The London City-EU connection holds despite of Brexit and the ban of LSE-Deutsche Börse merger

Margrethe Vestager, Member of the European Commission, in charge of Competition (pictured here) delivered last week a Press conference. She explained why the European Commission  prohibited the proposed merger between Deutsche Börse AG and London Stock Exchange Group. Date: 29/03/2017. Location: Brussels – EC/Berlaymont. © European Union, 2017/ Source: EC – Audiovisual Service/ Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart.

European Commission’s decision to ban the Deutsche BörseLondon Stock Exchange merger, on the one hand solved a long list of problems it could have triggered, in view of and after the Brexit. On the other hand though, this decision has created probably as many issues, because London is the long established low cost and competitive capital market hub, catering for the entire European Union.

Even Wolfgang Schäuble, the stubborn German minister for Finance has recognized that the financial sector Brexit has to be very cautious and gradual. The reason is that mainland Europe is not ready, at least not yet, to offer the same quality and low cost capital and derivatives markets opportunities or clearing and settlement services as London, even for the euro denominated transactions.

Who relocates?

Some big global financial groups located in London have started ‘advertising’ relocation of personnel to mainland Europe. However, this is kind of blackmailing the British government to meticulously serve their ‘cause’ during the Brexit negotiations. The real prospects of transferring the bulk of their activities to the Continent are currently nonexistent. Their ‘passport’ to do business in the Continent is not actually at stake, at least in the foreseeable future. Marketplaces of the size and the shine of London are developing very slowly and gradually, and Paris or Frankfurt need a lot of time, deep structural changes and different mentality, in order to try imitating City’s success story. Until that day comes, if ever, the City will continue servicing the Continent as it does for some decades now. Let’s return to Brussels and look deeper into the LSE– Deutsche Börse blocked merger.

Last Wednesday, Margrethe Vestager, the European competition Commissioner, delivered a Press conference in Brussels to announce the decision of the EU’s anti-trust watchdog, forbidding the €30 billion marriage of the two largest stock exchanges of Europe. Understandably, the main reason for the banning is that in a number of key markets, like fixed income instruments and derivatives clearing, this merger would have created a ‘de facto’ monopoly. Possibly though, the European Commission had some other, ulterior motives in forbidding this gigantic merger, which in the distant future could even neutralize some aspects of the Brexit itself.

Barring a monopoly

In any case, the key factor for the banning was the fixed income instruments clearing (bonds and repurchase agreements), a business in the region of trillions. The Commission’s announcement turning down the merger didn’t mention the Brexit not even once. Instead, Vestager focused on her duty to safeguard fair competition and low cost services to the financial community of the entire Europe.

The relevant Commission Press release says plainly that “… the merger would have combined Deutsche Boerse AG’s Frankfurt based clearing house Eurex with LSEG’s clearing houses LCH. Clearnet (which comprises London based LCH Clearnet Ltd and Paris based LCH Clearnet SA) and Rome based Cassa di Compensazione e Garanzia. This monopoly in clearing fixed income instruments would also have had a knock-on effect on the downstream markets for settlement, custody and collateral management”. Some weeks ago, the Commission had asked the LSE to put up its Italian affiliate (CCG) for sale and let go of it, in order to allow the merger. In that way, fair competition would have been safeguarded. However, the LSE directors rejected the Commission’s condition. So, Vestager was obliged to forbid it.

The LSE works for the EU

But why did the LSE directors deny letting go their Italian affiliate? This is a firm which offers clearing services to practically all transactions on the Italian government paper. It’s a lucrative market, given the excessive volume of this country’s public obligations, consisting exclusively of fixed income bonds, reaching €1.3 trillion in total. If the LSE directors had the slightest doubt that the Brexit could threaten the dominant position of their Italian company, they could have considered letting it go. But they didn’t. Obviously, they feel one hundred per cent secure, that they can continue in the foreseeable future profiting from the Italian and other European debt markets.

The Commission went even further and stated one more reason why the merger couldn’t go through. The relevant passage of the Press release says, “In addition, the merger would have removed horizontal competition for the trading and clearing of single stock equity derivatives (based on stocks of Belgian, Dutch and French companies)”. Brexit or no Brexit, the Commission was sure, that the merged company would have become a monopoly in important segments of Europe’s financial markets and consequently forbade it.

They are not afraid the Brexit

In conclusion, the two most competent agents in predicting the repercussions of the Brexit on London financial hub’s role in mainland Europe’s financial markets, seem to agree about one thing. Both the LSE and the Brussels Commission tell us there is nothing to fear or business will be as usual in the relations between the City and the Continent, at least in the foreseeable future. Obviously both parties, Britain and the European Union, don’t want to touch the present arrangement. The City is eager to continue dominating in EU’s financial universe, and the Continent doesn’t want to lose the services of London.

The City offers its competitive services to practically all the European financial firms, from the big banks to the smallest trader of stocks or bonds. From the simplest transactions on stocks and bonds to the most sophisticated derivatives, the London City is presently unbeatable. And what is even more important, everybody knows that such markets cannot be ‘ordered’ to emerge, with some EU directives. So the City in the long term will continue to offer its services to the entire EU with or without relocations. As for the London bankers’ fears, they are exaggerated if not overplayed. That kind of ‘sharks’ have always something else in mind, than what they say is at stake.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

EU leads the torn away South Sudan to a new bloody civil war

Germany and France only care about keeping their borrowing cheap

EU Parliament: It takes real banks to fight unemployment and recession

‘Internal security’ or how to compromise citizens’ rights and also make huge profits

Is the EU competent enough to fight human smuggling in 2015?

EU-Russia relations: the beginning of a warmer winter?

The IMF overstates the risks for Eurozone and downgrades the threats for the US economy

Draghi sees inflationary bubbles

Changing for the change: Medicine in Industry 4.0

US – Russia bargain on Syria, Ukraine but EU kept out

What the future holds for the EU – China relations?

Terrorism and migrants: the two awful nightmares for Europe and Germany in 2016

COP21 Breaking News: China has promised to cut emissions from its coal power plants by 60% by 2020

The EU bows to Turkey in view of the talks for a political settlement in Syria

Parliament sets conditions on EU-China investment deal

An EU Summit without purpose

US prosecutors now target Volkswagen’s top management, upsetting Germany

Berlin wants to break South’s politico-economic standing

Google strongly rejects EU antitrust charges and now gets ready for the worst to come

MEPs and European Youth Forum call on EU to Invest in Youth

The Commission sees ‘moderate recovery’ but prospects deteriorate

EU legislation protecting home buyers approved in Parliament

Intel @ MWC14: Our Love Story with Mobile – Transforming Wireless Networks

UK’s Cameron takes the field to speed up TTIP talks. Will “rocket boosters” work?

The Europe we want: Just, Sustainable, Democratic and Inclusive

How much more social deterioration can the EU people endure?

Access to health in the developped and developing world

Trump questions US – Europe kinship, approaches Russia

Italy solves the enigma of growth with fiscal consolidation: The Banking Union

The reason the world showed limited empathy to the Orlando victims

A sterilised EMU may lead to a break up of Eurozone

Microsoft’s YouthSpark: a kiss of Life to European Youth from the European Parliament

Galileo funding: A ‘small’ difference of €700 million

The next 48 hours may change the European Union

JADE Testimonial #1: Marcello @ Enlargement

China invites the EU to a joint endeavor for free trade and order in the world

Spirit unlimited

Deutsche Bank again in the middle of the US-EU economic skirmishes

The third bailout agreement for Greece is a done deal amid European economies full of problems

“Fortress Europe”, “Pegida” and its laughing stocks

Davos: Why the global elites couldn’t find answers this year?

Iran nuclear talks’ deadline extended: the match is still open for many

EU’s new environmental policy on biofuels impacts both the environment and the European citizen

ECB money bonanza not enough to revive euro area, Germany longs to rule with stagnation

More billions needed to help Eurozone recover; ECB sidesteps German objections about QE

EU economy: Between recession and indiscernible growth

My unlimited China

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

EU and India re-open talks over strategic partnership while prepare for a Free Trade Agreement

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

ITU Telecom World 2017 on 25-28 September in Busan, Republic of Korea

EU-Turkey deal on migrants kicked off but to who’s interest?

The South China Sea Arbitration: Illegal, Illegitimate and Invalid

EU to lead one more fight against climate change at G7 summit

China is the first non-EU country to invest in Europe’s €315 billion Plan

In China things are moving in the right direction

Has Germany rebuffed ECB on the banking union?

“Airbnb and YouTube are two great examples of a crowd based capitalism”, key stakeholders outline the boundaries of the 4th Industrial Revolution in Davos

Why do medical students need to emigrate to become doctors in 2017?

Junker for Commission President: What were the stakes in this affair

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s