Threats from mammoth banks and Brussels fuel May’s poll rates

UK Prime Minister Theresa May met with President Jean-Claude Juncker of the European Commission at 10 Downing Street, (26 April 2017, UK Government photo)..

The Theresa May brexiteer government has started feeling the heat about their choice to fight an electoral battle on a clear and loud plea, that a vote for Tories on 8 June is a vote for a hard Brexit. And mind you the closer we get to the polling date the more heated the controversy becomes. According to a Reuters report, “Estimates for possible finance-related job losses from Brexit are on a broad range from 4,000 to 232,000, according to separate reports by Oliver Wyman and Ernst & Young”.

Of course the final account of the financial jobs to be lost in London’s City depends on the kind of Brexit the next UK government is to pursue. The harder the Brexit the more jobs to be lost. Politics, though, sometimes works in mysterious ways. It seems that the threats from the City’s mammoth banks and the Brussels bureaucracy are fueling May’s poll rates. It’s as if the June 2016 scenario repeats itself. At that time, the whole world ‘advised’ and pressed the Brits to vote ‘remain’, yet on the 23rd of the month they voted ‘leave’. Let’s take one thing at a time.

What do the banks want?

Putting two and two together, it becomes apparent that May has set course for a wild Brexit, paying no attention to the damage this may bring to the London City’s complex and unbelievable wealthy financial markets. This is especially true for the few mega-banks, which have being producing for at least two decades now one in every ten GB pounds of the country’s GDP, out of that golden square mile of London’s soil. Already, the bosses of those mammoth financial groups like UBS, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Citi, Deutsche Bank and HSBC are on rooftops, airing threats that thousands or even hundreds of thousands of jobs will be moving to Frankfurt, Dublin, Paris and elsewhere in the Continent.

Yet, all those threats seem to deepen the divide between the London financial aristocracy and the rest of English population, of hard working people, the unemployed and the small or very small businesses. The financial sharks are affirming that they want an amicable Brexit without saying so explicitly. In reality, they are craving for their business to continue as usual, but this isn’t possible anymore. Less than a month ahead from the Election Day on 8 June and the interferences from the banks and Brussels in British politics are to intensify.

May has the advantage

It’s interesting though, that May’s government exploit to their political benefit the threats voiced by the London City, in the same way as they are dealing with the hardened language of the Continental governments about the Brexit’s conditions and costs. May repels all those threats and warnings with an… imperial grandeur and a chauvinist conviction, in direct contradiction with the rest of our globalised world. Only Trump’s America is happy with May. She tells the Brits they can brazen out all the 27 mainland EU countries and the mammoth banks banking on the dangerous but sure ‘patriotic’ element. It’s quite obvious then, why all those more or less ‘foreign’ interventions, seem to be feeding the polling ratings of the Tories. Chauvinism pays good dividends on the first days to those ‘selling’ it, but the blood and tears for sure follow for everybody.

It’s a pity that, at the presently crucial times for Britain, the Labour Party and the Liberals are under so weak leaderships. The major and the minor opposition parties of Parliament cannot articulate a convincing alternative narrative. They let May’s populists to fully and exclusively exploit all the ‘patriotic’ and ‘populist’ tales. It is as if May is Prime Minister of just the English countryside, at the striking exception of London. Not to say anything about the revolting Scotland and Northern Ireland, two nations which are eager to rather leave the UK than exit from the EU.

The specter of June 2016

It’s exactly the same as on the 23 June 2016 Brexit vote. The more the whole world was ‘advising’ even threatening the Brits not to vote ‘leave’, the more their will for Brexit was toughened. The same scenario is actually repeated now. The more threats come from Berlin, Brussels and the mammoth global banks, the more May’s narrative convinces the left behind Brits in the countryside, who live in a completely different world, than the Londoners.

Regarding the relations between the Brexiteer government and the London City, many think that even the wildest Brexit doesn’t really threaten the heart of this famous and centuries old financial hub. London may continue its career as a globally renowned money washing machine, catering for the grey and large banking accounts. The Brexit may facilitate this characteristic of the London City, by freeing Britain from EU’s financial rules, at times very tight. Yet again, the definite breakup of the London Stock Exchange long planned but ill-fated merger with the Deutsche Börse in Frankfort is a negative sign. Before the Brexit, this marriage was supposed to create such a huge market to dwarf New York; not anymore. Surely the Brexit played a decisive role here.

More losses to come

However, London and in many respects the entire British economy, is to undergo difficult to estimate costs from the May’s government firm decision, to effectively block the other Europeans from living and working in the UK. Britain’s huge tourist industry, the manufacturing and construction sectors and the retailing business already report having problems. According to Reuters “on Tuesday (2nd May), the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) said employers saw the sharpest fall in the availability of workers to fill their vacancies in 16 months. Recruitment companies reported a drop in the number of European Union nationals available to work in sectors such as food manufacturing and healthcare, REC said”. Undoubtedly, those tendencies are going to worsen, if PM May is to have her way. Most probably though, she will.

As things turn out, the 8 June vote will finish the job the Brexiteers started one year ago. The result will be a Britain sailing out on the uncharted and troubled waters of the treacherous high seas of our brave and dangerous world. The Brexiteer narrative being itself a popular but dangerous myth deprived of any certainties, has at the same time created powerful enemies. The anti-EU, alias anti-Globalization populist rhetoric of the Brexiteers may prove lethal, not because it doesn’t contain hard realities and truths that it does, but because it is ‘used’ in meta political, even meta-democratic ways, with an analogy only to Trump’s America. It’s the new ways of the few to manipulate the many. The result may be a monster…

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Kellen Europe Hosts EuroConference 2016

JADE @ European Business Summit 2014: Youth Unemployment – a drive to Entrepreneurship

Volkswagen getting away with it in Europe

3 reasons why AI won’t replace human translators… yet

Stigmatized, shunned and shamed, International Widows’ Day draws attention to their unique needs

Connected Claims returns to London in 2018

Philippe de Backer of ALDE at European Business Summit 2015 stresses: “Reinvent your business”

EU economy: Between recession and indiscernible growth

Parallel downfalls of Merkel and Deutsche Bank threaten Germany and Europe

Eurozone very close to a sustainable growth path

US, Russia oblige each other in Syria and Ukraine selling off allies

Draghi keeps the euro cheap, helps debt refinancing, recapitalization of banks and growth

Medschool 4.0: how to succeed in the smart revolution of healthcare

The Italian ‘no’ and France’s Fillon to reshape Europe; Paris moves closer to Berlin

80,000 youngsters at risk in DRC after forcible expulsion from Angola: UNICEF

Heat-resistant crops, ‘green’ infrastructure, can prepare Near East and North Africa to better tackle droughts – UN agency

European Commission requests that Italy presents a revised draft budgetary plan for 2019

Who cares more about taxpayers? The US by being harsh on major banks or the EU still caressing them?

Mobile 360 Series – Russia & CIS: Empowering the Digital Economy

Why are the Balkans’ political leaders meeting in Geneva this week?

Charges against Baha’i in Yemen must be dropped: UN experts urge release of detainees

High level political talks didn’t break the stalemate in Ukraine

Eurostat overturns Commission’s assessment of the economy

New rules for audiovisual media services approved by Parliament

French full-body veil ban, violated women’s freedom of religion: UN Human Rights Committee

European Youth calls on European Council for urgent action on “humanitarian crisis” and questions the EU/Turkey deal respect of human rights

It’s time to end our ‘separate but unequal’ approach to mental health

Armed groups threaten every child in Central African Republic, UNICEF warns

Are the G20 leaders ready to curb corporate tax-avoidance?

Will CETA be implemented after eight long years or it will be vetoed by the EU citizen?

Economic sentiment and business climate stagnate in miserable euro area

The Bavarians threaten Berlin and Brussels with immigration crisis

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

Eurozone economy desperately needs internally driven growth

How can education empower youth to become tomorrow’s leaders

EU Parliament and Council: Close to agreement on the bank resolution mechanism

Virtual Doctor: a core part of modern healthcare?

Food supply chain: A step closer to ending unfair trading

UN chief calls for ‘solidarity, compassion and action’ on World Refugee Day

How to future-proof India’s economy

‘Unconscionable’ to kill aid workers, civilians: UN Emergency Coordinator

Will Brexit shatter the EU or is it still too early to predict?

“A global threat lies ahead worsened after the EU’s green light to the Bayer-Monsanto merger”, a Sting Exclusive by the President of Slow Food

IMF v Germany: Eurogroup keeps the fight under control

How will the EU face the migration crisis when the Turkish threats come true?

Parliament backs a modernised EU electoral law

How will EU look after French, Dutch and German Elections and what will be the implications for Youth Entrepreneurship?

European Youth, quo vadis?

‘Staunch support’ for Iran nuclear deal tempered by concern over missile testing

Indoor air pollution is deadly. Here’s an unconventional solution

The EU has to prove it can remain one piece

Pharmaceuticals conceal drug side effects with the EU’s Court blessing

Can we balance conservation and development? Science says yes

Commission proposes fishing opportunities in the Atlantic and North Sea for 2019

Eurogroup: IMF proposes Germany disposes

A Sting Exclusive: “Regulators and the shipping industry collaborating for a sustainable future”, written by the Secretary General of IMO

Global Talent – Professional Internships

8 amazing facts to help you understand China today

ECB should offer more and cheaper liquidity if Eurozone is to avoid recession

AIDEX 2015: Humanitarian Hero Award Winner Announced

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s