The London City-EU connection holds despite of Brexit and the ban of LSE-Deutsche Börse merger

Margrethe Vestager, Member of the European Commission, in charge of Competition (pictured here) delivered last week a Press conference. She explained why the European Commission  prohibited the proposed merger between Deutsche Börse AG and London Stock Exchange Group. Date: 29/03/2017. Location: Brussels – EC/Berlaymont. © European Union, 2017/ Source: EC – Audiovisual Service/ Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart.

European Commission’s decision to ban the Deutsche BörseLondon Stock Exchange merger, on the one hand solved a long list of problems it could have triggered, in view of and after the Brexit. On the other hand though, this decision has created probably as many issues, because London is the long established low cost and competitive capital market hub, catering for the entire European Union.

Even Wolfgang Schäuble, the stubborn German minister for Finance has recognized that the financial sector Brexit has to be very cautious and gradual. The reason is that mainland Europe is not ready, at least not yet, to offer the same quality and low cost capital and derivatives markets opportunities or clearing and settlement services as London, even for the euro denominated transactions.

Who relocates?

Some big global financial groups located in London have started ‘advertising’ relocation of personnel to mainland Europe. However, this is kind of blackmailing the British government to meticulously serve their ‘cause’ during the Brexit negotiations. The real prospects of transferring the bulk of their activities to the Continent are currently nonexistent. Their ‘passport’ to do business in the Continent is not actually at stake, at least in the foreseeable future. Marketplaces of the size and the shine of London are developing very slowly and gradually, and Paris or Frankfurt need a lot of time, deep structural changes and different mentality, in order to try imitating City’s success story. Until that day comes, if ever, the City will continue servicing the Continent as it does for some decades now. Let’s return to Brussels and look deeper into the LSE– Deutsche Börse blocked merger.

Last Wednesday, Margrethe Vestager, the European competition Commissioner, delivered a Press conference in Brussels to announce the decision of the EU’s anti-trust watchdog, forbidding the €30 billion marriage of the two largest stock exchanges of Europe. Understandably, the main reason for the banning is that in a number of key markets, like fixed income instruments and derivatives clearing, this merger would have created a ‘de facto’ monopoly. Possibly though, the European Commission had some other, ulterior motives in forbidding this gigantic merger, which in the distant future could even neutralize some aspects of the Brexit itself.

Barring a monopoly

In any case, the key factor for the banning was the fixed income instruments clearing (bonds and repurchase agreements), a business in the region of trillions. The Commission’s announcement turning down the merger didn’t mention the Brexit not even once. Instead, Vestager focused on her duty to safeguard fair competition and low cost services to the financial community of the entire Europe.

The relevant Commission Press release says plainly that “… the merger would have combined Deutsche Boerse AG’s Frankfurt based clearing house Eurex with LSEG’s clearing houses LCH. Clearnet (which comprises London based LCH Clearnet Ltd and Paris based LCH Clearnet SA) and Rome based Cassa di Compensazione e Garanzia. This monopoly in clearing fixed income instruments would also have had a knock-on effect on the downstream markets for settlement, custody and collateral management”. Some weeks ago, the Commission had asked the LSE to put up its Italian affiliate (CCG) for sale and let go of it, in order to allow the merger. In that way, fair competition would have been safeguarded. However, the LSE directors rejected the Commission’s condition. So, Vestager was obliged to forbid it.

The LSE works for the EU

But why did the LSE directors deny letting go their Italian affiliate? This is a firm which offers clearing services to practically all transactions on the Italian government paper. It’s a lucrative market, given the excessive volume of this country’s public obligations, consisting exclusively of fixed income bonds, reaching €1.3 trillion in total. If the LSE directors had the slightest doubt that the Brexit could threaten the dominant position of their Italian company, they could have considered letting it go. But they didn’t. Obviously, they feel one hundred per cent secure, that they can continue in the foreseeable future profiting from the Italian and other European debt markets.

The Commission went even further and stated one more reason why the merger couldn’t go through. The relevant passage of the Press release says, “In addition, the merger would have removed horizontal competition for the trading and clearing of single stock equity derivatives (based on stocks of Belgian, Dutch and French companies)”. Brexit or no Brexit, the Commission was sure, that the merged company would have become a monopoly in important segments of Europe’s financial markets and consequently forbade it.

They are not afraid the Brexit

In conclusion, the two most competent agents in predicting the repercussions of the Brexit on London financial hub’s role in mainland Europe’s financial markets, seem to agree about one thing. Both the LSE and the Brussels Commission tell us there is nothing to fear or business will be as usual in the relations between the City and the Continent, at least in the foreseeable future. Obviously both parties, Britain and the European Union, don’t want to touch the present arrangement. The City is eager to continue dominating in EU’s financial universe, and the Continent doesn’t want to lose the services of London.

The City offers its competitive services to practically all the European financial firms, from the big banks to the smallest trader of stocks or bonds. From the simplest transactions on stocks and bonds to the most sophisticated derivatives, the London City is presently unbeatable. And what is even more important, everybody knows that such markets cannot be ‘ordered’ to emerge, with some EU directives. So the City in the long term will continue to offer its services to the entire EU with or without relocations. As for the London bankers’ fears, they are exaggerated if not overplayed. That kind of ‘sharks’ have always something else in mind, than what they say is at stake.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

An all-out fight for the EU budget

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

Novartis and Johnson & Johnson to deprive Europeans of their right to Health

Commission’s action plan: financial world mandatory links to environmental targets

European Business Summit 2014: The role of youth entrepreneurship education in EU’s Strategy for Competitiveness

Commission’s action against imports from China questioned

This is what countries are doing to fight plastic waste

Preparing the future today: World Health Organisation and young doctors

ITU Telecom World 2016: it’s all about working together

Global health challenges require global medical students

New VAT rules in the EU: how a digital sea could have become an ocean

Macro-Financial Assistance: Europe’s way to control Ukraine?

Can the banking union help Eurozone counter its imminent threats?

Why do medical students have to emigrate to become doctors in 2017?

Industrial producer prices on free fall and stagnant output

How smart tech helps cities fight terrorism and crime

Gender equality and medicine in the 21st century: an equity unachieved

Lessons from the Global Entrepreneurship Index

MEP Cristiana Muscardini @ European Business Summit 2014: International Trade in Europe

“One Belt One Road”: Its relevance to the European Companies


Re-thinking citizenship education: bringing young people back to the ballot box

European Commission determined to conclude EU-Mercosur trade deal this year despite French concerns

Eurozone: Even good statistics mean deeper recession

Do academia and banks favour a new Middle Ages period?

JADE Spring Meeting 2016 highlights

Juncker’s Investment Plan in desperate need for trust and funds from public and private investors

Eurozone: Bank resolution proposal gains wider interest

World Retail Congress Dubai 2016: Retail’s night of nights

EU unfolds strategy on the Egypt question

COP21 Breaking News: Conference of Youth Focuses on Hard Skills to Drive Greater Climate Action

Financial Transaction Tax: More money for future bank bailouts?

Are ECB’s €500 billion enough to revive Eurozone? Will the banks pass it to the real economy?

Has Germany rebuffed ECB on the banking union?

Pollinating insects: Commission proposes actions to stop their decline

A new proposal breaks the stalemate over the Banking Union

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

Will CETA be implemented after eight long years or it will be vetoed by the EU citizen?

The Peoples are missing from EU’s monetary union

GDPR and the World Cup have these 4 things in common

EU lawmakers vote to reintroduce visas for Americans over “reciprocity principle”

Russia and the West use the same tactics to dismember Ukraine

German opposition win in Lower Saxony felt all over Europe

The importance of exchanges for the medical students of the world

Greece returns to markets at a high cost to taxpayers, after four years out in the cold

A Sting Exclusive: “The Chinese economy is steady and moving in the right direction”, Ambassador Yang of the Chinese Mission to EU underscores from Brussels

Auditors say EU spending delivers limited value for money but the timing of their report poses questions

D-Day for Grexit is today and not Friday; Super Mario is likely to kill the Greek banks still today

EU plans to exploit the Mediterranean Sea and the wealth beneath it

How bad is the Eurozone economy? The ECB thinks too bad

A Brussels antithesis reveals where the EU is heading

Copyright: European Union , 2017; Source: EC - Audiovisual Service; Photo: Frank Molter

EU hits deadlock on the future of glyphosate a month before deadline

EU Commission: Once in every 20 beef meals you eat…horse probably with drugs in it

Investment, not debt, can kick-start an entrepreneurial Europe

From inconvenience to opportunity: the importance of international medical exchanges

Canada leading the way on women’s inclusion and empowerment, says OECD

EU-US resume trade negotiations under the spell of NSA surveillance

Trump stumbles badly on his Russian openings; Europeans wary of Putin

EU to pay a dear price if the next crisis catches Eurozone stagnant and deflationary; dire statistics from Eurostat

Ahead of State of the Union the European Youth Forum highlights lack of action on youth employment

A Sting Exclusive: “Youth voice must be heard in climate change negotiations!”, Bérénice Jond Board Member of European Youth Forum demands from Brussels

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s