The London City-EU connection holds despite of Brexit and the ban of LSE-Deutsche Börse merger

Margrethe Vestager, Member of the European Commission, in charge of Competition (pictured here) delivered last week a Press conference. She explained why the European Commission  prohibited the proposed merger between Deutsche Börse AG and London Stock Exchange Group. Date: 29/03/2017. Location: Brussels – EC/Berlaymont. © European Union, 2017/ Source: EC – Audiovisual Service/ Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart.

European Commission’s decision to ban the Deutsche BörseLondon Stock Exchange merger, on the one hand solved a long list of problems it could have triggered, in view of and after the Brexit. On the other hand though, this decision has created probably as many issues, because London is the long established low cost and competitive capital market hub, catering for the entire European Union.

Even Wolfgang Schäuble, the stubborn German minister for Finance has recognized that the financial sector Brexit has to be very cautious and gradual. The reason is that mainland Europe is not ready, at least not yet, to offer the same quality and low cost capital and derivatives markets opportunities or clearing and settlement services as London, even for the euro denominated transactions.

Who relocates?

Some big global financial groups located in London have started ‘advertising’ relocation of personnel to mainland Europe. However, this is kind of blackmailing the British government to meticulously serve their ‘cause’ during the Brexit negotiations. The real prospects of transferring the bulk of their activities to the Continent are currently nonexistent. Their ‘passport’ to do business in the Continent is not actually at stake, at least in the foreseeable future. Marketplaces of the size and the shine of London are developing very slowly and gradually, and Paris or Frankfurt need a lot of time, deep structural changes and different mentality, in order to try imitating City’s success story. Until that day comes, if ever, the City will continue servicing the Continent as it does for some decades now. Let’s return to Brussels and look deeper into the LSE– Deutsche Börse blocked merger.

Last Wednesday, Margrethe Vestager, the European competition Commissioner, delivered a Press conference in Brussels to announce the decision of the EU’s anti-trust watchdog, forbidding the €30 billion marriage of the two largest stock exchanges of Europe. Understandably, the main reason for the banning is that in a number of key markets, like fixed income instruments and derivatives clearing, this merger would have created a ‘de facto’ monopoly. Possibly though, the European Commission had some other, ulterior motives in forbidding this gigantic merger, which in the distant future could even neutralize some aspects of the Brexit itself.

Barring a monopoly

In any case, the key factor for the banning was the fixed income instruments clearing (bonds and repurchase agreements), a business in the region of trillions. The Commission’s announcement turning down the merger didn’t mention the Brexit not even once. Instead, Vestager focused on her duty to safeguard fair competition and low cost services to the financial community of the entire Europe.

The relevant Commission Press release says plainly that “… the merger would have combined Deutsche Boerse AG’s Frankfurt based clearing house Eurex with LSEG’s clearing houses LCH. Clearnet (which comprises London based LCH Clearnet Ltd and Paris based LCH Clearnet SA) and Rome based Cassa di Compensazione e Garanzia. This monopoly in clearing fixed income instruments would also have had a knock-on effect on the downstream markets for settlement, custody and collateral management”. Some weeks ago, the Commission had asked the LSE to put up its Italian affiliate (CCG) for sale and let go of it, in order to allow the merger. In that way, fair competition would have been safeguarded. However, the LSE directors rejected the Commission’s condition. So, Vestager was obliged to forbid it.

The LSE works for the EU

But why did the LSE directors deny letting go their Italian affiliate? This is a firm which offers clearing services to practically all transactions on the Italian government paper. It’s a lucrative market, given the excessive volume of this country’s public obligations, consisting exclusively of fixed income bonds, reaching €1.3 trillion in total. If the LSE directors had the slightest doubt that the Brexit could threaten the dominant position of their Italian company, they could have considered letting it go. But they didn’t. Obviously, they feel one hundred per cent secure, that they can continue in the foreseeable future profiting from the Italian and other European debt markets.

The Commission went even further and stated one more reason why the merger couldn’t go through. The relevant passage of the Press release says, “In addition, the merger would have removed horizontal competition for the trading and clearing of single stock equity derivatives (based on stocks of Belgian, Dutch and French companies)”. Brexit or no Brexit, the Commission was sure, that the merged company would have become a monopoly in important segments of Europe’s financial markets and consequently forbade it.

They are not afraid the Brexit

In conclusion, the two most competent agents in predicting the repercussions of the Brexit on London financial hub’s role in mainland Europe’s financial markets, seem to agree about one thing. Both the LSE and the Brussels Commission tell us there is nothing to fear or business will be as usual in the relations between the City and the Continent, at least in the foreseeable future. Obviously both parties, Britain and the European Union, don’t want to touch the present arrangement. The City is eager to continue dominating in EU’s financial universe, and the Continent doesn’t want to lose the services of London.

The City offers its competitive services to practically all the European financial firms, from the big banks to the smallest trader of stocks or bonds. From the simplest transactions on stocks and bonds to the most sophisticated derivatives, the London City is presently unbeatable. And what is even more important, everybody knows that such markets cannot be ‘ordered’ to emerge, with some EU directives. So the City in the long term will continue to offer its services to the entire EU with or without relocations. As for the London bankers’ fears, they are exaggerated if not overplayed. That kind of ‘sharks’ have always something else in mind, than what they say is at stake.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Our present and future tax payments usurped by banks

Why Italy will not follow the Greek road; Eurozone to change or unravel

Worldwide UN family celebrates enduring universal values of human rights

We are close yet so far…

China hopes EU Commissioner De Gucht drops super anti-dumping tariff on solar panels

Can the EU last long if it cuts Cyprus out?

Could Rwanda become Africa’s healthcare leader?

Do the EU policies on agro-food smell?

EU-UK: A deal synonymous to ‘remain’, England pays the Irish price

Court of Auditors: EU budget money is there to be spent not to create value

“BEUC cautions against TTIP that would seek to align EU and US chemicals management frameworks”

EU Top Jobs summit ended with no agreement: welcome to Europe’s quicksand!

A new bioeconomy strategy for a sustainable Europe

Window for a Brexit deal: Brussels to think again May’s proposal

MEPs react to breaches of human rights in Moldova, Burundi and Somalia

MWC 2016 LIVE: Telenor CEO calls on operators to embrace Mobile Connect initiative

European Commission recommends to the European Council (Article 50) to find that decisive progress has been made in Brexit negotiations

European Youth Capital 2019 announced: Novi Sad, Serbia

EU unveils plan to accelerate Capital Markets Union ahead of London’s departure from the bloc

7 key challenges for the future of ASEAN – and how to solve them

COP21 Breaking News_04 December: Launch of CREWS, climate risk & early warning systems

‘Dire consequences’ for a million children in the Middle East, North Africa, as funding dwindles

Dear China

Respect people’s peaceful assembly and fair trail rights, UN human rights wing urges Nicaragua

Despite funding crisis, Palestine refugee classrooms set to stay open, says UNRWA

How wealthy people transmit this advantage to their children and grand children

ECB should offer more and cheaper liquidity if Eurozone is to avoid recession

Aid teams respond to escalating southwest Syria conflict: 750,000 civilians are at risk

Social inclusion: how much should young people hope from the EU? 

Parliament adopts its position on digital copyright rules

To win combat against HIV worldwide, ‘knowledge is power’, says UNAIDS report

Africa’s inspiring innovators show what the future could hold

IMF: All you want to know about Argentina

EU’s Bank signs € 150 million loan to India as part of record investment in clean energy

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

Have central banks missed the exit train?

For how long will terror and economic stagnation be clouding the European skies?

Charlie’s tragedy energized deeper feelings amongst Europeans; back to basics?

Trump asked Merkel to pay NATO arrears and cut down exports ignoring the EU

We can’t tell if we’re closing the digital divide without more data

Erasmus+: an expected budget of €3 billion to be invested in young Europeans and to help create European Universities in 2019

UNICEF appeals for end to ‘war on children’ in Syria and Yemen

Economic sentiment and business climate stagnate in miserable euro area

UN chief condemns attack targeting international forces in northern Mali

Rule of law in Hungary: Parliament should ask Council to act, say committee MEPs

Budget MEPs approve €104.2 m in EU aid to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal

Lithuania vs Parliament over 2014 EU budget

Further reforms can foster more inclusive labour markets in The Netherlands

Banks suffocate the real economy by denying loans

EU’s new environmental policy on biofuels impacts both the environment and the European citizen

Northern Ireland: Parliament wants to secure post-Brexit regional funding

A Sting Exclusive: “Europe must be more ambitious in COP21 and lead on climate finance and sustainable development”, Green UK MEP Jean Lambert points out from Brussels

Russia and the West use the same tactics to dismember Ukraine

Campaign kicks off with High-level Event on #FairInternships

How dearly will Germany pay for the Volkswagen emissions rigging scandal

11 lessons the history of business can teach us about its future

IMF: How To Deal With Failed Banks

A Sting Exclusive: “Junior Enterprises themselves carry out projects focusing on the environment”, JADE President Daniela Runchi highlights from Brussels

Is Data Privacy really safe seen through Commissioner’s PRISM?

‘Passport to dignity’ that schools represent may expire fast, without emergency funding warns UN Palestine refugee agency

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s