summit in Brasilia

UN says ‘many humanitarian achievements’, one year after ouster of ISIL from Mosul

Scientists can lead the fight against fake news

The sad plight of fledging doctors

IMF: All you want to know about Argentina

Vaccinations and the movement of anti-vaccers

Why we need a moderate approach to moderating online content

A Sting Exclusive: “Europe must be more ambitious in COP21 and lead on climate finance and sustainable development”, Green UK MEP Jean Lambert points out from Brussels

Confronting neo-mercantilism: why regulation is critical to global trade

How the powerful science of behaviour change can make us healthier

South Sudan’s foreseen genocide: from “Never Again” to “Again and Again and Again”?

Ukraine pays the price for lying between Russia and the EU

Breaking barriers between youth in the new tech era: is there an easy way through?

New roadmap toward healthier and cleaner oceans adopted by UN Environment and European Commission

This Chinese tech giant’s latest gadget is… a bus

Oh, well, you are wrong, Google responds to the European Commission

‘Favour dialogue’ over violence, UN chief urges all parties following clashes in Mali’s capital

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

How music can help children with autism connect

Consumers suffer three defeats

Trump questions US – Europe kinship, approaches Russia

The European Sting @ Mobile World Congress 2014, Creating What’s Next for the World. Can EU Policy follow?

Here’s how to prepare South-East Asia’s young people for the future

What the global Internet’s stakeholders can learn from Europe’s new data law

In the future of work it’s jobs, not people, that will become redundant

Summer JADE Meeting 2015: We came curious, we left inspired

Women vital for ‘new paradigm’ in Africa’s Sahel region, Security Council hears

2016 crisis update: the year of the Red Fire Monkey burns the world’s markets down

Parliament: Last compromise on bank single resolution mechanism

Threats from mammoth banks and Brussels fuel May’s poll rates

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

UN chief welcomes ‘first concrete step’ in normalizing Eritrea-Ethiopia relationship

Eurozone: In vicious cycle of disinflation and unemployment?

Guterres expresses ‘grave concern’ following explosion at large political rally for reform-minded Ethiopian Prime Minister

A few, or rather two, trade and economic alliances may rule our brave new world

UN gender agency hails record-breaking number of women in new US Congress as ‘historic victory’

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s